Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classroom Walkthrough with Reflective Practice
Advertisements

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Differentiated Supervision
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Differentiated Supervision
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Curriculum Focused Visit In Search of Standards. People’s minds are changed by observation and not through argument. (Will Rogers) What gets monitored.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Principals’ Retreat “Learning To Walk, Walking To Learn” Renée E.Jackson, Superintendent Local District G August 9, 2001.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Comprehensive K-12 Mathematics Improvement Plan Update May 9, 2013.
TPGES Overview Part II Jenny C. Ray PGES Consultant.
Academic Excellence For All Brian D. Bannen Principal.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
New Teacher Induction.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Quality Compensation Program
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Teacher Evaluation System
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Targeted District Review Report
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Georgia Department of Education
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Information
Curriculum Selection Process
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta

Evaluation Committee Staff at McKeesport Area School district worked to create an evaluation process that culminates with a teacher showing evidence of student growth. District motto “Move, Engage, Assess” drives components of the evaluation process. Members of the evaluation committee included:  Assistant Superintendent  Director of Federal Programs  District Technology Integrator  Board Member  Principal  7 teachers

Evaluation Objectives Assign a Central Office Administrator to each building Create a district wide walkthrough and instructional round form Creation of a teachers’ personal academic goal Use of an online software package to collect and analyze data from teacher walkthroughs

Move, Engage, Assess Student engagement and discourse drives instruction through:  Cooperative learning  Formative assessment  Critical thinking activities  Performance activities  High level questioning Teacher is a facilitator in the classroom, not a lecturer.

Move, Engage, Assess Students drive instruction, not subject content. Formative assessment is an essential component of instruction achieved through:  Individual whiteboards  Ticket out the door  Journaling  Technology  Questioning

Teacher Observation Tools Walk-through Instructional Round Formal Observation Informal Observation Teachers’ Personal Academic Goal

Walk-through Walk-through is conducted 2 or 3 times monthly for each teacher. Observation is only 5 minutes in length. Observer looking for components of district motto “Move, Engage, Assess”. Walk-through is not evaluative.

Instructional Rounds District motto drives what is observed during an Instructional Round. Instructional rounds may consist of a principal, curriculum director, teacher(s), and/or central administrator. Instructional rounds last 20 minutes. There is a group discussion to discuss group members’ observations.

Instructional Rounds Teachers are encouraged to infuse specific targeted instructional strategies into their lesson design to increase: Active teacher engagement Active student engagement Instructional rigor Assessment for learning

Formal observation Career level employees receive a formal observation. Formal observations were constructed to coincide with the PDE-426 and PDE rating forms. Professional employees are evaluated in 4 domains.

Formal Observation Four domains highlighted in formal observations include: Planning and preparation Classroom environment Instruction Professionalism

Informal Observation Observation is 15 minutes in length. Informal observations may be conducted on Level II professional employees. A summary is written of components seen during the observation. Observer looking for components of the district motto.

DISCOURSE What is a personal academic goal? What am I to assess? What happens if my students don’t show growth? How much growth do students need to show? Will I receive an unsatisfactory rating?

Teachers’ Academic Goal Goal must address a standard within the teachers’ grade level and/or academic area. Goal is to be attainable and not all encompassing. Goal is to be submitted to building administrator for approval.

Teachers’ Academic Goal Teacher is to collect data by testing students on the academic goal chosen.  Elementary teachers test class  Secondary teachers test every student of that course / class First test given at the start of the school year. Same data collection tool used after May 15.  Teacher to submit data to building principal as evidence of student growth / regression

STUDENT NAMEBASELINE SCOREFINAL SCORE+ / - GROWTH ____

Teacher Compass

Teacher Compass Teacher Compass is an on-line program that houses all district observations / evaluations. Reports can be generated for individual teachers and the building. Videos for professional development are available to attach to teacher observations.

Teacher Compass Components of Teacher Compass:  Teacher listing  Rubrics  Videos for professional development  Individual teacher reports  Building report for Walk-throughs  Data analysis for building / teacher strengths and concerns