SiD Tracking Status Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F1 Contribution to ILC Vertex Detector Tobias Haas 23 Febuary 2005.
Advertisements

Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
7 June 2006 SLAC DOE Review M. Breidenbach 1 KPiX & EMCal SLAC –D. Freytag –G. Haller –R. Herbst –T. Nelson –mb Oregon –J. Brau –R. Frey –D. Strom BNL.
Progress towards a Long Shaping-Time Readout for Silicon Strips Bruce Schumm SCIPP & UC Santa Cruz SLAC LCWS05 July 28-31, 2004.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
Progress towards a Long Shaping-Time Readout for Silicon Strips Bruce Schumm SCIPP & UC Santa Cruz SLAC LCWS05 July 28-31, 2004.
Vertex Detector Mechanics Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
Drift Chambers Drift Chambers are MWPCs where the time it takes for the ions to reach the sense wire is recorded. This time info gives position info:
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
1 The ILD LoI IDAG Referees for ILD Benchmarking – J.A. Hewett, W.G. Li Tracking – R. Nickerson Calorimetry – D. Green MDI – T. Himmel.
IDAG Tracking Review  Groups have not yet submitted LOI  Avoid ‘temptation’ to regard as a Technical Design Review  Rules Specified –leave groups to.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
SiD Tracking Simulation: Status and Plans Richard Partridge for the SiD Tracking Group Vancouver Linear Collider Workshop July 19-22, 2006.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Silicon Tracking Systems in Mokka Framework Valeri Saveliev, Obninsk State University.
Preparing for the SiD LoI SiD Parallel Session TILC08 March 5, 2008 John Jaros.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
How we’re organizing ourselves Rich Partridge, Marcel Demarteau for the Tracking Group SiD Advisory Meeting December 11, 2006 Tracking Review at Beijing.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
ILD Optimization Why – when – what Ties Behnke, DESY Henri Videau, LLR.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Momentum resolution study of LDC 6 th SiLC meeting, Torino, Dec M. Regler, M. Valentan Interplay of TPC and SET: influence on the momentum.
New LDC optimization studies... ILD Workshop, DESY-Zeuthen, 14–16 Jan M. Regler, M. Valentan presented by W. Mitaroff New LDC optimization studies.
Overview of SiD Tracking Rob Kutschke,Fermilab LSWS07 June 1, 2007 (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
May 31th, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Tracking Studies in the 4 th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E. Cavallo.
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
How to Get Involved in SiD Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC LCWS 07.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
Tracking in a TPC D. Karlen / U. Victoria & TRIUMF for the LCTPC collaboration.
EMCal Sensor Status (* M. Breidenbach*,
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Silicon Tracking / Silicon Readout R&D Richard Partridge SLAC / Brown.
Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford ILC VD Workshop, Menaggio 22 April 2008 SiD Vertex Detector.
SiD Vertexing and Tracking Contribution to the LOI Bill Cooper Marcel Demarteau Ron Lipton Rich Partridge Dong Su For the SiD Vertex/Tracking Group SiD.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
VLCW06, July 23, 2006 H.Weerts Vancouver, CA 1 Where YOU can contribute in SiD. H.Weerts Argonne National Lab for SiD concept design study.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson,
Hybrid CMOS strip detectors J. Dopke for the ATLAS strip CMOS group UK community meeting on CMOS sensors for particle tracking , Cosenors House,
How to organize ourselves Rich Partridge, Marcel Demarteau for the Tracking Group SiD Tracking Meeting December 8, 2006 Tracking Review at Beijing.
Durham TB R. Frey1 ECal R&D in N. America -- Test Beam Readiness/Plans Silicon-tungsten SLAC, Oregon, Brookhaven (SOB) Scintillator tiles – tungsten U.
SiD R&D Plan and Opportunities for New Collaborators
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
Upgrade Tracker Simulation Studies
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
SiD Tracking What’s Next?
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
SiD Electronic Concepts
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
SiD Tracker Concepts M. Breidenbach
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
Presentation transcript:

SiD Tracking Status Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting

Richard Partridge2 Overview u An all-silicon tracker is a distinguishing feature for SiD Silicon pixel vertex detector Silicon strip outer tracker u Many advantages to our choice Superior momentum resolution where it matters (i.e., high p T ) Low occupancy, excellent 2-hit resolution allows efficient tracking in dense jets Single bunch timing minimizes effect of machine backgrounds Si strips  compact tracker  5T field  reduced VTX inner radius Highly integrated tracker design with excellent forward tracking capabilities Mature and proven technology u …and a few areas where brand X may have an advantage A TPC will probably be better at finding tracks from K S /  decays and kinks A gaseous tracker will probably have less material in the central tracking volume TPC provides particle ID at low momentum Does any of this really matter for the ILC physics program?

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge3 Baseline Tracker Layout u 5 barrel layers of axial strips u 4 forward disks / end with stereo strips u Pin-wheel design with z overlaps u Carbon fiber/rohacell support cylinders/disks

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge4 Another Perspective Barrel tracker layout in GEANT simulation

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge5 Tracker Module Design u Highly modular design u Each module has 1 or 2 sensors mounted on a support frame u Each sensor is readout independently u Modules overlap to eliminate projective cracks u Modules clip into holders mounted on support structure

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge6 Sensor Submission u A prototype sensor has been submitted to Hamamatsu 25  m strip pitch, 50  m readout pitch Double metal layer routes strips to readout chip that is bump bonded to sensor Double metal layer also used to route power and readout traces to chip u Submission also includes two test structures Small sensor for testing power / data routing using prototype readout chips DC coupled sensor using charge division to measure longitudinal coordinate

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge7 Readout Chip u Baseline readout chip is KPiX 1024 channel chip planned 4 analog buffers./ channel Same chip as calorimeter readout? u Recent KPiX beam test KPiX wire bonded to CDF L00 Sensor Exposed to electrons at SLAC ESA Charged particle signal observed u LSTFE-2 (Santa Cruz) First version showed good noise performance Time over threshold readout chip u Deep submicron chip (Paris) Considerable success in developing prototype readout chip in 0.09  m process The future is getting smaller…

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge8 Pigtail Cable Design (U. New Mexico)

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge9 Power Delivery Issues u These need to be investigated!! u Need to switch ~10kA on / 5 Hz for power cycling u Large Lorentz forces on conductors u Net force on tracker must be 0, but potential for substantial internal forces and torques Forces are not static – power cycling will generate impulses at 5 Hz Will these forces / torques cause the tracker to vibrate? u How do we bring power in? Probably don’t want to bring in 10kA at 2.5 V Serial powering of multiple readout chips? Capacitive DC-DC converter for each readout chip? u These issues need to be investigated!! Good opportunity for someone who wants to take on a SiD tracking project

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge10 Alignment and Position Monitoring u For ~10,000 sensors, there are ~60,000 alignment constants Track based alignment is probably the only method that will meet our goal of 7  m hit position resolution Scale of problem overwhelms usual matrix inversion algorithms New algorithms have been developed for CMS – need to learn about this! u Track-based alignment requires detector positions to be stable or well monitored over long intervals u Problem has a number of different aspects Relative alignment of sensors in a tracker barrels / disks Relative position between barrel / disk layers Relative position between tracker and vertex detector Relative position of tracking systems relative to beam spot Reproducibility of positioning during push-pull operation u Likely there is not a single solution to all problems

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge11 Beam and non-Beam Testing u Need to test critical aspects of SiD tracker design u Some expected tests include: Noise / cross-talk / performance of double metal design Verification of hit position resolution Electrical and mechanical aspects of power pulsing in 5T field Mechanical properties of prototype support structures u Beijing tracking review recommended a large bore solenoid for beam testing to be shared between the silicon and TPC groups If this was free, that would be great! If expensive, then we need to identify our true magnet needs Do we really need a big bore? What tests are best done in beam? What are best done optically? u What sort of system/slice tests are needed for the detector EDR? u What tests are needed to make technology choices?

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge12 Simulations u Lots of progress in developing full tracking simulations u Immediate goal is to deliver a first tracking package that can be used by non-experts Likely to have some level of cheating in first pass (for example, in pattern recognition) As infrastructure advances, increase fidelity of simulation Output – namely track objects – will remain the same so we don’t break user code based on top of the tracking package u Two approaches to segmentation Virtual segmentation of disks and cylinders allows quick exploration of the parameter space Full segmentation into planar sensors allows more thorough and detailed studies Likely that both will be important

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge13 Tracking R&D Summary SystemWork PackageInstitutions Mechanical Mechanical Support DesignFermilab, SLAC, Washington Module DesignFermilab, SLAC Frequency Scanning InterferometryMichigan Sensor Double Metal SensorFermilab, SLAC, Tokyo Thin SiliconPurdue Sensor Characterization and TestingNew Mexico, SLAC Readout KPiX ReadoutDavis, Oregon, SLAC Time Over Threshold ReadoutSanta Cruz Charge Division ReadoutBrown, Santa Cruz CableTracker KPiX CableNew Mexico, SLAC Simulation Simulation InfrastructureFermilab, Kansas State, Oregon, SLAC Vertex Seeded TrackingBrown, Colorado, Fermilab, Oregon, Santa Cruz Stand Alone TrackingFermilab, Santa Cruz, SLAC Calorimeter Assisted TrackingKansas State (Bonn) Fitting and ResolutionOregon, Santa Cruz, SLAC

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge14 Tracking Perspective for the LOI u We like to see the LOI as a mile post along the road to an EDR u Certainly it is important to put out a compelling LOI u Nevertheless, the long term goal is producing the EDR u Minimize dead-end efforts that divert us from the overall objective of getting ready for the EDR u Describe the SiD tracker technology choice, design, R&D status, and simulated performance as obtained with the tools being developed for an EDR

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge15 Towards the LOI u Technology choice: silicon u Motivated layout of the detector General layout Description of detector geometry, including number and locations of barrel and forward tracking layers Average number of measurement planes intersected by infinite momentum particle as function of angle Material budget as function of angle Particle densities for background and physics processes Motivates technology choice in certain regions: pixels versus strips Segmentation and tiling Longitudinal segmentation in barrel Tiling in forward region Occupancies (averaged over full layer and peak occupancy in jet core) Detailed detector description Describe baseline design and possible alternatives Sensors, readout, modules, mechanical supports, cables, alignment, power, etc. Some of this may need to be in a supplementary document

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge16 Performance Characterization – Step 1 u Characterization of performance using traditional metrics Momentum resolution as function of p T and angle Impact parameter resolution as function of p T and angle Track finding efficiency as function of p T and angle Isolated tracks as function of angle Inside jet cores: Z-> 500 GeV as function of angle K S efficiency Fake rate as function of angle and momentum u Goal is to have all infrastructure in place by SiD Workshop planned for Jan. ’08 with a first pass at characterization of detector performance

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge17 Performance Characterization – Step 2 u Move towards benchmark physics processes: develop the metrics that measures physics performance Physics will apply a non-uniform weighting to the traditional metrics Inefficiency at high momentum more critical than at low momentum Weighting may depend on physics For example, leptonic ZH heavily weights momentum resolution Characterization of performance using physics benchmark processes u Some potential tracking benchmark processes ZH missing mass distribution H   mass resolution b/c tagging efficiency in Higgs decays Acollinearity of forward Bhabhas (luminosity spectrum) Long-lived charged particles (e.g., GM SUSY) Need some good ideas for forward benchmarks

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge18 Design Optimization u Optimize the design using traditional metrics and / or physics benchmarks as appropriate Effect of adding a 6th layer / 5th disk Effect of >0 barrel stereo layers Determine weak spots in the mechanical design and re-optimize u Optimize integrated detector performance What is needed for good PFA performance? Impact of long-lived secondaries Impact of inefficiency and fakes Impact of material u In parallel Continue working out in more detail and optimizing the design Continue a vigorous R&D program to meet requirements for an EDR

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge19 For More Information on SiD Tracking u See Tim Nelson’s talk in the ALCPG plenary session u A reasonably current report was prepared for the Beijing Review: u Get on the SiD tracking mailing list Send to Marcel or myself and we will add you to the u Attend the SiD tracking /vertexing meeting Friday, 11 AM Fermilab time

Fermilab ALCPG Meeting Richard Partridge20 Conclusions u The SiD Tracking effort is founded on a few key principles Take full advantage of the superb hit resolution, two-track separation, design flexibility, and timing properties offered by silicon strip detectors to provide robust tracking capability that meets the ILC physics goals Aggressively work to minimize the material in the tracking volume Optimize the tracker as one element of an integrated detector design u A comprehensive R&D program has been put in place to perform the R&D required to succeed in this effort This program is unlikely to be static, as historically we have benefited by the rapid pace of advances in semiconductor manufacturing technology u The LOI is an important milestone for SiD Tracking Goal is an optimized design based on full simulation of both traditional metrics and physics benchmarks