The OIA And All That How the OIA operates What criteria it uses What “recommendations” it makes What will make for “good practice” Mike Adey, Ruth Hattam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ADMISSIONS POLICY. WHY AN ADMISSIONS POLICY ? To ensure that the University is compliant with the QAA Code of practice: Admissions to Higher Education.
Advertisements

1 National Conference for Insurance Managers in Higher Education 23rd-24th April 2008 at Aston University Snakes and Ladders – Managing Risk in Higher.
Academic Misconduct Panels Student Governance December 2013 AMP DEC13.
Student Appeals Academic Misconduct. Appeals and Complaints Processes within Northumbria University Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) Student.
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.
Department for Learning and Development
Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
1 TACKLING PLAGIARISM AND ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT ‘GETTING THE BALANCE RIGHT’ ROB BEHRENS INDEPENDENT ADJUDICATOR FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Research Degree Examining and Chair of Viva: Professor Stephen Lacey Friday 30 November 2012 A104.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
East Anglia Branch Annual Seminar Downing College, Cambridge 14 June 2013 The Man* in the Middle *The masculine gender shall include the feminine.
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND TRANSPARENCY ENOHE CONFERENCE, INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA, MAY Rob Behrens Chief Executive and Independent Adjudicator ENOHE 2015
Secondary School Admissions Meeting 21 November 2014.
The OIA’s remit and review process The OIA’s remit and review process ONLINE SEMINARS – JUNE/JULY 2015 Felicity Mitchell – Deputy Adjudicator Hilary Jones.
Partnership arrangements (SCITTs) Partnership arrangements (SCITTs) ONLINE SEMINARS – JULY 2015 Felicity Mitchell – Deputy Adjudicator Hilary Jones – Membership.
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
Purpose of the Standards
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
1 Learning from Complaints OIA Policy Seminar Postgraduate Study & International Students 21 January 2010 Susanna Reece Deputy Adjudicator.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Discretion and Judgement: HSE’s approach Mike Cross 3 June 2014.
OIA Perspectives on Fitness to Practise GMC-MSC Student Fitness to Practise Training Conference 2 May Christine Child, Adjudication.
Complaints by Older Adults against Financial Institutions Examples and Possible solutions By Conor Cashman Senior Investigator.
The Role of the Professional Advisor – The View from Canada Dave Pelletier Rotorua,
Collaborative Provision (FEC & AP) Collaborative Provision (FEC & AP) ONLINE SEMINARS – JULY 2015 Felicity Mitchell – Deputy Adjudicator Hilary Jones –
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
ASSESSMENT TASK 5 PRESENTATION ON : THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Management Responsibilities. Building a Culture of Safety.
Handling Complaints in Small and Specialist Institutions: the Role and Remit of the OIA Susanna Reece Deputy Adjudicator 29 June 2010.
1 PLAGIARISM The OIA’s experience Ruth Deech & Michael Reddy.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
1 Satisfying Student Demand Conference London– 10 June 2008 Managing student complaints – ensuring transparency and fairness Robert Behrens The Independent.
1 Internal Audit. 2 Definition Is an independent activity established by management to examine and evaluate the organization’s risk management processes.
THE STUDENT EXPERIENCE – WHAT’S THE DEAL ? Presentation by Robert Behrens Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education in England and Wales to Higher Education.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
How to deal with the implications of New Regulation 28 Magda Wierzycka CEO SYGNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT.
Complaints by students rise 25% Complaints by students against their universities have risen for a third year, the adjudicator has reported. 9 April 2008.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 7-1 Chapter 7: Audit Planning and Documentation.
+ Human Rights Complaints. + Filing a Complaint A lawyer is not needed to file a complaint. Complaints can be withdrawn at any point. Complainant – person.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National Information Sharing Day February2009.
ODAO Information Sharing Day Presentation February/March Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
Welcome Managing concerns and complaints How should schools handle complaints? This session links to guidance from the DfE and local authorities, and looks.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
TOWARDS EARLY RESOLUTION AND A GOOD PRACTICE FRAMEWORK HIGHER EDUCATION OMBUDSMEN AND EMPOWERMENT “Don’t Mourn, Mobilize” Joe Slovo ENOHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE,
LEGAL ISSUES The Guardian Higher Education Summit 2007 Ruth Deech.
Monika W ó jtowicz, LL.M. European Privacy Seal Certification of evaluators and the application procedure from the perspective of an EuroPriSe evaluator.
Good administration by public bodies means: Produced by Steffan Sanchez.
ETHICS – FROM CODES TO PRACTICE KARIM MURJI, THE OPEN UNIVERSITY, UK.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Auditor Training Module 1 – Audit Concepts and Definitions
NUS Charter on Complaints & Appeals
MODULE 2 INTRODUCTION TO GOVERNANCE AUDIT
THE STUDENT EXPERIENCE – WHAT’S THE DEAL ?
The Independent Chair: The role and situations explored
University of Brighton
University of Brighton
University of Brighton
Student complaints and consumer rights issues
Presentation transcript:

The OIA And All That How the OIA operates What criteria it uses What “recommendations” it makes What will make for “good practice” Mike Adey, Ruth Hattam

Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education Independent Paid by subscription from HEIs Voluntary from 2004, obligatory from 2005 Based in Reading –25 “adjudicators” –Nearly all trained as lawyers

When May Students Access the OIA? Only once all the university’s internal processes have been completed Have three months after this Will not consider complaints about admissions, employment matters or academic judgement* Is available to students on a franchised programme *OIA definition: “Academic judgement … is a judgement that is made about a matter where only the opinion of an academic expert will suffice”

How are Complaints Investigated? Case is allocated to an adjudicator Request information from the university –Regulations –Documents considered during the university’s internal processes Two criteria when forming a conclusion –Own regulations and procedures followed? –Were the decisions made reasonable in all the circumstances?

Sample Case Studies An appeal or a complaint? –Which of our internal procedures should we use? Is it a question of academic judgement? Was it a reasonable decision?

What Decisions May the OIA Make? Produce a “formal decision” Justified/Partially Justified/Not Justified Makes “Recommendations” to the university –University recommended to re-visit the case, e.g. Examination Board –Recommended to take a particular course of action –Pay the student a specific sum of money for inconvenience, distress, compensation –Review its regulations and/or procedures OIA statistics reported anonymously on an annual basis

Trends in Student Appeals and Complaints Nationally 15% of cases go to the OIA, 33% of these are upheld or settled in some way

Student Appeals and Complaints: What Does it Mean for Staff? Understanding of process Transparency and objectivity Potentially intimidating Issues of confidentiality Professionalism……

Good Practice Clear audit trails Follow regulations and make reasonable decisions Principles of natural justice Never put in writing anything you would not want other parties to see

Undertaking an OIA Investigation A university had completed its internal procedures and the student has complained to the OIA You are the OIA adjudicator –What information would you have asked for? –What would you have decided?

Questions ?