Neutrino Beam MC We propose to adopt ‘jnubeam’ as the official T2K code for flux calculation. –It is well established and almost ready for flux calculation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
Advertisements

Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Ozgur Ates Hampton University TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design” And OLYMPUS Experiment “Study of Systematics” 1.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
Simulation Project Major achievements (past 6 months 2007)
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Beamline Takashi Kobayashi 1 Global Analysis Meeting Nov. 29, 2007.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Responsibility on Next Beam Test Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
Current Status and Possible Items around ‘neutrino beam’ Horn Target Remote maintenance tools Decay volume window and collimator muon monitor Many items.
Near Detector Report International Scoping Study Detector Meeting 4 July 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Beam MC progresses for beam MC sub-group. Summary of update in 09b,c,10a 09b Geometry of baffle, target, 1st horn, dump and MUMON is updated. 09c MUMON.
Interaction Length A. Murakami. L = (interaction length of proton in carbon by PDG) change of constant : means uncertainty of L (change 0.8, 0.9,
1 of 14 NuMI Beam Flux Sacha E. Kopp University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin – 41 University of Southern California – 38.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.
Kaons in the SPL Superbeam Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de L’accélérateur Linéaire.
04/06/07I.Larin pi0 systematic error 1  0 error budget Completed items (review) Updated and new items (not reported yet) Items to be completed.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Horns, Hadron production etc. (from hadron production to neutrino beam) A.K.Ichikawa KEK 200/9/26 Study on horns Changing -beam energy Hadron.
BNL neutrino beam. Optimization and simulations Milind Diwan June 10.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
Measuring Neutrino Oscillations with the T2K Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL Dec-2011.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)
Mitchell Yu Carol Guimaraes Arturo Fiorentini York University 2013/11/22 NuStorm Near Detector Flux Study.
BSM Group Activities DUNE Collaboration Meeting –ND Physics Jan. 14, 2016 Jae Yu Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
T2K neutrino oscillation results Kei Ieki for the T2K collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute 2014/2/22 1 ν T okai K amioka.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Current Status of the T2K Experiment Ryan Terri (for the T2K Collaboration) 31 May – 4 June 2010 Planck 2010, CERN.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Characterization of muon beam in T2K with emulsion detectors A. Ariga, T. Ariga, C. Pistillo AEC-LHEP University of Bern 1.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
1 Temp Otani Murakami 2010/8/17 1.Monte Carlo simulation 2.Summary of 10a beam DATA 3.Comparison DATA and MC 4.Syst. error study.
The CERN Near Detector(s) initiative
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
Update of the Fiducial calibration study in 2km WC detector
Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison
MUMON / emulsion total flux uncertainty
Stability (fitted beam center)
Neutrino Beam Profile Measurement
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Update of RG-A Hadron Structure Analyses
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Neutrino Beam MC We propose to adopt ‘jnubeam’ as the official T2K code for flux calculation. –It is well established and almost ready for flux calculation except for some missing geometry. –Fluxes for ND280 and Super-K are already distributed as ‘07a’. Both nu and anti-nu. The beam group will take the responsibility to maintain the code, do necessary upgrades and to distribute the neutrino flux files. It is managed by a CVS server at KEK. This is very convenient for us, so we want to keep the server at KEK. The version is now tagged like ’07a’. We can follow the GANG guideline for gagging if necessary.

Task lists Minimal In addition to mass production and version control, –Geometry update (within ’09?) Striplines are missing. –NA61 inclusion (w/ NA61-T2K group) –Error estimation for flux and/or far-to-near extrapolation. Integration of the Information from NA61, primary beam monitor, alignment of the beamline equipment, MUMON, INGRID is necessary. –Define variables to be attached to each event In future? – Framework update? (C++ w/ GEANT3, Geant4) If there are rational reasons.

Working group Beam MC sub-working group will be made under the beam group. Maybe during the next pre-meeting, we can have a meeting to establish this sub group and make a mailing list to share information.

supplement

T2K Flux 07a A. K. Ichikawa

Main Changes since 04a Decay Volume was shortened from 130m to 110m. Target diameter was reduced from 30mm to 26mm. Realistic geometry of the Target Station He chamber is incorporated.

 Flux at Super-K Ep = 30GeV, Off-Axis 2.5 degree. 5yr = 8.33E21 POT, which corresponds to 5E21 POT at 50GeV.  anti   e anti- e

anti-  Flux at Super-K Ep = 30GeV 5yr = 8.33E21 POT, which corresponds to 5E21 POT at 50GeV. anti-   anti- e e anti-  flux with opposite horn polarity  flux with nominal horn polarity

Comparison with 04a 04a(40GeV) 07a The peak is decreased by 10%. The origin of this decrease was checked and it is found that it dominantly comes from shorter decay volume.