Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
LECC 2006 Ewald Effinger AB-BI-BL The LHC beam loss monitoring system’s data acquisition card Ewald Effinger AB-BI-BL.
CMS HL-LHC EM Calorimeter Upgrade M. Hansen, CERN for the CMS ECAL upgrade project(s)
CMS ECAL End Cap EDR Meeting CERN 28 Nov. to 29 Nov 2000 A.B.Lodge - RAL 1 ECAL End Cap CMS ECAL End Cap Engineering Design Review. EDR meeting held 28.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
Saverio Minutoli INFN Genova 1 T1 Electronic status Electronic items involved: Anode Front End Card Cathode Front End Card Read-Out Control card Slow Control.
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
CM26 March 2010Slide 1 EMR Status o Intro o Construction o Magnetic shielding o Electronics o Prototype Cosmics test o Schedule Jean-Sebastien Graulich,
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CMS ECAL Split 08/09/04 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS.
September 8-14, th Workshop on Electronics for LHC1 Channel Control ASIC for the CMS Hadron Calorimeter Front End Readout Module Ray Yarema, Alan.
David BAILLEUX US CMS on behalf of the Caltech group Laser Monitoring System - Electronics review 20 March Overview Overview Laser control Laser.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
Gueorgui ANTCHEVPrague 3-7 September The TOTEM Front End Driver, its Components and Applications in the TOTEM Experiment G. Antchev a, b, P. Aspell.
CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS ECAL Group.
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
U. Of Rochester DOE Review, July 15-16, 2002: P. de Barbaro, CMS1 CMS Project at UR Pawel de Barbaro University of Rochester DoE Review July 15-16, 2002.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter US CMS JTERM III 12 January 2009 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
1 US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, WBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota US-CMS L2 ECAL Manager.
07-Jan-2010 Jornadas LIP 2010, Braga JC. Da SILVA Electronics systems for the ClearPEM-Sonic scanner José C. DA SILVA, LIP-Lisbon Tagus LIP Group * *J.C.Silva,
Sept. 17th, 2008 Nicolo Cartiglia, INFN, Turin, Italy 1 Installation, Commissioning and Performance of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) Electronics.
S.MonteilCOMMISSIONING1 PS/SPD ELECTRONICS OUTLINE 1)STATUS OF PS/SPD FE BOARDS PRODUCTION 2)PHASES OF PS/SPD COMMISSIONING 1)LEDs AND DETECTORS 2)TUBES.
E.Guschin (INR,Moscow) 3 May 2006Calorimeter commissioning meeting Status of PRS/SPD detector Cosmic test results Installation/tuning of monitoring system.
SiPM Readback Noise Tagging & HCAL Calibration Dayton Thorpe July 8, 2010.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
CMS ECAL DCS 10.Oct S.Zelepoukine ICALEPCS CMS ECAL DCS 1 The Detector Control System for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS Experiment.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
9/17/2008TWEPP 2008, R. Stringer - UC Riverside 1 CMS Tracker Services: present status and potential for upgrade Robert Stringer University of California,
CMS Tracker: Detector Control Units & Tracker Monitoring My Summer Student project (A contribution to:) Fatima Kajout 11 th of August 2003Student Session.
Common test for L0 calorimeter electronics (2 nd campaign) 4 April 2007 Speaker : Eric Conte (LPC)
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter
26/May/2008Calor LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating pad detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring Eduardo Picatoste Universitat.
ECAL Off detector Electronics Workshop Lisbon April T. Camporesi ECAL activity sites 2005 Integration (now) 904 (now) Cosmic ray calibration (May)
SPD VFE installation and commissioning (status and plans) I.Summary of VFE installation II.Stand alone VFE test: noise & offset III.Stand alone test: LED.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
Juan Valls - LECC03 Amsterdam 1 Recent System Test Results from the CMS TOB Detector  Introduction  ROD System Test Setup  ROD Electrical and Optical.
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.
May 10-14, 2010CALOR2010, Beijing, China 1 Readout electronics of the ALICE photon spectrometer Zhongbao Yin *, Lijiao Liu, Hans Muller, Dieter Rohrich,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Overview Detector details Crystals Photo-detectors
CMS-ECAL Front-End monitoring Matteo Marone
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
BESIII EMC electronics
UK CMS Oversight Committee Mtg
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
Overview of the new CMS ECAL electronics
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter and Operational Experience

Outline Page 2 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006  The Barrel electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) of CMS  Electronic system  Installation of the on-detector electronics  Commissioning and operation of the detector  Current status and plan  Conclusions

The ECAL Barrel Detector of CMS Page 3 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) is a compact detector designed to operate in a challenging environment: 4T magnetic field high radiation environment of 1-2 kGy/year at the LHC bunch crossing rate of 40 MHz. The Barrel part of ECAL consists of 61,200 lead- tungstate (PbWO 4 ) crystals optically coupled to twice as many Avalanche Photodiodes (APD): short radiation length of 8.9 mm and small Moliere radius of 22 mm fast scintillator radiation-hard (do need monitoring of transparency → see A. Bornheim’s talk) The radiation-tolerant, on-detector electronics performs several of the data acquisition functions. It comprises: ~ 20,000 printed circuit boards ~ 5000 optical links.

ECAL Barrel Construction Page 4 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 A super-module 2 APDs/crystal At two regional centers, CERN and INFN/ENEA Rome: crystals are characterized coupled to APDs assembled into modules (400 or 500 crystals/module) → see R. Paramatti’s talk. At CERN, each set of 4 modules is made into a super-module, completed with cooling system. There are 36 super-modules in ECAL Barrel, each of them has 1700 crystals.

On-detector Electronics Page 5 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 VFE x 5 MB FE LVR Trigger Tower (TT) Very Front End card (VFE) Front End card (FE) Trigger Sums Data Modularity: Trigger Tower – it reads a 5x5 grid of crystals: 5 VFEs (Very Front End cards) - each one reads a strip of 5 crystals along φ 1 FE (Front End card) – it controls and receives data from the 5 VFEs 1 LVR (Low Voltage Regulator card) – it stabilizes and distributes the LV 1 MB (Mother Board) – it distributes the HV and provides connections to the VFEs. On the FE: 2 GOHs (Gigabit Optical Hybrids) – to send out data and trigger primitives 1 CCU (Clock & Control Unit) – I 2 C interface. The 68 FEs on a super-module are connected by a system of 8 Token Rings.

On-detector Electronics Page 6 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 x12 x6 x1 MGPA Logic 12 bit ADC bits 2 bits HV APD VFE architecture for single channel On a VFEs, each one of the 5 crystal signals: is amplified by a Multiple Gain Pre-Amplifier (MGPA) with 3 gains (1, 6 and 12) the 3 outputs are digitized in parallel by 3 of the 4 channels of a 40-MHz, 12-bit ADC the highest, non-saturated gain is selected by a digital logic The FE: stores data during the Level 1 trigger latency of about 3μs prepares and sends trigger primitives at a 40-MHz rate. VFE

Off-detector Electronics Page 7 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 Clock & Control System (CCS) Data Concentrator Card (DCC) Trigger Concentrator Card (TCC) Main functions of the off-detector electronic boards: CCS: reception/distribution of LHC clock and control signals + front-end initialization TCC: encoding of trigger primitives and transmission to Regional Calorimeter Trigger at 40 MHz + classification of trigger tower importance and transmission to SRP at Level 1 rate DCC: integrity check + data reduction + transmission to central DAQ at Level 1 rate Selective Readout Process Modularity: 1 super-module

Electronics Integration Center Page 8 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 The on-detector electronics is installed and tested at CERN Prevessin

On-detector Electronics Installation Page 9 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 The installation of the on-detector electronics proceeds as follows: Motherboards are installed and connectivity verified. VFE, LVR and FE cards are installed Each trigger tower is fully tested before proceeding with the next one Token Rings are installed. Default and redundancy connection paths are tested. Trigger and data optical links (GOHs), and Distributed Fiber Patch Panels are connected Trigger towers are re-tested with their final links. Low Voltage Distributors are installed and voltage outputs measured.

Single Trigger Tower Test Page 10 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 Each trigger tower is connected and fully tested before proceeding with the installation of the next one: the CCU ID (trigger tower number) is readout all devices connected to the 16 I 2 C interfaces of the CCU are scanned the registers of the 1 FE and 5 VFE cards are initialized and read back a pedestal scan is performed pedestals are set to ~ 200 ADC counts for each channel and gain mean and RMS of all pedestals are measured mean amplitude and RMS of injected test-pulses are measured LVR settings, APD leakage currents and crystal temperatures are measured via Detector Control Unit chips installed on LVR and VFE cards.

Electronics Installation Page 11 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 FE cards, with Token Rings and GOH LV distribution Once all trigger towers are completed, connected and tested, the LV distributors and cables will cover them.

Commissioning of Super-modules Page 12 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 Once a super-module is completed, a one-week of automatic operation with the final on-detector electronics is performed. The standard CMS-ECAL off-detector electronics and the latest, stable version of the CMS-ECAL data acquisition software are used. The data taking includes the following: PEDESTAL SCAN - to determine the proper pedestal settings PEDESTAL RUN - to measure mean and RMS of each channel and gain TEST-PULSE RUN - to measure the pulses injected by the MGPA LASER RUN - to measure laser pulses injected into each crystal. A monitoring program automatically performs control tasks on the entire super-module data at completion of each run, including: check data integrity check pedestal mean and RMS check laser and test-pulse amplitudes Summary plots and results are automatically produced into web pages to provide immediate feedback for possible intervention. The ECAL safety system supervises low- and high-voltage, and cooling system, to allow safe and unattended operation of the super-module.

Pedestals Page 13 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 Pedestal Mean Value for the 3 Gains Pedestal RMS for the 3 Gains Pedestals of the full supermodule as output of the monitoring program.

Test-Pulse and Laser Page 14 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 Test-Pulse Amplitude VS Channel No. for the 3 gains Laser-Signal Amplitude VS Channel No. Test-pulse and laser signals of the full super-module as output of the monitoring program. ADC counts

Environmental Variables Page 15 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 Detector Control Unit (DCU) integrated circuits on VFEs and LVRs measures: APD capsule temperatures (1 thermistor/10 crystals) APD leakage currents temperatures and low voltage settings of the on-detector electronics The access to environmental variables of the on- detector electronics has provided important clues for understanding features and solving problems during the integration and commissioning phases. Spread of values due to un-calibrated DCUs. What matters is measurement of temperature variation: precision and stability are °C. Spread due to un-calibrated voltage dividers at DCU input.

Cosmic Ray Data Taking Page 16 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 After the one-week commissioning, each super-module is transported to a nearby cosmic ray calibration stand → see G. Franzoni’s talk ~ 10 days of cosmic ray data nominal CMS temperature stable environmental conditions standard sequences of pedestal, test-pulse and laser runs are also recorded super-module is operated automatically - no shifters the ECAL safety system is used data are automatically monitored at completion of each run data are subsequently analyzed to extract crystal inter-calibration constants An important added value is a period of continuous running of each super-module, where detector stability and performance are probed.

Super-module Integration Progress Page 17 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 After commissioning and cosmic data taking of first ~10 super-modules (17,000 channels) ~ 15 channels are not working ~ 15 channels are noisy or have one or two of the three gains not working Current situation and planned schedule: SMs in integr. center SMs ready Plan

Magnet Test and Test-Beams Page 18 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006 On the surface of the CMS location, two super-modules and a segment of the CMS detector are ready to take part to the CMS Magnet Test & Cosmic Challenge later this month. Starting in July, a subset of super- modules will be calibrated at CERN using an electron beam. Still at CERN, a super-module will take part in a combined hadronic and electromagnetic calorimeter test-beam. Additional tests for the commissioned super-modules are taking place in the near future:

Conclusions Page 19 Paolo Rumerio, CERN CALOR 2006  The commissioning of ECAL Barrel is flowing steadily in compliance with the CMS installation schedule.  Integration of on-detector electronics requires testing of each installed layer before proceeding with the next. Procedures are well defined and have improved with experience.  The standard CMS-ECAL off-detector electronics, acquisition software and detector safety system are heavily used during commissioning and cosmic ray calibration. An automatic data monitoring program provides immediate feedback for possible intervention.  The cosmic ray calibration adds a valuable test of each super-module in a stable environment, where the detector performances, in addition to functionality, are probed and monitored.  A level of channel failure down to a few tenths of a percent has been achieved.  The ECAL Barrel super-modules are being tested on different fronts, exploring functionality and performance both as stand-alone entities and in concert with other CMS sub-detectors.