1 Assessment of Asynchronous Discussions within Online Courses David Wicks Assistant Professor Director of Instructional Technology Services Seattle Pacific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College of Health Sciences Lunch and Learn Series February 12, 2010 Rena Murphy & Sharon Stewart.
Advertisements

Where do I Begin? Basic Course Development for Online Learning.
Engaging Students in Online Discussion
Professor or Editor? Time-Saving Strategies for Effective Grading of Writing Assignments DR. DAVID S. HOGSETTE.
► Why regular and effective student contact matters. ► Definition of regular and effective student contact. ► How to achieve regular and effective student.
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
Applying Assessment to Learning
Integrating writing into (even large) economics classes All handouts available at Jennifer Imazeki San Diego State University jenniferimazeki.com.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
The Blackboard Project EDIT 652 Fall 2005 Dr. Mike Uttendorfer.
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses
University of Delaware Workshops on Problem-Based Learning International Islamic University Malaysia Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
Virtual Interactions For Online Learning Mawdudur Rahman, Ph.D. Visiting Professor, College of Business Zayed University Dubai, UAE Online Chats and Threads.
University of Delaware Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh and Barb.
Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Contributions by Sue Groh and Hal White.
Online Course Observation. Objectives: 1.Articulate the steps of an online faculty observation 2.Explain the elements of the GRCC Online Course Observation.
Web Design Course Review Grade Level: High School Semester: Fall 2012 Reviewers: Tonya C., Vickie C., Anet E., Sha S. Review Date: November 2012.
Activity: Pre-Assessment Probe Classroom Assessment Technique (CAT) Domain: Assessing Prior Knowledge, Recall, and Understanding: CAT Activity: Background.
ASSESSMENT IN ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS. WELCOME o Facilitator name Position at university Contact info.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments Oct 2013.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Using Student Assessment to Improve Instruction Dr. Tim Fry.
Active Learning Ideas WebCT. Level 1: Web supported / Web-presence Web supported (Web-presence) courses are courses where basic materials about the course.
Classroom observation. Instructional Activities to be observed include but may not be limited to….. Classroom instruction Laboratory and clinical instruction.
Instructional Design F LORIDA A TLANTIC U NIVERSITY.
Universally Designed Syllabi Kirsten Behling, MA Suffolk University.
InTeGrate Assessment David Steer, University of Akron Ellen Iverson, Carleton College May 2012.
Student Assessment Workshop #5 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Best Practices & What Works in Online Learning Assessments Renee Welch & Karin Riggs External Education September 28, 2006.
Learner-Centered Teaching In Engineering/Technology Classrooms Steven A. Freeman Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching.
1 NURS 325: Context of Health Care Delivery I Nina Trocky, MSN, RN Vanessa P. Fahie PhD, RNC University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Nursing.
Blended Learning in Higher Education Workshop 3
Valuing E- Portfolios: Formative and Summative Assessment Jane Moore, National-Louis University David Wicks, Seattle Pacific University.
Ten or more useful features in Outlook 2007 For existing users who are upgrading to Outlook This workshop will cover valuable new features including:
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
Distance Education. Glossary of Terms Asynchronous Communication in which interaction between parties does not take place simultaneously.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Introduction and Overview Welcome !
An Assessment For Learning. A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” and clearly defines gradations of.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
Identifying Assessments
Staying Relevant A examination of an effective online course. Staying Relevant Learning Team A E-Learning/AET 541 September 29, 2014 Dr. Mary Poe (Elizabeth.
Research Problem The role of the instructor in online courses depends on course design. Traditional instructor responsibilities include class management,
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
PEER ASSESSMENT AND SELF- ASSESSMENT. Peer assessment  The practice is employed to save teachers time and improve students' understanding of course materials.
Learning Upside Down: Mark Burris Director of Scholarly Technology and Resources (STaR) Using CE6 Assessments and Grading Form Tools.
Swapna Kumar, EdD Boston University April 30, 2009.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
HCOA 8 th Grade Language Arts Reviewed by: Tasia C. Ross D. Susan R. November, 2012.
Tips on Discussing the Standards & Giving Peer Feedback February 2010.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7 Assessing and Grading the Students.
Assessment Online. Student Assessment Design learner-centered assessment that include self-reflection Design grading rubrics to assess discussions, assignments,
Navigating the wiki maze: Ten tips for successful collaboration in small group projects using Blackboard Using wikis in collaborative learning projects.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Documenting Your Teaching and Student Evaluations
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
Going Beyond Course Design: Implementing Online Delivery Standards
Quality Matters Conference October 2013 Dr. Joy Kutaka-Kennedy
Professional Development
David Wicks, Seattle Pacific University
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses
Blackboard 8: Discussion Board
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
Presentation transcript:

1 Assessment of Asynchronous Discussions within Online Courses David Wicks Assistant Professor Director of Instructional Technology Services Seattle Pacific University

2 Overview Instructors use a variety of techniques to assess student contributions to asynchronous discussions within online courses. Faculty often report confusion and dissatisfaction with their assessment techniques (Dennen, 2002). This presentation will discuss various assessment methods and introduce the concept of having students self-assess their work using a rubric.

3 Formative assessment Goal – Understand what students know (and don’t know) and provide timely feedback to improve their knowledge and understanding. Process –Read student postings and participate in discussion during the specified timeline –Provide alternative explanations, new content, and/or ask questions Grading – All students receive the same grade if they participate.

4 Advantages and Disadvantages of Formative Evaluation Advantages –Students benefit from one-to-one instruction –Just in time –Efficient grading Disadvantages –Enormous amount of time spent on discussion –Teacher-centered = Dead Threads –Knowledge construction or destruction? –Low expectations = limited discussion?

5 Summative Assessment Goal – Evaluate student performance after conclusion of each discussion Process –Read and assess student postings –Minimum instructor interaction during discussion time Grading –Feedback provided in the form of a grade –May use rubric to provide reliable measure of student performance.

6 Advantages and Disadvantages of Summative Evaluation Advantages –Objective measure of performance –Freedom from active participation in discussion –Knowledge construction – student-directed discussion Disadvantages –Enormous amount of time spent on assessment –May lack timely/informative feedback from instructor –May encourage quantity rather than quality

7 Which should be used? Both have strengths and weaknesses A hybrid approach may work best –Feedback without thread killing –Reliable assessment without an enormous time commitment

8 Self-Assessment of Discussion Possible component of discussion assessment solution –May: Clarify expectations of discussion Provide reliable, efficient method of assessment Add element of self-examination to discussion

9 Example of how self-assessment See handout

10 Questions or Comments?