MEDINE 2 Thematic Network Heraklion Executive Board meeting 12th February 2007 Karel Van Liempt

1 Resource centre and Advisory unit about the name about the philosophy about the methodology action lines composition of TF/unit

2 Resource centre and Advisory unit about the name -unit? task force? -resource centre/advisory unit -sustainability and development

3 Resource centre and Advisory unit about the philosophy -steer towards internal debate statements/priorities -increase external credibility -recognised as reliable interlocutor

4 Resource centre and Advisory unit about the methodology -focus on outputs of the TF of Medine 1, Medine 2 -rely on renowned medical faculties (geographical distribution) associations (AMEE, WFME, AMFE, ESIB, EMSA …) -each conclusion of TF has to be approved by EB

5 Resource centre and Advisory unit action lines -1. prepare sustainability -2. present as a reliable interlocutor for EC -3. establish contacts with neighbouring education of health sector

6 Resource centre and Advisory unit action line 1 prepare sustainability -diagnosis (year 1) what exactly are we looking for what is already present what is lacking coming to a conclusion -proposal (year 2) draw up proposal looking for financial resources -start of agreed initiative (year 3)

7 Resource centre and Advisory unit action line 2 present as a reliable interlocutor for EC -focus on two precise items qualification framework and sectorial approach European directives and impact on Bologna

8 Resource centre and Advisory unit action line 3 establish contacts with neighbouring education of health care sector -looking for structural ways to maintain contacts (e.g. Archipelago)

9 Resource centre and Advisory unit composition of the TF/Unit -input of TF leaders and EB members -representation of associations (AMEE, WFME, AMSE, ESIB, EMSA) -representation of renowned medical faculties (geographical balance) -external European stakeholders (e.g. representation of industry, hospital sector …)