Principles of Planning Hot Topics in Preparedness Northwest Center for Public Health Practice School of Public Health & Community Medicine University of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation

Advertisements

Protocol Development.

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.

Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.

Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,

Demystifying a “Risk-focused Surveillance Approach” to Establishing and Monitoring Standards for Sound Systems of Financial Management 10 th Annual Public.

Writing a Research Protocol Michael Aronica MD Program Director Internal Medicine-Pediatrics.

Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Overview of Nursing Process, Clinical Reasoning, and Nursing Practice.

Understanding Validity for Teachers

Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.

NANDA International Investigating the Diagnostic Language of Nursing Practice.

Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)

Criteria and Standard.

Multiple Choice Questions for discussion

LOT QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLING (LQAS). What is LQAS A sampling method that:  Is simple, in-expensive, and probabilistic.  Combines two standard statistical.

Outcomes based approach to measuring the impact of new technology Vikas Arya HSCI 740 Spring 2004 May 22,2004.

Programming Logic and Design Fourth Edition, Introductory

The Evaluation Plan.

Purchasing Agreement. Ambition in Action PURCHASING AGREEMENT Purpose Set out the terms by which the DDG TAFE purchases training services.

Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,

The Logic Model An Introduction. Slide 2 Innovation Network, Inc. Who We Are National nonprofit organization Committed to evaluation as a tool for empowerment.

Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart

Theory and Theoretical Model PHCL 436. Outline Interrelation between theory, research and practice. Theory definition and components. Use of health theories.

Evaluating. Evaluation the nurse and the patient together measure how well the patient has achieved the outcomes specified in the plan of care allow the.

“Working to ensure children, birth to 5, are prepared for success in school and life.” Wake County SmartStart Logic Model Training May 2013.

Ethics of Community-Based Prevention Research: A Reflection and Dialogue Stephen B. Fawcett University of Kansas.

Study Eligibility Criteria: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.

Title of the work subject to the challenge Author, affiliation Supervisor(s), affiliation Date of Beginning and predicted End.

Goals of the Workshop BUILD A COMMUNITY INTERESTED IN EVALUATION DEVELOP APPROACHES TO EVALUATION THAT COMBINE ACCOUNTABILITY AND LEARNING USE EVALUATIONS.

Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 9

1 Nemours Health Planning and Evaluation Collaborative Learning Session I: Designing Effective Health Programs.

Assessment Specifications Gronlund, Chapter 4 Gronlund, Chapter 5.

Analytic Frameworks: Interactive Quiz Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director for Methods, Vanderbilt University EPC Assistant Professor, Institute.

Learning Objectives Identify the model to create a well-built Clinical Question Differentiate between the various Evidence- Based Care Types of Questions.

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 5 Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.

Vincent Briseno EDTC  In a technology-enhanced environment, the MTT demonstrates knowledge of:  Instructional design  Development  Assessment.

Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher

Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles

Practice- Based Evaluation Research Week 4 Day 2 DIE 4564 Research Methods.

FIVE THINGS THAT LEAD TO THE DEATH OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IN YOUR ORGANIZATION ASHELEY A. HEPBURN, DIRECTOR SOPHIA HOLT, SR. BUDGET ANALYST OFFICE OF.

Project Work Plan - Manchester JSNA National Dataset Project Workshop 3 London, 28 th May 2009 Neil Bendel Manchester Joint Health Unit.

School Development Goal Development “Building a Learning Community”

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 06The Nursing Process in Mental Health Nursing.

Programming Logic and Design Fourth Edition, Comprehensive Chapter 5 Making Decisions.

All health care professionals must understand and use the EBP approach to practice Incorporates expertise of clinician and patient’s values and preferences.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Specific Types of Quantitative Research.

1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.

Copyright © 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 8 Planning and Outcome Identification.

Program Evaluation Key Informant Interview Themes Jack Thompson, Director Northwest Center for Public Health Practice University of Washington School of.

Debunking Theories of Change

Scientifi c Method Chapter 1: The World of Earth Science.

Research And Evaluation Differences Between Research and Evaluation  Research and evaluation are closely related but differ in four ways: –The purpose.

Survival Skills for Researchers Study Design. Typical Process in Research Design study Generate hypotheses Develop tentative new theories Analyze & interpret.

HSC Provide information about health and social care or children and young people’s services EDUC8TIONS LTD.

Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs

Theories of intrapersonal capacity 2

Nursing Process Applied to Community Health Nursing

Clinical practice guidelines and Clinical audit

Proposal Writing.

An Overview of Evaluation Research

How Managers Make Things Happen

Solution Selection: What works?

What is Correlational Research?

Improving Budgetary Outcomes

Measuring Data Quality

How to Hypothesis.

IHI L22 Session Summary Team:______________.

OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010

Presentation transcript:

Principles of Planning Hot Topics in Preparedness Northwest Center for Public Health Practice School of Public Health & Community Medicine University of Washington July 27, 2004 William W. Dyal Director, Population Based Services DeKalb County Board of Health

Why Plan? Planning – The process for constructing an organized response to a problem or series of related problems.

Planning – The application of rational decision making to the commitment of future resources.

Good planning eliminates the risk of failure. True or False?

False. Planning does not eliminate risk. Its purpose is to make the most efficient use of resources. The value of planning should not be judged by the accuracy of its predictions but by whether it helps optimize results in a changing environment.

Rational Decision Making Requires only that the manager ask four questions and that his/her actions be in agreement with the answers.

A. Who am I? B. What am I? C. Where am I? D. Who cares? E. None of the above? The first of these four questions is: Rational Decision Making

1.Where am I? (The starting point) 2.Where do I want to be? (The ending point) 3.How do I get there? (The plan of action) 4.How do I know I’m getting there? (Milestones)

Where Am I? 1.The Problem (our current capacity to dispense) 2.Available Resources (ours and others) 3.The State of the Art (the current level of technology)

Where Do I Want To Be? Outcome Objective – A quantitative measurement of the problem at some future date. A statement of what our capacity to dispense will be by some specific future point in time.

How Do I Get There? Intervention Strategy – basis for predicting the expenditure of resources on specified activities and objectives will lead to the anticipated outcome. In its simplest form, an “if-then” logic model or theory.

Activities and Process Objectives Activities – a series of work statements that describe how program resources will be used Process Objectives – milestones to be achieved en route to the achievement of the anticipated outcome

How Do I know I’m Getting There? Measurement Comparison

Measurement and Comparison of what? A. Measurement of the intended for comparison to the ideal? B. Measurement of the actual for comparison to the intended? C. Measurement of the actual for comparison to the ideal? D. None of the Above?

How Do I know I’m Getting There? Measurement Comparison Evaluation – Measurement of the actual for comparison to the intended (activities, process objectives, & outcome objectives)

Success!