Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

Strategic Highway Safety Plan Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Welcome.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
PIARC T.C. C2.1 & C2.3 Comparison of National Road Safety Policies & Plans Crash Analysis/Problem Definition & Time of Return Methodology October 2008.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Highway Safety & Wildlife: A National Perspective October 24-25, 2005 Patrick Hasson National Technical Service Team Leader Safety and Design FHWA Tel:
1 The Road Towards Zero Deaths: Rules to Live By Joe Toole Associate Administrator for Safety Federal Highway Administration Missouri Traffic and Safety.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Meeting the AASHTO Safety Goal Daniel L. Carter, PE UNC Highway Safety Research Center AASHTO Safety Mgmt Subcommittee Meeting September 2, 2009.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Early 2008 Highlights Office of Accident Records Lee Axdahl.
1 Hawaii Strategic Highway Safety Plan: FACILITY DESIGN Dan Galanis Injury Prevention and Control Program Hawaii Department of Health 1250 Punchbowl St.,
IRR Safety Management System Bureau of Indian Affairs & Federal Lands Highway 15th NW Tribal Transportation Symposium.
INTERTRIBAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OCTOBER 30, 2003.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
Fleet Safety. Introduction: Why Address Fleet Accidents Frequency of Fleet Accidents (NSC) 22% of workplace fatalities were highway accidents 80-90% were.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 1-2 Introduction Highway Traffic Fatalities Trend.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
Advancing Highway Safety in the U.S. Michael Halladay, Director FHWA Office of Safety Integration Federal Highway Administration Border to Border Transportation.
Annual Safety Meeting February 21, 2007 Ron Marshall, SD LTAP Local Rural Road Safety in SD - What does the data tell us?
People Saving People Dec. 4, 2000 Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment Louis V. Lombardo Office of Human-Centered Research.
Meg Moore Traffic Engineering Section Director Traffic Operations Division Texas Department of Transportation.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
EPI 2670: Injury Epidemiology Transportation Related Injuries Thomas Songer, PhD University of Pittsburgh.
Selecting Countermeasures 1 Module 5 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
October 24, 2015 The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance Vermont Highway Safety Alliance AARP Driver Safety Annual Meeting October 29, 2014 Presented by: Kevin.
Statewide Analysis Strategies Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
Overview of Road Safety in the United States Jeff Michael, Ed.D. Associate Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration February 16, 2009.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Healthy Regions, Healthy People Policy and Research Symposium Series presented by Susan B Herbel,
Roadside CE 453 Lecture 23. Sideslopes – Foreslope (Backslope) Design 1.Considerations: Stability and Vehicle Recovery a.if slope “>” 3:1 use barrier.
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
June 23, 2006 Asset Management A Tool to Save Lives, Time, and $$$
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Successes in Reducing Highway Fatalities Kathy Harvey, MoDOT State Design Engineer July 16, 2008 Albuquerque, N.M.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Highway Fatalities A National Health Crisis Highway Designers Can Help Turn Around By Anthony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services American.
Safety-Based Deployment Assistance for Location of V2I Applications Carol Tan, FHWA and Kim Eccles, VHB Traffic Records Forum, 2015.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
SCOHTS Meeting April 28-30, Completed NCHRP Projects Report 641 – Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips.
Office of Research and Information Technology 2013 Large Truck and Bus Crash Overview Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology June 2015.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Factors in Traffic Fatality Fluctuations
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok, BTS

Presentation Overview Introduction/Safety Problem FHWA Safety Goals Data Collection – FARS – GES Interpretation of Results Conclusions

Introduction 37,795 fatal motor vehicle crashes in 2001 – Resulting in 40,016 deaths +/ million injuries resulting from auto crashes in 2001 Heavy personal toll and economic cost

Introduction What is the cost of traffic crashes for 2001? Why do we care about this cost? How do we quantify this cost?

Introduction February 2002: OST guidance on value of life (in 2001 dollars): – Fatality = $3 million – Severe injury = $1.01 million (AIS 5,4 (A)) – Minor injury = $60,000 (AIS 3-1, (B+C)) – PDO = $2,300

FHWA Safety Goals Reduce the rate and number of highway related fatalities and injuries Performance Measures and Benchmarks – Highway-related fatalities per 100 million VMT – Number of highway-related fatalities – Highway related injuries per 100 million VMT – Number of highway-related injuries (millions)

FHWA Safety Goal-Fatalities

FHWA Safety Goal-Injuries

Problem Statement How to achieve these safety goals? What types of crashes should we focus? What countermeasures are appropriate? How to evaluate the effectiveness of countermeasures?

R&D Efforts One approach: – review traffic crash records to identify the crash types that will provide the largest “return on investment” for specific treatments. Need to estimate benefit-cost ratios: – Benefits: reduction in crash (by type) for specific treatment – Costs by crash type

2001 Crash Data Fatal crash data obtained via FARS – Fatality Analysis Reporting Systems Injury/PDO crash data obtained via GES – General Estimation Systems Crash impacts that result in fatality, injury or PDO are called “harmful events” and are broken into two groups: – First Harmful Event (FHE) – Most Harmful Event (MHE)

FHE Crashes FHE – Recorded as an accident level variable – Each crash is assigned a single FHE regardless of the number of vehicles involved – FHE may not be the impact that caused the greatest trauma or property damage

MHE Crashes MHE – Recorded as a vehicle level variable – Separate MHE are assigned to EVERY vehicle in a crash

Example Wet pavement, two-vehicle collision injuring two occupants in the struck vehicle. The striking vehicle was then deflected into the utility pole, killing the driver. – FHE vehicle-vehicle collision – MHE Struck vehicle = vehicle-vehicle collision Striking vehicle = utility pole

Data Collection 2001 crash data were broken into four groupings: – All crash types FHE MHE – Run off road crash types FHE MHE

Why focus on ROR crashes? FHWA Office of Safety R&D, Roadside Team: – Interested in identifying focus of future research w/r/to ROR crash treatments Data supported focus on these crashes: – ROR crashes are contributory cause for 38% of fatalities (McFadden, ITE 2002)

Data Collection Data were also normalized for the following contributing factors: – Alcohol involvement – Restraint usage

MHE – 2001 Fatal Crashes (5 most frequent events) EventFatalsAlcoholNo Rest. Vehicle in Transport 15,286 (40%) 2,776 (18%) 14,514 (92%) Overturn 7,721 (19%) 1,907 (25%)6,106 (79%) Pedestrian 4,723 (12%) 762 (16%) 4,723 (100%) Tree 3,802 (9%) 878 (23%) 2,510 (66%) Utility Pole1,199 (3%)221 (18%)755 (63%)

MHE – 2001 “A” Injury Crashes (5 most frequent events) EventA InjuriesAlcoholNo Rest. Vehicle in Transport 168,293 (62%) 8,118 (5%) 26,705 (16%) Overturn 41,786 (15%) 8,111 (20%) 12,101 (29%) Tree 17,336 (6%) 4,552 (26%) 4,163 (24%) Sign Post/ Sign 9,943 (4%) 2,428 (24%) 2,793 (28%) Culvert 8,077 (3%) 1,949 (24%) 3,156 (39%)

MHE – 2001 “B+C” Injury Crashes (5 most frequent events) Event B+C Injuries AlcoholNo Rest. Vehicle in Transport 1,237,081 (72%) 27,602 (2.2%) 86,064 (7%) Overturn 62,147 (4%) 7,528 (12%) 11,370 (18%) Sign Post/ Sign 53,720 (3%) 11,409 (21%) 9,679 (18%) Pedestrian 53,141 (3%) 181 (0.3%) 53,141 (100%) Tree 39,621 (2%) 7,350 (19%) 6,239 (16%)

MHE – 2001 Fatal + Injury Crash Comparison of Most Frequent Events Rank Event Frequency FatalA Injuries B+C Injuries 1 Vehicle in Transport (Alcohol/Restraint) Vehicle in Transport (Alcohol/Restraint) Vehicle in Transport (Alcohol/Restraint) 2 Overturn (ROR) Overturn (ROR) Overturn (ROR) 3Pedestrian Tree (ROR) Sign Post/ Sign (ROR) 4 Tree (ROR) Sign Post/ Sign (ROR) Pedestrian 5 Utility Pole (ROR) Culvert (ROR) Tree (ROR)

2001 MHE Fatal + Injury Crash Costs By Most Frequent Events Rank Event FrequencyFatalitiesInjuries Vehicle in Transport$46 Billion$206 Billion Overturn$23 Billion$45 Billion Pedestrian (Fatal) Tree (Injury)$14 Billion$18 Billion Tree (Fatal) Sign Post/Sign (Injury) $11 Billion Utility Pole (Fatal) Culvert (Injury) $4 Billion$9 Billion

MHE – 2001 ROR Fatal Crashes (5 most frequent events) EventFatalsAlcoholNo Rest. Overturn 5,953 (36%) 1,962 (33%) 3,937 (66%) Tree 3,662 (22%) 1,088 (30%)2,114 (58%) Vehicle in Transport 1,401 (8%)118 (8%)312 (22%) Utility Pole1,076 (7%)315 (29%)593 (55%) Embankment509 (3%)162 (32%)342 (67%)

MHE – 2001 ROR “A” Injury Crashes (5 most frequent events) EventFatalsAlcoholNo Rest. Overturn 26,817 (30%) 6,364 (24%) 9,004 (34%) Tree 16,646 (19%) 4,552 (27%)4,094 (25%) Sign post/ Sign 9,651 (11%) 2,349 (24%)2794 (29%) Culvert7,898 (9%)1,949 (25%)3,157 (40%) Embankment4,765 (5%)834 (18%)1,431 (30%)

MHE – 2001 ROR “B+C” Injury Crashes (5 most frequent events) EventFatalsAlcoholNo Rest. Overturn76,656 (22%) 10,467 (14%) 14,815 (19%) Sign post/ Sign 48,162 (14%)10,261 (21%)8,823 (18%) Tree40,622 (12%)7,043 (17%)6,646 (16%) Parked Vehicle26,543 (8%)4,569 (17%)4,539 (17%) Culvert26,325 (8%)4,607 (18%)4,715 (18%)

MHE – 2001 Fatal + Injury Crash Comparison of Most Frequent Events Rank Event Frequency FatalA Injuries B+C Injuries 1Overturn 2Tree Sign Post/ Sign 3 Motor Vehicle in Transport Sign Post/ Sign Tree 4Utility PoleCulvert Parked vehicle 5Embankment Culvert

2001 Fatal + Injury Crash Costs By Most Frequent Events Rank Event FrequencyFatalitiesInjuries Overturn$18 Billion$29 Billion Tree$11 Billion$18 Billion Motor vehicle in transport (Fatal), Sign Post/Sign (Injury) $4 Billion$11 Billion Utility Pole (Fatal) Culvert (Injury) $3 Billion$9 Billion Embankment (Fatal), Guide rail (Injury) $2 Billion$5 Billion

Interpretation of Results So What? – What does this information tell us? – How do we apply what we know? Ans. – Focus areas for safety programs.

AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Developed in Reduce the deaths and health care costs due to crashes on highways Guidance for state DOT safety management plans

AASHTO SHSP Crash Categories DUI Aggressive driving Seat belt Peds Head-on Curves Trees Utility poles Guiderail Intersections

Head on Crashes Vehicle crosses the centerline or median or travels wrong way in opposing traffic lane and crashes Objectives to reduce HOC: – Keep vehicles from encroaching onto opposite lane – Reduce the severity of crashes that occur

Head on Crashes Strategy Low cost improvement – Centerline rumble strips for two lane roadways

Run off Road Crashes Contributory cause for 38% of fatalities FHWA 2-prong approach concentrates on: – Keeping vehicles in travel lanes – Minimize the harmful effects when the vehicle leaves the roadway

Taken During Construction ROR Crash Strategy Pavement edge rumble strips

ROR Crash Strategy Curve Delineation

ROR Strategy Utility Pole Relocation Digitally Enhanced Photograph BEFORE AFTER

ROR Strategy Utility Pole Delineation

ROR Strategy Hazardous Tree Removal BEFORE Digitally Enhanced Photograph AFTER

Conclusions 2001 crash data were analyzed: – Ranked by frequency of harmful events – Calculated costs in 2001 dollars of these crashes – Validate existing safety improvement programs – Provide data to estimate benefit/cost ratios for safety treatments

Conclusions 2001 crash data: – Provides guidance for future research efforts – Validates AASHTO SHSP priority areas Accurate crash data essential for future highway safety initiatives

Questions? Contact Information: – – John McFadden, HRDS Georgetown Pike McLean, VA Phone: