International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 1 Agenda Item 5 : (a) Data collection, associated data treatments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date/ event: Author: Overview of ETC Water data outputs 2010 Miroslav Fanta ETC Water data manager WISE TG Meeting Madrid Miroslav Fanta.
Advertisements

Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues.
ENERTECH REMODECE REMODECE MEETING September, the 24th 2007.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Applying the GSBPM to Business Register Management Steven Vale UNECE
Experience from the data collection exercise for update of the WFD priority substances 2011 D.PREUX and B.FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW.
Stream Quality Analysis Problem Based Learning Module Kerry Hartman Fort Berthold Community College.
September 6 th -8 th, 2011, Istanbul, Turkey 21 th Meeting of the Advisory Group PMA AC Regional database on Pollution September 6-8, 2011 Istanbul, Turkey.
Water.europa.eu Agenda item 7d Report on the quality assessment of the monitoring database Strategic Co-ordination Group November 2010 Madalina.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic 1 Subsystem QUALITY in Statistical Information System Czech.
Annual Meeting, June , Split, Croatia WP3: QA/QC Validation – MSFD Interactions current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner contribution: ISPRA.
Expert Workshop, June , Split, Croatia Output from TG Data for MSFD implementation EMODnet Chemistry Giordano Giorgi - ISPRA.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Session 26: Quality Issues in Census « Rome, 10 July 2008 « Quality Assurance and Control Programme.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (4), Brussels, 14/10/2008 slide 1 Agenda Item 6.2 : (a) New data collection. Overview of the new.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
1 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 1 ENPI/SEIS Consultation Meeting European Commission, Brussels, 11 November 2010 Current Situation and.
1 Event/ date: Working Group D meeting, 7 April 2011, Brussels Author: Dr Anita Künitzer/ Miroslav Fanta, CENIA 1 State of the Environment Reporting Miroslav.
Workshop on Water Quantity reporting Workshop on Water Quantity reporting Introduction to the EEA SoE water quantity data flows and data collection process.
Annual Meeting, June , Istanbul, Turkey WP1: Data collection and metadata compilation in sea regions: current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner.
Proposal for estimation of surface water bodies background levels for selected metals Slovak Republic.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Ireland and the WFD The Dangerous Substances Surveillance Monitoring Programme Ciaran O’Donnell Environmental Protection Agency.
International Office for Water Prioritisation of substances under the WFD: Compilation of the comments WG E (4), Brussels, 15-16/10/2008.
International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.
International Office for Water Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) Testing robustness and limits of the prioritisation methodology.
Henrik Kjems-Nielsen ICES Secretariat InterCatch – the screen guide.
1 EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER EUROWATERNET Towards an Index of Quality of the National Data in Waterbase.
Dedicated maps on contaminants
Concept of a Danube River Basin GIS
REPORTING SDG INDICATORS USING NATIONAL REPORTING PLATFORMS
Prioritisation of substances under the WFD: Results of the test run
Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template
INSPIRE MIG-T MIWP-16 activity report.
Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM)
Dangerous Substances Assessment under Art
An introduction to MEDIN Data Guidelines.
Chemical status (1) (A. V, 2.4.5)
Identification of standardisation needs in the light of the SW/MW Guidance development - 3rd CMA meeting - 23 March 2006, Brussels Ulrich Borchers,
(a) Data collection WG-E(3)-03/03/IOW - Data collection
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007
Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.
Agenda Item 4 : (a) – proposals for testing of quality and representativeness of monitoring data and for presentation of results B.FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW.
ESS.VIP VALIDATION An ESS.VIP project for mutual benefits
Two main areas identified
Dedicated maps on contaminants
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
WFD Article 8 Schemas Yvonne Gordon-Walker.
CMA Plenary Meeting 21/10/2008 PARIS
Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Draft concept to assess quality of monitoring database
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Quality assessment of the monitoring database on priority substances
Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Guidance Document on Chemical Monitoring of Surface Water (Version 3.0)
Contaminants products for EMODNet Chemistry 3
Water Information System for Europe
Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Summing up and next steps
Reporting of chemical monitoring data to ICES Overview and way forward
(a) Overview of the database and the comments received
PRIORITY (HAZARDOUS) SUBSTANCES
WG E on Priority Substances
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
Agenda Item 6: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) EAF(9)-06/02/INERIS - Data processing - preparation for data collection.
Review of the results of monitoring-based prioritisation
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research (RIVO)
The electronic reporting system for UWWTD Questionnaire 2007
Working Group on Reference Conditions
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 1 Agenda Item 5 : (a) Data collection, associated data treatments and data processing Document: WG-E(6) Prioritisation process: Monitoring-based ranking B.FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 2 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive The main steps The data collection The data gathering and preparation The calculations The factsheets

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 3 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Data collection 2008 and 2009 A strictly defined template with 22 mandatory fields Flexibility introduced on 8 fields (longitude/latitude, LoD/LoQ, type of station, date of sampling, biota species, laboratory name) A flexible data collection tool, and detailed documentation for non experts, to: - minimise reporting burden: except on some validity checks, any fraction, any unit, any substance even with missing mandatory fields is accepted - allow decentralised distribution of the tool (experienced by RO) - maximise quantity of data collected Interaction between data provider and consultant for correction of missing fields and coherence

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 4 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 5 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Preliminary data checks and treatment Elimination of:  Monitoring on groundwater and on marine water stations  data measured before year 2000  non relevant parameters (e.g. P(tot), Nitrates, etc.)  datasets for which neither LOD nor LOQ was provided (except if >LoQ)  Insufficient precision of matrix or fraction (all ”other”) Correction of:  missing LoD/LoQ, fraction, inconsistencies…  station location if missing  substance name (in national language) or CAS code if detected wrong  unit (in national language)  fraction when it can be gathered with existing fractions  date of sampling or date of analysis format or when one is missing

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 6 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Central Database creation A central database similar to the End User tool (Station, Sampling, Analysis) –structured database –on-line management tools for import of datasets –Maintenance tools for storing and saving All individual files imported (more than 50 files, up to 40 GBytes) Correction –for missing CAS N°, wrong names, doublets –Harmonisation of names for 150 substances (PCBs, dioxins…) –Harmonisation of fractions for 31 fractions

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 7 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Source: GIS layer : Official WFD Districts Summary situation: database content (5 July 09) - Data Surface water - 26 Member States + CH and NO - almost stations -4 water body types sampling - 14,6 million analyses substances or groups (Tin compounds)

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 8 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Calculation steps: Identification of the manageable list of substances Summary statistics are calculated for each substance

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 9 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Central Database Preparation Harmonisation of the measurement units –About 130 units on the 1130 substances provided and 102 units on 21 Tin compounds –Final unit defined, Water: µg/l, Sediment: µg/kg dw, Biota: µg/kg ww –Specific case of Tin compounds: Water: µg Sn+/l, Sediment: µg Sn+/kg dw, Biota: µg Sn+/kg ww –Discard of measures on lipid weight (24 substances, 1612 analyses) Values below the detection limits (LoD or LoQ) often provided, transformation needed: –if <=LoD, value=LoD/2 –if <=LoQ, value=LoQ/2 Identification of high determination limits, discard 99th percentile DL

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 10 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 11 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Calculation steps: Calculation of PECs, general case Grouping of the fractions - organic substances on Whole water with + without separation of the two phases - metals on Whole water with + without separation of the two phases - metals on dissolved phase of water - all substances on sediment fraction below 2mm - all substances on sediment fraction below 63µm - all substances on sediment fraction below 20µm - all substances on Fish - all substances on Invertebrates Discard of organic substances on dissolved phase Calculation of statistics: - Total number of countries and RBDs providing analyses, - Total number of stations and number of stations for which at least one analysis is above DL, - Total number of analyses, number of analyses above DL and maximum of the analyses above DL, - 90th percentile of the means of all analyses above DL (PEC1) - 90th percentile of the means of all analyses on each station (PEC2)

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 12 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Calculation steps: Calculation of PECs for sum of PCBs and sum of dioxins/furans/PCB dioxin-like Extraction of all PCB, furans and dioxins Conversion of values less than: - if <= LoD or <= LoQ : =0 - if >LoD and no LoQ and <3xLoD: =0 Extraction of quantified PCB dioxin-like, furans and dioxins - Conversion of units: Water: µgTEQ /l, Sediment: µg TEQ/kg dw and Biota: µg TEQ/kg ww Sum of analyses values of dioxins by station and sampling Extraction of quantified PCBs Sum of analyses values of PCBs by station and sampling Calculation of statistics

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 13 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Calculation steps: Identification of analyses < DL based on PNEC For all analyses not quantified, i.e. <=LoD or <=LoQ –Identification of analysis matrix –comparison of DL with PNEC: »if DL> 2 x PNEC: analysis is identified Calculation of statistics on number and % identified (from 0 to 100% of analyses)

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 14 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Calculation steps: Calculation of ‘a-posteriori’ PECs Discard of not quantified analyses where DL> 2 x PNEC Calculation of statistics: - Total number of countries and RBDs providing analyses, - Total number of stations and number of stations for which at least one analysis is above DL, - Total number of analyses, number of analyses above DL and maximum of the analyses above DL, - 90th percentile of the means of all analyses above DL (PEC1) - 90th percentile of the means of all analyses on each station (PEC2) Comparison with previous results

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 15 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Factsheets: Summary information available Factsheets: summary information for each of the 1151 substances Website available at (last update 5/07/09) : Password: visitor One factsheet per substance with summary statistics By country By Waterbody Distribution of concentration by fraction and along DLs Number of analyses by year and country Map of all stations For each factsheet a downloadable pdf file A section “download” with reports made of various selections of factsheets zip file of all factsheets

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 16 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Factsheets: website extracts Screens of Factsheets + download page

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 17 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Conclusions and perspectives A data collection process implemented in 26 MS and NO and CH and repeated in some countries, A big Central database with the most recent monitoring data on 1151 substances, A first set of statistical calculations implemented, A promising dataset, useful for future activities on EQS…

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 18 Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive Thanks for your attention…