Michele Cooke Betsy Madden Jess McBeck Growth by Optimization of Work A Boundary Element Method tool for exploring fault evolution using the principle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Advertisements

Statistical Physics Approach to Understanding the Multiscale Dynamics of Earthquake Fault Systems Theory.
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
CHAPTER 4: FRACTURE The separation or fragmentation of a solid body into two or more parts, under the action of stresses, is called fracture. Fracture.
3 – Fracture of Materials
Fracture, Toughness and Strength by Gordon Williams.
(Introduction to) Earthquake Energy Balance
SINTEF Petroleum Research The strength of fractured rock Erling Fjær SINTEF Petroleum Research 1.
Crack Nucleation and Propagation
Lecture 25 Bodies With Holes / Stress Perturbations Around Cracks Geol 542 Textbook reading: p ;
Michele Cooke Department of Geosciences 1. Work Budget 2. Boundary Element Method 3. GROW.
Structural Geology: Deformation and Mountain Building
J.Cugnoni, LMAF-EPFL,  Stress based criteria (like Von Mises) usually define the onset of “damage” initiation in the material  Once critical stress.
FRACTURE MECHANICS II Sara Ferry NSE|H.H.Uhlig Corrosion Lab 22.71| October 23, 2012 recap:
2009 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Static and Fatigue Testing of Thick Adhesive Joints for Wind Turbine Blades Daniel Samborsky, Aaron Sears, John Mandell,
Geology Resolving stresses on a plane. Outline Resolving stress on a plane Determining maximum shear stress Class problem.
Lecture #19 Failure & Fracture
Brittle deformation III Terminology The formation of faults and shear cracks Insights from acoustic emission experiments Theoretical versus actual material.
Application Solutions of Plane Elasticity
Joints and Shear Fractures
Initialize\ Update CZM input parameters u s – u e < tolerance? Extract simulated displacement field, u s ABAQUS solve in batch mode Replicate experiment.
Workshop A12-1 Fatigue: Stress-Life.
Workshop A12-2 Fatigue: Strain-Life.
CST ELEMENT STIFFNESS MATRIX
Thermal Strains and Element of the Theory of Plasticity
2. Introduction to the Visual Studio.NET IDE 2. Introduction to the Visual Studio.NET IDE Ch2 – Deitel’s Book.
QUIZ 1.What are Earthquakes? 2._____ is the deformation of a material caused by stress. 3.Describe tension stress. 4.Faulting causes rock to _________.
CompuCell Software Current capabilities and Research Plan Rajiv Chaturvedi Jesús A. Izaguirre With Patrick M. Virtue.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL),
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
API 6HP Process1 API 6HP Example Analysis Project API E&P Standards Conference Applications of Standards Research, 24 June 2008.
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Arnab Ghosh Ph.D. Research Assistant Analytical Modeling of Surface and Subsurface.
Raft & Piled-raft analysis (Soil-structure interaction analysis)
Neural Networks1 Introduction to NETLAB NETLAB is a Matlab toolbox for experimenting with neural networks Available from:
Mokashi Imrankhan Sherkhan Guided by: M S Bobji Seminar on.
J. L. Bassani and V. Racherla Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics V. Vitek and R. Groger Materials Science and Engineering University of Pennsylvania.
1 Software Reliability Assurance for Real-time Systems Joel Henry, Ph.D. University of Montana NASA Software Assurance Symposium September 4, 2002.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Fracture Overview Fall Figure 6.1 Rectangular plate with hole subjected to axial load. (a) Plate with cross-sectional plane;
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
1 Using PROPID for Analysis Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999 
Static Analysis Static Analysis, Internal Forces, Stresses: Normal and Shear 1.
Introduction Introduction to Brittle Deformation.
Shape Finder Appendix Thirteen. Training Manual Shape Finder August 26, 2005 Inventory # A13-2 Chapter Overview In this chapter, using the Shape.
Exam 2 Grade Distribution. Stress-strain behavior (Room T): Ideal vs Real Materials TS
Drucker-Prager & Concrete
Rib Forging Workshop Nine REFERENCE: Training Manual Viscoplasticity (5-35)
General Troubleshooting Nonlinear Diagnostics. Goal – In this workshop, our goal is to use the nonlinear diagnostics tools available in Solution Information.
Application Development in Engineering Optimization with Matlab and External Solvers Aalto University School of Engineering.
Global Energy Minimization for Multi-crack Growth in Linear Elastic Fracture using the Extended Finite Element Method Danas Sutula Prof. Stéphane Bordas.
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
1 Structural Geology Brittle Deformation 1 Lecture 12 – Spring 2016.
IDENTIFICATION OF FATIGUE FRACTURE PLANE POSITIONS WITH THE EXPECTED PRINCIPAL STRESS DIRECTION Aleksander KAROLCZUK Ewald MACHA Technical University of.
Room: 407 Tel: Patrice Rey.
ENT 487 FRACTURE MECHANISMS IN METALS
Summary of Scientific Goals & Features Needed to Achieve Them
Fracture of Solids Theoretical tensile strength of a solid U(r) a r
WORKSHOP 12 SUSPENSION SYSTEM II
7. Yield Criteria of Metals
Imperial College OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE Department of Aeronautics Failure Analysis of a Composite Wingbox with Impact Damage:- A Fracture.
NECKING OF A TEST SPECIMEN
WORKSHOP 3 GSE IMPORT.
( BDA 3033 ) CHAPTER 6 Theories of Elastic Failures
Fracture of Solids Theoretical tensile strength of a solid U(r) a r
( BDA 3033 ) CHAPTER 6 Theories of Elastic Failures
Using PROPID for Analysis Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
The Traction Vector and Stress Tensor
Theoretical Model: Slip propagation
DR. AL EMRAN ISMAIL FRACTURE MECHANISMS.
Yielding And Fracture Under Combine Stresses
Presentation transcript:

Michele Cooke Betsy Madden Jess McBeck Growth by Optimization of Work A Boundary Element Method tool for exploring fault evolution using the principle of work minimization

2 GROW Project overview: II. Future work: Study coalescence patterns of multiple flaws. Min Work Max Work I. Current work: Automated search for the most efficient growth direction of a single flaw.

3 GROW Griffith Crack  Make the ellipse into a crack  Find the maximum tangential stress  Find the stress concentration    

4 GROW First step: Model validation For closed flaws dipping 60° under uniaxial compression, wing crack growth has been observed at: (angles measured clockwise from tip) 110° Experimental & Numerical (Nemat-Nasser & Horii, 1982; Horii & Nemat- Nasser, 1985) 126° Experimental (Bobet & Einstein, 1998) 117° Numerical (maximum tangential stress) (Bobet, 2000) 110° Numerical (max opening) (DeBremaecker & Ferris, 2004) Dip=60° Initiation angle Wing crack

5 GROW Wing cracks observed at outcrop scale Bear Creek, Sierra Nevada, California August, 2007 Pollard & Segall (1983), Figure 7a

6 GROW 1. Jointing 2. Shear Reactivation 3. Wing cracks! Bear Creek, Sierra Nevada, California Tension Pollard & Segall (1983), Figures 7a, 13 Wing cracks observed at outcrop scale

7 GROW = 12.7mm Bobet & Einstein (1998), Figures 4a, 6  Loaded in uniaxial compression  First: to 20 kN (8.8 MPa)  Then: in 5 kN steps (2.2MPa) at mm/s Wing cracks created at laboratory scale

8 GROW Bobet & Einstein (1998), Figures 11, 13 Closed flawOpen flaw Wing cracks created at laboratory scale

9 GROW Model validation For closed flaws dipping 60°, wing crack initiation angles measured clockwise from tip: 110° Experimental & Numerical (Nemat-Nasser & Horii, 1982; Horii & Nemat- Nasser, 1985) 126° Experimental (Bobet & Einstein, 1998) 117° Numerical (Bobet, 2000) 110° Numerical (DeBremaecker & Ferris, 2004) Initiation angle Wing crack

10 GROW Validation against direction of maximum opening  DeBremaecker and Ferris (2004) use maximum opening e.g. That a crack will grow in the direction that maximizes opening (normal displacement discontinuity). Initiation angle Wing crack

11 GROW How is our work different?  Different criteria for crack growth have been utilized in previous studies. e.g. That a crack will grow in the direction that maximizes:  Strain energy;  Shear slip;  Opening.  But we think that the Earth is lazy, e.g. That a crack will grow in the direction that minimizes work. Initiation angle Wing crack

12 GROW  Observation is ~126˚ for a closed flaw Work minimization is at an angle of 120°

13 GROW Uniaxial wing crack experiments uniaxial Min Work Max Work  Under biaxial stress opening- mode wing cracks grow from the fault tip

14 GROW Animation of crack growth under biaxial loading Bobet & Einstein (1998)

15 GROW Biaxial experiments Biaxial Min Work Max Work  Under biaxial stress, shearing cracks prefer to grow in-line.

16 GROW Animation of crack growth under biaxial loading De Braemecker and Ferris, 2004

17 GROW  GROW is a perl wrapper that calls fric2d  Runs models with different orientations of potential propagation User specifies angle increment.. Resolution  Work Criterion: change in work produced by growing crack > (W prop +W seis ) then continue propagation along the most efficient path  Stops propagation when fault intersects boundaries or another crack

18 GROW  Specify growth from an existing fault tip or specify a point and explore initiation of a fault

19 GROW Adding elements At a point within the body  Considers angles 0˚ to 180˚ At tip of a fault  Considers angles 45˚ to 135˚  Cannot intersect other elements

20 GROW Effect on External Work  Hypothesis: Fault growth increases the efficiency of the system Critical  W ext for fault initiation is smaller than the overall work effect of a complete fault surface. The change in work is non- linear with fault growth.  W ext =  S+ W seis + W fric

21 GROW Input File

22 GROW Bookkeeping parameters  Tolerance controls the frictional convergence

23 GROW Observation and Boundary Lines Dip=60° 160 x 160 mm 25 mm flaw For work minimization need to apply displacement boundary conditions. If tractions are applied then the solution follows the maximum work because the most efficient fault systems under a given stress will produce the greatest displacement.

24 GROW Specify the Fault  Sandbox version has dynamic weakening  Will incorporate this into Fric2d

25 GROW Can have fractures as well  Fractures are mode I Joints fluid-filled crack

26 GROW Searching for fault that minimizes work  Step 1 Option A: flag a fault to grow Option B: Specify to search at a point  Call GROW from the command line grow inputFile angleIncrement criticalWork (topo file) If you are providing topography then add the file name, In this case sandbox.c is run instead of fric2d.c If no topo file then fric2d will assign y=0 as the Earth’s surface if the gravity flag is turned on.

27 GROW Files that creates  *.raw Lists the angles tested and the resultant work Updated as the fault propagates  *.eff Is the input file for the most efficient fault  *.work More detailed report of work only created after the model is done

28 GROW Output file

29 GROW

30 GROW Other scenarios  Fault approaching a bedding plane  Growth of two faults

31 GROW Fault Approaching a bedding plane

32 GROW Interaction of two faults

33 GROW Download  ftp://eclogite.geo.umass.edu/pub/cooke/grow_p ack.zip ftp://eclogite.geo.umass.edu/pub/cooke/grow_p ack.zip Unzip the file Compile the fric2d and sandbox codes Move the executable files up one directory so that they are in the same folder as the input files  Fric2d documentation Click link for software downloads

34 GROW What is in the bundle  Directories with executables Fric2d_stuff sandbox_stuff  *.in  input files for toy models  GROW_4_12.pl <- script to continue running fric2D or sandbox and fie the most efficient fault propagation path  external_Work_New.pl <- script to calculate work

35 GROW Making movies in matlab  Two matlab scripts can make movies of the growth GROW.m <- from one end GROW_from2ends.m <-shows growth from two ends  STEPS COPY the Fault lines from the *.eff file created by GROW into matlab Run the scrip  The range of the plot may need to be shifted for your model results