Progress towards a common North American Geoid in 2012 Daniel Roman, Yan Wang & Xiaopeng Li National Geodetic Survey Geosciences Research Division.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Beyond GEOID12: Implementing a New Vertical Datum for North America

Advertisements

Investigation of the Topographic Effect by Using High Degree Spherical Harmonic Expansion Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA IAG Scientific Meeting.

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.

Comparison of Gravimetric Geoid Models Over the Great Lakes Region Daniel R. Roman and Xiaopeng Li.

Datums, Heights and Geodesy Central Chapter of the Professional Land Surveyors of Colorado 2007 Annual Meeting Daniel R. Roman National Geodetic Survey.

OPUS-Database: Supplemental Data for Better Datum Conversion Models D.R. Roman and N.D. Weston F.I.G. Working Week Session TS04A: National Geodesy I Marrakech,

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Plan Overview Center for Operational Oceanographic.

UNCLASSIFIED Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Stephen Malys NGA Senior.

Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.

Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.

Modernizing the Geopotential Datum: Replacing NAVD 88 Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D.

Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch

Vertical Datums and Heights

45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in.

NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.

Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.

1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.

Using Aerogravity to Produce a Refined Vertical Datum D.R. Roman and X. Li XXV FIG Congress June 2014 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Session TS01A, Paper.

International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.

Geoid Surfaces and Theory Session B of Datums, Heights and Geodesy Presented by Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Of the National Geodetic Survey.

Datum Shifts and Geoid Height Models

G13A Towards a New Vertical Datum Daniel R. Roman 1, Xiaopeng Li 2, Simon A. Holmes 3, Vicki A. Childers 4, and Yan M. Wang 1 1. Geosciences Research.

Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.

Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.

NGS HSRP Update Ronnie Taylor, Acting Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA October 13, 2010.

Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,

Progress Toward a Unified Geoid-Based Vertical Datum for North America

A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.

GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.

New Vertical Datum Implementation Plan FGDC Silver Spring, MD. July 30, 2013 Mark C. Eckl Chief of the Observation and Analysis Division, National Geodetic.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.

GPS and Geodetic News You Can Use David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State of Ohio National Geodetic Survey, NOAA 2008 Ohio GIS Conference September.

Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.

NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Update Michael Dennis, RLS, PE ® Esri Survey Summit July 6-9, 2013 ● San Diego, CA.

Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.

Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.

Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.

National Geodetic Survey Programs & Geodetic Tools William Stone Southwest Region Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey

20 FEB 2009 Salt Lake City, UTACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference 2009 Geoid Modeling, GRAV-D and Height Mod.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.

National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,

NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.

National Spatial Reference System: Present and Future Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento

The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)

Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System

Status and Plans of the National Geodetic Survey’s Gravity Database Update Daniel R. Roman and Yan Ming Wang October 13-14, 2005 Austin, Texas.

Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.

New Vertical Datum: plans, status, GRAV-D update FGCS San Diego, CA. July 11, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical.

Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,

Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.

The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,

Benefits of the New Reference Frames Dru Smith Joe Evjen 60 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…

Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum.

Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.

New Datum: Vertical (Geopotential) FGCS Silver Spring, MD. July 24, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical Datum.

Overview of Datums Commonly Used in Michigan and the National Spatial Reference System Michigan Society of Professional Surveyors 70 th Annual Meeting.

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.

Scientific Roadmap towards Height System Unification with GOCE 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Th. Gruber (1), R. Rummel (1), M.

Determination of the Mean Dynamic Topography at the Coast using the Geodetic and Ocean Approaches and Consequences for Worldwide Height System Unification.

Integration of Gravity Data Into a Seamless Transnational Height Model for North America Daniel Roman, Marc Véronneau, David Avalos, Xiaopeng Li, Simon.

Evaluation of the Release-3, 4 and 5 GOCE-based Global Geopotential Models in North America M. G. Sideris (1), B. Amjadiparvar (1), E. Rangelova (1), J.

Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.

Improvements to the Geoid Models

Some recent decisions: NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey

California Geodetic Advisor,

Presentation transcript:

Progress towards a common North American Geoid in 2012 Daniel Roman, Yan Wang & Xiaopeng Li National Geodetic Survey Geosciences Research Division

Considerations for Unification Datum surface (W 0 selection) GNSS Reference Frame EGM Reference Model Kernel Modification USGG2012 – CGG2010 Comparisons – Gravity data sets – Techniques GRAV-D

Agreement on W 0 Value Session G1B, Tuesday, 05 June 2012 Regional and global geoid based vertical datums II: Progress towards a common North American Geoid in of

Tide Gauge comparisons limited to where SST models exist TSC04C: Heights, Geoid, & Gravity Paper 5691, 08 May 2012, 0900 F.I.G. Working Week May 2012 Rome, Italy 4 62,636, m 2 /s 2

Goemetric Reference Frame NAD83(CSRS) vs NAD83(2011) PERSOMM Rich Snay Should agree Differing SOP’s may cause inconsistencies in velocities and positional coordinates Must also track ref. epoch U.S. set epoch at Canada also tracks GIA closely NAD83(CSRS) vs NAD 83(2022) U.S. may have to keep “NAD 83” name for legal reasons It will effectively be IGS2020 or ITRF2020 Likely fixed at a specific epoch (not dynamic) HTDP to transform Use these to access GNSS- derived orthometric heights

Spectrally Combined Reference Model

Degree Kernel Modification ModelAlaskaCONUS µ (m)σ(m)µ (m)σ(m) EGM USGG2009 (AK 360/CONUS 120) TGM040912d+RTM+kernel TGM040912d+RTM+kernel TGM040912d+RTM+kernel TGM040912d+RTM+kernel TGM040912d+RTM+kernel TGM040912d+RTM+kernel TGM040912d+RTM+kernel

USGG2012 – CGG2010 Differences

USGG2012 – USGG2009 Differences

USGG2012 – USGG2003 Differences

GRAV-D Status Map Key Green: Available data and metadata Blue: Data being processed, metadata may be available Orange: Data collection underway White: Planned for data collection

Aerogravity Production Timeline AK08– Fall 2012 AK09-- Fall 2012 PV09-- Summer 2012 NY11-- Summer 2012 AK Fall 2012 AK Fall 2012 AK Fall 2012 IN11-- Fall 2012 AK11 -- Winter 2013 IN12 -- Winter 2013 CA11-- Spring 2013 MN12-- Spring 2013 TX12-- Summer 2013 ME12-- Summer 2013

Questions? Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D., GRAV-D P.I., Geoid Team Lead Geosciences Research Division, National Geodetic Survey, NOS, NOAA x161