THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS Outline Motivation The role of MME-CCS DB and MB transfer lines Main beam Main beam quadrupoles Other issues conclusions CLIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thin Film Coatings for SPS-U
Advertisements

RHIC electron cloud and vacuum pressure rise characteristics P.He, H.C.Hseuh, W.Fischer, U.Iriso, D.Gassner, J.Gullotta, R.Lee, L.Smart, D.Trbojevic, L.F.Wang.
Upgrade Plan of KEKB Vacuum system Pre-kickoff KEK1 Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Challenges for vacuum system Designs for.
Summary of the two-stream instability session G. Rumolo, R. Cimino Based on input from the presentations of G. Iadarola, H. Bartosik, R. Nagaoka, N. Wang,
8 th January, 2007 European Linear Collider Workshop, DL, UK ILC DR Vacuum System Progress in ECLOUD Task (Goal 7) for the ILC DR Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev.
Progress on investigation of dynamic vacuum (RF structures only) Sergio Calatroni With Cedric Garion, Chiara Pasquino, Pedro Costa Pinto, Mauro Taborelli.
How e-cloud effect affects the ILC DR Vacuum System Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Basics of Vacuum Technology Unit: Pa = N/m 2 = J/m 3 UnitPa or N/m 2 bar10 5 mbar100 atm= 760 torr x 10 5.
VASCO (VAcuum Stability COde) : multi-gas code to calculate gas density profile and vacuum stability in a UHV system Adriana Rossi General equation VASCO.
BISMV & H 0 -H - PSB INJECTION VACUUM REQUIREMENTS LIU - PSB meeting 29th October 2012 C. Pasquino, P. Chiggiato, J. Hansen.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Vacuum tests for CLIC module prototypes 6 November 2013 C. Garion2 Outline: Reminder: specification.
E-CLOUD VACUUM OBSERVATIONS AND FORECAST IN THE LHC Vacuum Surfaces Coatings Group 03/07/2011 G. Bregliozzi On behalf of VSC Group with the contributions.
LHeC Experimental Beam Pipe
Pressure 1 atmosphere ~ 1 bar ~ 760 mm Hg ~ 760 torr ~ 100,000 Pa Ion gauges read in mbar i.e. 1x mbar = 1x atm. Sometimes ion gauges read.
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
John Amann – ILC Mechanical Engineering 11/13/06
26-28 August 2008 Final EUROTeV Scientific Workshop, Uppsala University, Sweden 1 ILC DR vacuum system related problems and solutions Oleg B. Malyshev.
Vacuum and mechanical design of ILC DR O. B. Malyshev ASTeC Vacuum Science Group, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Low Emittance Ring Workshop
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
13/09/2005Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Light Sources Workshop, Barcelona, Spain 1 Gas Flow Modelling in Design of the Vacuum System for of the Synchrotron.
18-20/12/2007 ILC Damping Ring R&D Mini-workshop, KEK, Japan Vacuum Design vs. e-cloud Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop 1 INVESTIGATION OF NON- EVAPORABLE GETTER FILMS O. B. Malyshev, K.J. Middleman, A. Hannah and.
Vacuum science.
Vacuum Fundamentals 1 atmosphere = 760 mm Hg = kPa 1 torr = 1 mm Hg vacuum range pressure range low 760 ~ 25 torr medium 25~ high ~ 10.
Vacuum Fundamentals 1 atmosphere = 760 mm Hg = kPa 1 torr = 1 mm Hg vacuum range pressure range low 760 ~ 25 torr medium 25~ high ~ 10.
Summary of Working Group II – Chamber Coating and Treatment Participants: Michel ChanelCERN Ping HeBNL Dick Hseuh BNL Roberto KersevanESRF Yulin LiCornell.
Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center Vacuum Systems Lecture 6 G.J. Mankey
CLIC Workshop – CERN, October / 17 DC breakdown experiments for CLIC CERN, TS-MME Antoine Descoeudres, Trond Ramsvik, Sergio Calatroni, Mauro Taborelli.
ICFA Workshop, December 9-12, 2003 Andreas Krämer - GSI Darmstadt1 Ion Beam Induced Desorption Yield Measurements at GSI The 13th ICFA Beam Dynamics Mini-Workshop.
Training in Vacuum Technology for JUAS 2013 Students
ALBA Vacuum System, E. Al-Dmour Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Light Sources 12 th -13 th Sep ALBA Vacuum System ALBA VACUUM SYSTEM E. Al-Dmour On.
Beam Induced Pressure Rise in Ring, Dec. 9-12, Beam Induced Pressure Rise in Ring ~ Experiences in KEK B-Factory ~ 1. Introduction :KEK.
2009/1/16-18 ILD09 Seoul 1 Notes for ILD Beam Pipe (Technical Aspect) Y. Suetsugu, KEK Parasitic loss Vacuum pressure profile Some comments for beam pipe.
Peter Spiller, GSI, ICFA workshop, Optimization of SIS100 Lattice and Dedicated Collimation System P. Spiller, GSI ICFA 2004 Bensheim
Preliminary View on the LHeC Experimental Vacuum Chambers Jonathan Bosch - University of Manchester And Ray Veness - TE/VSC J.Bosch and R.Veness LHeC -
Preliminary calculations for the vacuum system of ELENA R. Kersevan TE/VSC-IVM – 21/6/2012 The vacuum sectors, the position of vacuum pumps, flanges, and.
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
F. Le Pimpec 1 How DID they make light bulb work ? Bulb Installed in 1901 at the Livermore’s (CA) Fire station. C filament - 4 W ♦ Since 1800 the electric.
-Plasma can be produced when a laser ionizes gas molecules in a medium -Normally, ordinary gases are transparent to electromagnetic radiation. Why then.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
GSI vacuum group Who we are:
1 Vacuum chambers for LHC LSS TS Workshop 2004 Pedro Costa Pinto TS department, MME group Surface Characterization & Coatings Section.
September 17-21, 2007Workshop on ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design, SLAC IR Vacuum Systems first thoughts Oleg Malyshev ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Electron Stimulated Desorption of OFE Copper Chiara Pasquino, Politecnico di Milano 9th March 2011, RF Structure Meeting.
Vacuum Devices for accelerator studies Bernard HENRIST CERN TE dept. – Technology Department VSC group – Vacuum Surfaces and Coatings OLAV III Oak Ridge.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Status of the activities on the vacuum system C. Garion TBMWG, 27/03/2013 Outline: ON/OFF mechanism: tribology study Pumping technology: MB quad VC Accelerating.
E-cloud Remedies and PS2 vacuum design J.M. Jimenez AT Department – Vacuum Group CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 Thursday 04 October Session 2: PS2 E-cloud.
Estimates of residual gas pressure in the LHC Adriana Rossi AT-VAC Workshop on Experimental Conditions and Beam Induced Detector Backgrounds April.
Title Page Design 3 Vacuum considerations for JLEIC beamline and Interaction Region Marcy L. Stutzman.
Two-Stream Phenomena in CLIC G. Rumolo and D. Schulte for the ACE, 3 September 2008 * thanks to W. Bruns, R. Tomás, SPSU Working Team General introduction.
Jari Koskinen 1 Thin Film Technology Lecture 2 Vacuum Surface Engineering Jari Koskinen 2014.
1 Vacuum in LER and HER. First estimation for the pumping system requirements (part II) A.Variola for B.Mercier, C.Prevost Annecy - Mars 2010.
τ- Charm Vacuum System Preliminary
Vacuum System P. Chiggiato TE-VSC
Progress on investigation of dynamic vacuum (RF structures only)
INVESTIGATION OF NON-EVAPORABLE GETTER FILMS
Heating and radiological
Vacuum Problems in the ILC Damping Ring
Preliminary Y-chamber specifications – First draft
Zr-V NEG coatings studied by ESD
G.Bregliozzi - VSC-LBV Section Collimation working group 08/07/02013
CEPC Vacuum System Dong Haiyi 2017/11/5.
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Leonard Vasiliev, Alexander Zhuravlyov and Alexander Shapovalov
Thermal Outgassing Rate for Various Beam Line Materials
RF Absorption Measurements from Beam Pipe Coatings
Pressure distribution calculations for the PETS
Vacuum in LER and HER. First estimation for the pumping system requirements A.Variola for B.Mercier, C.Prevost, F.Letellier.
Presentation transcript:

THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS Outline Motivation The role of MME-CCS DB and MB transfer lines Main beam Main beam quadrupoles Other issues conclusions CLIC workshop 17/10/2007 Pedro Costa Pinto TS/MME/CCS

THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS Motivation Changes in the vacuum requirements for CLIC: In 2006: “dynamic vacuum should be 1x10 -8 mbar, static vacuum 1-5x10 -9 mbar “ In 2007: “whispers” of about 1x mbar for the main beam (MB) near the intersection point and for the transfer lines (MB and DB). For the MB: high luminosity => high electrical field => ionization of the residual gas by tunnel effect => ion induced desorption (IID) => instabilities. For the transfer lines: high current => ionization of the residual gas by collision => ion induced desorption => instabilities. Not yet fully studied. Need confirmation from simulations. Anyway, “always better than for the main beam...”

The role of MME-CCS induced desorption, (by photons, electrons, ions), is a surface phenomena. CCS has expertise in surface analysis, surface treatments and thin film coatings for UHV applications. This expertise can be (and has already being) used to find solutions for surface’s related problems. THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

DB and MB transfer line Total length: 2x 21km 2% filled with 1m long magnets: 2x 420 magnets Diameter of the beam pipe  =40mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) Vacuum pump Vacuum pump P pump P max P x L=2L half tube Pressure profile in a tube with uniform distributed outgassing q -> outgassing rate R -> radius of the tube L half tube -> length of half tube S -> pumping speed C -> conductance of half tube THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Total length: 2x 21km 2% filled with 1m long magnets: 2x 420 magnets Diameter of the beam pipe  =40mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) No bakeout: main gas H 2 O q [Torr.l.s -1. cm -2 ] S [l.s -1 ] L [m] L [m] With bakeout: main gas H With bakeout: CO With NEG: not pumped CH With NEG: not pumped Kr Possible solution… Better solution DB and MB transfer line Static vacuum THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Total length: 2x 21km 2% filled with 1m long magnets: 2x 420 magnets Diameter of the beam pipe  =40mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) With NEG, the pumping power is right there! pressure recovering time is much shorter. DB and MB transfer line Why NEG coating solution better than bakeout? Without NEG, desorbed molecules will follow random walk movement until being pumped by localized pumps (extremities of the beam pipe) DB and MB transfer lines seams feasible with actual technology. THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Pumping speed in the accelerating structures is limited Main Beam Bakeout excluded: tight mechanical tolerances. Dynamics of the H 2 O pumping in limited conductance systems must be better understood If torr are necessary… this is a feasibility issue for CLIC! Pumping speed and geometry Thermal desorption/adsorption rates Surface coverage vs time Ion desorption yields Ionization efficiency per train Ion bombardment of the walls Breakdown rate Gas released per breakdown ……………………………………… We propose monte carlo and electrical network analogy approach Best possible dynamic vacuum must be simulated An experimental set-up is being implemented to study H 2 0 pumping dynamics THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Main Beam quadrupoles Bakeout excluded: temperature of the magnets < 80 o C length: ~1-2m Diameter of the beam pipe  5-6mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) L=1000mm  =5.6mm stainless steel Non baked stainless steel: q 1h =10 -9 Torr.l/s/cm 2 q(h) = q limit + q 1h. t -1 What about q limit ? x P L/2 0 L P pump P L/2 Depends on H 2 O desorption-adsorption dynamics Effects of beam conditioning?... THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Main Beam quadrupoles length: ~1-2m Diameter of the beam pipe  5-6mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) T. Zickler CLIC module working group meeting # Distributed pumping is required Beam pipe Antechamber Pumping: NEG, Sublimation pump With actual technology: Antechamber with active pumping elements (NEG coating or strip, sublimation pump) Probably not a feasibility issue THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Main Beam quadrupoles length: ~1-2m Diameter of the beam pipe  5-6mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) T. Zickler CLIC module working group meeting # Distributed pumping is required Beam pipe And If we find a lower activation temperature NEG? The NEG film will be applied directly in the beam pipe. NEG thin film THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Requires high distributed pumping speed Other issues Combining rings not a feasibility issue NEG coatings are widely used in electron storage rings for synchrotron light sources. (ESRF, Elettra…) More details are necessary to evaluate situation. High levels of synchrotron radiation => high photon induced desorption CCS is launching a program to develop new materials with low SEY. Nitrides, carbides and borides of transition metals, C:N and other carbon based materials will be studied. injection lines feasibility issue VERY low secondary electron yield (SEY) required ( maybe…) THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Conclusions MB and DB transfer lines: torr feasible with bakout or NEG. (NEG better for dynamic vacuum). Not a feasibility issue. Main beam: torr not possible without heating the structures. Best possible dynamic vacuum must be simulated. H 2 O behavior must be studied. feasibility issue. Combining rings: classical NEG solution. Input is necessary to correctly evaluate the situation. Not a feasibility issue. injection lines: maybe a SEY of 0.9 is required. feasibility issue. acknowledgments Bernard Jeanneret and Daniel Schulte. Main beam quadrupoles: distributed pumping required. Probably not a feasibility issue. THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

CO pressure evolution in an 30GHz HDS structure THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Pumping distribution in 30GHz HDS structure THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Introduction Brief overview of the outgassing in UHV systems Thermal outgassing: Driving force: thermal energy. Stimulated outgassing: Non baked systems: mainly H 2 O baked systems: mainly H 2 But also CO, CO 2, CH 4 … Outgassing rates THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Introduction Brief overview of the outgassing in UHV systems Thermal outgassing: Driving force: thermal energy. Stimulated outgassing: Non baked systems: mainly H 2 O baked systems: mainly H 2, but also CO, CO 2, CH 4 at lower rates Driving force: particles striking the surfaces of the system (photons, electrons, ions) Strongly dependent baked systems: mainly H 2, but also CO, CO 2, CH 4 at lower rates THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Introduction Combination rings: synchrotron radiation => high photon stimulated desorption DB transfer line: Ions created and trapped inside trains; between trains ions are released and strike walls => ion stimulated desorption Main beam: Near the interaction point beam’s electrical field is enough to ionize residual gas => ion stimulated desorption MB transfer line: Roughly the same as DB transfer line THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Total length: 2x 21km 2% filled with 1m long magnets: 2x 420 magnets Diameter of the beam pipe  =40mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) And for the magnets? if T max =200C ok for existing NEG If not, hybrid solution! pump NEG coated beam pipe Uncoated beam pipe DB and MB transfer line THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Main Beam quadrupoles Bakeout excluded: tight mechanical tolerances. THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS

Main Beam quadrupoles length: ~1-2m Diameter of the beam pipe  5-6mm Limit pressure to avoid ion stimulated desorption: Torr (“large” molecules) T. Zickler CLIC module working group meeting # Distributed pumping is required Beam pipe Antechamber Pumping: NEG coating Sublimation pump THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS