NECESSITY OF UNIFIED EU PATENT SYSTEM: U.S. PERSPECTIVE Jeffrey M. Samuels Professor of Law The University of Akron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EOC Judicial – Systems / Structures
Advertisements

CHAPTER 4 THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM AND COURT JURISDICTION DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8.
Judicial Branch.
UNITED STATES Levels and Jurisdiction  3 Levels of the Court system Supreme Court Courts of Appeal District Courts  Original Jurisdiction Court in.
1 Click to edit Master Changes to the U.S. Patent System Steven Steger September 4, 2014.
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
The Organization of the Federal Courts Ch. 10 Sec. 2 Pp
Unit Eight The Judicial Branch.
The Evolution of English IP Litigation within the European Union Stephen Jones Solicitor-Advocate, UK and European Patent Attorney Baker & McKenzie LLP.
Pearson Education, Inc., Longman © District Courts.
H o w t h e F e d e r a l C o u r t s a r e O r g a n i z e d H o w d o t h e d if f e r e n t k i n d s o f c o u r ts fi t t o g e t h e r ? Congress.
Welcome to our Quiz Show. So you want to be as smart as a State Court Judge?
Courts, Jurisdiction, and Administrative Agencies
Dr. Thomas W. Reimann IP Practice in Japan AIPLA Midwinter Meeting Las Vegas, January 2012 Latest Patent Development in the European Union.
Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,
Law for Business Mr. Bernstein Dispute Resolution and the Court System, pp October 6, 2014.
The Judicial Branch A Review.
Evolution of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law – United States Asian Judges Symposium Manila, Philippines July 2010.
Hot Issues in Patent Law Steven G. Saunders
Judicial Branch Citizenship: American Government.
Federal Court System Identify the source of power of the federal courts Name the various levels of federal courts and describe their jurisdictions LESSON.
 Describe what roles does the president fulfill, and what authority come from such roles?  Explain what limitations are placed on the president by the.
The Effect of the Supreme Court Decision on Patent Reform Legislation John F. Duffy Professor of Law George Washington University Law School © 2007 John.
1 “Views on the New (or Pending) Patent Reform Legislation” AIPLA Annual Meeting October 18, 2007 Gary L. Griswold President and Chief Intellectual Property.
The Unified Patent Court
CHAPTER 1 Overview of U.S. Legal Concepts Copyright © 2015 Carolina Academic Press. All rights reserved.
The Federal Courts Unit 6 – Chapter 20 “Without them (federal judges) the Constitution would be a dead letter” Alexis de Tocqueville.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 18.
Judicial Branch Federal District Courts (94 Courts in 12 Districts) Federal Appeals Court (12 Appeals Courts +1 Special Appeals Court) Supreme Court (Highest.
State Government Judicial Branch. VA Supreme Court 7 Justices (1 Chief and 6 Associates) Chosen by the General Assembly 12 year terms (8 years for lower.
Article III-The Judicial Branch Our Nation’s Court System.
European Parliament: Location and composition It is located in Strasbourg (France). After the Lisbon Treaty no country can have less than 6 members and.
Patents I Introduction to Patent Law Class Notes: February 19, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
A Dual Court System Business Law. Previously…  Explain the need for laws.  Compare the different sources of law.  Examine the constitutional basis.
Law for Business, 15e by Ashcroft Chapter 2: Courts and Court Procedures Law for Business, 15e, by Ashcroft, © 2005 West Legal Studies in Business,
Patents and Patent Reform Ross Epstein October 19, 2010 Association for Corporate Growth.
Thursday January 8 th, 2015 NO WARM UP TODAY!!! NO WARM UP TODAY!!!
Federal and State Courts. Jurisdiction The types of cases a court can hear. Two types of jurisdiction: Original/Appellate. Original: The first step in.
How the Federal Government Works: The Judicial Branch 8.28 Describe the significance of the Magna Carta, the English Bill of Rights, and the Mayflower.
3/10/ The Federal Court System: An Introductory Guide For Mr. Brady’s Awesome Class.
 The Senate serves as a jury to impeach the President.  They ratify treaties made with other nations.  The Senate also approves and rejects.
Supreme Court 1 court  Highest ranking court  7 justices, elected to 6-year terms  hears appeals from lower courts  no witnesses or juries  interprets.
The U.S. Court System #1.
United States Federal Courts youtube. com/watch
South Carolina Supreme Court
Unit 4: Law & the Legal System
Amy Semet, Princeton University
The Principles of the Constitution
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
The Federal Courts.
American Court Structure
AMERICAN SUPREME COURT AND JUDICIAL REVIEW
Efficient and Balanced European Patent System Comments from U. S
Welcome to our Quiz Show
11 Courts of Appeals for Patents Before 1982
3-2 The Federal Court System
The National Judiciary
The Judicial System Structure.
Judicial Branch.
Unit 4: Law & the Legal System
The nc court system.
The Federal & State Courts
Toshiko Takenaka Ph.D. Washington Research Foundation Professor of Technology Law University of Washington School of Law (Seattle) The Best Practice for.
Each state has its own judicial system that hears nonfederal cases
Federal and State Courts Notes
Judicial Branch Not Guilty!!!.
15.3 Americas Dual Court System
The Federal Court System
Intellectual Property Owners Association
Powers of the judicial branch
Presentation transcript:

NECESSITY OF UNIFIED EU PATENT SYSTEM: U.S. PERSPECTIVE Jeffrey M. Samuels Professor of Law The University of Akron

U.S. VIEW Generally supportive because: 1.Lower costs in obtaining patents – by as much as 80% 2. Simplified validation procedure 3. Fewer translation and renewal requirements 2

U.S. VIEW “Like our European counterparts, US applicants are interested in high quality, efficient, and timely patent process at the lowest cost possible. They are also interested in reliable, uniform, and easily accessible enforcement procedures.” - Letter from Michael K. Kirk, executive director, AIPLA, to Erik Nooteboom, EU IP Unit, dated March 28,

U.S. VIEW Not on front-burner. Everyone preoccupied by implementation of America Invents Act – Study ordered on int’l patent protection for small business No U.S. IP Association has adopted formal resolution in support – “Our [IPO] Committees have been following developments on the unitary European patent system, which would be generally good for patent owners in the U.S. but the European system has been a moving target.” April 5, from IPO Executive Director Herbert C. Wamsley PTO Director David J. Kappos has voiced support 4

UNIFIED PATENT COURT Exclusive Jurisdiction in Respect of Validity and Infringement – May result in greater uniformity and predictability – Reduce forum shopping 5

U.S. EXPERIENCE Creation of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1982 – Led to more predictable interpretation of U.S. patent law – Made patents more valuable – Danger of “bar capture” – Supreme Court of U.S. serves as check; Court of Justice of European Union may do the same 6

RECENT SUPREME COURT PATENT CASES Patentable Subject Matter – Mayo v. Prometheus, 2012 U.S. Lexis 2316 – Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. ____ (2010) Nonobviousness – KSR v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007) Injunctions – eBay v. Merc Exchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006) Infringement – Festo v. Shoketso Kinzoko Kogyo Kabushika, 535 U.S. 722 (2002) 7

TRIAL COURT EXPERTISE For most part, U.S. relies on judges with no specialized patent experience or juries Pilot patent program -Trial judges can elect to hear patent cases To extent, EU papent court will rely on judges with technical expertise, such would be viewed favorably by many in U.S. 8