Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review TAMI OHOYO COORDINATOR OF SECONDARY MATH TEACHING & LEARNING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching to the Standards: Math A Literacy-Based Approach for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities by Katherine Trela, PhD, Bree Jimenez, MS.
Advertisements

Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
Carroll County Public Schools Gifted & Talented. On February 28 th, 2012, the Maryland State Board of Education approved regulations that set the minimum.
LITERACY AND MATH WORKSTATIONS. AGENDA Purpose of workstations Purpose of planning/center board Setting Expectations Literacy Workstations Math Workstations.
Professional Learning Team Conference June Each participant will leave the session knowledgeable about inter-rater reliability  What it is  Why.
Understanding Response to Intervention (RtI) : What it Is & How it Works in Midway ISD.
K-5 Math Instructional Material Selection Process Margaret Hendrickson 3,2,1 Bridge: 3 Things You Want/Important 2 Pet Peeves.
Observation Process and Teacher Feedback
TEACHER LEADER TEAM Amory School District.
Differentiated Supervision
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Lewiston Porter PEC Standards- Based Report Card Grades K-3 Report Card Committee Members: Heidi Kazulak, Suzanne Hedemann, Lisa Winslow, Kelly Millville,
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
 Student Learning Objectives February 26, 2015 Work and Creation Session.
Getting to a Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Empowering Teacher Leaders to Develop District Level Rigorous Curriculum October 24, 2011.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Linked Learning: Utilizing Data High School Teachers Council September 22, :00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.
Railside High School Study
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Southwind High School August 5, 2015.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Poppy Underwood – White Station High Pam Metz - Cordova High August 5, 2015.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT SPECIALIST TRAINING SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
St. Cloud Partnership in Mathematics Grant Presented by: Jona Deavel, Math Coach/7-8 th Grade Math Teacher and Jenny Merriam, Grant Coordinator.
CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING AUGUST 15, 2011 PBL UNIT #10.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
LESSON STUDY INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING TEAMS – LIVING WITHIN A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY By Nancy J. Larsen, Ph.D.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
March 11,  Under Tab 2  Look at the Table of Contents  Based on the Table of Contents, what peeks your interest and want to learn more about?
Jeffco Textbook Review January Purpose of the Review Process To review and recommend learning resources that provide major support for instructional.
From SEF to SIP March 24, Content Objectives Participants will 1. Understand SIP law 2. Explore the CNA 3. Explore the Plan-Do-Check-Act Model for.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Effective School Council Meetings School Council Forums 2009.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
ACADEMIC REVIEW: GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC SUPPORT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO HELP THE SCHOOL IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
How to move a large district forward with efficiency and effectiveness Jeff Heller & Mike Jaszczak Parma City Schools November 1, 2012.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
{ Formative Assessment 8th Grade Mathematics. ➢ Build a shared understanding of formative assessment techniques, relative to the SMPs and content standards.
{ Developing Student Thinking Seventh Grade Mathematics.
“Inspiring our students to reach their full potential.”
Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review TAMI OHOYO COORDINATOR OF SECONDARY MATH TEACHING & LEARNING.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review TAMI OHOYO COORDINATOR OF SECONDARY MATH TEACHING & LEARNING.
Scheduling at Tier 2: How Do We Fit It All In? September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant.
Rank the following know-how levels from the lowest level to the highest remember (memorize and repeat facts as they are given in various sources) understand.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review Tami Ohoyo Coordinator of Secondary Math Teaching & Learning.
The Planning Period and Beyond…
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Student Teaching Orientation Dec 13, 2017
Curriculum and Assessment
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Kent School District Middle School Math Curriculum Review TAMI OHOYO COORDINATOR OF SECONDARY MATH TEACHING & LEARNING

Purpose The purpose of a Curriculum Review shall be to affirm or to recommend changes to curriculum frameworks and/or an instructional materials review. A review would typically result in one of the following actions: ◦Affirm continued use of curriculum frameworks and instructional materials; or ◦Establish a time line for completion of recommended actions

Objectives Today you will: Complete the examination of four potential new resources Rank the four potential resources in five categories ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations Confirm Pilot Team (3:30 – 4:00)

Norms Actively participate and monitor your own air time Have a positive presupposition; gently question ideas and listen to understand Suspend judgment Encourage and respect divergent thinking Stay focused and on task Practice positive problem solving Start and end on time (or earlier) When sharing information, focus on the content not the individual Respect & provide time to process Allow for the option to add to our norms

Process Review 4 potential new resources (Jan. 15 – Feb. 5) Narrow the options to 2 (Feb. 5) Pilot the top 2 recommendations (Feb. 29 – Mar. 25) Reach consensus on the top recommendation (Mar. 30) Complete Technology Review (Feb. 8 – Mar. Mar. 15) Present to Executive Director of Standards Based Instruction (Apr. ) Present to Instructional Materials Committee (Apr. 19) Present to KSD School Board (May 11) Communicate with teachers and principals throughout the process

Evaluation of Resources Complete the evaluation for your assigned resource You will have approximately 2 hours ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations

Reflecting on Your Findings Pick one of the following about which to discuss: ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations Are you struggling to find something? Are you excited/disappointed about what you’ve found? Do you have a question for your group?

BREAK We will reconvene in 5 minutes

Evaluation of Resources Complete the evaluation for your assigned resource You will have approximately 2 hours ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations

Reflecting on Your Findings Pick one of the following about which to discuss: ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations Are you struggling to find something? Are you excited/disappointed about what you’ve found? Do you have a question for your group?

LUNCH We will continue our work in 30 minutes

BREAK We will reconvene in 5 minutes

Evaluation of Resources Complete the evaluation for your assigned resource You will have approximately 2 hours ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations

Reflecting on Your Findings Pick one of the following about which to discuss: ◦Standards Alignment ◦Instructional Framework ◦Enrichment & Support ◦Technical Quality ◦Equitable Representations Are you struggling to find something? Are you excited/disappointed about what you’ve found? Do you have a question for your group?

Resource Rankings For each category: Standards Alignment Instructional Framework Enrichment & Support Technical Quality Equitable Representations Rank the programs at your grade level from = Highest Ranking 4 = Lowest Ranking From these rankings, the top two programs will be used in the pilot.

Next Steps & Wrap Up Thank you for your participation in this important work! Frequently Asked Questions/Talking Points Our next meeting is scheduled for March 9 (4:00 – 6:30)

MS Math Pilot Team 6th7th8th Ryan YvarraNicole KiefferNancy Hill David JohnsonCalvin YeeCarole Lynch Ed PadillaAmanda DuarteKristine Murphy Michael RobinettBob MattsonJanett Meyers Thank you for taking part in this important step!