Action Research: Resistance to Computer Training Suzanne Stear BTST 656 – May 8, 2013
Area of Focus The purpose of this study is to: Describe and identify the areas of resistance to computer training in a corporate setting Incorporate solutions to help prevent individual resistance
Concept Map – C onnections to Resistance Confidence Resistance Motivation Relevance Value (Transfer to job) Delivery Method New Employee Upper Management
Triangulation Matrix Data Source Research Questions:123 What is the relevance (why employee needs to learn application) of the computer training? Interview Questionnaire Literature – Web information, journal articles, and text book What is the value (transfer to job position) of the computer training? InterviewQuestionnaire Literature – Web information, journal articles, and text book What is the trainee’s motivation level (readiness to learn)? InterviewQuestionnaire Literature – Web information, journal articles, and text book What are strategies to resistance for successful learning? InterviewQuestionnaireLiterature – Web information, journal articles, and text book
Literature Review - Relevance Relevance - Strategies to avoid and overcome resistance Quality of training design Positive relationships Improve learner competency – challenging experiences Practice using application - proficiency
Personal Experience - Relevance Relevance Strategies Pre-assessment Overview that informs trainees of: What they can expect Relevance Value to diminish resistance
Literature Review - Value Value and Transfer to job Vital element – valuable training to use in job position Organization support Provide training to remain current and proficient
Value Design Training design needs to be: Engaging Leads to new learning Practice for retention
Additional Value Strategies Incentives for levels of advancement Self-customized projects Resources – that benefit others Templates, forms, documents, and presentations
Literature Review – Motivation Strategies Self-efficacy – person’s judgment about their ability to learn Positive learning environment + Positive reinforcement to learning = Positive results and increased self-efficacy Accommodate for those with higher anxiety Pairing or grouping trainees Pre-assessment
At This Point Stop periodically in data collection to identify gaps: Additional matrix question Valid questions for survey RethinkReflect Discuss ReplanUnderstand Learn
Methodology Qualitative - Conducted 2 interviews Quantitative – Survey 15% Completion rate Sample population was 17/111
Interviews and Analysis Strategies to use from Interviews: Interview 1 – Pre-assessment of different levels and pairing Interview 2 – Collaborate with IT Provide a time line to: Inform employees of application changes When new or enhanced versions will be installed Elimination of out of date applications
Survey - Relevance of Training Concern
Survey - Relevance of Training Relevance of training for job position
Survey - Value of Training and Transfer to Job 100% application available to use at work area 58% provided with learning materials and examples Importance of materials provided Learning environment (classroom vs. online) 60% of population sample use the new training Different applications daily Incentive to use
Survey - Motivation/Self-Efficacy of Training Confidence in learning the new application 23% 46% 31%
Survey - Motivation/Self-Efficacy of Training Motivation to attend the training 14% - Very Motivated 57% - Motivated 22% - Somewhat motivated 7% - Unmotivated to attend – some concern 0% - Did not want to attend
Survey and Analysis Strategies to use from Survey: Description of training to confirm: Relevance, Value, improve job skills and productivity Provide materials and examples for reference
Most important part of project… ListeningAnalyzing the Data
Conclusion Resistance will be inevitable but... if effective training design is established and implemented trainees will be able to benefit from its value use the new learning to enhance their job performance