E. Todesco MAGNET (RE)Training E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC risk review, 5 th March 2009 Acknowledgements:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 2009 Summary of Chamonix 09 Steve Myers.
Advertisements

Cable inventory, relative measurements and 1 st mechanical computations STUDY OF THE QUADRUPOLE COLLAR STRUCTURE P. Fessia, F. Regis Magnets, Cryostats.
Status of the LHC Project L.Evans - C.Wyss Riunione CSN1 INFN Napoli, 21 Settembre 2005.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Expected Quench Levels of the Machine without Beam: Starting at 7 TeV ? P. Pugnat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland LHC Project Workshop Chamonix XV, Tuesday 24.
Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets, B.Dehning 1 B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco,
Quench-based magnet sorting at the MEB presented by L. Bottura Workshop on Beam generated heat deposition and quench levels for LHC magnets March 3 rd,
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
LMC 30 LPC A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run Heat pulse.
Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
The diode lead resistance ‘issue’ A. Verweij, TE-MPE, CSCM workshop 7/10/2011 Contents:  Diode geometry  Measurements performed in the past  Measurements.
1 Task particle simulations studies: preliminary results of D2 field quality M. Giovannozzi Setting up of simulations Results Outlook NB: numerical.
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
Frequency Transfer Function Measurements during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Arjan Verweij, Zinur Charifoulline, Andrea Musso MPE-TM
1 / 23 Workshop Chamonix XV January 2006, L'Esplanade du Lac, Divonne-les-Bains S. Sanfilippo Transfer Function of the.
R.Schmidt, HC 28/5/ Access to underground areas during powering Risk: accidental massive helium release (as on 19 September) when superconducting.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
1 CSCM-7TeV Powering Implementation and ELQA Third LHC Splice Review November 2012 M. Bajko, M. Bernardini, B. Bordini, k. Brodzinski, J. Casas-Cubillos,
AT-MEI Group, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 MPP Unbalance between apertures of MB B30R7 MPP meeting 18/06/2008 Unbalance between apertures of Dipole.
AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances.
Brainstorming on the field model: MAS activities P. Hagen, E. Todesco, J.P. Koutchouk CERN, 24 h March 2006 Field quality Working Group.
Understanding AC losses for LHC magnets What can we learn about heat exchange? Understanding AC losses Removing heat from the coil –Magnet (temperature)
Modelling and testing of circuit protection of new superconducting magnets for the HL-LHC project 1 st Workshop FTEC 2015 Alejandro Fernandez Navarro.
AT-MAS/SC A. Verweij 21 Mar 2003 Present Status and Trends of Cable Properties and Impact on FQ Workshop on Field Quality Steering of the Dipole Production.
E. Todesco PROTECTION FOR QXF E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland QXF protection meeting 28 th October 2013.
J.P. Koutchouk, L. Rossi, E. Todesco A phase-one LHC luminosity upgrade based on Nb-Ti J.P. Koutchouk, L. Rossi, E. Todesco Magnets, Cryostats and Superconductors.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
E. Todesco CAN WE IMPROVE THE MAGNETIC CYCLE/MODEL AND THEIR EFFECTS? E. Todesco For the FiDeL team: C. Alabau Pons, L. Bottura, M. Buzio, L. Deniau, L.
LHC Machine Status Report Mike Lamont for the LHC team Acknowledgements: Mirko Pojer, Matteo Solfaroli, Katy Foraz et al.
E. Todesco ENERGY OF THE LHC AFTER LONG SHUTDOWN 1 ( ) C. Lorin, E. Todesco and M. Bajko CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues.
7 th March 2008 Magnet Modelling N. Sammut On behalf of the FIDEL Working Group.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
Expected field quality in LHC magnets E. Todesco AT-MAS With contributions of S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, A. Lombardi, F. Schmidt (beam dynamics) N. Catalan-Lasheras,
The Large Hadron Collider The 19 th Sep 2008 incident [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] NIKHEF Seminar ( )
E. Todesco QUENCH BEHAVIOUR TEAM ACTIVITIES E. Todesco for the QBT CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 7 th January 2016 MSC Technical Meeting.
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
NIKHEF Annual Meeting, December 18, The LHC Project Status report to the NIKHEF annual meeting Jos Engelen Based on last week’s reports to CERN.
E. Todesco RETRAINING AND DETRAINING IN THE LHC E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC Machine Advisory.
TE-MSC-MDT. FTEC Follow-Up Meeting Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT 28/04/2016.
CSCM Test description and Risk assessment  Goal  The typical and ultimate current cycle  Test sequence for type test and regular test  Risk assessment.
SOME MORE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF TRAINING DATA
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
LHC Hardware Commissionning
E. Todesco for the QBT CERN, Geneva Switzerland
ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION DATA AFTER THERMAL CYCLE SECOND PART
Looking back on 2014 and Perspectives for the MPE Group in 2015
STATISTICAL SUMMARY AND INTERPRETATION OF THE TRAINING CAMPAIGNS
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Powering the LHC Magnets
Recommissioning of sector 12 after a short warm-up during eYETS 2016/17 QBT, MP3 – May 2017 S. Le Naour.
Field model deliverables for sector test and commissioning: when and what? The implementation of an accurate magnetic model will be vital for efficient.
QUENCH BEHAVIOUR TEAM ACTIVITIES
DESIGN OPTIONS IN THE T RANGE
POSSIBLE SCENARIOS FOR TRAINING
SEMI-ANALYTIC APPROACHES TO MAGNET DESIGN
Magnet Circuit performance at 6
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
LHC OPERATION AND SUPPORT
Andrzej Siemko (CERN) and Marco Zanetti (MIT)
MQY as Q5 in the HL LHC era Glyn Kirby MQY 001 bat 927.
US-LARP Task: IR Commissioning
US-LARP Task: IR Commissioning
HQ01 field quality study update
E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
Electrical measurements and diagnostics
Presentation transcript:

E. Todesco MAGNET (RE)Training E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC risk review, 5 th March 2009 Acknowledgements: B. Bellesia, N. Catalan-Lasheras, S. Feher, L. Rossi, A. Siemko, W. Venturini-Delsolaro, A. Verweij, the HC team, the SM18 team

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 2 Retraining: DIPOLES AT 6.5 TeV Main dipoles and quads were not trained to 7 TeV All sectors reached 5 TeV without quench One sector (5-6) trained up to 6.6 TeV – based on this experience To go to 6.5 TeV: About 10 quenches per sector, for a total of 80 quenches No quenches from Firm1 A few quenches (10%) from Firm2 All the rest (90%) from Firm3 – all in different magnets This behaviour, observed in 5-6 during hardware commissioning, can be obtained by a model based on test data Do we need training after each warm-up ? We do not know

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 3 Retraining: A MODEL FOR DIPOLES Method: evaluate correlations between 1 st virgin quench and 1 st quench after thermal cycle About 110 magnets available – random part modeled as Gaussian Each firm treated separately Use these correlations to extrapolate the values of the virgin quench, measured in all magnets, to the condition after thermal cycle

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 4 Retraining: DIPOLES TO 7 TeV From the model: in each sector in average 5 quenches from Firm1, 13 from Firm2, 20 from Firm3 – total of about 40 quenches per sector This gives only the first quench in each magnet The model is clearly too optimist after 6.5 TeV – we do not know why

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 5 Retraining: DIPOLES TO 7 TeV Estimate based on empirical exponential fit of HC data : about 110±30 quenches per sector (A. Verweij, Chamonix) This fit implies that Firm3 magnets will get much worse than in their virgin condition (2 quenches per magnet to go to nominal instead of 1)

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 6 Retraining: MAIN QUADRUPOLES All MQ circuits reached 9.31 kA (5.5 TeV) without quench Two sectors have been trained more: Sector 4-5 reached 6.6 TeV with one quench Sector 5-6 reached 6.9 TeV with one quench If the training of these two sectors is significant, we should expect reaching 7 TeV in the whole machine with a few quenches per sector

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 7 Retraining: OTHER MAGNETS Going to 7 TeV, based on hardware commissioning 2008 experience, for the other magnets (mostly individually powered) ~0 quenches in the MQX ~15 quenches in the separation dipoles ~12 quenches in the MQY, ~35 quenches in the MQM, Contrary to the dipole case, we have some magnets quenching more than one time (up to ~5 quenches)

E. Todesco 5 h March 2009 – LHC risk review - 8 CONCLUSIONS Main dipoles: total of 80 quenches to 6.5 TeV 7 TeV not reached, estimates based on empirical fit gives 900±300 quenches (upper bound ?) Estimates for first quench based on a model give 320 that is clearly a lower bound Up to 6.6 TeV quenches mostly from Firm3 magnets, and all in different magnets According to the model, up to 7 TeV most quenches should still be in Firm3 Main quads: should go to 7 TeV with quenches Other magnets ~15 quenches in the separation dipoles, ~12 quenches in the MQY, ~35 quenches in the MQM, Some magnets quench more than one time (up to ~5 quenches)