HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION-2014-2015 “RAM STYLE”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
School Social Workers Evaluation Process Training
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Overview Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Powerful Professionalism Becoming a Memorable Teacher for all the Right Reasons.
Teacher PDP for the School Year
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity A closer look at the Standards School Executive Training.
NC Educator Evaluation System Training for New Administrators Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
ADMN 6130 Class 5 The faithful teacher is eager to find out every imperfection in the instruction, always on the alert for improvement, dissatisfied with.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by Brian Foster.
North Carolina Principals Council Fall 2012 Kimberly Simmons NCDPI Jennifer Preston NCDPI.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
NC Educator Effectiveness System NC Educator Effectiveness System Orientation and Training Southern School of Energy and Sustainability.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Log in before presentation CTE, C & I, Early Learning login: password:
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity A closer look at the Standards School Executive Training.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
Evaluation with Fidelity Western Region Educators August 2012
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process August 2, 2012
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”

Pre-test 1.True or False: Educators may use the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System without training. 2.Within ____ weeks of a teacher’s first day of work, orientation on the N.C. Educator Evaluation (NCEES) must be provided. 3.Teachers should complete a self-assessment Pre-observation conferences are required 5.Formal observations must be... 6.Post-observations must be held... 7.True or False: The summary ratings must be an average of the notations on a teacher’s rubric from throughout the year. 8.Which resources contribute to the development of the PDP: 9.If a teacher is completing their third year, they must receive ratings of _______ or higher to be issued a SP2 license.

Teacher Evaluation Process

Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process. Component 2: Orientation Within two weeks of teacher’s first day, the principal will provide: A. The Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers; B. Teacher Evaluation Policy ID Number: TCP-C-004 C. A schedule for completing evaluation process. Before Week 2 of School Year STEP 1: Training and Orientation

Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the principal meets with the teacher to discuss: self- assessment, professional growth plan a written description of the lesson(s) to be observed. Goal: To prepare principal for the observation. Before First Formal Observation STEP 2: Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric, the teacher shall rate their performance and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year.

Component 5: Observations A. Formal observation: 45 min. or entire class period B. Probationary Teachers: 3 formal by principal and 1 formal by peer C. Career Status Teachers: Evaluated annually. During the renewal year: 3 total- 1 must be formal Observations shall be noted using the Rubric. Within the 1 st nine weeks STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) Component 6: Post-Observation Conference The principal shall conduct a post-observation conference no later than ten school days after each formal observation. Discuss and Document strengths and weaknesses on the Rubric

Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the Teacher Summary Rating Form- A. Give rating for each Element in Rubric B. Comment on “Not Demonstrated” C. overall rating of each Standard D. Provide teacher with opportunity to add comments to the Summary Rating Form E. Review completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with teacher and F. Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form. Component 8: PD Plans Individual Growth Plans-“Proficient” or better Monitored Growth Plans-At least 1 “Developing” Directed Growth Plans-“not Demonstrated” or “Developing” rating for 2 sequential yrs. Before the End of the School Year STEP 4: Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting

21 st Century Video (4 C’s) Communication Collaboration Critical Thinking Creativity Above and Beyond HNQkhttps:// HNQk 21st Century Video (4 C’s)21st Century Video (4 C’s)

Framework for 21st Century Learning: A Vision for 21st Century Student Success 21st Century Learners have the actions, attitudes, and skills that allow them to communicate, collaborate and create effectively. Well developed 21st Century Learners have specific capacities in: Creativity and Innovation Communication and Collaboration Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making Digital Citizenship Research and Information Fluency Technology Operations and Concepts Effective 21st Century Educators offer authentic, relevant learning experiences that support the development of these skills. As you explore the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards, you will find that these practices and expectations for students are interwoven into the standards set forth for North Carolina teachers.

21 st Century Student Outcomes and Support Systems Learning Environment Professional Development Curriculum and Instruction and, Standards and Assessment

Evaluation Standards STANDARD I: TEACHERS DEMONSTRATE LEADERSHIP STANDARD II: TEACHERS ESTABLISH A RESPECTFUL ENVIRONMENT FOR A DIVERSE POPULATION OF STUDENTS STANDARD III: TEACHERS KNOW THE CONTENT THEY TEACH STANDARD IV: TEACHERS FACILITATE LEARNING FOR THEIR STUDENTS STANDARD V: TEACHERS REFLECT ON THEIR PRACTICE

North Carolina Teaching Standards a) Take five minutes to review the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards – As you read about each standard, reflect on your personal strengths and areas for improvement. Using a notecard at your table, rate yourself in order of the standard with which you feel most knowledgeable to the standard with which you are the least comfortable. b) Make your way to the poster with the standard of your greatest strength. Share with others in your Standard Group why you have chosen this standard as your strength. On the top of the poster, each participant should graffiti write experiences, expertise, or other reasons each thinks this standard is his/her strength. c) Make your way to the poster with the standard that is your second greatest strength. Read the information already on the poster. Repeat the steps in "b" above by discussing with colleagues your rationale for ranking this standard your second strongest. Then, add any additional thoughts to the top of the poster. d) Now, move to the poster that you chose as your weakest standard. Read the comments other participants have added to the poster. Discuss with colleagues why you think this standard offers you the most potential for growth. At the bottom of the poster, add reasons why you are least comfortable with this standard.

Reflection Activity On the reverse side of your note card where you ranked your level of strength with each standard, take a few moments to think about areas for improvement. Reflect on the group conversations, your own self-assessment, and the standards themselves. Take five minutes to write a personal commitment for the school year.

1.True or False: Educators may use the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System without training. 2.Within 2 weeks of a teacher’s first day of work, orientation on the N.C. Educator Evaluation (NCEES) must be provided. 3.Teachers should complete a self-assessment...every year, online and in isolation (without observer) 4. Pre-observation conferences are required… Before the first observation. 5.Formal observations must be...45 minutes or at least one class period 6.Post-observations must be held...after each formal observation and within 10 school days 7.True or False: The summary ratings must be an average of the notations on a teacher’s rubric from throughout the year. 8.Which resources contribute to the development of the PDP: self assessment, school data and district initiative 9.If a teacher is completing their third year, they must receive ratings of proficient or higher to be issued a SP2 license.

Rating Scenarios Read and rate the scenarios as: – Developing – Proficient – Accomplished – Distinguished