Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam GdR Saclay – 11/04/08 Magali Besnier hep-ex – 0706.0437v3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrino Oscillation Appearance with OPERA Amina ZGHICHE Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
MINOS sensitivity to dm2 and sin2 as a function of pots. MINOS sensitivity to theta13 as a function of pots Precision Neutrino Oscillation Physics with.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
Outline Natasa: Part I. Opera Experiment – An Introduction Mar: Part II. Explanations & Contradictions John: Part III. Consequences.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
OPERA experiment T.Toshito (Nagoya univ. Japan) for the OPERA collaboration Apr
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Sampling Detectors for e Detection and Identification Adam Para, Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College Interest de jour: what is sin 2 2  13  oscillations.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Latest Results from The MINOS Experiment
1 735 km The MINOS Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jeff Nelson William & Mary Fermilab Users’ Meeting June 6, 2007.
Current and Near Future Long Baseline Experiments Stéphane T’Jampens CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SPP.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
ENHANCED DIRECT PHOTON PRODUCTION IN 200 GEV AU+AU IN PHENIX Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, WWND 2009.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
OPERA Neutrino Experiment Tija Sīle presentation is based on: Doktorantūras skolas “Atomāro un nepārtrauktās vides fizikālo.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Study of the ND Data/MC for the CC analysis October 14, 2005 MINOS collaboration meeting M.Ishitsuka Indiana University.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
PROJECT X PHYSICS STUDY WORKSHOP (PXPS 2012) Working Group on Time of Flight Conveners: Mike Albrow (FNAL) & Bob Wagner (ANL) New directions in fast timing:
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Ff Neutrino Time of Flight measurements (with MINOS) Phil Adamson 12 th September 2012.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Results from OPERA Pablo del Amo Sánchez for the OPERA collaboration
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam GdR Saclay – 11/04/08 Magali Besnier hep-ex – v3

Previous measurements Theory : if M < 3 eV/c² *  |v-c| / c < for a 10 GeV *best limit on neutrino mass (cosmological measurement, 2005) But : some theories allow |v-c| / c ~ |β -β μ |< 4×10 -4 (99% confidence level), with |1-β μ |<10 -5 Previous terrestrial measurement with Fermilab neutrino beam :  comparison between detection of µ and µ emitted in the same time (  + /K + decays) Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, (1976) |β ( ) -β μ |=|β ( ) -1|<4×10 -5 (95% confidence level) E : GeV. D ~500m 1) First direct velocity measurement (1976) : 2) Second measurement (1979) : Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, (1979)

MINOS =3 GeV (LE) D=732 km MINOS measurements of neutrino velocity Difference with previous measurements : Absolute transit time measurement of an ensemble of neutrinos by comparing arrival times between ND and FD FD ND

Event selection ND selections for  CC-like events: | Tarrival-Texpected | < 7µs At least 1 “good ” reconstructed track  select  or  events Track-Vertex inside the fiducial volume  Remove cosmic background E v reco <30 GeV (E v reco =E µ + P had ) Cut on a likelihood-based variable (PID) to separate NC and CC events ( ) FD selections : | T arrival -T expected | < 50µs 1 “good” track reconstructed with direction within 53° of that of the beam Track-Vertex inside the fiducial volume Neutrino-induced rock muons (track entering from the front face of the detector with direction within 26°) and shower events inside detector volume (mostly NC) also accepted 473 induced events, with 258  CC-events ( ) events

Timing measurement ND FD timet FD t ND t0t0 t1=t ND - t 0 - d ND t2=t FD - t 0 - d FD t 0 : time of proton extraction magnet signal t ND and t FD : time of the earliest scintillator hit d ND and d FD : known timing delays (readout time, electronic latency, GPS antenna fiber delays) Deviation from the expected TOF  (massless neutrino)   = (t2- t1) –  Uncorrelated jitter of the GPS clocks   (t ND - t FD )=150 ns. MI Identical GPS receiver underground connected to surface with optical fibers Uncertainty :  |d ND – d FD |) = 64 68% CL, mostly due to GPS optical fibers NO ! The neutrino beam pulse is not instantaneous … but 9.7 µs long !

Timing measurement ND profile interactions P 1 6 (t 1 ) P 1 5 (t 1 ) PDF P 1 n (t 1 ) ND  (t ND - t FD )=150 ns Expected FD : P 2 n (t 2 )=  1/(2  ) exp (- (t 2 -t’)/(2  ²)) P 1 n (t’) dt’ Deviation  from the expected time t 2 -   maximisation of L=  ln(P 2 (t 2 i -  -  )) time of FD events relative to prediction after fitting the TOF  P 2 5 (t 2 -  ) P 2 6 (t 2 -  ) FD  = -126 ± 32(stat.) ± 64(sys.) C.L. ( Remember :  |d ND – d FD |) = 64 ns ) NuMI beam pulse is 9.7 µs long with 5 or 6 batches

Relativistic mass measurement T m (E )=   ( 1-m c²/E ) Time of flight of a relativistic with a mass m Log-likelihood function : m : free parameter E i reco : reconstructed energy R(E i v, E i reco ) : detector response parametrised through MC E i v : fitted true energy constrained by R and E i reco.  : free parameter constrained by earlier systematic measurement by a gaussian with   =64ns. m = (stat.+syst.) With  =-46 ns E i reco < 10 GeV M =50MeV/c² M =17Mev/c² m = (stat.+syst.) With  =-99  140 (stat) ns

Velocity measurement Remember :  = -126 ± 32(stat.) ± 64(sys.) C.L. |v-c|/c=|-  /(  )|=5.1 ± 2.9 (stat.+syst.) 10 For between 1-30 GeV Consistent with the speed of light at less than 1.8 . Most sensitive test of neutrino velocity : Arrival time comparison of photons and neutrinos from SN1987a : |v-c|/c< , but only for E ~10 MeV L.Stodolsky, Phys. Lett. B201, 353 (1988) Neutrino velocity could be strong function of E. MINOS is the only one measurement constraining v in the 1-30 GeV range. But no improvements wrt previous terrestrial measurements.

OPERA is a long baseline neutrino experiment at Gran Sasso laboratories, receiving a  beam ( =17 GeV) from CERN, 730 km away.  It will be able to provide another measurement of v in the 1-30 GeV range Future measurements Possible improvements : Actual OPERA GPS system is equivalent to the one of MINOS. New timing system based on GPS/atomic clock will be installed in the next months both at CERN and LNGS, times more precise. Combination with other neutrino experiments at LNGS will improve statistics. Talk from D. Autiero will give more informations on this subject in following GdR meetings

Long base=730 km  T= L/c = 2.4 msec L and  T from GPS expected as the best  T < 10 nsec  L < 5 cm ( ? ) Then |  -1|~   ~ 4*10 -6 Remember : FNAL( ) -> CNGS – time of proton bunches OPERA – time of event using RPCs OPERA neutrino velocity measurement Worse case :  GPS > p bunch interspace ( 5ns now)  T ~ p batch length/  12  N (now 2 batchs with 10.5  s length) At present  t ~ 10  s/  12  1000 ~ 100ns   ~ 4*10-5 Is it possible to have 20 p batchs with 1  s length ? Better case :  GPS < p bunch interspace ( 25ns as for LHC)  T ~  GPS ~ 10 ns   ~ 4*10-6 Expected OPERA accuracy