Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program The General Administrators Meeting: By Andy Denison, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee September 13 th, 2012

Administrator Evaluation Committee Patty Buoy Youssef Mossallam Jill Chochol Shannon Peterson Andrew DenisonGail Shenkman Glenn Maleyko

Legislative Changes  Most of the changes reflect what is required by state law  We had a fair process that included input from all levels.

Legislative Changes  Evaluation must include student growth data by %, %, %.  We are going to wait for the State to provide Direction.  We have a profile that was modified with this tool.  We will also include data in the year end evaluation summary.

Most Significant Change -We have eliminated the use of the NC rubric. We are now in better compliance with the 4 scale state rating system. -Rating scale, ineffective, minimally effective, effective and highly effective by September 19, This change was already implemented. -Rubric based on work by Kim Marshall in alignment with work by Charlotte Danielson

Administrative Tool Timeline  Self Assessment- By September 30th.  Meeting with Evaluator to discuss goals and data to be gathered by October 31st.  Data Collection and Mid Year Visit to the school by evaluator between November 1st and March 30th.  Administrator provides a brief summary on progress. By May 1st. School Profile should also be completed.  Year End Evaluation Meeting by June 15th. This must be submitted to HR by this date.

Questions?

HR Website employment/hr-evaluation-tools