Target Practice with AMAOs 1, 2, 3. AMAOs 1,2,3 District level targets for EL under Title III Accountability They show how all of the EL in a cohort are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

ELD Institute Practicum Rigorous ELD Instruction Using Enhanced Into English! Lessons.
1 The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California’s Implementation of No Child Left Behind Coachella Valley Unified School District Dr. Paul Grafton.
1 Title III Access to Core Instructional Coach AMEEL NOOS Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
IUSD English Learner Program October, The English Learner Master Plan is….. A companion piece to the Strategic Plan A description of the procedures,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAOs are achievement objectives for English learners that corporations must meet that receive Title III funds.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
Post-Test Data Analysis Workshop. Agenda I. Analyze 2014 TerraNova Results II. Comparative Data Analysis: TerraNova & Explore Test Results III. Using.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
1 Session 1: Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) Title III Access to Core Professional.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Sartorette School 2015 School Plan/Local Control Accountability Plan.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives. Thompson School District Core Values Integrity –We will consistently demonstrate respect, honesty, transparency,
English Learner PLC Workshop Grossmont union high school district English Learner Programs March 24, 2009.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Silvia C. Dorta-Duque de Reyes San Diego County Office of Education
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Progress Report for English Language Learners Narrowing the Gap October 2006.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
BERRY SCHOOL CST RESULTS. BERRY English Language Arts 2012/2013 CST Comparison Percent Proficient – All Students.
1 Session 1: Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) Title III Access to Core Professional.
DELAC DISTRICT ENGLISH LEARNER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARCH 15, 2010.
English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) and the Title III Year 4 Plan Montague Charter Academy for the Arts and Sciences Prepared and Presented.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
California Assessment of STUDENT PERFORMANCE and PROGRESS
Student Achievement and School Support Division
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
San Leandro USD DELAC Meeting
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Reclassification: Fluent English Proficient
CELDT MOVEMENT BY LEVELS
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
English Learning Meeting June 12th, :00 – 2:15 pm
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Target Practice with AMAOs 1, 2, 3

AMAOs 1,2,3 District level targets for EL under Title III Accountability They show how all of the EL in a cohort are achieving in either: –AMAO 1: Making at least one year’s growth on CELDT –AMAO 2: Becoming English Proficient within a reasonable amount of time –AMAO 3: Being competitive with peers by meeting academic expectations on CST in ELA and Math »Paul Gale, Ph.D.

District Level AMAO’s Do… Tap into a district’s vision of English Learner programming. Highlight overall programming emphasis and whether it is effective: –With student’s initial language growth –With getting EL students proficient –With getting EL students to be academically successful »Paul Gale, Ph.D.

District Level AMAOs Do Not… Show how well an EL program is working at specific sites, at specific grade levels, with particular EL levels or with particular teachers. One must delve deeper into each AMAO and go directly into the classroom to observe which strategies are being used and determine if these strategies are used appropriately. »Paul Gale, PhD

Title III Accountability Report Go to Use pull down menu for “Level” to choose “District” Use the pull down menu for “Subject” to choose “Title III Accountability” Chose Year, is most recent report Choose “Submit”

AMAO 1 Expectations Is the percent of English learners that move from one overall level to the next as measured by the CELDT B EI I EA A Do you know the Target Expectation for 2009? Do you know the Target Expectation for 2009?

AMAO 1 Column 1a: Enter the number of all EL students taking the pre- & post- CELDT from the CDE report. Column 1b: Enter the actual spring 2007 % of EL students who achieved this AMAO. Column 1c: Enter the number of EL students who achieved this AMAO in spring –Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

AMAO 2 Column 2a: Enter the AMAO 1 target % percentage that must make yearly progress. Column 2b: Calculate the number of students this % percentage represents. Multiply the number of students in column 1a times the % percentage in column 2a. Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

Calculating the GAP Column 3a: Subtract column 2b from column 1c. –If negative, then the district made AMAO 1 target –If positive, this is the amount of EL students that must make one PL gain. Calculate the % percentage by dividing column 3a by 1a. Break it down further by simple distribution Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

Divide and Conquer Column 4: Enter the number of schools in your district Column 5: Divide the results of 3a by the number of schools in column 4. Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

Example AMAO 1 1a1b1c2a2b3a3b45 Studen ts taking CELDT % Achieve AMAO # Achieve AMAO What Should be Spring 2009? 1a x 2a Gap c-2b Gap % 3a divided by 1a # of Schools Simple Distribution N%N%NN%NN

AMAO 2 Expectation Is the percent of English learners that reach proficiency level as measured by the CELDT Any students who have been Els or four years must become proficient. + Do you know the Target Expectation for 2009?

AMAO 2 Column 1a: Enter the Total EL cohort from your calculations above. Column 1b: Enter the actual spring 2008% of EL students who achieved the AMAO 2. Column 1c: Calculate the number of EL students who achieved this AMAO 2 in spring 2008 by multiplying Column 1a by Column 1b. Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

AMAO 2 Column 2a: Enter the AMAO 2 target % percentage needing to make yearly progress. Column 2b: Calculate the number of students this % percentage represents. –Multiply the number of students in column 1a times the % percentage in column 2a –Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

Calculating the GAP Column 3a: Subtract column 2b from Column 1c. If the result is negative, then the district has met its AMAO 2 target for this period. If the result is positive, this is the amount of EL students that need to move to level 4 or 5 in order to achieve its AMAO 2 target. Break it down further by simple distribution Lynne Aoki, Region 10 T3Y4 Consultant

AMAO 2 1a1b1c2a2b3a3b45 Students taking CELDT % Achieve AMAO # Achieve AMAO What Should be Spring 2009 target? What Should be Spring 2009? 1a x 2a Gap c – 2b 3a divided by 1a # of Schools in DIstrict Simple Distribution N%N%NN%NN

AMAO 3 Is the percent proficient for the English Learner subgroup as measured by the CST for both English language arts (ELA) and Math A significant subgroup in Ca. is considered 100 students Do you know the Target Expectation for 2009?

Talk to your neighbor… Discuss what relevance this information has to your district, sites and future planning meetings with administrators?