Federal Aviation Administration 0 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, 2011 0 Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Hazard Assessment Steve Summer Federal Aviation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Fuel Cell Flammability Fuel Cartridge Assessment Intl Aircraft Systems Fire Wkg Grp Harry Webster.
Advertisements

E-Tablet Fire Tests Systems Meeting FAA Fire Safety [1]
Federal Aviation Administration 0 The Impact of Synthetic Fuels on FAA Flammability Requirements June 24, The Impact of Low Flashpoint Fuels on.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Accident Investigation Root Cause Analysis
Lithium Metal and Lithium-ion Battery Packaging Development 2014.
Avionics. jobs
Presented to: Icing Weather Information Exchange Location: NCAR, Boulder, CO By: Mark Mutchler Date: November 2013 Federal Aviation Administration Using.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada.
Accident Summary Cargo smoke warning during approach to PHL Smoke filled cockpit after landing Crew evacuated via slide at left forward (L1) door Major.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
Oint Aviation Authorities June 2004OST 04-2, Helsinki1 TGL No. 36 Approval of Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) Georges Rebender – JAA Operations Director.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium Batteries for Aircraft Usage May 11, Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium.
State of the Art of Fuel Tank Ullage Oxygen Concentration Measurement William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Lithium Ion Battery Cells – Risks and Hazards ICAO FAA Fire Safety LiCoO2.432Wh LiCoO2.
Class C Cargo Compartment ULD Suppression Agent Penetration Test
Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Recent Safety Recommendations from Aircraft Accident Investigation Authorities Sources: Korean Aircraft and.
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
EVS-GTR TF5 Update Progress TF5 task force – thermal propagation 2015/6/4.
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB)
Federal Aviation Administration FAA Fire Safety Branch September FRM: Nitrogen System Validation Federal Aviation Administration AAR-440 Fire Safety.
Presented by: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAA Flight Standards: Weather in the Cockpit Guidance and Policy Roger Sultan AFS-430 December 18,
Fuel Tank Inerting Joint Airbus/FAA, A320 Flight Tests
PRBA – The Rechargeable Battery Association
Full Scale Battery Fire Test Plan
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
FUELING OPERATIONS. AIRCRAFT FUELING JET Fuel – Turbine Engine AV Gas – Piston Engine.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen,
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB)
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Minimum Safe Altitude Warning November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael Air Traffic Manager, Boston ARTCC.
FAA R&D Efforts Leading to Fuel Tank Inerting
Statement of Capabilities November 2001 Management Consulting Services Technical Support Federal Aviation Administration Proxtronics is responsible to.
Course ILT Safety Unit objectives Identify safety issues and hazards in the computer environment Identify ways to avoid injury and strain when working.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Transport of Lithium Batteries in Carry-on and Checked Luggage Systems working group meeting Harry.
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. Atlantic City, NJ By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Test for Thermal/Acoustic Insulation 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire.
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration November 17-18, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
FAA CRASHWORTHINESS RESEARCH PROGRAM
Reticulated Foam Advantages: 100% protection Passive System
Lithium Batteries Fuel Cells
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System
Federal Aviation Administration Halon 1211 Stratification/ Localization in Aircraft Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
NFPA ELECTRIC VEHICLE SAFETY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS Module V : Emergency Operations Module V : Emergency Operations 5-1.
Halon Contamination SIB R1 Deletain Rémi Powerplant Installation & Fuel Systems Certification Directorate Novembre 2011.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Special Conditions for Passenger Airplanes,
October 30-31, 2002 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center Wing Fuel Tank During.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Presented by: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAA Weather in the Cockpit Guidance and Policy Roger Sultan AFS-430 July 22, 2014.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 Preliminary Results of FAA Fuel Tank Inerting Flight Testing on the NASA.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Fuel Cell Fire Test Plan Systems Working Group Meeting Harry Webster, FAA Fire Safety Team April.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Low Fuel Load Flammability Work International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada February.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer.
Federal Aviation Administration CAA Training Videos Development Richard Hill Program Manager, Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Nitrogen Inerting Requirements – A Lit. Review International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Wing Tank Flammability Testing William Cavage Steven Summer AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration International.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Rotorcraft VFR Part 91 Operations Pilot Certification & Operating Rules Aircraft Electronics Association.
electronic information management device replacement paper documents moving map, operation manuals Electronic flight bag.
Batteries as Integral Part of Equipment
Flammable and combustible liquids
Installation of Non-Required Equipment
A. Touching both terminals with the hands can cause electrical shock
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
Fire in the hold Disclaimer: this safety moment is designed to prevent similar incidents occurring. All guidance herein is provided in good faith and.
Presentation transcript:

Federal Aviation Administration 0 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Hazard Assessment Steve Summer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ November 17, 2011

Federal Aviation Administration 1 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Background EFBs are electronic devices used to replace the paper materials typically found in the pilot’s Flight Bag. They are divided into three classes: Class I – Portable electronic device (PED), Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) equipment, used as loose equipment and stowed during portions of flight Class II – PED, can be COTS equipment, mounted and connected to aircraft power during flight for use and charging. Class III – Considered installed equipment, these are not PED, or COTS equipment, but rather are pieces of equipment built and tested specifically for aircraft EFB use.

Federal Aviation Administration 2 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Background Class I EFBs are considered portable electronic devices (PEDs) and are not subject to airworthiness standards. Class II EFBs are also considered PEDs, and are not subject to airworthiness standards, however their mounting/charging connection hardware are. Class III EFBs are subject to airworthiness standards, as they are considered installed equipment. Responsibility for class I and class II EFBs falls under FAA flight standards

Federal Aviation Administration 3 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Proposed Testing A brief set of tests is planned to assess the potential hazard posed by class I and class II EFBs. Laptop outfitted with a high capacity (7.2 Ah) Li-Ion battery will be installed in cockpit of FAA Fire Safety 737. Battery has been modified, replacing one of the battery cells with a small cartridge heater, used to initiate thermal runaway. Thermocouples placed on the cartridge heater, and one adjacent battery cell. Smoke meter installed across pilot and co-pilot stations. Gas sampling (CO, CO 2, O 2 ) locations at pilot and co-pilot stations.

Federal Aviation Administration 4 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Proposed Testing Laptop will be placed in the cockpit within a mesh cage to prevent any damage to aircraft. In addition, all flammable material (carpeting, seat cushions, etc) from the cockpit has been removed. Two test scenarios will be conducted and documented (filmed): Resulting fire will be extinguished immediately following first battery event. Subsequent events of adjacent batteries will be monitored. Resulting fire will be allowed to continue for as long as possible without endangering the aircraft. Video of test, along with smoke and gas concentration data should provide a good assessment of what hazard is being introduced into the cockpit through the use of EFBs.