Principles and Parameters (II) Rajat Kumar Mohanty Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 2: Constraints on Movement.  Formal movement rules (called Transformations) were first introduced in the late 1950s  During the 1960s a lot.
Advertisements

NP Movement Passives, Raising: When NPs are not in their theta positions.
Syntax-Semantics Mapping Rajat Kumar Mohanty CFILT.
Chapter Two Syntactic Categories Syntactic categories are of two types: Lexical categories (N, V, P, A, AdP) and functional categories (IP, CP, DP)
Lecture 7 Syntax Transformations.
Movement Markonah : Honey buns, there’s something I wanted to ask you
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Long Distance Dependencies (Filler-Gap Constructions) and Relative Clauses October 10, : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin (Examples from Kroeger.
Detecting Complements and Adjuncts Rajat Kumar Mohanty Center for Indian Language Technology IIT Bombay.
Syntax Lecture 13: Revision. Lecture 1: X-bar Theory X-bar rules for introducing: – Complement (X 1  X 0 Y 2 ) – Specifier (X 2  Y 2 X 1 ) – Adjunct.
Week 12b. Relative clauses CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Relative clauses Another place where we see wh- movement, besides in explicit questions (either in the.
Week 14. Finishing up from last time and some commentary… CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
1 Auxiliary Verbs and Movement Phenomena Allen ’ s Chapter 5 J&M ’ s Chapter 11.
Constraining X-bar theory using the mental dictionary
Computational Intelligence 696i Language Lecture 3 Sandiway Fong.
Week 8. Midterm debrief CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Midterm results Mean: 88 Mean: 88 Median: 93 Median: 93 A A- B+ B B-
Week 12a. More wh-movement, Subjacency, and relative clauses CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
Week 13a. QR CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Quantifiers We interpret Bill saw everyone as We interpret Bill saw everyone as For every person x, Bill saw x. For.
Bounding Theory Constraints on Wh-movement. NP islands What i did Bill claim [ CP that he read t i ?] *What did Bill make [ NP the claim [ CP that he.
Sanjukta Ghosh Department of Linguistics Banaras Hindu University.
Syntax Lecture 3: The Subject. The Basic Structure of the Clause Recall that our theory of structure says that all structures follow this pattern: It.
Week 9.5. Relative clauses CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Finishing up from last week… Last week, we covered wh-movement in questions like: –What i did Bill buy.
Week 14b. PRO and control CAS LX 522 Syntax I. It is likely… This satisfies the EPP in both clauses. The main clause has Mary in SpecIP. The embedded.
Week 9.5. Relative clauses CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Finishing up from last week… Last week, we covered wh-movement in questions like: Last week, we covered.
CAS LX 522 Syntax I Week 9. Wh-movement.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 3 Movement. A brief history of movement Movements as ‘special rules’ proposed to capture facts that phrase structure rules cannot.
Embedded Clauses in TAG
LEL 1 Syntax 8: Wh-movement. Outline Questioned constituents in English undergo movement to first position of the sentence. This movement can lead to.
Lecture Four Syntax.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
English Linguistics Chapter Six Syntax. 中国. 中学政治教学网崇尚互联共享 Syntax Syntax is the study of how words are combined with others to form.
Syntax Lecture 5: More On Wh-movement. Review Wh-movement: – Moves interrogative ‘wh’-phrase – from various positions inside the IP – to the specifier.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 10 Grammaticality. How do grammars determine what is grammatical? 1 st idea (traditional – 1970): 1 st idea (traditional – 1970):
Time, Tense and Aspect Rajat Kumar Mohanty Centre For Indian Language Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian.
Chapter 4: Syntax Part V.
Syntax V November 23, Weekday Update Syntax homework will be posted after class today …due on Friday. On Wednesday, we will work on a few more practice.
Culture , Language and Communication
Revision.  Movements leave behind a phonologically null trace in all their extraction sites.
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
1 Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - IV Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra.
The Minimalist Program
Linguistic Theory Lecture 5 Filters. The Structure of the Grammar 1960s (Standard Theory) LexiconPhrase Structure Rules Deep Structure Transformations.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 16, March 6, 2007.
Ian Roberts  Generate well-formed structural descriptions  “create” trees/labelled bracketings  More (X’) or less (PS-rules) abstract.
November 16, 2004 Lexicon (An Interacting Subsystem in UG) Part-II Rajat Kumar Mohanty IIT Bombay.
 Chapter 8 (Part 2) Transformations Transformational Grammar Engl 424 Hayfa Alhomaid.
1 Natural Language Processing Lectures 8-9 Auxiliary Verbs Movement Phenomena Reading: James Allen NLU (Chapter 5)
Syntax VI November 29, Announcements! The time and place of the final exam will be: Craigie Hall C 105 Wednesday, December 15th 8-10 am Also note:
SYNTAX.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
November 9, Lexicon (An Interacting Subsystem in UG) Part-I Rajat Kumar Mohanty IIT Bombay.
Lecture 1: Trace Theory.  We have seen that things move :  Arguments move out of the VP into subject position  Wh-phrases move out of IP into CP 
Week 11. Interim summary and some things to do in class. CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
An Introduction to Semantic Parts of Speech Rajat Kumar Mohanty rkm[AT]cse[DOT]iitb[DOT]ac[DOT]in Centre for Indian Language Technology Department of Computer.
1 Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics II Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra.
(Transformational) Generative Grammar
X-Bar Theory. The part of the grammar regulating the structure of phrases has come to be known as X'-theory (X’-bar theory'). X-bar theory brings out.
MENTAL GRAMMAR Language and mind. First half of 20 th cent. – What the main goal of linguistics should be? Behaviorism – Bloomfield: goal of linguistics.
Lec. 10.  In this section we explain which constituents of a sentence are minimally required, and why. We first provide an informal discussion and then.
Week 12. NP movement Text 9.2 & 9.3 English Syntax.
Course Outline Advanced Syntax.
English Syntax Week 12. NP movement Text 9.2 & 9.3.
Lecture 12: Summary and Exam
4.3 The Generative Approach
: 2018.
X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series
Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - III
Principles and Parameters (I)
Presentation transcript:

Principles and Parameters (II) Rajat Kumar Mohanty Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

Levels of Representation in Universal Grammar (UG) Lexicon Move-alpha D(eep)-Structure S(urface)-Structure LF (logical form) PF (phonetic form) Theta roles Constrained by theta criterion Transformational rules Constrained by EPP X-bar rules

Universal Principles Language specific Parameters

Outline  Move-   Structure Preserving Hypothesis (SPH)  Head Movement Constraint (HMC)  Tensed S Condition (TSC)  Doubly Filled COMP Filter  Bounding Theory  Subjacency Principle

D-structure to S-structure  Move-  : Move any constituent anywhere (subject to other constraints)  S-structure: the actual word order in a sentence  D-structure is mapped onto S-structure by the function Move- 

Move-   Movement: Bounded / Unbounded  Bounded movement rearranges the argument structure of a verb and is confined to a minimal clause.  Unbounded movement does not affect the argument structure.

Move-   Types of movement NP-movement NP-movement Wh-movement Wh-movement V-raising V-raising I-raising I-raising  Restrictions Only maximal or zero-level categories can move Only maximal or zero-level categories can move For maximal categories, movement must be from an A- position. It must be to a position that is not  -marked. For maximal categories, movement must be from an A- position. It must be to a position that is not  -marked. For zero-level categories, Head Movement Constraint must be satisfied. For zero-level categories, Head Movement Constraint must be satisfied.

Structure Preserving Hypothesis (SPH)  SPH forces head categories to move to head positions and maximal projections to maximal (spec) positions.  Examples Which car will John fix? Which car will John fix? *Will which car John fix? *Will which car John fix?

spec V ` VP NPV I ` IP NP I fix NP t Which car will John fix ? C ` CP C t [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] WILL John Which car will

spec V ` VP NPV I ` IP NP I fix NP t * Will which car John fix ? C ` CP C t [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] WILL John Which car will Violation of SPH

Head Movement Constraint (HMC)  Movement of an X 0 category  is restricted to the position of a head  that governs the maximal projection of .  According to HMC, movement of the verb is restricted to I.

IP I ` I titi VP V ` NP V sink Unaccusative Movement [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] The ship sank NP The ship V-raising

John seems to be happy. IP I ` NP IVP V ` I ` seem IPV John I VP N ` N [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] TO V` V be AP happy titi titi Tensed S Condition (TSC): Move an NP to an empty position provided the NP is not contained in a tensed S. spec e

It seems that John is happy. IP I ` NP IVP V ` C ` seem CPV It C IP N ` N [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] that Tensed S Condition (TSC): Move an NP to an empty position provided the NP is not contained in a tensed S. spec e John is happy

IP I ` I titi VP V ` NP V kick Passivization The ball was kicked NP The ball [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] BE + -EN

NP V ` VP spec V NP CP N` N spec meet who be The man who I met was John I ` IP NP I John [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] man C` VP V` N` the Det C IP I I` VNP t I [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] Relativization

Doubly Filled COMP Filter  The man who I met was John.  * The man who that I met was John.  COMP cannot contain both a wh-element and a complementizer (parametric variation)

v P v ` spec V ` VP v NP V PP I ` IP NP I give who the book titi t who did you give the book to ? C ` CP NP C t [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] DO you P P` to NP

v P v ` spec V ` VP v NP V PP I ` IP NP I give To whom the book titi t To whom did you give the book ? C ` CP PP C t [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] DO you Pied-piping

spec V ` VP NPV I ` IP NP I buy NP t Who bought what ? C ` CP spec C what [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] t who PF movement

spec V ` VP NPV I ` IP NP I buy NP t Who bought what ? C ` CP spec C t [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] t who what LF movement PF movement

spec C ` CP spec C IP I ` IP NP I think who t that who do you think that John likes ? C ` CP NP C John likes t [Tense] [AGR] [+ EPP] DO you VP V ` V t Cycle-2 Cycle-1

[ CP who do [ IP you think [ CP t that [ IP John likes t ] Violation of subjacency principle

Bounding Theory  Subjacency principle (subordinate + adjacency)  Movement must not cross more than one bounding nodes in one cycle  Bounding Nodes (English): IP, DP (parametric variation)

[ IP It seems [ CP that [ IP John is likely [ IP t to pass the exam ]]]] * [ IP John seems [ CP that [ IP it is likely [ IP t to pass the exam ]]]] *[ IP John seems [ CP that [ IP t is likely [ IP t to pass the exam ]]]] Violation of TSC Violation of subjacency

Sources and further readings  Comsky, Noam Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. CUP, Cambridge.  Comsky, Noam Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.  Ouhalla, Jamal Introducing Transformational grammar. Arnold, London.

THANK YOU