KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 4, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable. June 4, 2003 A Strategic Course for the Future Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable June 4, 2003.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
College of Business Goals Academic Year Goal 1: Increase Awareness of Academic Programs and Centers Goal 2: Maintain AACSB Accreditation Goal.
The Value of Academic Libraries Initiative: A Briefing, A Discussion, and An Opportunity for Engagement Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe & Mary Ellen Davis 9 th.
Quality Enhancement Plan: Year Four Implementation.
SEM Planning Model.
Standards 2.5, 3.3.1, & The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
1 FDIC Corporate University Aligning Learning With Corporate Objectives March 2006.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Campus Plan East & Winter Park Mission Statement East Campus values innovation, creativity and achievement. This Campus Plan provides the initial.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
College Council Strengthening Shared Governance September 24, 2014.
Fayetteville State University’s Quality Enhancement Plan Why Are We Doing This?
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Key requirements Focused on student learning Inclusive Transformative Five year duration Strong assessment component.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
October 15, 2015 QEP: PAST AND PRESENT AND FUTURE.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
ENGAGING A UNIVERSTY’S LEADERSHIP TEAM IN ELEVATING GLOBAL LEARNING GS-106 Ed Rugg, Dan Papp, Lynn Black & Barry Morris Kennesaw State University
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
SACS Reaffirmation and the QEP Introduction and Welcome – Kay Jordan, Joe Scartelli Administrative Support: Personnel SACS Reaffirmation Overview – Rick.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
Academic Program Review
Accreditation Self-Study
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) Orientation
Accreditation Summary
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Fort Valley State University
Key requirements Focused on student learning Inclusive Transformative
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Presentation transcript:

KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan

 Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1) includes a broad‐based institutional process identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment, (2) focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution, (3) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP, (4) includes broad‐based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP, and (5) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement. (Quality Enhancement Plan)  Proposed revised Core Requirement and new Comprehensive Standard  1. Proposed Revision to Core Requirement 2.12, Quality Enhancement Plan  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that includes an institutional process for identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment and focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution.  2. Proposed New Comprehensive Standard  The institution has developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that (1) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP; (2) includes broad‐based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP; and (3) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement.

To assure that global learning rises to the top of KSU’s educational priorities and learning outcomes by 2012

Tracking Progress Goal 1: Broad-based Cabinet-led Leadership Will be Tracked and Ensure Success of the QEP Goal 2: Global Learning Opportunities and Specialists Will Be Identified and Tracked Goal 3: Financial Support for Global Learning Initiatives Will Be Identified and Tracked Goal 4: Global Learning Competencies of Students Will Be Identified, Certified and Tracked Expanding Opportunities Goal 5: Degree and Student Success Programs Will Strengthen Global Learning Opportunities, Outcomes, and Achievements Goal 6: Campus-wide Financial Support for Global Learning Initiatives Will Double Goal 7: Infrastructure for Global Learning Will Expand Substantially in Personnel, Technology, and Library Resources Expanding Participation Goal 8: Promotion of Global Learning and its Value Will Expand Substantially Goal 9: Incentives, Awards and Professional Development Programs for Global Learning Will Be Substantial and Broad-based Goal 10: Campus-wide Engagement in Global Learning Will Increase Greatly

 Track and encourage Colleges to increase the number of academic degree programs that have a global learning focus  Track and encourage all academic degree programs to refine global learning outcomes for their majors

 Track and encourage Colleges and academic degree programs to increase the number of new or revised courses that contain 30%+ Global Learning content  Collect evidence of achievement of global learning outcomes within these courses

 Encourage programs to align course assignments and other experiences (e.g., study abroad, service learning) with the requirements for Global Engagement Certification  Encourage programs to develop advising sheets for all majors for obtaining Global Engagement Certification

 Track and encourage Colleges and academic degree programs to identify, develop, and/or hire faculty who self- identify as Global Learning Specialists or Global Learning Contributors  Encourage Colleges and departments to acknowledge faculty contributions to global learning initiatives in faculty assignments and promotion & te nure guidelines

 President’s Cabinet  Executive Director of IGI/Director of CSP  Accreditation Liaison  Global Learning Coordinating Council (GLCC)  Faculty, Staff and Students

 Provide concentrated and dedicated leadership and administration facilitation to the achievement of the QEP’s purpose and goals for the college/unit they represent  Facilitate communication and QEP work distribution among deans, chairs and student success directors  Need adequate “reassigned time,” support and recognition

 Place QEP goals as a standing agenda item for departmental meetings & strategic planning  Encourage development of new/revised GL courses  Contribute to leadership in GL programming, research, student teaching abroad, education abroad, etc.  Develop/Hire GL Specialist/Contributors  Recognize faculty for their Global Learning efforts in ARD’s and FRD’s  Actively partner with your GLCC Coordinator

Annual Departmental Reports 1. Develop QEP Objectives within YOUR strategic plan – Due to GL Coordinator by end of August 2. QEP Annual Report- Due by end of April University –wide Reports 1. Mid-Review due Spring Final Review due 2012