Visualizing Winter Nitrate Formation Using CMAQ Process Analysis Charles Stanier – University of Iowa 319-335-1399 CENTER FOR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
Advertisements

Heterogeneous Photochemistry of Nitrogen Oxides on Urban Grime Alyson Baergen and D.J. Donaldson April 15, 2014.
Comparison of the CAM and RRTMG Radiation Schemes in WRF and coupled WRF-CMAQ models Aijun Xiu, Zac Adelman, Frank Binkowski, Adel Hanna, Limei Ran Center.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A LIMITED AREA ATMOSPHERE-CHEMISTRY MODEL: BOLCHEM M. D’Isidoro (1),S. Fuzzi (1), A. Maurizi (1), F. Monforti (2),
Sensitivity to changes in HONO emissions from mobile sources simulated for Houston area Beata Czader, Yunsoo Choi, Lijun Diao University of Houston Department.
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
THE PUMA PROJECT AND SUBSEQUENT AIR QUALITY MODELLING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ROY M. HARRISON AND XIAOMING CAI SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHY, EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
THE IMPACTS OF TRANS-BOUNDARY TRANSPORT OF AEROSOLS ON THE REGIONAL AIR QUALITY: A case study of Mexican wildland fire on May 1998 Hee-Jin In 1, Daewon.
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
The impact of the thermal power industries from the Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei regions on Beijing haze studied by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model (Preliminary.
Effects of climate change on future wildfire and its impact on regional air quality Hyun Cheol Kim, Dae-Gyun Lee, and Daewon Byun 1 Institute for Multidimensional.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Improving Cloud Simulation in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Through Assimilation of GOES Satellite Observations Andrew White Advisor: Dr. Arastoo.
Cloud Correction and its Impact on Air Quality Simulations Arastoo Pour Biazar 1, Richard T. McNider 1, Andrew White 1, Bright Dornblaser 3, Kevin Doty.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Application of synoptic typing to an investigation of nocturnal ozone concentration at a maritime location, New Zealand B. A. Khan 1, C.R. de Freitas 1.
Assessment of the vertical exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum above a wildland fire using observations and mesoscale simulations Joseph J. Charney.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
Model-Data Fusion Approaches for Exposure Estimation Charles Stanier Assistant Professor University of Iowa CENTER FOR GLOBAL AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL.
Understanding fine particle episodes in the Upper Midwest during the 2009 LADCO Winter Nitrate Study using CMAQ and CAMx: model performance, processes,
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
GEM-MACH Global The Canadian Global Air Quality Modeling/Forecasting System Dr. Sunling Gong Science and Technology Branch January 16-17, 2012.
O UTLINE Why are we interested in linking GEOS- CHEM with regional air quality model (CMAQ)? Technical issues to consider when linking GEOS-CHEM & CMAQ.
EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF GAS/PARTICLE MASS TRANSFER TREATMENTS FOR 3-D AEROSOL SIMULATION AND FORECAST Xiaoming Hu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Utah Wintertime PM2.5 Modeling Lance Avey Utah Division of Air Quality.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
WRAP Experience: Investigation of Model Biases Uma Shankar, Rohit Mathur and Francis Binkowski MCNC–Environmental Modeling Center Research Triangle Park,
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Intermediate model for the annual and global evolution of species
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
PM 2.5 Response to Different Emissions Reductions Scenarios Over São Paulo State, Brazil. Taciana T. de A. Albuquerque a, J. Jason West b, Rita Yuri Ynoue.
The GEOS-CHEM Simulation of Trace Gases over China Li ZHANG and Hong LIAO Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences April 24, 2008.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Development of the air pollution forecast system VENUS and its validation (in Japan) Seiji SUGATA *, Toshimasa OHARA ( National Institute for Environmental.
Model & Chemistry Intercomparison CMAQ with CB4, CB4-2002, SAPRC99 Ralph Morris, Steven Lau, Bongyoung Koo ENVIRON International Corporation Gail Tonnesen,
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
New Features of the 2003 Release of the CMAQ Model Jonathan Pleim 1, Gerald Gipson 2, Shawn Roselle 1, and Jeffrey Young 1 1 ASMD, ARL, NOAA, RTP, NC 2.
2006 Graduate Student Symposium Measurement of HCl (g) in troposphere and lower stratosphere with CIMS technique Analytical characteristics and its implications.
Sensitivity analysis of influencing factors on PM 2.5 nitrate simulation the 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 16, 2012 This research was supported.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Data Needs for Evaluation of Radical and.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Chemistry-Climate Interaction Studies in Japan Hajime Akimoto Atmospheric Composition Research Program Frontier Research System for Global Change Chemistry.
A Comparison Study of CMAQ Aerosol Prediction by Two Thermodynamic Modules: UHAERO V.S. ISORROPIA Case study for January 2002 episode Fang-Yi Cheng 1,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Impacts of Meteorological Conditions Modified by Urban Expansion on Surface Ozone over Yangtz River Delta and Pearl River Delta region, China Xuemei Wang,
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL AQMEII Phase 2: Overview and WRF/CMAQ Application over North America.
Evaluations of CMAQ Simulations in southern Taiwan
Andrea Fraser DIAC PhD student Supervised by Prof. H ApSimon
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
Presentation transcript:

Visualizing Winter Nitrate Formation Using CMAQ Process Analysis Charles Stanier – University of Iowa CENTER FOR GLOBAL AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Background Based on the work in –Yoo Jung Kim, S.N. Spak, G.R. Carmichael, N. Riemer, C.O. Stanier. Modeled aerosol nitrate formation pathways during wintertime in the Great Lakes region of North America. J. Geophys. Res., vol. 119, no. 21, pp –12445, doi /2014JD022320, Charles Stanier and Yoo Jung Kim have given a number of presentations on nitrate formation visualized through process analysis. These visualizations might be useful in atmospheric chemistry classes, so we are putting the powerpoints up there. Please use with the attribution: “Kim, Yoo Jung, et al. J. Geophys. Res. 2014; used with permission of Charles Stanier, Univ. or Iowa”. Questions – please contact Charles Stanier Sept 9, 2010IDNR Workgroup - Stanier 2

3 LADCO Winter Nitrate Study (Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2009)

Nitrate formation analysis by process analysis NO 2 + OH  HNO 3 (b) NO 2 + O 3  NO 3 + O 2 (a) NO 3 + NO 2 ↔ N 2 O 5 (c) NO 3 + VOC  organic products(g) N 2 O 5 + H 2 O(g)  2HNO 3 (d) N 2 O 5 + H 2 O(l)  2HNO 3 (e) RH and composition dependent accommodation coefficient, uncertain Daytime Nighttime

Model Configuration U of Iowa Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) v4.7.1 –CB05 gas phase / AERO5 aerosol module –ACM2 PBL closure –Mass-conserving advection –35 vertical layers LADCO’s 12 km regional modeling grid –Hourly boundary conditions from a 36 km simulation (with the same configuration) covering the continental United States. Meteorology –WRF with the RPO configuration selected by Iowa DNR, SESARM, and LADCO –ACM2 PBL closure –Pleim-Xu land surface module –RRTM radiation –Morrison microphysics –Kain-Fritsch cumulus –NARR 3-hourly met for initial and boundaries –Analysis nudging on NARR above the PBL, horizontal winds used for observational nudging in the PBL Emissions –LADCO’s 2007 emissions inventory used for 12km domain. –Day-specific biomass burning emissions from MODIS fire detection products. Process Analysis –Chemical and process rates stored for all layers up to 550 m, with focus on NOy processing and N2O5 heterogeneous chemistry

6 Mean total nitrate Jan – Mar CMAQ. µg / m 3

7 Reactio n ReactantsProducts R1NO 2 + hνNO + O R3O 3 + NONO 2 R4O + NO 2 NO R5O + NO 2 NO 3 R6O + NONO 2 R7NO 2 + O 3 NO 3 R14NO 3 NO 2 + O R15NO 3 NO R16NO 2 + NO2 NO 2 R17NO 3 + NO 2 NO + NO 2 R18NO 3 + NO 2 N2O5N2O5 R19N 2 O 5 + H 2 O2 HNO 3 R20N 2 O 5 + H 2 O + H 2 O2 HNO 3 R21N2O5N2O5 NO 3 + NO 2 R22NO + NO + O 2 2 NO 2 R23NO + NO 2 + H2OHONO R24NO + OHHONO R25HONONO + OH R26OH + HONONO 2 R27HONO + HONONO + NO 2 R28NO 2 + OHHNO 3 R29OH + HNO 3 NO 3 R30HO 2 + NOOH + NO 2 R31HO 2 + NO 2 PNA R32PNAHO 2 + NO 2 R33OH + PNANO 2 R46NO 3 + ONO 2 R47NO 3 + OHHO 2 + NO 2 R48NO 3 + HO 2 HNO 3 R49NO 3 + O 3 NO 2 R50NO 3 + NO 3 2 NO 2 R51PNA0.61HO NO OH NO 3 R52HNO 3 OH + NO 2 R53N2O5N2O5 NO 2 + NO 3 R89PANC 2 O 3 + NO 2 R90PANC 2 O 3 + NO 2 Integrated Reaction Rate Analysis

8 Daytime pathway (µmole/m 2 -day) Nighttime pathway (µmole/m 2 -day) Homogeneous nighttime pathway (µmole/m 2 -day) Heterogeneous nighttime pathway (µmole/m 2 -day) Through model layer 20 (~3.15 km)

9 DaytimeNighttime Total Nighttime Fraction

10 Aerosol Nitrate Fraction x10 Dotted = nighttime period. Solid = daytime. Mayville episode buildup periods N2O5 x 100 (ppb) Nitric Acid (ug/m3) Nitrate Aerosol (ug/m3) O 3 /10 Gas Ratio Total Ammonia NH3(g) OH+NO2 (day) N2O5 pathways (night)

11 Reservoir in µmole N / m 2. Fluxes are in µmole N / m 2 -hr. Black lines Aerosol process Horizontal advection and diffusion Vertical advection and diffusion Emissions DDEP a: net NO 3 radical formation c: net N 2 O 5 formation g: HNO 3 formation from the NO 3 radical Colored lines b: NO 2 + OH → HNO 3 d: homogenous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Flux e: heterogeneous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Milwaukee Day

12 Reservoir in µmole N / m 2. Fluxes are in µmole N / m 2 -hr. Black lines Aerosol process Horizontal advection and diffusion Vertical advection and diffusion Emissions DDEP a: net NO 3 radical formation c: net N 2 O 5 formation g: HNO 3 formation from the NO 3 radical Colored lines b: NO 2 + OH → HNO 3 d: homogenous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Flux e: heterogeneous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Milwaukee Night

13 Reservoir in µmole N / m 2. Fluxes are in µmole N / m 2 -hr. Black lines Aerosol process Horizontal advection and diffusion Vertical advection and diffusion Emissions DDEP a: net NO 3 radical formation c: net N 2 O 5 formation g: HNO 3 formation from the NO 3 radical Colored lines b: NO 2 + OH → HNO 3 d: homogenous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Flux e: heterogeneous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Mayville Day

14 Reservoir in µmole N / m 2. Fluxes are in µmole N / m 2 -hr. Black lines Aerosol process Horizontal advection and diffusion Vertical advection and diffusion Emissions DDEP a: net NO 3 radical formation c: net N 2 O 5 formation g: HNO 3 formation from the NO 3 radical Colored lines b: NO 2 + OH → HNO 3 d: homogenous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Flux e: heterogeneous formation of HNO 3 from N 2 O 5 Mayville Night