PCI Geomatics User Group Meeting Koreen Millard Carleton University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

Microwave remote sensing applications and it’s use in Vietnam
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
On The Use of Polarimetric Orientation for POLSAR Classification and Decomposition Hiroshi Kimura Gifu University, Japan IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, Canada.
Don Atwood & David SmallIGARSS July USE OF RADIOMETRIC TERRAIN CORRECTION TO IMPROVE POLSAR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION USE OF RADIOMETRIC TERRAIN.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
Sar polarimetric data analysis for identification of ships S. Swarajya lakshmi ADRIN, Dept. of Space, Govt. of India India Geospatial Forum – 14 th International.
Marine Surveillance with RADARSAT-2: Ship and Oil Slick Detection Gordon Staples, Jeff Hurley, Gillian Robert, Karen Bannerman MDA GSI Richmond, BC
Best Model Dylan Loudon. Linear Regression Results Erin Alvey.
A Short Note on Selecting a Microwave Scattering or Emission Model A.K. Fung 1 and K. S. Chen 2 1 Professor Emeritus University of Texas at Arlington Arlington,
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
Natural Resources Canada Ressources naturelles Canada Canadian Forest Service Service canadien des forêts Evaluation of Multi-temporal and Multi- polarization.
ReCover for REDD and sustainable forest management EU ReCover project: Remote sensing services to support REDD and sustainable forest management in Fiji.
Heesam Chae, Hoonyol Lee Dept. of Geophysics, Kangwon National University, Chunchon, Kangwon-do, Korea Seong-Jun Cho, No-Wook Park Korea Institude of Geoscience.
1 Microwave Vegetation Indices and VWC in NAFE’06 T. J. Jackson 1, J. Shi 2, and J. Tao 3 1 USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab, Maryland, USA 2.
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Akira Kato 1, Manabu Watanabe 2, Tatsuaki, Kobayashi 1, Yoshio Yamaguchi 3,and Joji Iisaka 4 1 Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Japan.
Dual Polarised Entropy/alpha Decomposition and Coherence Optimisation for Improved Forest Height Mapping Z-S Zhou, P. Caccetta, E. Lehmann, A. Held – CSIRO,
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
Microwave Remote Sensing Group 1 P. Pampaloni Microwave Remote Sensing Group (MRSG) Institute of Applied Physics -CNR, Florence, Italy Microwave remote.
A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management.
On Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture from SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
IGARSS’11 Compact Polarimetry Potentials My-Linh Truong-Loï, Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institue of Technology Eric Pottier, IETR, UMR CNRS.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California MITSUBISHI SPACE SOFTWARE.
Data Sources Sources, integration, quality, error, uncertainty.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
- Microwave Remote Sensing Group IGARSS 2011, July 23-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 M. Brogioni 1, S. Pettinato 1, E. Santi 1, S. Paloscia 1, P. Pampaloni 1,
IEEE IGARSS Vancouver, July 27, 2011 Monitoring and Retrieving Rice Phenology by means of Satellite SAR Polarimetry at X-band Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez J.
Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI)  Michigan Technological University 3600 Green Court, Suite 100  Ann Arbor, MI (734) – Phone 
Monitoring Tropical forests with L-band radar: lessons from Indonesian Peat Swamps Matt Waldram, Sue Page, Kevin Tansey Geography Department.
A presentation by Craig J. Evanego - U.S. National Ice Center Remote Sensing and Monitoring Ice Conditions in the Great Lakes.
IGARSS 2011 SAR Data for Subsurface Saline Lacustrine Deposits Detection and Primary Interpretation on the Evolution of the Vanished Lop Nur Lake Xiaolin.
Remote sensing for surface water hydrology RS applications for assessment of hydrometeorological states and fluxes –Soil moisture, snow cover, snow water.
IEEE IGARSS Vancouver, July 27, 2011 On the potential of TanDEM-X for the retrieval of agricultural crop parameters by single-pass PolInSAR Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez.
Synthetic Aperture Radar at The Alaska SAR Facility
Christian N. Koyama University of Cologne IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, July 26 Soil Moisture Retrieval Under Vegetation Using Dual Polarized PALSAR Data Christian.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture with SAR Jiancheng Shi ICESS University of California, Santa Barbara.
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021 Lecture 8 Observing platforms & systems and revision.
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 27, Vancouver 1 Monitoring Vegetation Water Content by Using Optical Vegetation Index and Microwave Vegetation Index: Field Experiment.
SEA ICE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF OKHOTSK SEA OBSERVED BY X- AND L- BAND SAR Hiroyuki Wakabayashi (Nihon university) Shoji Sakai (Nihon.
0 Riparian Zone Health Project Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Grant S. Wiseman, BS.c, MSc. World Congress of Agroforestry Nairobi, Kenya August 23-28,
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Daily observation of dust aerosols infrared optical depth and altitude from IASI and AIRS and comparison with other satellite instruments Christoforos.
Classification Method Validation for Rice Mapping Using ENVISAT APS Data Erxue CHEN(1), Zengyuan LI(1), BingxiangTan(1) , Wei He(1), Bingbai LI(2) (1)Institute.
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
Rick Guritz IGARSS Meeting, July Rick Guritz, Don Atwood 1 Bruce Chapman, and Scott Hensley 2 1)Alaska Satellite Facility 2)NASA Jet Propulsion.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
CLPX Workshop May 28-29, 2003 Boulder, Colorado Ground-based Radar Measurements of LSOS Snowpack Gilles CASTRES SAINT-MARTIN Kamal SARABANDI Radiation.
Assessment on Phytoplankton Quantity in Coastal Area by Using Remote Sensing Data RI Songgun Marine Environment Monitoring and Forecasting Division State.
Detection of Wind Speed and Sea Ice Motion in the Marginal Ice Zone from RADARSAT-2 Images Alexander S. Komarov 1, Vladimir Zabeline 2, and David G. Barber.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Localization of the study area and monitored fields superimposed with a colored.
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Layover Layover occurs when the incidence angle (  ) is smaller than the foreslope (  + ) i.e.,  <  +. i.e.,  <  +. This distortion cannot be corrected!
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Location and Landsat TM images of the study area: Wuhan, China. Figure Legend:
Who will you trust? Field technicians? Software programmers?
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Examining Scattering Mechanisms of Bubbled Freshwater Lake Ice with Time-Series of RADARSAT-2 (C-band) and UW-Scat (X-, Ku-band) Polarimetric Observations.
Class 12 Assessment of Classification Accuracy
Estimationg rice growth parameters using X-band scatterometer data
Monitoring of Rice Growth Using Polarimetric Scatterometer System
Hiroshi Kimura Gifu University, Japan IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, Canada
Radar backscattering measurements of paddy rice field using L, C and X-band polarimetric scatterometer ISRS 2007.
(L, C and X) and Full-polarization
M. L. Williams1 and T. L. Ainsworth2
Introduction and Basic Concepts
Landsat (same day) data viewer
M. L. Williams1 and T. L. Ainsworth2
Hiroshi Kimura Gifu University, Japan IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, Canada
POLARIMETRIC OBSERVATION FOR RICE FIELD BY RADARSAT-2 AND ALOS/PALSAR
Introduction to SAR Imaging
Presentation transcript:

PCI Geomatics User Group Meeting Koreen Millard Carleton University

I. Peatland Classification Data: – LiDAR DEM, DSM and derivatives – Interpreted training data locations – GPS field data measurements Software: – Classification: R (randomForest package) – Data Processing: LASTools SAGA GIS Millard and Richardson (2015). Remote Sensing. 2015, 7(7), ; doi: /rs /rs

II. Understanding polarimetric response to spatial and temporal variability in hydrology and vegetation Data: – Radarsat-2 Fine Quad Wide (FQ1 and FQ5, ASC and DESC) 13 images 2014, 15 images 2015 – LiDAR DEM, DSM and derivatives – Classification from I – MODIS NDVI composites – Landsat-8 NDVI (3 cloud free images per year) – Field Data Water table depth (collected hourly) Surface Soil Moisture (5 cm) collected within 24 hours of acquisition Software: – PCI Geomatica SAR Polarimetry Workstation/EASI – PCI Geomatica OrthoEngine – R statistics – Trimble Business Office – Diver Office

Loadings GroupVariable NumberVariable NamePC1PC2PC3 1 X.2, X.3, X.40, X.41 HV, VH, HV (dB), VH (dB) Low-Positive High- Positive 2 X.17, X.19, X.30, X.31, X.33 Power due to Volume Scattering, Pedestal Height, Max of Completely UnPolarized Component, Min of Completely UnPolarized Component, Min of Received Power Mid-PositiveHigh Positive Mid- Positive 3 X.8, X.10, X.13, X.36 CP Entropy, CP Alpha, Touzi Alpha, coefficient of variation Mid-NegativeHigh-Positive Mid- Positive 4 X.12, X.18, X.22 X.23, X.27, X.37 Power due to Rough Scattering, Max Degree of Polarization, Min Degree of Polarization, min of the completely polarized component, fractional power Mid-Positive Mid to High Negative Low- Positive 5 X.24, X.32, X.34, X.35, X.38 Max of the completely polarized component, Max of the received power, Max of scattered intensity, min of the scattered intensity, total power Low NegativeHigh-Positive Low- Positive

III. Soil moisture retrieval in peatlands from SAR polarimetry Data: – Radarsat-2 Fine Quad Wide FQ1 and FQ5, ASC and DESC 13 images 2014, 15 images 2015 – LiDAR DEM, DSM and derivatives – MODIS NDVI composites – UAV-airphoto and DSMs. – Classification from I – Field Data Water table depth (collected hourly) Surface Soil Moisture (5 cm) collected within 24 hours of acquisition Software – PCI Geomatica SAR Polarimetry Workstation/EASI – PCI Geomatica OrthoEngine – R statistics – Agisoft Photoscan – LASTools

Relationship between Soil Moisture and SAR polarimetric parameters 2014 SAR Parameterr value HV (intensity)0.13 VH (intensity)0.15 Cloude Pottier Entropy-0.67 Cloude Pottier Alpha Angle-0.69 Dominant Eigenvalue0.69 Power due to Double Bounce0.27 Power due to volume scattering0.35 Power due to rough surface0.81 Pedestal Height0.43 Max degree of polarization0.66 Min degree of polarization0.71 max of the completely polarized component0.78 min of the completely polarized component0.79 max of the completely unpolarized component0.38 min of the completely unpolarized component0.37 max of the receive power0.76 min of the receive power0.37 max of the scattered intensity0.75 min of the scattered intensity0.75 coefficient of variation-0.66 fractional power0.64 total power0.75 HV db0.21 VH db0.28

IV. Monitoring hydrology with SAR Interferometry Data: – Remote Sensing Radarsat-2 Fine Quad Wide – FQ1 and FQ5, ASC and DESC – 13 images 2014, 15 images 2015 LiDAR DEM, DSM and derivatives – Field Data: Water table depth (collected hourly) EnviroScan Diviner Profile Soil Moisture Measurements Software: – GAMMA – Diver Office – R statistics

RADARSAT-2 Sigma nought LUT LiDAR DEM Freeman Durden Decomposition SAR Intensity and Ratios (HV/HH, VV/HH) Cloude-Pottier Decomposition Co/Cross-Pol Magnitude of the Correlation Coefficient Pedestal Height Total Power Co/Cross-Pol Phase Diff. Enhanced Lee Filter (7x7) LiDAR DSM, CHM Orthorectify Polarimetry Touzi Decomposition

lowhigh 0 cm5 cm 02 π

Thanks for listening! Questions or Comments? Acknowledgements: – Jon Pasher and Lori White (EC NWRC) – Luke Copeland (University of Ottawa) – Elyn Humphreys (Carleton University) – South Nation Conservation Authority – NSERC – In-valuable field crew: Marisa Ramey, Melissa Dick, Cameron Samson, Alex Foster, Lindsay Armstrong, Julia Riddick, Keegan Smith, Melanie Langois, Doug Stiff and Fernanda Moreira Amaral