AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September 20041 Cryogenics for LHC Test Benches Safety Aspects Overview of the Test Station Overview of the Operation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19th – 20th of September 2007Cryogenic Expert Meeting at GSI, Jan Patrick Meier1/11 Cryogenic Experts Meeting at GSI, 2007 The SIS 100 Cryogenic Jumper.
Advertisements

Coupling Coil Test Facility Update Ruben Carcagno Fermilab September 20, 2012.
ZONE 18 CRYOGENICS M. Sanmarti On behalf of AT-ACR-OP section.
ESS Cryogenic System Process Design Philipp Arnold Section Leader Cryogenics CEC – ICMC 2015 June 29, 2015.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
LARP LQX and MQX Magnets Cryogenic Testing at Fermilab’s Industrial Building 1 Roger Rabehl Technical Division/Test & Instrumentation Department.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac CM - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden J. Polinski.
SOFT 2004 OVERVIEW OF CRYOGENIC TECHNOLOGY FOR THE THERMONUCLEAR FUSION P. DAUGUET, M. BONNETON, P. BRIEND, F. DELCAYRE, B. HILBERT, A. RAVEX Air Liquide.
1 Cryogenic in Fusion Devices” Kavita Rathore MTech – NST Delhi University.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Internal review of superconductors and magnet laboratories 2nd part: Infrastructure/Laboratories Cryogenics Klaus Barth (CERN), Vladislav Benda (CERN)
The cryogenic systems of the ATLAS and CMS detectors Johan Bremer on behalf of TE/CRG 06/06/2013AFF.
Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel to define length of restricted working areas  Actual situation  Evolution  How to continue  Set-up of the spilling.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Roberto Than CRYOGENICS SYSTEM.
Cryogenic update before Fermilab meeting (and after the helium tank review) Coordination meeting 6 th May 2015 K. Brodzinski HiLumi-LHC-CC-Cryo-PPT-18_v1.
Review of the Tests of Superconducting Magnets in SM18 14 th January 2005 Review of the Cryogenic Infrastructure in SM18 Bruno Vullierme ACR-MT.
S. Claudet - 31st May 2007Power refrigeration for LHC Power refrigeration at 4.5K & 1.8K for the LHC S. Claudet, CERN AT-ACR.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Safety Considerations Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
HC review, A. Perin, 12-MAY DFB Project LHC hardware commissioning review May 2005 Hardware commissioning of the DFBs and DSLs and connection.
L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
SM18 cryogenics infrastructure upgrade L. Serio TE-CRG.
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab CSN2, September 22,
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR FUTURE LHC SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS POINT SUR LA STATION D’ESSAIS préparé par Jean-Marc Gheller Steering committee –September.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
AT-ECR/C.FabreMay 31, 2007 Cryogenics for Liquid Argon Calorimeters Caroline Fabre on behalf of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Cryogenics Collaboration.
Overview of the ESS Linac Cryogenic Distribution System
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
CRYOGENIC SYSTEM of RAON Chul Jin Choi, Ki Woong Lee Cryogenics and Control Team Accelerator Division 5/23/2013 Chul Jin Choi, Ki Woong Lee Cryogenics.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 1 ICEC 26- ICMC 2016 March 7-11, 2016, New Delhi, India Michael Nagel Cryogenic commissioning, cool down and first.
Internal review of superconductors and magnet laboratories 2nd part: SM 18 & b.163: current status, weak points, possible improvement Cryogenics Vladislav.
ESS | Helium Distribution | | Torsten Koettig Linac – Helium distribution 1.
SIS 100 Vacuum chamber Recooler String system Components
Vishy Ravindranath LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
Existing Prototype Test Facility (PTF) and planned Series Test Facility Schroeder, Claus Cryo-Review Darmstadt
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
He Plant, LN2 Systems and Commissioing
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
N. Hasan1, P. Knudsen2 and V. Ganni2
Experience: past events and accidents
SPS cryogenic proximity equipment and SM18 validation
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Status of the cryogenic system for B180
Block 4 and Cluster D - Safety
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
SHMS Cryogenics and Q2(Q3Dipole) Cool Down
High Magnetic Field Lab, CAS
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
Cryogenics – The Basics
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Thermohydraulic behaviour of the cryogenic system
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Cryogenics for LHC Test Benches Safety Aspects Overview of the Test Station Overview of the Operation Safety matters: Experience Discussion

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Overview of the Test Station Block Diagram General view Cryogenic Feed Boxes Cooldown/Warmup system

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September LP GHe Heater 200 kW CFB CCU 1 (IHI) (2005) CCU2 Linde Heater 1 30 kW COMP 1 COMP 2 COOLDOWN-WARMUP SYSTEM (CWS) -2 x100g/s 2-12 bar GHe Compressors - LN2 distribution - 2 x 120 g/s 140 kW Cooldown Units - 1 LPGHe Heater 200 kW -1 HPGHe Heater 30 kW GHe PUMPING SYSTEM CWU 1 C only CWU 2 C only COMP 3 (2005) Cryogenic Compound Line, 12 valve boxes (CCL) LHe WPU 1 Cooldown Warmup Line, 12 valve boxes (CWL) WPU 2 Heater 2 30 kW GHe <90 K GHeLN2GN2 GHe 40 bar GHe Recover y Other Utilities required for Magnet Tests GHe HP GHe Heater 30 kW INTERFACES WITH CRYOGENIC FACILITIES OF ZONE 18

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September CWL CCL CWU1 CWU2 HEATER SSS DIPOLE CFBs

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Cooldown / WarmUp System 02TE TE 263

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September CWS Specifications Helium Circulation for Cooldown and Warmupup Magnets are cooled down and warmed up with a forced circulation of GHe. 2 x 100 g/s, 2/12 bar-compressors in SW18 (3 compressors in 2005) Cooling Down to 90 K LN2 supply line from the two L dewars supplying two Cooldown Units so called CWU 1 and CWU 2 each including a LN2 vaporizers and a GHe counter flow heat exchanger Maximum cooldown mass flow rate with both CWUs in parallel: 220 g/s 80 K using 1200 g/s LN2 85 g/s 80 K are required for the cooling down of 1 magnet in 12 h Warming Up to 300 K Injection of preheated 320 K and heating of the returned GHe One 30 kW electrical heater: Max. flow rate: 190 g/s 290 K One 200 kW electrical heater: Max. flow rate: 175 g/s 80K. 90 g/s 320 K are required for the warming up of 1 magnet in 12 h

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Cryogenic Feed Box

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Set of 4 x 0.6 kA Current Leads 2-position pair of 13 kA Current Leads Heat Exchanger 2-position SC lines M1/M3 2 x Retractable Sleeves M2, M1/M3 CRYOGENIC FEED BOX AIR LIQUIDE

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Sealing of CFB-magnet interfaces

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September CRYO-MAGNET in setup, cooldown, powering, quench, warmup phases. Cryomagnet / CFB Interfaces INFRASTRUCTURE Cryogenic and conventional Utilities CRYOGENIC FEED BOX Conventional cryogenic system with passive final safety devices. Operation handled by a PLC-based control system.

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September No Cryomagnet / CFB Interfaces INFRASTRUCTURE 14 circuits connected to each CFB (Compressed Air, GHe, LHe, GN2, …), vacuum barriers Pressures from 0 to 14 bar, Temperatures from 4.5 to 320 K. CRYOGENIC FEED BOX 7 accessible CFB hydraulic interfaces for cryo-magnet (isolation valves closed) The CFB control system handles and monitors this sequence.

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September PT X Y C’ M1/M3 M2 E N GHe 4.5 K, 16 mbar GHe 80 K, 14 bar GHe 320 K, 14 bar Sat LHe 1.6 bar GHe K, 1.3 bar GHe K, 2.5 bar GN2 300K, 2.5 bar Vac CFB -Magnet (de)connection CFB circuits are locked and monitored by CFB PLC and locked by operators. Magnet side Utilities Circuits locked by CFB PLC Utilities side ALARM GHe 300 K, 1.1 bar (SV not represented)

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Main CFB Specifications Electrical circuits:1 x 13 kA and 2 x 600 A Design pressure: 20 bar Cdown/Wup typical GHe mass flow rate:100 g/s C-down typical LHe mass flow rate: 20 g/s 1.9 K Subcooling typical mass flow rate:12 g/s LHe content in normal operation:50 l (+ magnet ~ 320 l) Inner buffer (handling of quenches): 550 l (~ 2,2 MJ, 14 bar, 8 K) Hydraulic circuits to magnet interfaces with isolation valves. Flanged hydraulic connections with double seals for magnet interfaces Retractable sleeves for hydraulic interfaces surrounding electrical circuits ones CFB is controlled by PLC, remotely operated. Local interlocks ensure safety of personnel for magnet (de)connection

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Overview of Operation CTB operating modes: Cog Wheeling Sequence of a magnet (de)connection Tasks Tracking System Priorities handling

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Cog Wheeling (example)

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Magnet (de)connection  Transport of magnet from SMA18 to SM18  Fitting of anticryostats (if any) & Magnet Return Box  Transport of magnet to the test bench  Connection of superconducting cables  Connection of hydraulic interfaces  Connection of anti-cryostats  Mechanical anchoring of MRB  Closing of the interconnection sleeve All checks (go/no-go) with the Task Tracking System  Reverse sequence of operations for disconnection

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Task Tracking System 1/5

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Task Tracking System 2/5

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Task Tracking System 3/5

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Task Tracking System 4/5

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Task Tracking System 5/5

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities All 12 CFB’s are controled in order to share cryogenic resources, i.e. GHe circulation of CWS, LHe/Cold GHe return, Cold GHe pumping This coordination is done by the Priority System which calculates in real time the CFB’s respective allocation of resources, according to a main priority list (1 st to 12 th ). Therefore, 3 other priority lists are calculated by the Priority System: CWS List: CFB’s which are using the GHe circulation Liquid/Cold return List: CFB’s which are taking LHe and returning cold GHe Pumping List: CFB’s which are cooling down to 1.9 K.

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities: Max use of Cooldown Warmup capacity The priority System distributes the CWS GHe mass rate flow among all the CFBs, taking care of total flow available from compressors and number of available CWU’s. Examples:

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities: Max use of LHe Supply

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities: Max use of cold GHe return capacity

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities: Max use of 1.9 K pumping capacity

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities: Pressure control during & after quench

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Priorities Issues Operation : Easier control Shorter reaction time Reduced number of human mistakes Anticipation of phases launches Data Analysis Resources Limitation Finding Resources Optimization Better average/maximum test rate

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Last but not least: Safety issues High Voltage electrical insulation Impurities Operation Magnet failure

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September High Voltage Electrical insulation problems Moisture on 13 kA current leads flanges ADDITIONAL HEAT EXCHANGERS

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Operation On 26 November 2003, during disconnection of magnet 2026 from TBE1, the feedthrough of one 13 kA current line was broken. A copper stabilizer of magnet was stuck to silvershoe of CFB. When magnet was moved back, the copper stabilizer pulled the CFB SC cable, therefore broke one feedthrough. In order to avoid an other similar problem, an insulating sleeve has to be inserted between CFB and MAGNET cables after each deconnexion (step added in traveler).

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Impurities BeforeThen:

AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Magnet MB3004 passed all the tests (warm, cold) before the training campaign It suffered for an inter-turn short circuit appeared during a quench at nominal Results : meltdown of the cable and then of the cold bore