PAIRED READING PLANNING –– PARENT TUTORING Context and problems Existing parental involvement/expectations Aims and objectives Initial project period Target.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

OPEN HOUSE School Name Date.
To Halton Youth Service 
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Junior Achievement Ireland “Generating impact through your partnerships with business.”
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
RE Subject Leadership - Christopher Power - June 2008 RE Subject Leadership RE Subject Leadership Developing Religious Education in School and Gathering.
Helping Your Child Succeed in School “Showing our children that we both value education and use it in our daily lives provides them with powerful models.
Chapter 41 Training for Organizations Research Skills.
BEST PRACTICE AÇEV’S FAMILY LITERACY PROGRAMS WORKING WITH PARENTS 8-10 May DUBLIN.
Parent Tutoring (PT) An Individualized Tier 3 Intervention for Students with Reading Problems Study 1 Duvall, Delquadri, Elliott & Hall (1992) Study 2.
Welcome to Second Grade Parent Night!. My Background Four years experience teaching First Grade and two years teaching Second Grade Received my Professional.
BRIGHT FUTURES Outreach Programs 2015 Idaho Commission for Libraries.
Kesgrave High School SEN Information Report Mission Statement As a school we value all our pupils and work hard to ensure that SEN pupils have access to.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
Chapter 10 Recruiting Children ©2013 Cengage Learning.
Evaluating the Incredible Years School Readiness Parenting Programme Supervised by Dr Tracey Bywater Incredible Years Wales School of Psychology Kirstie.
FY12 Title I Common Program Review Findings Title I Technical Assistance Session May 11, 2012.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
North Ayrshire Libraries Education Resource Service.
IDDS Planning Timeline + Milestones to Success!. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT + CULTURE PARTICIPANT EXPERIENCE CURRICULUM + SCHEDULE OPERATIONS + FINANCE THE.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
An introduction to PM Benchmark
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
Evaluating the Incredible Years School Readiness Parenting Programme Kirstie Cooper.
Researching the Incredible Years Infant & Toddler Programmes Nia Griffith Bangor University Nia Griffith Bangor University.
 It is a charter mark designed to develop pupils' responsibility and participation in their own education. It can empower all pupils, increase motivation.
Primary Inspection Models 14 September Overview of today’s briefing Revisions to the overall effectiveness conclusion Revisions to the performance.
Caregiver Resource & Development Project (CARED Presented by Janet Mwitiki and Maggie Kamau-Biruri Kenya.
Jackson R2 School West Lane Elementary Tier 2 Small Group Social Skills.
Illinois Regional Consultants: AKA Model Classrooms and Mentor Teachers Michelle Clyne, Coordinator Project Reach: IL Deaf-Blind Services.
Teaching Young Children, 4 th Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Working with Parents, Families, and Communities Chapter 7.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
How would you inform me if you have concerns about my child ? How do you identify children with special educational needs ? Will my child have access to.
Administering a Griffiths Course Mrs Rebecca Shearer Postgraduate Administrative Co-ordinator, Edinburgh.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section B 1.
Evaluation To consider evaluation theory and apply it to the Welcome to Your Library project plans and begin to determine steps projects needs to take.
National Statistics % of UK library authorities took part –4000 libraries running the challenge –690,000 children took part –47,000 children became.
School Self-Evaluation May 29 th 2012 Peer Tutoring Evaluation techniques Findings Collaborative data analysis has huge “potential payoff for organisation.
Parents Meeting: 11 th September 2014 Welcome to Year 1.
Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek.
Direct Behavior Rating: Using DBR for Intervention.
© Crown copyright 2011, Department for Education These materials have been designed to be reproduced for internal circulation, research and teaching or.
Year 7 Introductory Evening Forging Successful Home-School Partnerships Mrs Hubbard and Mrs Mowatt.
Kindergarten 2016 Parent Workshop #1 How to help your child, Learning And Support, Best Start Assessment.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Jorge F. del Valle ( A monitoring system for program evaluation in family foster care CHALLENGES OF FOSTER CARE AT THE BEGINNIG OF THE 21st.
The Role of the IRIS Consultant Self-Determination Conference Wisconsin Dells November 10, 2010.
Students Consulting on Teaching Alan White and Ann Macfadyen.
PAIRED READING PLANNING – PEER TUTORING A. CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES 1. Objectives of project 2. Support from colleagues/outside agencies 3. Problems specific.
Assessor Training 11 TH FEBRUARY Key Messages from Ofsted  Strengths  The partnership has a clear vision for improving the quality of practice.
1 Forest Schools Title – briefly explain project in one sentence Subtitle – briefly explain project partners involved Photo’s Other logos.
Meet the Teacher Grafton Primary School 22 nd October 2015.
Managing Special Needs Assistants. Legislation Allocation Recruitment Appointment Contract Roles Management Review Special Needs Assistants.
Policy & practice Some thoughts There is no assessment panacea. There are strengths and weaknesses for both observation and question- based assessment.
Child Centred Principles of the Quality Standards Day 2.
Parent Education What Are We Saying & How Are We Saying It? AMS Conference Chicago, 2011.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Partnership with Families.
Contact: Kirstie Cooper Tel: The School Readiness Programme What is School Readiness? The Incredible.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Adult Student Match.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Using peer tutoring to improve reading
OPEN HOUSE School Name Date.
Open House School Name Date.
Background To Development of RE
OPEN HOUSE School Name Date.
OPEN HOUSE School Name Date.
Presentation transcript:

PAIRED READING PLANNING –– PARENT TUTORING Context and problems Existing parental involvement/expectations Aims and objectives Initial project period Target group: children and parents Staff training

PAIRED READING PLANNING –– PARENT TUTORING Book access – sources Recruitment of parents Training of parents and children Support and monitoring Feedback and re-contracting Evaluation

CONTEXT Age range of school Head teacher interested? Other teachers interested? Project coordinator

CONTEXT Size of school Ethnic minorities Social advantages/disadvantages Size of catchment area and ease of access to school Other information about catchment area

CONTEXT School reading standards – data? Teaching of reading in the school Head teacher/school development plan Aims/wider problems Estimated likely response of staff

CONTEXT History of parental involvement: (a) Social and fund-raising events (b) Response to open evenings, etc. (c) Specific parental work in school (d) Contact with parents of target children Other re: quality of school–community relationships Any likely problems

OBJECTIVES Target Group Ages (tutees) Classes Number Distribution of reading attainment

OBJECTIVES Tutors Natural parents Parent volunteers Staff volunteers Other combination

OBJECTIVES Project period (initial ‘trial’ period) Specific objectives : ______________________ _______________________

MATERIALS Child’s free selection/guided child selection (how guided?) For each source of books, current and proposed access and loan recording system School library Classroom libraries Internal special collections

MATERIALS Loan special collection Reading scheme (basal readers) School bookshop Community library Other/special events

RECRUITMENT A. First introductory letter: with school report/newsletter at/after open evening? timing? B.Detailed invitation to meeting(s): timing?reply slip? C.Reminder: timing?reply slip?

RECRUITMENT Consider: Mail or child delivery? Invitation in person to parents who come into school? How to energise children to persuade parents into coming? What advance build-up in school? Advance target group children meeting? Telephone contact with parents? Home visits for personal invitation? Posters or public notices as well? Local press publicity?

TRAINING Initial staff briefing/training Time Date Duration Response/reactions? Who subsequently practised?

TRAINING FOR TUTORS/TUTEES: OUTLINE One meeting or two? Two-stage training or two parallel meetings? With children (what about siblings?)? Time(s)? Day(s) and date(s)? Transport provided?

PLACE Position of electric points Access to TV/OHP Access to books for practice (pre-chosen?) Practice space Crèche/childminding/play space Arrangement for refreshments When?

TRAINING FOR TUTORS/TUTEES: DETAIL Who will do what? Welcome Introduction How not to do it: video or role play? Talk: how to do it Demonstration Video/live role play/live child demo Practice (monitors?) Questions Talk on access to books/home–school records/other follow-up

SUPPORT AND MONITORING For children and parents (1) Home–school records: Cards, sheets or books? Returned to whom and when? (2) Meetings in school: Surgery or booster? Individual or group or both? With whom? When? How often? (3) Home Visits: By whom? To whom?

SUPPORT AND MONITORING For project staff Mid-project review: Time? Date? Consultant to visit? End of project review: Time? Date? Consultant to visit?

FEEDBACK Feedback meeting: Individual: children present? Group? Children/parents together/separate/both? Time(s)? Date(s)? Place?

FEEDBACK Format: School perceptions Parent perceptions Child perceptions Evaluation results Client critique of training/follow-up Options for continuation (e.g. continue as now, continue with reduced frequency, continue with adjusted method, stop with view to later restart if required) Pair decision re: continuation and record of this Certificates or other commendation for children

EVALUATION Reading tests/assessments already in use in school: Frequency? Time of year? How far back does data exist?

EVALUATION Measurement: Standardised reading test(s): Individual? Group? Pre-/post-/baselined/control group? Criterion-referenced reading assessments (IRIs, Cloze tests, Word lists, etc.)? Other: error frequency counts, rate, no. of books read, etc.?

EVALUATION Attitudinal/affective/subjective outcomes: Attitude or self-esteem scales? Structured teacher observations: checklist or interview? Structured child observations: questionnaire or interview? Structured parent observations: questionnaire or interview?

EVALUATION Was the project well organised (process)? Which of your objectives were met? To what extent? How would you improve it next time? How to collect data for long-term follow-up? In 6/12/18/24 months?