Doc.: IEEE 802.15-06/286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /281r3 Submission July, 2006 Jinkyeong Kim, ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /180r0 Submission Mar04 Reed Fisher OkiSlide 1 A Proposed Millimeter-Wave-Based Alternative PHY for IEEE Reed Fisher.
July 2005 Slide 1 doc.: IEEE / 419 r0 Submission Abbie Mathew, NewLANS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /348r0 Submission July, 2004 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co,. Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /281r0 Submission May, 2006 Jinkyeong Kim, ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE c Submission September, 2005 Pollock, Skafidas and Saleem, NICTA LtdSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /0167r0 Submission 16 March 2005 Bosco, Baldwin Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0525r2 Submission March 2006 Slide 1 Hideto Ikeda Oki Electric, Yozo Shoji NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /263r0 Submission May, 2004 Yozo Shoji, CRL Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /286r3 Submission July, 2006 Noriyasu Kikuchi, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /133r0 Submission March 2003 Michael Park, Samsung Electronics co., LtdSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /241r0 Submission May 2004 Reed Fisher Oki Electric IndustrySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission Philips May, 2006 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE a Submission January 2004 Pat Kinney, Kinney Consulting LLCSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /436r0 Submission November 2003 Vijay DhingraSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /047r0 Submission Jan 2002 Mary DuVal, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission November 2015 Slide 1Li Qiang, Huawei Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
IEEE /r1 Submission March, 2005 Slide 1 Yozo Shoji, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE d Submission September 2006 Shigeru Fukunaga, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission July 2004 Liang Li, WXZJ Inc Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /649r0 Submission November 2004 Slide 1 Hiroyo Ogawa, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /241r4 Submission November 2004 Reed Fisher Oki Electric IndustrySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE r1 Submission November, 2004 Keiichi Ohata, NECSlide 7 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Jan 2010 C.S. Sum1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏
Doc.: IEEE c Submission July, 2005 Skafidas,Pollock,Saleem, NICTASlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /227r0 Submission July 2000 Rick Alfvin, Eastman Kodak CompanySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /291r2 Submission July 2006 NiCT, NTTSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0351r1 Submission September, 2003 Kiyoshi Hamaguchi, CRLSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
平成30年9月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 Novemver 2007
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG3c Project Timeline] Date Submitted: [13.
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Usage model for short-range line-of-sight.
<month year> October 2005
18 January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ MAC for 60 GHz Gigabit WLAN/WPAN]
<month year> November 2005
<month year> doc.: IEEE /119 May, 2004
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Applications and requirements for mm wave.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE /119 September, 2003
<month year> July 2005
平成31年1月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c motion.
平成31年1月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Japanese.
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Applications and requirements for mm wave.
July 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Usage model for short-range line-of-sight.
June, 2006 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 June, 2006
平成31年2月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 March 19, 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Notice.
平成31年2月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2008
January 2003 doc.: IEEE /056r0 May 2004
平成31年2月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2007
<month year> November, 2004
平成31年2月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 Jan 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Motion to.
October 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG3c Project Timeline] Date Submitted:
平成31年4月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 March 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Revision.
<month year> doc.: IEEE /119 May, 2004
<month year> doc.: IEEE / September 2004
平成31年5月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 September 2007
<month year> doc.: IEEE / July 2004
<month year> November 2005
June, 2006 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 June, 2006
June, 2006 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Jan, 2007
January 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [17.
November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Project Plan] Date Submitted: [15.
平成31年7月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 March 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Call.
平成31年7月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2007
August, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Improve the latency between GTS request.
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
<month year> July, 2004
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Oki Response to request of Usage Models] Date Submitted: [12 July, 2006] Source: [Tadahiko Maeda 、 Hideto Ikeda, Noriyasu Kikuchi] Company [Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.] Address [3-4 Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, , Japan] Voice:[ ], Re: [Request of contributions for Usage Models for UMD subgroup] Abstract:[Proposal of Usage Model] Purpose:[To be adapted in 15.3c Usage Model Document] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 2 Proposed Usage Model Tadahiko Maeda Noriyasu Kikuchi Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 3 Wireless Home Video Network Home Gateway (Home Video Server) HD TV Set (DEV1) Laptop PC (DEV2) Portable Device (DEV5) Camcorder (DEV3) Room1 Room2Room3 U1’ U4” U9’ U4’ Corridor HD TV Set (DEV4) U4’ Repeater U4’,U4”,U9’ U9’ U4’, U4” Repeater device: A device to extend or bridge a service area of the network. It might have multiple mode transceivers that operate on different channels. Internet Repeater

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 4 Usage Model Covers Use Cases Application mix Residential (Wireless Home Video Network) U1(U1’), U4(U4’&U4”), U9(U9’ ) (LOS for all) ・ Server x1: Fixed ・ DEV1: uncompressed HDTV(A1), Fixed ・ DEV2 & 3: compressed HDTV(A1), Portable ・ DEV4: compressed HDTV(A1), Fixed ・ DEV5: contents download(A2), Portable Comments: ・ A server streams uncompressed and compressed HD video to DEVs in the same room and other rooms. ・ A server also works as a download/upload server to/from portable devices. ・ Some repeater devices are located to extend service areas over the wall in a house. ・ Right positioning of the repeater device can ensure steady LOS conditions.

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 5 Involved Use Cases U#ApplicationEnvironme nt Separation (m) SightMotioncomments U1’Uncompressed HDTV (A1) ResidentialUp to 7LOSFixedA variation of U1 with LOS U4’Compressed HDTV (A1) ResidentialUp to 7LOSFixed during streaming A variation of U4 with a longer separation U4”Compressed HDTV (A1) ResidentialUp to 7LOSFixedA variation of U4’ with fixed receiver U9’File Transfer (A2) ResidentialUP to 7LOSFixed during streaming A variation of U9 with a longer separation

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 6 Background Audio/Video transmissions are considered as promising 60 GHz mmWave applications for home users. Users have many AV equipments (TV set, PVR, Camcorder, etc) spread in several rooms. Family members can use them in individual rooms simultaneously. Video sources can also be distributed and some come from outside home, e.g. through the Internet, CATV, TV broadcasts. Current trend is integrated digital living environments. One solution is that one central home video server distributes video contents, which may be stored in it or come through it, to all rooms in a house. Repeater devices are essential for these wireless systems. The maximum distance of each link is 7 meters in the Usage Model

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 7 Applications in the System Two classes of applications –Real-time HD video streaming applications Compressed (MPEG-2, 1080i): 24 Mbps (typical) Uncompressed (HDMI, 1080i): 2.2 Gbps –Non real-time or interactive applications Huge file download/upload WEB surfing –Both work on gigabit Ethernet Throughput is limited mainly by equipments –Typically less than 100 Mbps

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 8 Traffic Assume a following scenario; –Four members of a family enjoy video services in each room or a family room. –Each gets an HDTV streaming simultaneously from the same server either in a compressed format or uncompressed format. –On watching TV, each may downloads/upload video contents from/to the server. –Total traffic of eight applications ( 2 applications for 4 persons) is estimated around 500 Mbps (24M x M x 4) at the end of the server. –If an uncompressed video application operates in addition, total throughput becomes 2.7 Gbps (2.2G + 500M).

doc.: IEEE /286r2 Submission July, 2006 Tadahiko Maeda, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.Slide 9 Repeater Repeater device is to extend or bridge a service area of the network. It might have multiple mode transceivers that operate on different channels to maintain total throughput high. –If N segment links in a home network share one channel time, its effective throughput is reduced to 1/N. –For example, a chain of seven repeaters links may divide a network into eight segments. It means that 3 Gbps PHY can support only as small as 375 Mbps of throughput.