A Topological Analysis of the Magnetic Breakout Model by Rhona Maclean University of St Andrews 10 th August 2004 Collaborators: Colin Beveridge, Dana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPD June 16, 2003 Separators: Fault Lines in the Magnetic Field Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Advertisements

Analytical and numerical models of field line behaviour in 3D reconnection David Pontin Solar MHD Theory Group, University of St. Andrews Collaborators:
The 3D picture of a flare Loukas Vlahos. Points for discussion  When cartoons drive the analysis of the data and the simulations….life becomes very complicated.
SOLAR FLARES Marina Rodríguez Baras 1. Solar activity Why do we study it? Close study of the internal processes of a star. Preventing the effects on the.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Colorado Research Associates Division, NorthWest Research Associates Magnetic Charge Topology (MCT) Analysis of NOAA AR8210 Graham Barnes NWRA/CoRA K.D.
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
Current sheets formation along magnetic separators in 3d Dana Longcope Montana State University Thanks: I Klapper, A.A. Van Ballegooijen NSF-ATM.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
A Diachronic Topological Analysis of the 13th May 2005 Solar Flare William M.R. Simpson, Angela Des Jardins U NIVERSITY OF S T. A NDREWS, M ONTANA S TATE.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
One mask to group them all, One code to find them, One file to store them all, And in a structure bind them. William (Tolkien) Simpson m.
Solar-B Science MeetingKyoto, Nov. 9, 2005 Quantifying Reconnection* Dana Longcope, Dave McKenzie Jonathan Cirtain, Jason Scott Montana State University.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Aug 16, 2004 Coronal loops formed by separator reconnection: The birth & life of AR9574 Dana Longcope Montana State University.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
A Comparison Between Magnetic Charge Topology and Local Correlation Tracking of Solar Active Regions Joanna Bridge Montana State University Solar Physics.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Magnetic Topology and the Corona- Heliosphere Connection Background: –Frozen-in flux (τ D ~ L 2 / η >> τ L ) implies that magnetic topology constrains.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Modeling Magnetic Reconnection in a Complex Solar Corona Dana Longcope Montana State University & Institute for Theoretical Physics.
Helicity as a Component of Filament Formation D.H. Mackay University of St. Andrews Solar Theory Group.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
2007 PROM WORKSHOP Space Sciences Lab / UC-Berkeley Sheared-Field Prominences and the Eruptive Implications of Magnetic Topology B. J. Lynch, Y. Li, J.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Session C8 Coronal Data Products AIA/HMI Science Team Meeting 16 February 2006 Marc DeRosa.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Sept. 13, 2007 CORONAL HEATING (Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
A topological view of 3D global magnetic field reversal in the solar corona Rhona Maclean Armagh Observatory 5 th December 2006.
Some new formulae for magnetic and current helicities Jean-Jacques Aly DSM/IRFU/SAp, CE Saclay, France.
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann (August 19, 2002) CME initiation: A zoo not an animal (Images from the on-line CDAW CME catalogue.
Calculating Magnetic Energy in Active Regions Using Coronal Loops for AR and AR Presentation by, Joseph B. Jensen.
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Sept. 13, 2007 A Global Effect of Local Time- Dependent Reconnection In Collaboration with Dana Longcope Eric Priest.
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
Problems in MHD Reconnection ?? (Cambridge, Aug 3, 2004) Eric Priest St Andrews.
Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Structure, Equilibrium and Pinching of Coronal Magnetic Fields Slava Titov SAIC, San Diego, USA Seminar at the workshop „Magnetic reconnection theory“
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
MHD wave propagation in the neighbourhood of a two-dimensional null point James McLaughlin Cambridge 9 August 2004.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
SIMULATING SHOCKS IN SOLAR FLARES MATTHEW THORNTON SUPERVISOR: DANA LONGCOPE NASA/SDO/S. Wiessinger.
X Visit For 100’s of free powerpoints.
Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis.
Coronal Magnetic Field – Force-Free Field and Topology CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 04, Feb. 14 Spring 2008 References: Aschwanden: Chap. 5.3 – 5.6 Articles:
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
K. Galsgaard1, A.L. Haynes2, C.E. Parnell2
Large-Scale Solar Magnetic Fields – How is Solar Cycle 24 Different?
Magnetic Topology of the 29 October 2003 X10 Flare
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Vector polarimetry with HMI
Scientific Collaboration of NAOC Facilities & Solar-B
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Quantifying Reconnection*
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann
Presentation transcript:

A Topological Analysis of the Magnetic Breakout Model by Rhona Maclean University of St Andrews 10 th August 2004 Collaborators: Colin Beveridge, Dana Longcope, Dan Brown and Eric Priest

Magnetic Charge Topology (MCT) Simple yet powerful Based on three assumptions: 1) point magnetic sources 2) sources lie in z=0 plane, the photosphere 3) potential field Leads to explicit expression for magnetic field:

The Skeleton of the Field Important structural features: null points spines separatrices separators

Topological Bifurcations Changes from one topological state to another Two types: –local: change in number of nulls –global: change in structure of field; number of nulls unaffected

What is Magnetic Breakout? Explanation for onset of solar flare –central flux system initially enclosed by overlying arcade –shear applied near neutral line in photosphere –magnetic reconnection in vicinity of coronal null –overlying field weakens and allows originally enclosed flux to ‘break out’ explosively Simplest configuration is delta sunspot –new flux emerging inside pre-existing sunspot region

Delta Sunspot Model Six unbalanced sources Positive central source corresponds to emerging flux Two separatrix domes prevent flux from connecting to infinity

Experiment 1: Source Strength Before global spine-fan bifurcation: After bifurcation:

Experiment 2: Source Position

Experiment 3: Changing α linear force-free field central source fixed series of 3 global spine-fan bifurcations (α=-0.01, and ) 3 rd bifurcation causes breakout

Conclusions New flux domain created in process of breakout This can only be caused by global bifurcations Examples here are global spine-fan and global separator Breakout behaviour can occur due to change of: –source strength –source position –force-free parameter α