HITSC Implementation Workgroup July 28, 2014. - 1 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. Quality Data Measurement Is An End-to-End.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Requirements and Health IT Standards Considerations for STAGE 3 Meaningful Use for Long-Term and Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) Update to the HITPC.
Advertisements

Constraining the CCDA Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, co-chair Cris Ross, co-chair August 11, 2014.
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.
S&I Framework Testing HL7 V2 Lab Results Interface and RI Pilot Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology June 23 rd, 2011 Contact:
Year End reports identified some issues Appointments kept but no documentation including super bill Encounters not “charged” without paper encounters Variation.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
HITSC Implementation Workgroup Practice Fusion CCDA Experience Presented By: Emily Richmond, MPH Senior Product Advisor July 27, 2014.
Information Exchange Workgroup’s Recommendations on the HIE Request for Information April 3, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
REC Reported Practice Level Challenges to Achieving Meaningful Use Office of Provider Adoption Support Dawn Heisey-Grove, MPH September 10, 2012.
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Executive Subcommittee Hearing on "Meaningful Use" of Health Information Technology Certification of.
Connecting Patients, Providers, and Payers John D. Halamka MD.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup December 2, 2013.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Constraining the CCDA Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, co-chair Cris Ross, co-chair August 20, 2014.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
NextGen Interoperability – Leading the Charge Presenter – David Venier DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
Putting the pieces together: EHR Incentive Programs, Meaningful Use, and Health Information Exchange.
1 The Three Phases of Collaboration: Chronic Disease Management, Cancer Prevention, and Capacity Kim Salamone, Ph.D. Vice President, Health Information.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
REGIONAL COLLABORATIVES September 14, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative Slide title © MAeHC. All rights reserved. MAeHC ROOTS ARE IN MOVEMENT.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Standard 4 Provide Self-Care Support and Community Resources NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
July 20, 2007 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Principles for Proper Use of HITSP Interoperability Specifications And Proposal for Proper.
Cardiac Episode with PCP referral to Cardiologist with Remote Monitoring & Follow-up Care Care Theme: Transitions of Care Use Case 9 Interoperability Showcase.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 29, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
America’s Voice for Community Health Care The National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) represents Community and Migrant Health Centers,
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
Data Intermediaries and Meaningful Use: Quality Measure Innovation, Calculation and Reporting Recommendations from Data Intermediary Tiger Team.
Q UALITY M EASURES W ORKGROUP Apr 12, Stage 1 CQMs Core Measures Alternate Core Menu Set Stage 1 Clinical Quality Measures.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments March 1, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
1 Massachusetts HealthCare System Transformation through Technology 2005 Progress Report Ed Esposito, Vice President Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Recommendations to the HIT Policy Committee on ONC Standards and Certification NPRM May 2, 2012 Certification and Adoption Workgroup Marc Probst, Intermountain.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
IE WG Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations August 7, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
September, 2005Cardio - June 2007 IHE for Regional Health Information Networks Cardiology Uses.
MATT REID JULY 28, 2014 CCDA Usability and Interoperability.
Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative Background May 9, 2013.
April 8, 2015 OSEHRA Population Health Analytics.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Draft Provider Directory Recommendations Begin Deliberations re Query for Patient Record NwHIN Power Team July 10, 2014.
Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.
© MAeHC. All rights reserved. MASSACHUSETTS eHEALTH COLLABORATIVE August 2005.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 26, 2012.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
Meaningful Use Stage 2 & Health Information Exchange (HIE) July 17, 2014.
EHealth Initiative Business and Clinical Motivator Work Group January 21, :00 p.m. EDT.
Pharmacy Health Information Technology Collaborative Date: April 28, 2016 Presenter:Shelly Spiro, RPh, FASCP Pharmacy HIT Collaborative Executive Director.
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
Implementation Workgroup Udayan Mandavia, iPatientCare, Inc. With: Kedar Mehta and Arnaz Bharucha July 28, 2014 Constraining the CCDA User Experience Presentation.
California Successes Engagement & Collaboration –Regional HIEs functioning and expanding for 25 years –25 organizations using Epic’s HIE solutions, many.
Health Information Technology Erin Aklestad, Account Manager April 2016.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #2 – Clinical Decision Support Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 7, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Quality Measure & Interoperability Solutions
Presentation transcript:

HITSC Implementation Workgroup July 28, 2014

- 1 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. Quality Data Measurement Is An End-to-End Process TransportValidation and analysisUser access Clinical source system Documentation & extraction RX Labs Vitals Problems Patient Provider Payer etc Remediation and Improvement HIE Web services TCPIP SFTP Other Electronic reporting MU, PQRS, AQC, etc Data management Report viewing Case tracking Data extraction Queries Pre-defined data marts Management Info System User information Utilization analysis Other

- 2 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. QDC Analytics Measure Inventory PQRS Pioneer ACO GovernmentCommercialPCMH MU Stage 1 and 2 EP and EH

- 3 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. Customer Examples

- 4 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. Data Sources ClinicalClaims

- 5 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. CCDA has been workable, but it is cumbersome From a technical perspective, it’s an unwieldy container, but these issues can be overcome CCDA architecture provides framework for standardized document-representation structured data Biggest issue is wide implementation variation across EHR vendors Two types of variation Data availability -One CCDA does not fit all needs -Some clinical information not available in CCDAs with certain vendors due to timing of CCDA generation in workflow ·e.g, Labs and E&M codes not included in CCDAs that get generated at end of visits -Data introduced for MU Stage 2 CQMs not available or not standardized among vendors (e.g., patient communication codes, devices applied on patients, reasons for not performing intervention, etc) Semantic normalization -Some fields are rough but often can be remediated (problems, medications, vitals, labs) vendor-by-vendor -Other fields are often not available or non-standardized across systems (historical procedure information, social history for codes on smoking status, cessation counseling, etc)

- 6 - Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative © MAeHC. All rights reserved. Recommendations Availability of standardized templates and implementation guides for high frequency and high value use cases ambulatory visit, inpatient visit, ED visit, specialist referral, nursing home TOC, HIE data aggregation, quality data aggregation, etc Current work in CCDA templates and FHIR profiles is working on this, but needs to be aggressively accelerated and made available Certification testing focused more specifically on implementation of CCDA to support data availability and semantic normalization for high priority use cases

Information Micky Tripathi, PhD MPP President & CEO