Tone Ishiyama & Hartlaub (2002) Syllabus study Randomly assigned students a punishing or rewarding syllabus. – Punishing: “If for some substantial reason.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
Advertisements

Meta-Cognition, Motivation, and Affect PSY504 Spring term, 2011 April 20, 2011.
Kelly Falcone & Al Trujillo
Tutorial Orientation Student Support Services TRiO Fall 2013.
Differences Between High School and College. Time Management in High School – You have a regular scheduled day from 8:10-3:35. Choosing Responsibly in.
From your English Department Advisors. The whole set is posted as one presentation entitled “Tips for New Students” in the “For Students” section. (The.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
Critical Thinking In Every Classroom Teaching Academy: New Faculty Orientation August 11, 2007.
Chapter 1 You Have Arrived A Primer on College Life Effective College Learning.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Office of the Registrar Degree Audit STARS Project.
Going to school because you want to. Setting your own course in life. Staying in school and getting good grades. Graduating and getting the “right” job!
Literature and Law: New English Major Track Proposal Pat Angley FX Gleyzon Farrah Cato Barry Mauer.
Diversity on Campus. The impact of diversity on college students Campus diversity initiatives positively affect minority & majority students Increase.
Preliminary Results of the 2004 Campus Climate Survey Dr. Roger P. Sugarman Director of Institutional Research Boone Faculty Club May 11, 2004 President’s.
Techniques for Improving Student Learning Outcomes Lynn M. Forsythe Ida M. Jones Deborah J. Kemp Craig School of Business California State University,
When the Tail Wags the Dog: Perceptions of Learning and Grade Orientations in, and by, Contemporary College Students and Faculty Howard R. Pollio University.
+ Measuring Teaching Quality in the Online Classroom Ann H. Taylor Director, Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
Accessibility Resources: An Introduction to the Memo Professor and student sitting and talking.
EAPY 677: Perspectives in Educational Psychology Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos 14 May 2009.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Influence of Instructor gender on College Achievement By: Florian Hoffmann & Philip Oreopoulos Alexandra Lanzarotta, Jessica Savoie, Nick Vetro & Nick.
Syllabus and Scheduling Kristen Traynor, Political Science Andrea Maxwell, Art History.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
1)Does females problem-solving performance diminish when they are placed in an environment in which males outnumber them? 2)Are such performance deficits.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Chapter 5 Gender Comparisons: Social Behavior, Personality, Communication, and Cognition _____________________.
Comparative Alumni Research: What Matters in College AFTER College.
When the Tail Wags the Dog: Perceptions of Learning and Grade Orientations in, and by, Contemporary College Students and Faculty Howard R. Pollio University.
Social and academic stereotypes and their Impact on students Keller (2002) Gender Schmader, Johns & Barquissau (2004) Gender Aronson, Fried & Good (2002)
Online Student Success:
An Introduction to Principles of Supplemental Instruction (SI)
©2003 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers. Study Skills Topic 1 Strategies for Success: The College System PowerPoint by JoAnn Yaworski.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
EEX 3257 COOPERATIVE LEARNING. BENEFITS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING Academic Benefits Increased achievement and increased retention of knowledge Improved.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
Online and Hybrid Course Design. Define Terms Traditional course Web Enhanced course Hybrid course Online course.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
TIPS FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING IN STEM HIGHER EDUCATION Benjamin C. Flores, Ph.D. Director, Computing and Electrical and Engineering Division MIE Project.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
1 Faculty Development Opportunities Weekly events – Institute on High Impact Pedagogical Practices – Faculty Development Workshop Series – The Pre-Tenure.
First-Year Seminars. Research Findings In short, the weight of evidence indicates that FYS participation has statistically significant and substantial,
Gender Based Education. Gender Bias u Gender affects the quantity and quality of students’ communication with teachers u Studies consistently show that.
College of Science August 20, 2013 Interactive Office Hours Agenda  What is an “office hour”?  “Interactive” defined  Role of the student.  Role of.
Yolanda Williams, MPA and Shunverie Barrientez, M.S. The University of Texas at San Antonio Las Vegas 2015 Code 1051.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Awareness of Gender Differences Creating a better Climate.
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology,
Graduate Student Academic Services (GSAS) would like to present An introduction to GradPath.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Exploring Research-based Principles of Learning and Their Connection to Teaching Dr. Susan A. Ambrose Associate Provost for Education Director, Eberly.
LO#8: EXPLAIN THE FORMATION OF STEREOTYPES AND THEIR EFFECT ON BEHAVIOR (SAQ) Stereotyping.
Computer Engineering Probation Workshop
Helen Zaikina-Montgomery, Ph.D. University of Phoenix
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Results for Faculty
Enhanced social identity as a stereotype threat intervention?
Meeting the Need for Information
Propensity Score Matching Makes Program Evaluation Easy
Inspiring the right mindsets for student success: What faculty can do
African American College Students’ Perceptions of Valuable College Experiences Relative to Academic Performance Jeanette Davis, M.Ed., PC and Cassandra.
Mr. Mize Under Graduate Graduate Bachelors in Communications (2005)
Stereotype Threat Theory and First-Generation Students:
Faculty In-Service Week
What Faculty Advisors and Deans Need to Know About Financial Aid
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Tone Ishiyama & Hartlaub (2002) Syllabus study Randomly assigned students a punishing or rewarding syllabus. – Punishing: “If for some substantial reason you cannot turn in your papers or take an exam at the scheduled time you must contact me prior to the due date, or test date, or you will be graded down 20%” – Rewarding: “If for some substantial reason you cannot turn in your papers or take an exam at the scheduled time you should contact me prior to the due date, or test date, or you will only be eligible for 80% of the total points.”

Impact of Tone continued Results – Significant difference in perceived approachability, desire to take the course – Less comfortable going to instructor with punishing wording for help First year students most affected by wording

Stereotype Threat Steele and Aronson (1995) Situational threat – different from stigma – Acute, sometimes chronic, pressure in students’ lives Needs some conditions: 1.Stereotype becomes relevant as a possible explanation of one’s performance 2.Task poses a challenge to the person 3.The outcome of the task is important to the person in terms of “self-definition”  Academic vanguard of the targeted group The person does not need to believe the stereotype

Stereotype Threat Simply activating an academic stereotype for a minority group before a test produces a decrement in performance!!

Microinequities Hall and Sandler (1982, 1993) Male students tend to get more eye contact are called on more get more praise for answers are asked more follow-up questions have their names used more and are more regularly given credit for their contributions …by generally well-meaning male AND female instructors.

Personal Interactions Seymour and Hewitt (1997) found that one of the reasons students switch from the sciences is faculty unavailability, and that, conversely, one of the variables that changed the minds of students who were thinking about switching was the intervention by a faculty member during a critical point in the student’s academic or personal life. Pascarella and Terenzini (1977) discovered that the absence of faculty contacts or the perception that those are largely formalistic exchanges is one of the determinants of student withdrawal from college.

Personal Interactions Astin (1997) “Faculty Student Orientation:” Student perceptions of whether faculty are interested in students’ academic problems are approachable outside of class treat students as persons and not as numbers care about the concerns of minority groups positively impacts self-reported critical thinking, analysis, and problem-solving skills retention percentage of students who go on to graduate school