HOW THE STATE CAN LEVERAGES PURCHASING VOLUME AND RESOURCES Cooperative Purchasing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Office of State Procurement
Advertisements

APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA Cooperative Purchasing Programs APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA.
Overview of National Cooperative Contracting Rutgers University Public Purchasing Educational Forum and NIGP Region II Annual Conference April 30, 2014.
Procurement Management
Invitation for Bid Goods and services. Formal solicitation with specifications. Award to low responsive, responsible bidder. May include options to renew,
Best Value Pre-selection and Procurement
FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES SFSP Procurement Procedures Part III, Page’s of the Administrative Guidance for Sponsors.
A DMINISTRATIVE C ODE Jim Westbrook, Purchasing Manager
SFSP Contracting for Vended Meals Virginia Department of Health Special Nutrition Programs 2014.
Gene Shawcroft, P.E. Central Utah Water Conservancy District April 29-30, 2013.
Multi-Stage Bidding.
Idaho High School Wireless Project Joyce Popp Chief Information Officer.
Procurement.
Procurement Reform Ensured value for the State of Arizona.
Cooperative Purchasing and the Questionnaire Larry Weeks, Director – YEMMC Yvonne Volpe, Procurement Specialist-TUSD.
Project Procurement Management
COMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT VEHICLES AND PROTESTING THOSE WHO DON’T COMPLY William J. Cea, Esq. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. Deborah Bovarnick Mastin, Esq.
THE NC CHILD NUTRITION PROCUREMENT ALLIANCE WHO WE ARE…
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
1 CDBG Procurement Requirements For Local Officials.
SDRGC 501(c)(4) Questions, Answers, and Issues April 9, 2008.
School District Purchasing. Purchasing Authority Arizona Statutes Arizona Statutes Arizona Administrative Code Arizona Administrative Code  Primary source.
Cooperative Purchasing Who’s Looking Out for Your Interests? Tony Des Chenes, Director Commodities Division Purchasing Operations.
Intergovernmental Relations Presented By: J. Greg Hudson THOMAS, HUDSON & NELSON L.L.P. 114 West 7 th, Suite 900 Austin, Texas (512) Presented.
1 S ERVICE · A CCOUNTABILITY · V ALUE · E FFICIENCY.
Purchasing Ethics and Vendor Relations
Request for Information Title 5 of Utah Procurement Code Christopher Hughes.
Multiple Award Contracts Training Presented by Jennifer Salts State of Utah - Division of Purchasing 1.
9/14/ Schedule 70 GSA Contracts Lena Ferris, State Procurement Analyst IT Team Lead.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
1 Cooperative ___Agreements___ __or__ Leveraged Purchasing Agreements (LPA)
PUBLIC PURCHASING IN FLORIDA ROLES IN THE PURCHASING PROCESS (rev. 05/27/2008)
WELCOME TO UNB. MARK McGEEHAN Assistant Manager, Procurement Services 3 plus years with UNB 28 years in Healthcare Procurement Current member of APPA.
LEAGUE OF CITIES & COUNTY GROUPS ProcureAZ The State of Arizona’s eProcurement & Sourcing Solution For Public Entities Statewide 1.
E-Rate Training for TASBO Members October 8, 2008 Presented by Susan Sullivan Director of Technology/Media.
Chapter 11: Project Procurement Management
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS FLORIDA COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS OCTOBER 3, 2013 Lee A. Weintraub, Esq. Becker & Poliakoff,
PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES. Procurement Procurement is the process of acquiring goods, supplies and services. It includes: Equipment, spare parts & supplies.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
Award Management Services Procurement Outreach Training Level II - Module C Specialized Agreements.
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
60A-1, Fla. Admin. Code and Chapter 287, Florida Statutes Recurring Issues.
Award Management Services Procurement Outreach Training Level II - Module C Specialized Agreements.
Questions? Call OGS Customer Services at (518) Basic Purchasing Governor David A. Paterson Commissioner John C. Egan.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Cooperative Purchasing, Intergovernmental Agreements and Joint Ventures Unit 8.
Department of Administration Materials Management Division Duane Kroll, CPPB.
March 2013 CPO Training Jan Hall, Contracts Manager.
What is BuyBoard? Overview  BuyBoard is a Purchasing Cooperative  16 year history  Meets all Missouri bid laws  Gains members access to a wide range.
CONTRACTING UPDATES AND BEST PRACTICES Purchasing & Contracting August 2016.
Cooperative Procurement MD Association of Community Colleges Procurement Officers June 2015.
CHORI Purchasing Flow Chart
Project Management – PTM712S
Processes and Procedures for Contracting at UO
Grant Administration and Procurement
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association
Ch 11 - Procurement Management Learning Objectives
Eric Verrelli Lead State Alaska Shared Services of Alaska
Texas Woman’s University
What PIs working on federally sponsored projects need to know.
Contract Management.
What PIs working on federally sponsored projects need to know.
Presenter’s Contact Information Larry Klein Procurement Services Group Office of General Services (518) OGS Website.
Procurement Plan and Procedures Code of Standards of Conduct
Purchasing in the 21st Century
Stockton University State Contract Training
PACE Purchasing Cooperative
CONSIDERATIONS ON SOUND PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Procurement Updates Lynn Rodgers, USDA, FNS
EXCEPTIONS TO COMPETITVE BIDDING
Project Procurement Management
Presentation transcript:

HOW THE STATE CAN LEVERAGES PURCHASING VOLUME AND RESOURCES Cooperative Purchasing

What is cooperative purchasing?  Means a procurement conducted by, or on behalf of, more that one public procurement unit (§ )  Realistically this means that when one organization joins with another to solicit a requirement Who can participate?  Anyone can participate in cooperative purchasing. One party to the cooperative effort must be a public procurement unit.  State Agency  Political Subdivision (cities, towns, counties, school districts)  Non-profit corporations

Cooperative Purchasing What is cooperative purchasing?  Means a procurement conducted by, or on behalf of, more that one public procurement unit (§ )  Realistically this means that when one organization joins with another to solicit a requirement What is “piggybacking”?  “Piggybacking” is when an organization joins an existing contract to satisfy their requirements.  Realistically this means the contract is already in existence and you do not conduct a solicitation  This can be an issue for your vendors

Cooperative Purchasing Why would the State bother with cooperative purchasing?  Staffing shortages  Workload volume  Expertise  Volume pricing What else is so special about cooperative purchasing?  The cooperative purchasing agreement can be written so the parties can share resources ( warehouse, capital equipment, people)  Share technology (ProcureAZ) – reimbursement possible

Cooperative Purchasing What organizations are out there?  GSA  Mohave Cooperative  NJPA  National IPA  NASPO Valuepoint  PCA  SPO  TCPN  US Communities How do you choose?

Cooperative Purchasing It’s a business decision  Understand your need – (One time or long term)  Find out if you organization has rules for cooperative purchasing  Find a cooperative organization with a contract you want to use  Read the cooperative agreement  Remember this isn’t an attempt to avoid the procurement process. The agreement/organization should allow you to feel comfortable that the intent of public procurement has been met What else?  Pay attention to any fees and who pays them  Conduct your due diligence – we still must be transparent

Cooperative Purchasing How does the State do cooperative purchasing?  We are a cooperative purchasing organization  We are a cooperative purchasing user As a cooperative program  We create statewide contracts for use by cooperative program members by adding language allowing entities other than the state to use the contract  We allow entities interested in our contracts to sign a cooperative program agreement  Avoid “cherry picking” the best price for a few items  Agree to submit purchasing records when asked for audit purposes  Abide by the terms and conditions of the audit  Agree that the vendor will remit 1% of the purchase price to the State for program administration

Cooperative Purchasing As a user of cooperative contracts  New rules were put in place in February of this year  Increased access to more than just NASPO Valuepoint and GSA  Allowed for piggybacking – with limitations (25% or $500,000)  Each contract is a business decision  Consideration is given to staff availability  The possibility of achieving a better price  Is there a need  If a state contract already exists, state agencies cannot use a cooperative  If a state contract does not exist due diligence must be performed

Cooperative Purchasing Due diligence  If an agency wants to lead a cooperative agreement, the State Procurement Administrator must approve (R )  Ensure the each cooperative member is responsible for their own requirements (payment, acceptance, testing, etc.)  Vendor performance issues are not collectively managed  The State has authority to exercise its own rights and remedies  State contracts cannot be used for leverage to gain additional concessions  The State can cancel any cooperative agreement for failure of a cooperative member to abide by the guidelines

Cooperative Purchasing  If piggybacking onto a cooperative contract (R )  Contract must have been awarded through a competitive process  Documentation is available to validate this  Bidders list  Solicitation with evaluation factors  Multiple offers received  Bid tabulation  Cooperative contract language included  Cost determined to be fair and reasonable  Cooperative agreement terms and conditions are acceptable  Vendor is willing to extend the cooperative price to the agency  Value is 25% of the initial or estimated value of the contract or $500,000 whichever is less

Cooperative Purchasing QUESTIONS???