National Institute of Agricultural Technology The Institutionalization of Impact Assessment in Argentina: The National Institute of Agricultural Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.
Advertisements

Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.
A NEW METRIC FOR A NEW COHESION POLICY by Fabrizio Barca * * Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Special Advisor to the European Commission. Perugia,
POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Bruno Dente, Politecnico di Milano Aalborg, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT.
DISASTERS, RISK and SUSTAINABILITY Omar D. Cardona.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Sharing Best Practice amongst European universities 1 THE ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI ISO 9001:2000 and AUTH Research Committee Christina Besta,
Association for the Education of Adults EAEA European AE Research – Look towards the future ERDI General Assembly, 2004.
Mainstreaming Gender in development Policies and Programmes 2007 Haifa Abu Ghazaleh Regional Programme Director UNIFEM IAEG Meeting on Gender and MDGs.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
Applying the Federal Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation Regulatory Craft in Nova Scotia Conference 2007 Halifax, Nova Scotia November 20, 2007.
The evaluation of quality of the training offer at territorial level The evaluation of quality of the training offer within territorial systems Isfol –
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Territorial Impact Assessment of Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies in ESPON Space ESPON PROJECT 2.3.2: GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES.
Introduction A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE WCD FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS & APPLICATION Alex Muhweezi & Chihenyo Mvoyi IUCN Uganda Country Office.
AN INTRODUCTION Country Systems. Outline 1. What are Country Systems? 2. What does it mean to use country systems? 3. Why does the ‘use of country systems’
Strategic planning-- scenarios b.v.l.narayanaSptm/rsc/brc.
Project “Ex-ante evaluation of programming documents and strengthening evaluation capacity for EU funds post-accession” (EUROPAID/130401/D/SER/HR) Project.
A Health Innovation Systems Approach: The Opportunity and the Challenge Dr. Padmashree Gehl Sampath Department for Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Towards a policy paper for Italy: Voluntary tools in the implementation of the European low carbon strategy in Italy: the Covenant of Mayors and other.
Strategic Planning Process in the Labor Administration _________________________________________ Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (MTPS) El Salvador.
Development and Transfer of Technologies UNFCCC Expert Workshop On Technology Information Technology Transfer Network and Matchmaking Systems: a LA & C.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency National Capacity Self Assessment (GEF/UNDP) The Third GEF Assembly Side Event – 30 th August,2006 Cape town Integrating.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
The theme involve current global adoption of crop biotechnology, trends, benefits and future direction It focus on the fundamentals of KM and its current.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Assessment of Regional Coordination Capacities Szepesi Balázs Lead Evaluator Workshop on introducing territorial development evaluations April 25, 2013.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
87 th International Conference SIEC-ISBE “Education for Business Sustainability” Krakow, July 27-31, 2015 “ Best educational practices from the Arctic.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
Implementation and follow up Critically important but relatively neglected stages of EIA process Surveillance, monitoring, auditing, evaluation and other.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
AfDB-IFAD Joint Evaluation of Agriculture and Rural Development in Africa Towards purposeful partnerships in African agriculture African Green Revolution.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
ELearning Socrates Minerva Concertation Meeting Helsinki 3 July 2006 « Dissemination and Exploitation of Results » Janette Sinclair European Commission.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
Socially Sustainable Development, May 2002 Responsive, Reliable, Resilient Social Aspects of Sustainable Development Steen Lau Jørgensen Social Development.
Social Analysis Workshop on Country Analytical Work June 19, 2001 Anis Ahmad Dani World Bank, Social Development Department.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
1 INTERIM REPORT ON SHA DEVELOPMENTAL WORK 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts and Correspondents for Health Expenditure Data Paris, September.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
Strategic and Business Planning for Ensuring of Cooperatives Sustainability Dr. Hakkı Çetin TARIS Union of Olive and Olive Oil Agricultural Sale Cooperatives.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Measuring social added value Italian experiences
TSMO Program Plan Development
Advanced Management Control and Sustainable Development
Advancing South-South Cooperation for Effective Implementation of
Localising SDGs Political dialogue
Sub-regional workshop on integration of administrative data, big data and geospatial information for the compilation of SDG indicators for English-speaking.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Towards.
An Integrated Governance Approach towards Inclusive Development
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
BRD The Development Bank of Rwanda Plc (BRD) is Rwanda’s only national Development Finance Institution Public limited company incorporated in 1967 and.
Presentation transcript:

National Institute of Agricultural Technology The Institutionalization of Impact Assessment in Argentina: The National Institute of Agricultural Technology as a Study Case Authors: 1 Gabutti, Silvina Gil, Gabriela Lema, Daniel Mirassou, Susana Morales, Susana Saucede, María Cristina Schain, Diego ARGENTINA (1) In alphabetical order

TOPICS  Introduction  INTA in the Science & Technology National System : a brief overview  The Impact Assessment, some reasons for the non adoption  Building on the institutional experience  Final Comments National Institute of Agricultural Technology

INTRODUCTION  Agencies of Science and Technology in Argentina have developed extensive experience in evaluation models to prioritize and to identify technical-academic quality in subsidies for different activities of investigation.  A greater focus on techniques of evaluation based on a partial level of study and short term perspectives can be observed.  Institutional experiences of the Impact Assessment (IA) from a multidisciplinary approach, of medium–long term and with a global look, are scarce.  This paper will attempt to identify reasons to explain the non adoption of these techniques of evaluation at an organizational level, analyzing the scarce institutional stability and government policies under a perspective of transaction costs.  Learning from the international experience, we will make recommendations for the institutionalization in an agency of Agricultural Technology.

S&T Public Budget Distribution 2005 (S&T Activities) Source: Budget for S&T Activities. Secretariat of Science and Technology; data from the Ministry of Economy.

Resources destinated to the Science and Technology System and INTA ( ) Source: Budget for S&T Activities. Secretariat of Science and Technology; data from the Ministry of Economy. Base 1998=100

 The increased budget for INTA is based on a new policy of strength and institutional development. Included in this policy is a change in the structure of consensus for decision making and in the management model.  Advancing in this sense is not a practice proposed by our institution itself, but rather that the evaluation of results and impacts is an incorporated theme in the national agenda.  A strategy is being set up at a national level for the methodological development of the Impact Assessment practice. INTA in the Science & Technology National System : a brief overview (cont.)

 Contracts  Within a public institution contracts are not made explicitly and among clearly identifiable contractors, they have multiple interacting parties on one side of the relationship (several researchers or teams with interactions) exposed to important contingencies derived from the randomness of research activities.  Their terms are generally vague, and leave much room for interpretation and have many loopholes that function as escape clauses.  Enforcement  Promises made in a research organization are not subject to any external effective enforcement mechanism. If a researcher fails to deliver on such a “contractual obligation” exploiting some excuse (i.e. external negative shocks), the only recourse to the other side is to accept the results and eventually reduce future financing or projects. The Impact assessment, some reasons for the non adoption Some systemic problems related to transaction costs within the organizational structure are:

The Impact assessment, some reasons for the non adoption (cont.) Governance Structures  Governance structures are characterized by various agency relationships. The idea in an agency relationship is that interests of the parties are at least partially in conflict, and the agent has some information or action advantage over the principal.  In this structure the informational problems are severe because specific research knowledge is usually only available and understandable by experts. Principals (i.e. managers or directors) in general do not have the opportunity to resort to external advisors to control the agent’s action results and this poses an important problem in the design of an incentive scheme. Bounded Rationality  In a research organization individuals´ knowledge is very imperfect. In many cases explicit contract writing, control and enforcement are impossible, because bounded rationality has as serious bite. The extent of the difficulty varies across research areas and times. Some areas with slow rates of innovation or less dynamic environments can have fewer uncertain outcomes and make contracts more feasible.

Building on the institutional experience  As of the approval of the Institutional Strategic Plan (ISP) , a management model was set up in accordance with the new trends in Science and Technology, institutionalizing the impact assessment.  The ISP establishes the features for the three-year mid term plans. The reform that is intended to be incorporated aims at promoting greater levels of decentralization, within the framework of a more efficient regionalization and of the strengthening of the social articulation.  Within this framework, ISP, for the first time, formalizes and institutionalizes the IA in the agro-industrial, food and agriculture system, in its economic, environmental, social and institutional aspects.  This implies: building institutional capacity, developing mechanisms that integrate the information of impact with the process of making decisions.

Strategic AreasRCPs Programmatic Map MTPs National Programs RTPs Specific &Integrated Projects ISP

The evaluation of the impact will be made possible relying on the elements of judgment associated with: Accountability; The benefits of the institutional investment in generation and transference of technology; The contribution to the competitiveness of the agro-industrial chains, the sustainability of the productive systems and to the development of the territories; The contribution to the scientific-technological development in the public and private sectors; The generation of information for strategic decision making on the future investments in investigation and development, transference and extension. Building on the institutional experience

DIMENSIONS OF ANALYSIS: SOCIAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTIONAL Strategic Components: TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER AND EXTENSION TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS Institutional Objectives INTERVENTION FIELDS: VALUE CHAINS AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS TERRITORIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMPETITIVENESS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SOCIAL EQUITY

Building on the institutional experience  The Integrated System of Evaluation that is being formed includes the following phases: Ex ante evaluation of the programmatic modalities, follow-up/ monitoring and Ex post evaluation in order to identify the products, result and impacts.  The information generated will feed the decision making process, allowing for priority setting and the identification of vacancies.  The analyses carried out at different levels (national, regional and local) and in the areas of intervention will spread knowledge about the contribution of INTA with the purpose of increasing the exports of agricultural products, food safety, employment, and of controlling environmental harm, among others.  This will also produce information concerning the adoption of technologies, gaps of productivity and competitiveness. Integrated System of Evaluation:

INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF EVALUATION Products Impacts EX ANTE Evaluation MONITORING EX POST Evaluation Outcomes DecisionMakingProcessDecisionMakingProcess  Priorities Settings  Resources Allotment  Vacancies ISP MTPs RTPs RCPs Programs Projects

The design of this Integrated System of Evaluation leads us to work on the: Selection of variables and indicators for each programmatic modality. Elaboration of Procedure Guidelines defining steps and norms. Incorporation of a multidisciplinary approach for the IA. Choice of methodologies and quali-quantitative techniques to process information. Design of an information system which encompasses distinct dimensions, levels and programmatic modalities.

In order to reach these goals we need: To strengthen institutional capacities to incorporate the IA as a routine within our processes To constitute multidisciplinary teams. To promote the inter-institutional link at national and international levels by means of evaluation networks.

Final Comments  The challenge therefore, is to build the Integrated and Participative System of Evaluation of Results and Impacts for the actions and strategies of INTA, towards institutional improvement.  The new institutional design has contemplated existing constraints and weaknesses, and has responded to the demands for greater control and transparency in the use of public funds.  With a perspective of a growing budget, INTA through the institutionalization of IA, among other changes, is establishing the base for a better control and effectiveness of its actions.  Advances must come, not from a forced sharpening of incentives within the existing agency structure, but from an integral reform of the framework.  The rules of the game are changing, and we must incorporate these in our daily tasks and procedures to strengthen the institutional performance.

Thank you for your attention