Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 919-541-5344,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Advertisements

NETTING Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2013 NETTING.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Richard (Rick) Goertz, P. E
Southern Environmental Law Center Georgia Air Summit May 4, 2006.
Part of NSR Program Applicable to Major Sources in Areas Not Attaining the NAAQS Nonattainment NSR Program (NA NSR)
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
Air Permitting Overview.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Laura McKelvey, Jessica Montañez,
Air Construction Permitting Services Sarah Piziali, Construction Permit Section Supervisor.
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) July 20, 2011 Major New Source Review (NSR) Rule Webinar Tribal.
Clean Air Act and Permits
Implications of Proposed Ozone Standards in Southeast Missouri (SEM) SMRPC Meeting, Perryville, MO April 24, 2015 Joletta Golik.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
1 PSD - Case #1 Case #1: –A simple cycle natural gas power plant with PTE NOx of 300 tpy and GHGs of 150,000 tpy CO2e receives a PSD permit addressing.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
Part of NSR Program Applicable to Major Sources in Areas Attaining the NAAQS Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program.
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Regulatory Update New Source Review Permitting Case Studies & Regulatory Updates August 26, 2009 ARIPPA Technical Symposium trinityconsultants.com.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) NSR PROGRAM Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training PSD Applicability Example Landfill Applicability Examples John Calcagni, EPA Region 4.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
1 Non-Attainment NSR Program Donald Law EPA Region 8.
Minor NSR Program and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Jessica Montañez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
PSD/Nonattainment Review You can do this! Marc Sturdivant Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life 10/8/08 Minor New Source Review Alberto Roybal.
New Source Review Rules Update Jessica Montanez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Policy Division.
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
Clean Air Act SAFE 210. Purpose Protect public health and regulate air emissions Addresses both stationary and mobile sources.
1 NSR Rule Review and Guidance 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review The Allegheny Mountain Section.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
1 Designations & Classifications for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
PSD/Nonattainment Applicability Arturo J. Garza Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Ozone Redesignation Substitutes for the HGB and DFW Areas
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Nonattainment NSR Permitting Process
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
Major New Source Review (NSR)—Part 1
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,

2 What is the purpose of this discussion? 1. NA NSR Applicability 3. NA NSR Applicability and Netting Example 2. NA NSR Program Requirements

3 How do we define a nonattainment area?  Areas in which air quality is worse than NAAQS levels  Such NA areas must improve air quality within a certain time period

4 Which sources might be subject to the major NA NSR program?  New major sources  Existing major sources making major modifications  Physical or operational changes at the source  Change should show significant net emissions increase

5 How do we determine if a new source is a major source under the NA NSR program? 1.Identify NA pollutants for new source 2.Determine source’s potential to emit (PTE) 3.Determine applicable major source thresholds 4.Determine if PTE exceeds major source threshold for any NA pollutant 5.If so, source is subject to major NA NSR for that pollutant

6 How do I identify which pollutants are nonattainment pollutants?  Determine if area is in attainment or nonattainment for each criteria pollutant emitted by the source  To find this information:  Contact the appropriate EPA Regional Office or applicable permitting authority  Search an EPA database such as:

7 What is the source’s potential to emit (PTE)?  The maximum capacity of source to emit a pollutant under its physical and operational design  Based on operating 24/7 (8760 hours/year), unless restricted by a permit condition  Can include effect of emissions controls, if enforceable by permit or:  State Implementation Plan (SIP),  Tribal Implementation Plan (TIP) or  Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) conditions

8 What is the applicable major source threshold?  100 tpy or lower depending on NA severity Nonattainment Areas PollutantNonattainment Classification Major Source Threshold OzoneMarginal (≥ < ppm)100 tpy of VOC or NOx Moderate (≥ < ppm)100 tpy of VOC or NOx Serious (≥ < ppm)50 tpy of VOC or NOx Severe (≥ < ppm)25 tpy of VOC or NOx Extreme (= ppm and up)10 tpy of VOC or NOx Particulate Matter (10µm) Moderate100 tpy Serious70 tpy Carbon MonoxideModerate (9.1 – 16.4 ppm)100 tpy Serious (16.5 and up ppm)50 tpy Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, PM2.5 and Lead Only one nonattainment classification100 tpy

9 When is a modification subject to the major NA NSR program?  When:  The proposed project emissions exceed the significant emission rate (SER) and  The proposed project results in a significant net emissions increase (i.e., contemporaneous increases and decreases in emissions at the existing major source exceed the SER) after a netting analysis is performed  SER Examples:  40 tpy for VOC, NO 2, SO 2

10 What steps should I follow to do a Netting Analysis? 1.Determine the emissions increase from the proposed project 2.Determine the beginning and ending dates of the contemporaneous period as it relates to the proposed modification 3.Determine which emissions units at the source experienced a physical or operational change that increased or decreased emissions during the contemporaneous period 4.Determine which emissions are creditable 5.Determine on a pollutant by pollutant basis, the amount of each contemporaneous and creditable emissions increase and decrease 6.Sum all contemporaneous and creditable increases and decreases with the increase from the proposed project to determine if a significant net emissions increase will occur

11 1. Determine the emissions increase from the proposed project  If project emissions > significant emissions rate (SER), source determines its net emissions increase to know if it is a major modification or not  If project emissions < SER, source is exempt from review and is not a major modification  For example, SO 2 emissions from proposed project are 80 tpy. 80 tpy > 40 tpy SER, thus net emissions increase determination needed

12  To determine the source’s net emission increase, we need to define the contemporaneous period  For NA NSR, States generally use 5 calendar years before the source commences operation  For 40 CFR Appendix S, period starts 5 years before the source commences construction and ends when the source commences operation  For example, our SO 2 source planned to commence construction in June 2006 and begin operation in September 2008, the contemporaneous period for Appendix S is defined as: 2. Determine the beginning and ending dates of the contemporaneous period June 2006 Commence Construction June 2005 June 2004 June 2003 June 2002 June 2001 June 2007 June 2008 Sept Commence Operation 80 tpy

13 3. Determine which units experienced an increase or decrease in emissions during contemporaneous period  Determine emission increases and decreases associated with a physical change or change in the method of operation at the source which did not require a PSD permit  For example, our SO 2 source increased its SO 2 emissions in 2003 and decreased its emissions in 2008 June 2006 Commence Construction June 2005 June 2004 June 2003 June 2002 June 2001 Sept Commence Operation June 2007 June tpy

4. Determine which emissions are creditable  An increase or decrease is not creditable if it has been previously relied on for issuing a permit and the permit is in effect during the review  A decrease is creditable only to the extent that it:  Is “federally-enforceable” from the moment that the actual construction begins  Occurs before the proposed emissions increase  Has the same health and welfare significance as the proposed increase from the source  A source cannot take credit for:  A decrease that it has had to make, or will make, in order to bring an emission unit into compliance  An emissions reduction from a unit which was permitted but never built or operated

15 5. Determine the amount of each contemporaneous emissions increase or decrease  On a pollutant by pollutant basis  Based on difference between old level and new level of emissions for each unit  Past decreases and/or increases in actual emissions based on:  Average of any two consecutive years in the past 5 for utilities  Average of any two consecutive years in the past 10 for non-utilities  For example, SO 2 emissions decreases and increases are: June 2006 Commence Construction June 2005 June 2004 June 2003 June 2002 June 2001 June 2007 June tpy 80 tpy25 tpy Sept Commence Operation

16 6. Sum all contemporaneous and creditable increases and decreases with the proposed modification  NEI = PMEI + CEI – CED where:  PMEI = Proposed modification emissions increase  CEI = Creditable emission increases  CED = creditable emission decreases  For example, NEI = = 65 tpy  65 tpy > 40 tpy SO 2 SER, project is a major modification June 2006 Commence Construction June 2005 June 2004 June 2003 June 2002 June 2001 June 2007 June tpy 80 tpy25 tpy Sept Commence Operation

NA NSR Applicability and Netting Exercise

18 Existing Source is Installing an Engine Testing Facility  First, determine if source is currently a major source  Source located in serious ozone nonattainment area PollutantPTE (tpy) NO 2 45 CO900 VOC355 Nonattainment Areas Major Source Thresholds PollutantNonattainment Classification Major Source Threshold OzoneSerious (≥ < ppm)50 tpy of VOC or NOx Carbon MonoxideSerious (16.5 and up ppm)50 tpy Nitrogen OxidesOnly one nonattainment classification exists 100 tpy

19 Existing Source is Installing an Engine Testing Facility  Second, determine if existing source is making a major modification  Source:  Began construction in March 2006 with a 26 tpy permit limit for VOC Emission Unit Construction Date Potential VOC Emissions Coating LineMarch tpy 2 Spray Paint Systems September tpy each Constructed following emission units: Emission UnitActual VOC Emissions Degreaser # tpy tpy Degreaser # tpy tpy tpy tpy tpy Removed following emission units in 2002:

20 Existing Source is Installing an Engine Testing Facility  Is the source currently a major one? Yes, for CO and VOCs  Is the new installation a major modification?  Step 1: 26 tpy VOC > 25 tpy SER for serious ozone nonattainment areas (CAA Section 183), source needs to determine NEI  Step 2: The contemporaneous period is: March 2006 Commence Operation Jan 2005 Jan 2004 Jan 2003 Jan 2002 Jan tpy

21 Existing Source is Installing an Engine Testing Facility  Is the new installation a major modification?  Step 3, 4, 5: Creditable emission increases and decreases during contemporaneous period are:  Step 6: Determine Net Emission Increases (NEI):  NEI = – 35 – 27 = 27 tpy  27 tpy VOC NEI > 25 tpy SER for serious ozone nonattainment area  Source is a major modification March 2006 Commence Operation Jan 2005 Jan 2004 Jan 2003 Jan 2002 Jan tpy 54 tpy 35 tpy 27 tpy 26tpy

NA NSR Program Requirements

23 What are the major NA-NSR program requirements?  LAER (Lowest Achievable Emission Rate)  Offsets at prescribed ratios  Alternative sites analysis  Statewide facility compliance certification  Public Involvement

24 What is LAER?  Rate that has been achieved or is achievable for defined source  Rate may be in a permit or regulation  Requirement does not consider the following:  Economic  Energy  Environmental  Other factors

25 What are emissions offsets and what are its requirements?  Emissions reductions from existing sources to balance emissions from proposed new or modified sources  Offset must be at least 1:1  Emissions offsets reductions must be:  quantifiable, enforceable, permanent and surplus (QEPS)  from actual emissions – real, no “paper”reductions  federally enforceable at the time of permit issuance for new source  in effect before the new source can commence operation

26 How is alternative sites analysis defined?  Source owner must submit an analysis of:  Alternative sites  Sizes  Production processes  Environmental control techniques  Analysis for such proposed source must demonstrate that benefits significantly outweigh:  the environmental impacts  social costs imposed as a result of its location, construction, or modification

27 How is compliance certification defined?  Source owner must c ertify that all other sources in that state that are:  Owned or operated by the source owner are  In compliance or  On an approved schedule for compliance

28 What are the public participation requirements?  Public notice:  Must be for a 30-day period  Generally in regional and local newspapers  All public comments must be considered before a final permit is established  A Technical Support Document (TSD) generally including responses to comments may also be available with the final permit