IT4009 Low carbon steel MSCTM, August 27, 2015 LMF + Marco Buzio, Alexandre Gerardin, Susana Izquierdo, Alessandro Parrella, Stefano Sgobba, Ezio Todesco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FERROUS METALS.
Advertisements

Heat Treatment of Steel
Results Conclusion Methods Samples Characterization of large size co-extruded Al-Ni stabilized Nb-Ti superconducting cable Objectives Background Stefanie.
EN Division-Metallurgy and Metrology
MatSE 259 Exam 1 Review Session 1.Exam structure – 25 questions, 1 mark each 2.Do NOT forget to write your student I.D. on the answer sheet 3.Exams are.
Heat Treatment of metals
4. Factors Effecting Work Hardening Characteristics Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Zafer Şenalp Mechanical Engineering.
Be/FS joining for ITER TBM Ryan Matthew Hunt FNST Meeting August 18, 2009 A collaboration between UCLA, SNL-Livermore, Brush-Wellman, Axsys Inc. and Bodycote.
MSE 201 – Laboratory IThe University of Tennessee Materials Science and Engineering Kurt Johanns MSE Laboratory I Mechanical Properties of Metals.
Fundamentals of Metal Forming Chapter 18
Nanostructured Metallic Materials Processing and Mechanical Properties Sung Whang.
April 2014 Laser grades April Market needs vs technical requirements High cutting speedExcellent flatness and surface quality Your needs A global.
Cable inventory, relative measurements and 1 st mechanical computations STUDY OF THE QUADRUPOLE COLLAR STRUCTURE P. Fessia, F. Regis Magnets, Cryostats.
Metal Forming.
Metal Forming. Overview Process Classification –Bulk Deformation Process –Sheet Metalworking Material Behaviour in Metal Forming –Flow Stress –Average.
THE EFFECT OF HEAT TREATMENT ON THE PROPERTIES OF ZIRCONIUM - CARBON STEEL BIMETAL PRODUCED BY EXPLOSION WELDING Mariusz Prażmowski 1), Henryk Paul 2),
Heat Treatment of Metals
Lead Technology Task 6.2 Materials for mechanical pump for HLM reactors M. Tarantino – ENEA Work Package Meeting – ENEA Bologna, November 17th, 2010.
Cold Working is Actually Strain Hardening Basic equation relating flow stress (strain hardening) to structure is:  o =  i +  Gb  1/2 Yield stress increases.
Specification of niobium sheets 031/05/2010 O. Capatina G. Arnau Izquierdo W. Weingarten S. Atieh.
CLIC Workshop – CERN, October / 17 DC breakdown experiments for CLIC CERN, TS-MME Antoine Descoeudres, Trond Ramsvik, Sergio Calatroni, Mauro Taborelli.
03/04/2000LHC Vacuum Design Meeting Karine COUTURIER/EST-SM C17110 and C17410 coppers  Chemical composition (wt%) : copper = alloy balance Be Ni Co Fe.
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1.
Energy Transfer.  One of the simplest ways energy is transferred is as heat.  Though energy has many different forms, all energy is measured in units.
Beam screens in IT phase 1
S.A.E. L ANGESLAG 1 LCD SOLENOID ALUMINUM STABILIZED SUPERCONDUCTOR LCD SOLENOID AL - STABILIZED SUPERCONDUCTOR E XTRUDED A L -0.1 WT.%N I MEASUREMENT.
P.Freijedo Date: Click here to add footer 2 C. Parente (HL-LHC Technical Quality Officer) Material samples provided by Niovawe: N22: Niobium.
1 Full document available on EDMS Metallurgical qualification of AISI 316L TIG welded tubes Summery - Richard French.
Strengthening of Metals.
GIGATRACKER SUPPORTING PLATE COOLING SYSTEM SIMULATION 1Vittore Carassiti - INFN FECERN, 11/12/2007.
Heat Transfer Simulation for the Welding of the T-Section.
Reactor pressure vessels of WWER (materials and technology) Janovec, J
TS-CV-Detector Cooling 25/11/2004M. Battistin - JCOV 25 November JCOV 25 November 2004 Results for the plastic-fluorocarbon compatibility tests Status.
Stress review - CERN, Review on stress sensitivity Part I R. Flükiger B. Seeber Group of Applied Physics (GAP) University of Geneva 1.
Baby MIND magnet design or “how to best magnetise a steel plate” Alexey, Etam, Gabriella, Helder, Herman Baby Mind Magnet CERN June 10, 2015.
Presented by: De Carlo Livio Supervisor: Scheubel Maud Section: EN/MME-MM.
DR KAFEEL AHMED Cast iron Properties 1.Strength 2.Hardness 3.Brittleness 4.Stiffness Depends upon 1.Alloying elements 2.Annealing.
New High Strength Bainitic Steel 20MnCrMo7 for Automobile Applications in Powertrains Dr.-Ing. Serosh Engineer, Dipl.-Ing. Charlotte Merkel EZM EdelstahlZieherei.
Fe 3 Al 1/4 cycle CGP at RT R. Łyszkowski, J. Bystrzycki, D. Kurowski, Z. Bojar, A. Fraczkiewicz 1, Z. Pakieła 2 Faculty of Advanced Technology and Chemistry.
INFLUENCE OF CHEMISTRY AND PROCESSING PARAMETERS ON YIELD RATIO OF LINEPIPE STEEL GRADE PIPES April , 2016 Middle East Steel Conference, Dubai.
Raw Materials Specifications and Material Batch History (Niobium sheets used to make 9-cell cavities) Lance Cooley Head, Superconducting Materials Department,
MatSE 259 Exam 1 Review Session 1.Exam structure – 25 questions, 1 mark each 2.Do NOT forget to write your student I.D. on the answer sheet 3.Exams are.
Magnetic measurements on MBHSP104
AN-Najah National University Engineering College Mechanical Engineering Dep. Effect of heat treatment temp in the micro hardness and tensile properties.
Properties and recrystallization behavior of heavily worked copper
, Prof. Dr. -Ing. Andreas Kern; Dipl. -Kffr. Esther Pfeiffer ; Dipl
4/27/2018 2:57 AM TOOL STEELS © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may.
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
The “Quenching and Partitioning” Process: Background and Recent Progress Fernando Rizzo Seminar Cambridge,
Heat Treatment of Steel
Ari D. Palczewski, SRF Scientist
P. Romano Triguero1, S. Melzer1, J. Moerman2
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
Ignacio Aviles Santillana
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
PET tensile test revised data
F. Caiazzo1, F. Curcio1, G. Daurelio2, F. Memola Capece Minutolo3, F
Noise analysis of the 1m3 DHCal test beam
Analysis of niobium material
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
Effect of Surface Treatments on the Superconducting Properties of Niobium Presented by A.S.Dhavale Sept. 23, 2010.
Heat Treatment of Metals
Strain Hardening & Annealing
Mechanical Properties of Metals
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
Presentation transcript:

IT4009 Low carbon steel MSCTM, August 27, 2015 LMF + Marco Buzio, Alexandre Gerardin, Susana Izquierdo, Alessandro Parrella, Stefano Sgobba, Ezio Todesco

ARMCO Pure Iron IT 4009, 1800 tonnes low carbon steel (magnetic/pure iron) Hot rolled 5.8 mm thickness. 650 x 3’000 to 4’000 mm. Magnetil® not available. Cold rolled << 5.8 mm thickness. ARMCO Pure Iron 5.8 mm AK steel patent (USA) Produced by Thyssen (DE) since Grade 2 and 4. 3 sets of samples tested at CERN: as received in may 2014, annealed at 980°C in august 2014, annealed at 750 and 850°C in june MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Test report EDMS# MSCTM, August 27, 2015 May 2014 ARMCO Pure Iron As received

Material certificate MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Tensile tests and Micro-optical Average tensile tests results of the three samples for each direction: Longitudinal direction: Rm = ± 2.3 MPa (IT4009, Rm<280 MPa/mm 2 ) Re = ± 6.5 MPa A% = 43.5 ± 1.8 % Transverse direction: Rm = ± 0.4 MPa Re = ± 4.4 MPa A% = 39.9 ± 2.3 % Micro-optical observations and image analysis revealed: Average Grain size G ≈ 5 in longitudinal direction Average Grain size G ≈ 7 in transverse direction IT4009, GS < 3.5 MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Magnetic Measurement MSCTM, August 27, 2015 Test performed by Marco Buzio and Giuseppe Montenero

Test report EDMS# August 2014 ARMCO Pure Iron Annealed at CERN 980°C 1hr. MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Yield and tensile strenght L IT4009, Rm 150 MPa/mm 2 MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Yield and tensile strenght T IT4009, Rm 150 MPa/mm 2 MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Grain Size L ≈ 4 IT4009, GS<3.5 MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Grain size T ≈ 4.5 IT4009, GS<3.5 MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Tensile tests and micro-optical Average tensile tests results : Longitudinal direction: Rm = ± 0.8 MPaIT4009, Rm < 280 MPa/mm 2 Re = ± 0.1 MPa IT4009, Re > 150 Mpa/mm 2 A% = 50.2 ± 1.2 % Transverse direction: Rm = ± 0.2 MPa Re = ± 3.9 MPa A% = 50.3 ± 0.7 % Micro-optical observations and image analysis revealed: Average Grain size G ≈ 4 in longitudinal direction Average Grain size G ≈ 4.5 in transverse direction IT4009, GS < 3.5 MSCTM, August 27, 2015

ARMCO chemical composition MSCTM, August 27, 2015 IT4009 C<0.03 Average value last 7 years (max value C=0.0027) At CERN Co<0.1 ARMCO 50 times better

AISI1010 comparison MSCTM, August 27, 2015

ARMCO B/H curves MSCTM, August 27, T at 1200 A/m 2 T at A/m 0.2 T at 40 A/m

B/H vs. thickness MSCTM, August 27, 2015

ARMCO Pure Iron Grade 4 MSCTM, August 27, 2015 ProbeAnnealing ARef. value B750°C, 1h C750°C, 5h D850°C, 1h E850°C, 5h

Test report EDMS# MSCTM, August 27, 2015 SamplesA (ref.)B (750°C,1h)C (750°C,5h)D (850°C,1h)E (850°C,5h) HB 31.25/ Average Std dev Equivalent Rm * Micro-optical observations and image analysis revealed: Average Grain for A, B and C, size G ≈ 7.5 in longitudinal direction Average Grain for A, B and C, size G ≈ 7.5 in transverse direction IT4009, GS < 3.5 * based on conversion from NF A /173

GS for samples D and E MSCTM, August 27, 2015 Sample D = 850°C, 1hr Few cristals >> 1 mm Many cristals < 20  m GS: beginning of recrystallization Sample E = 850°C, 5 hrs Very few small cristals Most of the cristals >> 1mm GS very low

Magnetic mesurements (Alessandro Parrella and Marco Buzio) MSCTM, August 27, 2015

H/B values (Alessandro Parrella and Marco Buzio) MSCTM, August 27, 2015 Sample ASample BSample CSample DSample E H [A/m]B [T]H [A/m]B [T]H [A/m]B [T]H [A/m]B [T]H [A/m]B [T]

BH and field quality (Susana Izquierdo and Ezio Todesco) MSCTM, August 27, 2015

BH and field quality: conclusions (Susana Izquierdo and Ezio Todesco) The impact of the BH on the harmonics is negligible. There impact on the transfer function is dominated by the magnetic properties of the iron at high field, which have not been measured. To be understood what is the impact of the annealing at higher field level: It will be only an issue if the reproducibility of the behaviour at high field is worse for the “non-annealed” case Would be good to measure the behaviour at higher field to have the full characterization MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Surface coating MSCTM, August 27, 2015 Annealed 835°C As received Annealed 835°C

Annealing cycle MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Conclusion ARMCO grade 4 (closer to the CERN specification) C content acceptable (as received + annealed) Average C=0.0013; Max C= AKS guaranteed C< (IT4009 C<0.0030). Co content ok (as received + annealed) Avg.Co=0.0020; Max Co= (CERN Co<0.1) Tensile and yield strenght ok (annealed) Warning for 850°C 5 hrs : annealing temp. and time vs. Rm critical (samples D and E  Rm very low). Suggest a test x two samples: 820°C 6 hrs + 980°C 2hrs. Magnetic carachteristics ok (annealed) Dimension: if annealed 780x4000x5.8 due to limitation of the edge trimming line in Huetteneim. Coating Annealing curve to be better defined Temperature control do be discussed: natural cooling too fast, temp gradient not equally distributed on the sheet surface? Temp control affects the grain size and surface quality. MSCTM, August 27, 2015

Urgent: storage Contract 1800 tonnes  230 m3 15 to 25 tonnes per truck (70 to 120 trucks) Metal sheets 4000 x 650 (or 780) x 5.8 Stack weight up to 2 tonnes Storage area 200 to 300 m2. MSCTM, August 27, 2015