CLIC MODULE TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Keith Kershaw CES, 8 October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMS ZDC Crane Emergency Payload Removal Procedures This document proposes the viability of using a portable hydraulic actuator Hand crane (Davit crane)
Advertisements

MODULE TRANSPORT CLIC Module Working Group 27 September 2010 Keith Kershaw CERN EN-HE.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Positron Source Update Jim Clarke Deepa Angal-Kalinin James Jones Norbert Collomb At Daresbury Laboratory and Cockroft Institute 21/07/2009.
CERN TS Department / Civil Engineering Group 8 February 2008 Civil Engineering Layouts & Tunnel Cross Section 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Meeting 8 Feb 2008.
Plasma Wakefield (AWAKE) Project Meeting 18 October 2012 Civil Engineering Feasibility Issues for the West Area EDMS : John Osborne GS-SE.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
R. Rinaldesi, K. Kershaw – HE Group
Collimation Remote Handling Highlights from work for collimation remote handling and remote survey. Plans Keith Kershaw EN-HE 14 June 2011.
7/28/03P. Kroon AEROGEL Assembly of Cells into 80-cell Array: –8 cells wide by 10 cells high mm high (Y) by 2077 mm wide (Z) by about 335 mm deep.
Remote Handling design progress for the Collimation Upgrade project Keith Kershaw EN-HE 6 June 2011.
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
Baseline Change Request BCR Title: EBD New 6 Ton Bridge Crane Installation BCR #: N/A Presenter’s Name: Robert Law CCB Presentation Date:
TS Department / Civil Engineering Group 17 October 2007 Civil Engineering Layouts & Tunnel Cross Section 1 CLIC workshop – Working group: Two beam hardware.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Transport and handling at CERN for FAIR
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
1 CLIC / ILC Collaboration for CES issues JOHN OSBORNE – CES 8 April 2009.
LHC Insertions Upgrade Working Group (LIUWG) Space available in tunnel Y. Muttoni.
Agenda : CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG.
Drive Beam transfer lines in the main tunnel B.Jeanneret CERN/AB/ABP CLIC Workshop, 16 Oct 2007.
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 19 May 2009 Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG CTC 19 May 2009 Tunnel Cross Section.
Civil Engineering and Services - drawings for CDR - CDR chapter J.Osborne and M.Gastal for CES WG 1.
08/31/07Shutdown’07 Week 4 F.G. Garcia1 MTA beam line installation Weekly Report August 31, 2007 Period covered: August 24 th to August 31 st (Week 4)
CLIC survey and alignment 1 CLIC CES meeting STARTSLIDE CLIC SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
A. Hervé - 17 Oct CLIC-Workshop CLIC Workshop: 17 Oct. 07 Interaction Region Engineering at ILC Push-Pull Option A. Hervé/CERN.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 08, 2004 Page 1 ACD Installation, Post LAT CDR Response to GLAST LAT CDR RFA Number 13: MGSE Detailed Dimension Study [for ACD Installation]
Transport of the CLIC Modules and Elements CLIC Workshop October 2007 Two Beam Hardware and Integration Working Group Keith Kershaw (CERN)
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
Transport and Handling (T&H) considerations for HL-LHC
COOLING & VENTILATION FOR THE DRIVE BEAM TUNNEL M Nonis – EN/CV – 16/9/2009 CLIC TWO BEAM MODULES REVIEW
GLAST LAT Project Page 1 ACD Installation, Post LAT CDR Response to GLAST LAT CDR RFA Number 13: MGSE Detailed Dimension Study [for ACD Installation] –A)
ILC TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Questions from last CES: Beam height explanation, Transport implications of sloping access tunnels proposed for access to.
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Accelerator Systems Installation F. Willeke, ASD Director 6 th ASAC October 22-23, 2009.
MDI 9 th Meeting - 22 nd January 2016 FCC Experimental Caverns - Feasibility and Excavation C. Cook (GS), J. Osborne (GS),
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch September 11, AGENDA Global Design Concept – Updated Global Assembly Concept – Updated Inner HCal Installation concept.
Alignment system and impact on CLIC two-beam module design H. Mainaud-Durand, G. Riddone CTC meeting –
LBNE Remote Handling Conceptual Design Issues for ORNL Collaboration Kick-off Meeting at ORNL 1/6/2010.
Design considerations for the FCC electrical network architecture FCC week 2016, Rome, April 2016 Davide Bozzini - CERN/EN/EL With the contribution.
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
KEY LEARNING from an Electrical Discharge [Dangerous Occurrence] that occurred on Thurs 03 October 2013.
Logo area Handling Engineering Requirements EN-HE Group Bruno Feral – EN/HE EDMS HL-LHC CE Consultant Kick-Off Meeting – 31/05/2016.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox February 2012.
Handling Discussions LAGUNA-LBNO/Layout Study Group - Friday 19/7/2013 Keith Kershaw EN-HE.
Structural Slab Analysis
Constraints Space Load Capacity Costs Operating hours.
CLIC Handling Engineering Update
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Updated Design of Detector Hall
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne, Jo Stanyard, Matt Stuart(SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) Cost & schedule Phase 3 - specification 10th May 2017.
CLIC Civil Engineering & Infrastructure
FCC lifts Layout, characteristics etc.
Tunnel Cross Section Studies
CLIC / ILC Collaboration for CFS works
MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design
5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting
FCC Civil Engineering update
COOLING & VENTILATION INFRASTRUCTURE
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
Presentation transcript:

CLIC MODULE TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Keith Kershaw CES, 8 October 2008

AIMS REVIEW REQUIREMENTS AND PROPOSE CONCEPTUAL SOLUTION FOR LOWERING AND UNDERGROUND TRANSPORT / INSTALLATION OF CLIC MODULES. THIS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN WILL BE AN INPUT INTO THE TUNNEL INTEGRATION STUDIES

APPROACH NEED TO CONSIDER : TRANSPORT ALONG TUNNEL TRANSFER AND INSTALLATION ON SUPPORTS LOWERING FROM SURFACE AND ENTRY INTO TUNNEL 20,000 MODULES SO NEED TO BE FAST. ALLOW INDIVIDUAL MODULE EXCHANGE Previous presentations reviewed transport and installation solutions used elsewhere

Transport questions + answers MODULE CONDITIONING FOR TRANSPORT What is the unit of transport? -one module –see later slides Dimensions in transport configuration - see later slide Weights in transport configurations -1500kg Potential lifting points (e.g. for transfer) –consider lifting points above module – allow space for spreader beam Potential support points – support under girders during transport TRANSFER TRAJECTORY RESTRICTIONS What supports etc will already be installed on the floor? – see later slides How much clearance space between adjacent modules during transfer/installation- 30mm allowed for interconnections – space available during installation to be defined POSSIBLE SIMULTANEOUS TRANSPORT/INSTALLATION OF SEVERAL INTERCONNECTED MODULES What are the possibilities/implications if several modules are interconnected on the surface and transported/ installed at same time? –support and survey concepts based on module installation one at a time VIBRATIONS Is it reasonable at this stage to assume that the levels of precaution taken for cryodipole tunnel transport will be sufficient? - 1g used as basis (i.e. normal handling techniques) note: need to avoid overloading supports during installation.

Transport envelope in cyan – 1125 x 1150 x 2100 Lifting points according to the worst case, i.e. on top of the transport envelope. Intergirder support acceptable assumption for the moment. R. Nousiainen

Assembly, Transport and Installation Continuation of the meeting held on 28 th of August 2008 K. Kershaw, H. Mainaud Durand, R. Nousiainen, G. Riddone, T. Touze (R. Nousiainen slides)

Assembly at surface - Use the same configuration as in the tunnel - MB-DB interconnections installed - Fiducialisation done Step 1

Add installation and transportation supports Step 2

Move module to a transportation support Step 3

Tunnel before module installation - Prepare propagation network reference and pre-align supports Step 4

Module at the installation point. - Use temporary supports for installation. Step 5

Step 5b Module at the installation point. - Use temporary supports for installation.

Step 6 Module installation trajectory 500

Step 7 Installed module with temporary supports

Step 7b Installed module - Temporary supports removed

CLIC 3-D Studies for module Transport and Installation INSTALLATION MODULES Keith Kershaw / John Osborne / A.Kosmicki 2008 Sept. 25th

RIGHT VIEW TYPICAL CROSS SECTION CLIC TUNNEL

Vehicle conceptual design Floor – running vehicles with on-board (un)loading cranes. Transport several modules at a time Avoid requirement for reserved space below beams / girders Modular: vehicle base with separate operator cabins and interchangeable lifting equipment modules Monorail for power (+ buffer batteries) 1200 wide x 2270 high x 12m long (+ 2.5m for cabs) Allows reservation of space in tunnel for transport and transfer of modules (however module beam offset issues may change transfer height)

3 cable trays 520mm 2 CV pipes 600mm 2 CV pipes 250mm Drive beam Main beam Safe passage Transport train Turnaround loop RIGHT VIEW TYPICAL CROSS SECTION CLIC TUNNEL Monorail

3 cable trays 520mm 2 CV pipes 600mm 2 CV pipes 250mm Drive beam Main beam Safe passage Transport train Turnaround loop RIGHT VIEW TYPICAL CROSS SECTION CLIC TUNNEL Monorail

3 cable trays 520mm 2 CV pipes 600mm 2 CV pipes 250mm Drive beam Main beam Safe passage Transport train Turnaround loop RIGHT VIEW TYPICAL CROSS SECTION CLIC TUNNEL Monorail

3 cable trays 520mm 2 CV pipes 600mm 2 CV pipes 250mm Drive beam Main beam Safe passage Transport train Turnaround loop RIGHT VIEW TYPICAL CROSS SECTION CLIC TUNNEL Monorail

Lowering of modules etc Use lifts for fast lowering of modules Method of fast loading of modules onto vehicles Space to allow loaded vehicles to queue before driving along tunnel (-e.g. grouped passage through interconnection work sites) Space for maintenance /repair Passing places to allow sorting of vehicles/modules

Shaft Jonction chamber with shielding Loading area Maintenance area Services area 10t Crane 3D models are based on Civil Engineering drawings prepared in 2007

Logistics – indicative figures 20,549 modules to install (assume supports already in place) Access shafts 5km apart Consider 1 vehicle with 4 modules Driving speed 4km/h Consider mid-sector (2.5km driving each way ) Ignore loading time (queuing) Driving time = 2 x 2.5/4 =1.25hrs Unloading / installation time = say ½ hr x4 = 2hrs 1 shift → 8 modules with one vehicle modules in 2 years (single shift, weekdays) → ~41/day → need min 6 operational vehicles for modules

Next steps 1)Agree concept as basis for further work – feedback from other groups 2)Continuous review and refinement as more details of modules and supports and other items and services become available 3)Consider transport and installation of: Overhead magnets Turnarounds Beam dumps Services