Philosophical Question of the Day! Let’s suppose that you and your family members (Mom, Dad, and Sister) went to eat a buffet dinner at the Golden Corral.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What, When and How? Dumitrela Negură BA. Introduced by Charles Ragin in 1987, when stumbling upon the causal inference problems generated by a small sample.
Advertisements

Chapter 3: The Experimental Research Approach Introduction Introduction –Goal is to discover the effects of presumed causes This multimedia product and.
CHAPTER 40 Probability.
Applications with Rational Expressions; Variation Section 7.5 MATH Mr. Keltner.
Part I: Mill’s Methods redux
COUNTING AND PROBABILITY
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 12 l Multiple Regression: Predicting One Factor from Several Others.
Simple Regression. Major Questions Given an economic model involving a relationship between two economic variables, how do we go about specifying the.
Theoretical Probability Distributions We have talked about the idea of frequency distributions as a way to see what is happening with our data. We have.
INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES
Introduction to One way and Two Way analysis of Variance......
Epidemic Curves Sensitivity/Specificity. Epidemic Curve Time (since exposure) Number of New Cases.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
DTC Quantitative Research Methods Three (or more) Variables: Extensions to Cross- tabular Analyses Thursday 13 th November 2014.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Presentation: “Causal Conclusions”. Homework Analogies – pp Review: – Exercises (models for exam) Analogical Reasoning, e.g., ex. 8.4 Causal Argumentation,
Distributions and properties 1. Sampling Distributions In modern SPC, we concentrate on the process and use sampling to tell us about the current state.
Comparative Research.
Dummy variable Up till now we have dealt exclusively with the variables which can measures in quantitative terms. But sometimes variables which we consider.
Standard Error of the Mean
4x + 2y = 18 a. (1,8) = 18 a. 4(1) + 2(8) = 18 b. (3,3)20 = 18 b. 4(3) + 2(3) = = = 18 15x + 5y = 5 a. (-2,7) NoYes b. (-1,4) a.
CHAPTER 21: Comparing Two Proportions
1 CAUSAL REASONING 1. 2 Many moral arguments are based on causal relations. E.g.: Playing violence video games increases the tendency to become violent.
The variety of living organisms
PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT EVALUATION Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness CAIRO, March - April 2009 Ignacio Pardo Universidad de la República,
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES AND CHI SQUARE. Independent versus Dependent Variables Given two variables X and Y, they are said to be independent if the occurance.
Debate: Reasoning. Claims & Evidence Review Claims are statements that serve to support your conclusion. Evidence is information discovered through.
By: Ellyn Polley.  One causes the other  Useful to establish claims of policy  Event A is necessary for event B to occur  Ex.- The Dog hit the table.
11.2 Series In this section, we will learn about: Various types of series. INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES.
BINOMIALDISTRIBUTION AND ITS APPLICATION. Binomial Distribution  The binomial probability density function –f(x) = n C x p x q n-x for x=0,1,2,3…,n for.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 14 Elements of Nonparametric Statistics.
Chapter 12 CAUSAL REASONING.
The Similarities Between Operant Conditioning and Natural Selection
An Introduction to Inquiry. Chapter Outline  Looking for Reality  The Foundations of Social Science  Some Dialectics of Social Research  The Ethics.
Analyzing Behavior The ABC ‘s of Operant Conditioning AntecedentsBehaviorConsequences Operant Response 1. Reinforcers 2. Punishers 1. Discriminative Stimulus.
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions Statistics for Business (Env) 1.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 9 Lecture Notes Chapter 9.
Chapter Two: Explaining Winston Jackson and Norine Verberg Methods: Doing Social Research, 4e.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
INDUCTIVE LOGIC DEDUCTION= DRAWING OUT IMPLICIT “KNOWLEDGE” OR CLAIMS FROM PREMISES. INDUCTION= EXPANDING “KNOWLEDGE” BY TESTING TRUTH OF THE PREMISES.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 1 Functions and Models.
Dept of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling STATISTICS Linear Statistical.
Chapter 10 Lecture Notes Causal Inductive Arguments.
Applied Quantitative Analysis and Practices LECTURE#31 By Dr. Osman Sadiq Paracha.
Variables & Concepts Moazzam Ali.
Graduate School for Social Research Autumn 2015 Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry socialinquiry.wordpress.com Causality.
© 2005 BERA 1 What Is a Causal Connection? Activities Results What will cause…….The results we want PoliciesPlans achievement ProceduresGoals achievement.
Read Sections 3.6 and 3.7 before viewing the slide show.
Sampling Design and Analysis MTH 494 Lecture-21 Ossam Chohan Assistant Professor CIIT Abbottabad.
The Language of Studies Lecture 9 – Part 2 Secs. 3.1 – 3.3 Wed, Jan 30, 2008.
Slide 7.1 Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 5 th Edition, © Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009.
Causal Arguments MILL’S METHODS AND SCIENTIFIC REASONING.
Producing Data 1.
Sampling Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh. Contents At the end of lecture student should know  Why sampling is done  Terminologies involved  Different Sampling.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Week 3 Multivariate analysis.
Theory of Area Studies Week 13 Approaches to Area Studies 4 Reference ID00804 Mi-Ae Wartenbee ID00803 Hyun Sook Moon I22019 Li Yuan.
IT 5433 LM3 Relational Data Model. Learning Objectives: List the 5 properties of relations List the properties of a candidate key, primary key and foreign.
GS/PPAL Research Methods and Information Systems
Inductive Logic and Analogy
Golden Corral Prices.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Comparative Method I Comparative methods deal primarily with finding and/or eliminating necessary and/or sufficient conditions that produce a given outcome.
Four Logical Relationships Between Tasks
Comparative Research.
Wednesday, September 21, 2016 Farrokh Alemi, PhD.
Going to McDonalds!.
Class 7.
Descriptive Studies; Causality and Causal Inference
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Syntax Syntax plays a less prominent role in Baby Talk than does vocabulary. Parents seem to use standard syntax in Baby Talk. Parents’ utterances are.
Presentation transcript:

Philosophical Question of the Day! Let’s suppose that you and your family members (Mom, Dad, and Sister) went to eat a buffet dinner at the Golden Corral down the street. Now all four of you are sick to your stomach! How can you determine what caused the illness?? Come up with a way to figure this out…

MILL’S METHODS Of Logic

Example: Suppose you drew up a table of the food taken by each family member. Let’s look at ways we can discover the cause of the illness. OysterBeefSaladNoodlesSick?? MomYes DadYesNo Yes SisterYes No Yes YouYesNoYesNoYes

Method of Agreement The method of agreement helps show that a certain factor (or factors) is necessary for bringing about a certain effect One can use the method of agreement to undermine a causal link between an effect and some purported cause by showing that sometimes the effect occurs without the factor The method of agreement says that if all cases where an effect occurs, there is a single factor that is common in all of those cases. So with this method, what is the cause of the illness? OysterBeefSaladNoodlesSick?? MomYes DadYesNo Yes SisterYes No Yes YouYesNoYesNoYes

Method of Difference The method of difference helps establish that a certain factor is sufficient for bringing about a certain effect One can use the method of difference to undermine a causal connection by showing that the presence or absence of the factor makes no difference to the observed effect Suppose the table is now different. In this case, you are the only one who did not get sick. The only difference between you and the others is the cause. What is the cause?? OysterBeefSaladNoodlesSick?? MomYes DadYes SisterYes YouYes NoYesNo

Joint Method of Agreement and Difference A combination of the methods of agreement and difference Compare a variety of situations in which a certain factor is present to similar situations in which that factor is absent. Then show that a certain effect is observed in all and only those instances in which that factor is present In the example, the join method is a matter of applying both the methods of agreement and difference. So in this case, what is the cause? OysterBeefSaladNoodlesSick?? MomYes DadYes NoYes SisterYes NoYes YouYesNo YesNo

Method of Concomitant Variance Demonstrate that quantitative variations in an effect are systematically related to quantitative variations in a particular factor In the same example, we might find that you felt a little sick having eaten one oyster, whereas your sister felt really sick after eating a few, and your father was critically ill after eating 10 in a row. Since the variation in the number of oysters corresponds to variation in the severity of the illness, is it rational to infer that the illnesses were caused by the oysters? OysterBeefSaladNoodlesSick?? MomYes DadYes NoYes SisterYes NoYes YouYesNo YesNo

Method of Residues Show that all of the factors known to have some influence upon a certain effect cannot explain the observed level of the effect. Then attribute the residual influence to an unexamined one The method of residues is most effective in cases where one cannot directly measure the level of influence a factor has over some effect In this new example, what is the cause of the illness? OysterBeefSaladNoodlesSick?? MomYes DadNo Yes SisterYesNo Yes YouNo Yes