Overview of the Final Report and Findings from the Review of Sampling Methods in Extrapolated New Base-Year Generation Studies May 11-12, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Presented by: Denise Sjahkit SURINAME. Introduction Overview of the main policy issues Scope Current compilation practices Data-sources Requirements for.
Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Forecasting Models With Linear Trend. Linear Trend Model If a modeled is hypothesized that has only linear trend and random effects, it will be of the.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Designs to Estimate Impacts of MSP Projects with Confidence. Ellen Bobronnikov March 29, 2010.
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
Expect the Unexpected Planning the Scope of an IT Performance Audit Robin Garity, C.P.A., C.I.S.A. October 2014.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 20 – April 3, 2008.
Purpose of the Standards
Creating Research proposal. What is a Marketing or Business Research Proposal? “A plan that offers ideas for conducting research”. “A marketing research.
1 Wisconsin Shares Child Care Subsidy Program Legislative Audit Bureau August 2009.
WMO UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES PROGRAMME WMO UNEP IPCC Good Practice Guidance Simon Eggleston Technical.
PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT ON MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (A CASE STUDY ON HEALTH CENTERS) 8/16/20151 Dr. Anna Nswilla CDHSMoHSW.
Conducting the IT Audit
Measuring the quality of regional estimates from the ABS Jennie Davies and Daniel Ayoubkhani.
SDG&E Small Business Energy Efficiency (SBEE) SoCal Gas Non-Residential Financial Incentives Program (NRFIP) Evaluation Results Steve Grover ECONorthwest.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of PricewaterhouseCoopers Introduction of Panel Members The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 What Companies Should Be Doing Now.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Sampling: Overview MICS Survey Design Workshop.
2005 Census Survey of Maricopa Household Survey Sample Design Overview Sample Size Assumptions.
DNV GL © 2013 Confidential April 10, 2014 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © 2013 Confidential September 8, 2014 Jarred Metoyer ENERGY HVAC Permit Study.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update.
Rate Reform Research and Communications Committee April 7, 2011.
August 7, Market Participant Survey Action Plan Dale Goodman Director, Market Services.
Discussion And Request For Direction On Options For Expanding Board Awards Program Market Development and Sustainability Committee March 7, 2007.
Projecting Property Tax Revenue Drew Corbett Budget Manager City of Sunnyvale.
IEc INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, INCORPORATED Measuring the Dosage Effect: Using Tenure as a Variable in Assessing Program Impact Angela Helman, Principal June.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
Understanding SB 1016 Solid Waste Per Capita Disposal Measurement Act 1.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
CHAPTER 12 Descriptive, Program Evaluation, and Advanced Methods.
©2000 Bank for International Settlements 1 F I N A N C I A L S T A B I L I T Y I N S T I T U T E BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS On-site Examination.
1 Diversion Rate Measurement System April 4, 2006.
SSC SI Data Processing Pipeline Plans Tom Stephens USRA Information Systems Development Manager SSSC Meeting – Sept 29, 2009.
Process Quality in ONS Rachel Skentelbery, Rachael Viles & Sarah Green
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Report to the Legislature Required by Senate Bill 2202 (due January 1, 2002) Board Briefing June 13, 2001 Agenda Item 5 Attachment 1.
1 Quality Control for Field Operations. 2 Overview Goal To ensure the quality of survey field work Purpose To detect and deter interviewer errors and.
Workshop LFS, April Estimating the non-response bias using exogenous data on employment Etienne Debauche Corinne Prost.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
Presentation to Board June 17, 2008 Presented by: J. A. Sabo, Associate Director – Leading Services & Treasurer of the Board BUDGET York Catholic.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Audit Evidence Process
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Demand Forecast Deviations Working Group Presented to: Stakeholder Advisory Committee Presented by: Pat Doran January 24, 2007.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Report Performance Monitor & Control Risk Administer Procurement MONITORING & CONTROLLING PROCESS.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
Draft Stormwater Proposal Home Builders Association of Virginia Richmond, Virginia June 29, 2009.
Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division Historical Performance Automated Systems Measurement Accuracy The Future Board MeetingAgenda Item 27.
Discussion of the 2003 School District Waste Reduction Survey and Findings April 13-14, 2004.
Work shop on Procurement Key-performance indicators with selected implementing entities Public procurement and property administration agency August 2016.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Internal Control Principles
Analysis of the Reporting Forms for the Structural Business Survey
Lab Roles and Lab Report
Mobility Choice Blueprint
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
MECH 3550 : Simulation & Visualization
Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
Unemployment Insurance Integrity Performance Measures
Enterprise Content Management (ECM) Project
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Final Report and Findings from the Review of Sampling Methods in Extrapolated New Base-Year Generation Studies May 11-12, 2004

Types of New Base Year Generation Studies Nonextrapolated “Actual” diversion data collected from diversion programs implemented within the jurisdiction Extrapolated Includes diversion data collected from a sample of the non-residential businesses and extrapolated to the entire non-residential business sector

Number of New Base-Year Generation Studies Since April 1998, Board staff have reviewed 184 submitted new base year studies for Board consideration. 143 Nonextrapolated studies 41 Extrapolated studies

Background Board expressed concerns regarding validity of extrapolated studies Working group convened Board staff performed analyses on extrapolation vs. nonextrapolation study methodologies

Extrapolated vs. Nonextrapolated Study Data Comparisons Generation pounds per person per day was 79% higher for extrapolated methodologies Diversion rates for extrapolated studies were significantly higher (53%) than nonextrapolated studies (41%). Average source reduction tonnage in extrapolated studies exceeded nonextrapolated studies by an average of 300%.

Response to Concerns regarding New Base-Year Study Data Base-Year Modification Certification Request form Board staff began on-site verification of new base-year generation study data Board pursued independent, third-party review of extrapolated study methodologies

Scope of Review Review 20 extrapolated studies. Only 2 of the 20 studies reviewed submitted sufficient data. Provide observations and recommendations for improving extrapolated methodologies used. Impact of poor quality or lack of study data.

Findings The findings in the final report address the impact of errors relating to: Study design; Sampling errors; and Technical data components of nonresidential diversion surveys.

Study Design Jurisdictions should list assumptions made in the study design and use sample data to assess their validity and appropriateness. Studies did not include listing of such assumptions. Jurisdictions did not use the study data to test the validity of assumptions.

Sampling Errors Accurate data on the selection of samples is needed for Board staff to fully evaluate the sampling methodology. Lack of documentation regarding sample selection. Studies employed nonrandom sampling methods.

Technical Data Lack of documentation regarding nonresponse. Most jurisdictions provided outlier analysis, but did not address all study design variables. Lack of access to study data.

Additional Analyses Case Study of One Extrapolated New Base- Year Generation Study Review of 35 extrapolated new base-year generation study data Diversion of Top 10 Businesses Compared to All Surveyed Businesses

Commercial Business diversion Represents Approximately 38% of Total Diversion 25% 38% 37% Non Residential Business Audits Res/ADC/Landfill Salvage Residential

New Base Year Case Study: Impact of the Largest Businesses (333) Audited Relative to the Total Business Audits (approx. 7,600) top 10top 20top 30 Business Generators % of Diversion tonnage from Businesses Audits

Diversion of Top 10 Businesses Compared to All Surveyed Businesses By surveying 10 top businesses: 94% of the jurisdictions captured 50% or more of the total diversion; 60% of the jurisdictions captured 80% or more of the total diversion; and 37% of the jurisdictions captured 90% or more of the total diversion.

Maximizing Efficiencies in New Base-Year Generation Studies Many of the jurisdictions would have been better off targeting their largest diverters and submitting a nonextrapolated study. These jurisdictions could have captured most of the industrial/commercial diversion without having to address problems associated with sample selection, nonresponse, outliers, or choosing an estimator.

Future Efforts Board staff will: Update the Board’s Base-Year Modification Request Certification form for extrapolated studies. Update the Board’s Diversion Study Guide to explicitly underscore the importance of documenting all critical aspects of study design, implementation and diversion rate calculation. Develop a Web-based reporting format.

Future Efforts (continued) Board staff will continue to Assist jurisdictions regarding their future new base-year generation studies; and. Stress the benefits of targeting the largest businesses first to measure the non-residential sector.

Summary Board staff were unable to perform a complete statistical review for 18 of the 20 studies due to insufficient study data. Findings support the value of targeting the top 10 businesses.