1 Fall River Bargaining obligation incurred by successor when there is a “rebuttable presumption” of union majority status Successorship determined by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management Rights Generally based on property rights principles – Owner/s has/have right to determine how property is used – Management represents the.
Advertisements

Contract Interpretation CBA’s – Contracts Between two parties – Rules for Governing a Workplace Govern a continuing relationship between two parties “Workplace.
HRMS 8.9 Upgrade Person Model. Introduction One of the significant changes to HRMS with the upgrade to 8.9 is the new Person Model. This course provides.
Objective: Understand the six activities/functions that are critical to operating a business.
AM I REALLY REQUIRED TO BARGAIN OVER THAT %*#!!!? Douglas G. Griffin Assistant General Counsel, School Board of Broward County & Author, School Law Answer.
Labor Relations Chapter 12.
Chapter 11 Organized Labor
1 PIE Factors Demonstrating “Community of Interest”
Dana Corporation, 351 NLRB No. 28, 2007 Legal Issues – Should employees in a bargaining unit to be able to challenge an employer’s lawful voluntary recognition.
TAKING NOTICE OF RESIGNATIONS. Lottering & Others v Stellenbosch Municipality (Labour Court) A resignation involves two separate elements –the unilateral.
1 Weingarten Ee has Section 7 right to refuse to be interviewed without representative present where: –ee requests union representation –ee “reasonably.
Bargaining Unit Group of workers within a plant, firm, occupation or industry that, on the basis of commonality of interest or production process; is determined.
1 Allentown Mack Sales v. NLRB Bd’s “good faith, reasonable doubt” standard for (legal “Struksness”) polling and withdrawal of recognition is rational.
1 Allentown Mack Sales v. NLRB Bd’s “good faith, reasonable doubt” standard for (legal “Struksness”) polling and withdrawal of recognition is rational.
Labor Relations Lecture 11 – Administrative Processes in Government.
1 Epilepsy Foundation Does the Weingarten right extend to employees who are not covered by a collective agreement? May an employer discipline a non-exclusively.
Jurisdiction of the NLRB Over Arbitral Matters Typical claims of violation of NLRA and CBA – Discharge of an employee who is an elected local union officer.
1 Ex-Cell-O Notes inadequacy of Board’s remedies Limitations on Board’s Remedial Authority –May not punish respondent –May not cause irreparable harm to.
Ethical problems of organizations (part 2) Geoffrey G. Bell, PhD, CA University of Minnesota Duluth November, 2003.
NGSU Regional Councils – Feb/Mar 2014 Employment Contracts Nationwide Group Staff Union.
Employing People AS Business Studies. Aims and Objectives Aim: Understand options for start-up businesses of employing people Objectives: Define full.
Labor and Benefits Lawyers Brothers and Sisters In Arms Stuart B. Johnston, Jr. Vinson & Elkins, LLP Stuart B. Johnston, Jr. Vinson & Elkins, LLP.
AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT IN COUNTY GOVERNMENT Angie Rogers Webb & Eley, P.C. Post Office Box Montgomery, Alabama Telephone: (334)
Protected Activities Federal and state labor laws prohibit most employers from coercing, prohibiting, or otherwise interfering with employees’ protected.
Chapter 7, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Fundamentals of Management, Sixth Canadian Edition 7-1 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Canada.
Job Security and Seniority Jared Thompson Jasmine Glenn Melanie Fowler.
Labor Relations Chapter 12. Labor Relations Chapter 12.
MANPOWER PLANNING. DEFINITION PROCESS BY WHICH ANORGANISATION ENSURES THAT IT HAS THE RIGHT NUMBER AND KIND OF PEOPLE AT THE RIGHT PLACE AND AT THE RIGHT.
Safety and Health: Legal Framework Statutory – Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) of 1970 Sets uniform standards – All business affecting commerce.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Financial Statements and Business Decisions Chapter 1.
Introduction and Overview of the National Labor Relations Act: Labor Law 101 Tom O’Connor Office of Assistant General Counsel for Labor and Pension Law.
Employment Free Choice Act Robert K. Robinson, PhD, SPHR Sam Causley, PhD Dave L. Nichols, PhD, CPA The University of Mississippi.
Dana Corporation (I), 341 N.L.R.B No. 150, 2004 Should a collective bargaining relationship established pursuant to an agreement between a company and.
1 Litton Financial Printing Court balancing three conflicting doctrines –In the absence of an agreement to extend contract past the expiration date, Katz.
Law for Business Mr. Bernstein Notes, pp Unions December 19, 2014.
Burns Successorship and the NYC DBSWPA: GVS Properties, LLC, 362 NLRB No. 194 (August 27, 2015). By James G. Paulsen Regional Director National Labor Relations.
American National Insurance Not a UFLP for employer to bargain for a “management functions” clause where that clause addresses terms and conditions of.
Employer Actions in VEPCO Speech –Speech –Bulletin asking ees not to bargain through a union Conduct –Anti-union history –Interrogation of ees –Railway.
 Gender diversity refers to the variation of genes within a species. The genetic diversity enables a population to adapt to its environment and to respond.
Carolyn Mitchell. Agenda Importance of Bargaining Unit Wagner Act and Bargaining Unit NLRB Bargaining Unit Determinations Wagner Act Experience vs. Taft-Hartley.
1 INSURANCE AGENTS TWO DIFFERENT CONCEPTS OF BARGAINING –BOARD: Reasoned Discussion –COURT: “Rough and Tumble” POINT: NO INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN PRESSURE.
1 First National Maintenance: What is the Issue? Must an employer, under its duty to bargain in good faith “with respect to wages, hours, and other terms.
1 IBM Corporation An employee who is not represented by a union is not entitled to the presence of a co-worker at an interview that the employee reasonably.
Professional Behavior What Supervisors Need to Know.
HN Public Personnel Administration Unit 8 Workplace Problems and Labor Relations.
LABOR UNIONS. Key Terms 1. Labor Union – organization of workers 2. Strike – workers refuse to work a. money b. benefits 3. lockout – when owners refuse.
Richland Operations Office Labor and Pension Landscape November 17, 2015.
Management Rights Generally based on property rights principles – Owner/s has/have right to determine how property is used – Management represents the.
Levy Ratner P.C. Daniel J. Ratner Courtney Allen
AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT IN COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Bargaining Process Timeline
First Collective Agreements
Ohio’s medical marijuana law
UNION ORGANIZING HIRING IN ORGANIZED FACILITIES
Vaca v. Sipes Preemption Issue
Linden Lumber Does Sec. 9(c)(1)(B) of the NLRA obligate an employer who has committed no unfair labor practices to petition for a representation election.
Objective 1.01 Understand the purpose and the functions of business
US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2002)
Labor Relation Done By :- Ahmad “Haj Ali” Raed Sukkar Murad Abu Salma Rashed Bsharat.
Burns Security Services 406 U.S. 272, 1972
Human Resource Management and Labor Relations
Employee Free Choice Act
Auciello Iron Works A violation of (8)(a)(5) for an employer to assert a GFD about a union’s majority status during CBK, regardless of information in its.
Borg-Warner Three Categories of Issues Rationale
Employment Relationships
Oakwood Care Center 343 N.L.R.B. No. 76 (2004)
M.B. Sturgis (and Jeffboat) 331 N.L.R.B. No. 173 (8/25/2000)
A QUICK REVIEW OF RECURRING LABOR LAW ISSUES FOR NECA CONTRACTORS
Who the heck is this guy from Washington DC?
PIE Factors Demonstrating “Community of Interest”
Presentation transcript:

1 Fall River Bargaining obligation incurred by successor when there is a “rebuttable presumption” of union majority status Successorship determined by “substantial continuity” doctrine –same business, jobs, working conditions, production process, products, customers –totality of circumstances –ee perspective Bargaining obligation incurred if predecessor’s ees a majority of “substantial and representative complement” of successor’s ees

2 Fall River (cont.) accepts “continuing bargaining demand” rule –once union makes a bargaining demand, it is maintained, even if it is initially made before “substantial and representative complement” hired

3 Dissent No successorship; no “substantial continuity” Employer Perspective –Break in continuity 6 months between Sterlingwale demise and Fall River establishment 9 months between Sterlingwale demise and Fall River production startup –No business relationship between Sterlingwale and Fall River –Attraction of customers on its own and not due to Sterlingwale Employee Perspective –Sterlingwale ees expected no further empl. with co. –Expiration of CBA –Fall River advertised for new workers –No continuity of workforce to presume maj. status

4 Recognition Before Hiring Legal “Although a successor employer is ordinarily free to set initial terms on which it will hire the employees of a predecessor, there will be instances in which it is perfectly clear that the new employer plans to retain all of the employees in the unit and in which it will be appropriate to have him initially consult with the employees' bargaining representative before he fixes terms.” (NLRB v. Burns Sec. Svs., 1972, 406 U.S. 272, ). Road and Rail Services, 348 NLRB No. 77, 11/30/06 –Where it is“perfectly clear” employer is a successor er announces intention to hire predecessor’s employees er does not invoke right to unilaterally set TCE –ees will accept employment –Er does not violate 8(a)(2) by recognizing union

Successorship and Alter Ego Cadillac Asphalt Paving Co. and its alter ego or successor Cadillac Asphalt, L.L.C.(7-CA-46464; 349 NLRB No. 5) Novi, MI Jan. 16,