Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HSAG Performance Improvement Projects Using Data to Develop Interventions and Statistical Testing to Evaluate Results Breakout Session #1 Florida EQR.
Advertisements

Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Technical Assistance for Florida Medicaid PMHPs August 21 st, 2007 Christy Hormann, MSW PIP Review Team Project.
WELCOME to the PIP Technical Assistance Training for Florida HMOs/PSNs We will begin shortly. Please place your phone on mute, unless you are speaking.
MCO Participation in External Quality Review Mandatory Activities During the SMMC Transition October 30, 2013 Presenter: Mary Wiley, BSW, RN, M.Ed. Project.
Title: The title should accurately describe the issue to be addressed and can never contain a proposed countermeasure. Overview Note: Remember that the.
Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. Performance Improvement Projects Nursing Home Diversion Program Where Are We Now? Concurrent Breakout Session #2 Florida.
Welcome to the EQR Quarterly Meeting! Wednesday, March 26, :00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. (EDT) We will begin shortly. Call-in information is ,
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, September 26, p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. February 14, 2008.
Causal / Barrier Analysis Florida EQR Quarterly Meeting
Quality Improvement Strategies Root Cause and Subgroup Analyses.
External Quality Review Organization (EQRO) Kick-Off Meeting
Report Preparation. Write to the audience  Who is the audience  What are its objectives and expectations  When there are two or more audiences use.
Report Preparation. Write to the audience  Who is the audience  What are its objectives and expectations  When there are two or more audiences use.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Pouring a Foundation for Program Improvement with Quality SPP/APR Data OSEP’s message regarding Indicators 1, 2, 13 and 14 - data collection and improvement.
Slide 1 Plan−Do−Study−Act! Using the PDSA Cycle to Improve Your Performance Improvement Projects March 18, 2014 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group June 18, :15 p.m.–4:45.
WELCOME! External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Wednesday, June 18, :00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. WELCOME!
1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis January 12, 2011 Christy Hormann, MSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIPs.
Evaluating a Research Report
Preliminary Results of the Special Health Care Needs Focused Study Tuesday, June 19, :15 p.m. –1:45 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director, Statistical.
Performance Improvement Projects: Validating Process, Tips, and Hints Eric Jackson, MA Research Analyst October 19, 2009.
Slide 1 Florida SIPP Quarterly Meeting Presenter: Jolene Rasmussen, MS Healthcare Analyst, PIP Review Team March 23, 2011.
Quality Strategy June 10, 2009 Presented by: Debby McNamara, LCSW, PMP Quality Coordinator, AHCA.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Upcoming EQR Activities Contract Year Two 1:45 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services.
Performance Measures 101 Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group March 28, :00.
NHDP Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 30th, 2010 Presenters: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, Research and Analysis Yolanda.
Validation of Performance Measures for PMHPs Presenter: Peggy Ketterer, RN, BSN, CHCA Executive Director, EQRO Services Health Services Advisory Group.
HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. January 11, 2011.
Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) Tuesday, June 27, :45 p.m. – 4:45 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA.
Results of the Adolescent Well-Care Focused Study Tuesday, June 19, :15 p.m. –12:00 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director, Statistical Evaluation.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Prepaid Mental Health Plans Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Cheryl L. Neel, RN,
Slide 1 HMO/PSN Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 26, 2011 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Project Manager, PIP Review.
Special Health Care Needs Focused Study Update 12:45 p.m. – 1:15 p.m. Presenter: David Mabb, MS, CHCA Senior Director, Statistical Evaluation.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101 Monday, June 18, :30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director of Statistical.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Adolescent Well-Care Focused Study Update 1:15 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Presenter: Granville Prince, BS, ALHC, FLMI, ACS, RHU Project Manager, EQRO.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Quality Improvement Tools for Intervention Determination Presenters: Kris Hartmann, MS Healthcare Analyst, Performance Improvement Projects Don Grostic,
Wisconsin Department of Health Services CDC and HRSA released guidance on June 19, 2015 Guidance for health departments and planning groups Development.
Last Updated: MONTH, YEAR Team: M. W. (Team Leader)R. F. T. D.M.G. T. L.D. J. (Sponsor) Green Belt Project Objective: TITLE Green Belt Project Objective:
Building the Perfect PIP for HMOs and PSNs Facilitators: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Manager, Performance Improvement Projects Debbie Chotkevys, DHA, MBA.
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Insert Title here- Keep the Title Concise
Plan−Do−Study−Act! Using the PDSA Cycle to Improve Your Performance Improvement Projects March 18, 2014 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Nursing Home Diversion Programs Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Cheryl L. Neel,
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews
Performance Improvement Projects: PIP Library
Applicants’ Orientation Meeting
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
Experiment Report Format
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Presentation transcript:

Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team

Activity I: Choose the Study Topic The study topic should:  Be selected following collection and analysis of data- if the MCO is a new plan and has no historical or plan- specific data, the documentation in Activity I should reflect this. The MCO should provide its effective enrollment date and the rationale for not having data.  Have the potential to affect member health, outcomes of care, functional status, or satisfaction. The MCO should be documenting the link between the study topic and outcomes of care.

Activity II: State the Study Question The study question should:  State the problem to be studied in simple terms and be in the recommended X/Y format “ Does doing X result in Y?”

The study population should:  Be accurately and completely defined and capture all members to whom the study question applies  Include all applicable codes that identify members for the population (denominator) Activity III: Identify the Study Population

Activity IV: Select the Study Indicator The study indicator(s) should:  Be well-defined, objective, and measures changes in health or functional status, consumer satisfaction, or valid process alternatives  Allow for the study question to be answered (the study question and study indicator should be in alignment)  Include the title of the study indicator(s) in the gray shaded box  Include remeasurement goals. The goals should be documented as percentages

 If sampling was used (most HEDIS-based PIPs), the MCO should complete the table in Activity V  If sampling was not used (most administrative data- based PIPs), the MCO should state that sampling was not used Activity V: Use Valid Sampling Techniques

Data Collection  The step-by-step process that leads to the production of the study indicator(s) rates should be documented  The MCO should include a copy of the manual data collection tool, if applicable  When surveys are used to collect data, the MCO should include a copy of the survey, CATI script if applicable, and cover letter that accompanies the survey  The data analysis plan should be documented (how rates are calculated, how rates will be compared to the goal, and what statistical test will be used Activity VI: Define Data Collection

Data Analysis  The MCOs should complete the data table for all PIPs that have progressed to the point of reporting data  For HEDIS-based PIPs, the rates reported in the PIP should match the MCOs rates reported to AHCA  The rates in the data table should be reported accurately (numerator divided by the denominator)  The measurement periods documented in Activity VII should match those documented in Activity IV Activity VII: Analyze Data and Interpret Study Results

Activity VIII: Implementing Interventions and Improvement Strategies Improvement strategies should:  Be related to causes/barriers identified through data analysis and quality improvement processes- the MCOs should be describing what quality improvement tools were used to identify barriers  Be revised if there was a decline in performance  The MCOs should be documenting the process used to evaluate the effectiveness of its interventions  The interventions should align with the barriers and directly impact the study indicator(s )

Disparity PIP TIPs  Disparity PIPs must have two study indicators  The MCO must have identified a statistically significant difference between two entities (i.e., race/ethnicities, age groups) for there to be a true disparity. This information should be documented in Activity I  The focus of the PIP should be to increase the rates for the two study indicators and to eliminate the disparity  The study question should be structured to reflect an increase in both rates and eliminate the disparity

Tips for Retiring PIPs  Before a PIP can be considered for retirement, the PIP should include at least baseline and two remeasurement periods of data  The study indicator(s) have achieved statistically significant improvement over the baseline and sustained the improvement  If a PIP has been in progress for greater than five years and all ten activities have been completed- consider the PIP for retirement. If rates are suboptimal, the MCO can continue its efforts for improvement internally

 For HEDIS-based PIPs, the MCOs should provide the HEDIS technical specifications annually  Data collection tools and surveys should be submitted on an annual basis  Verify that the survey question listed in the PIP matches the question in the survey  Review submitted Fishbone and/or cause and effect diagrams annually to ensure that they have been updated  Use the Interactive Data Submission System (IDSS) document to verify reported HEDIS rates General PIP Tips

Questions and Answers