LIGO- G050090-00-Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Extracting Supernova Information from a LIGO Detection Tiffany Summerscales Penn State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 18 – Mass-radius relation for black dwarfs Chandrasekhar limiting mass Comparison.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the Einstein Telescope Design Study Team 1GWDAW-Rome 2010.
P3 Revision. How do forces have a turning effect? The turning effect of a force is called the moment. Distance from force to pivot – perpendicular to.
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture 2: The equations of stellar structure Dr. Stephen Smartt Department of Physics and Astronomy
The Evolution of Binary-Star Systems
Numerical Relativity & Gravitational waves I.Introduction II.Status III.Latest results IV.Summary M. Shibata (U. Tokyo)
Compact remnant mass function: dependence on the explosion mechanism and metallicity Reporter: Chen Wang 06/03/2014 Fryer et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91.
The evolution and collapse of BH forming stars Chris Fryer (LANL/UA)  Formation scenarios – If we form them, they will form BHs.  Stellar evolution:
LIGO- G Z August 19, 2004August 2004 LSC Meeting 1 Towards an Astrophysics-Based Burst ETG Tuning Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity.
Neutron Star Formation and the Supernova Engine Bounce Masses Mass at Explosion Fallback.
February 20, 2006Dissertation Defense 1 Adventures in LIGO Data Analysis Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong EE3900 Computer Networks Data Transmission Slide 1 Continuous & Discrete Signals.
Multi-Messenger Astronomy AY 17 10/19/2011. Outline What is Multi-messenger astronomy? Photons Cosmic Rays Neutrinos Gravity-Waves Sample-Return.
Core-collapse SN neutrinos and GW bursts We are developing a proposal to the LSC-Virgo to search for associated bursts of low-energy neutrinos and GW bursts.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
Compact Objects Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 15 “How will we see when the sun goes dark?” “We will be forced to grope and feel our way.”
Announcements. Radio Astronomy of Pulsars Tiffany Pewett
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
The Astrophysics of Gravitational Wave Sources Conference Summary: Ground-Based Detectors ( Hz) Kimberly New, LANL.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
DelayRatio: A Gravitational Wave Event Physical Likelihood Estimator Based on Detection Delays and SNR Ratios Amber L. Stuver LIGO Livingston ObservatoryCalifornia.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
LIGO- G Z August 19, 2004Penn State University 1 Extracting Signals via Blind Deconvolution Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
LIGO G Z Perspectives on detector networks, and noise Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry, Penn State University.
The RIDGE pipeline as a method to search for gravitational waves associated with magnetar bursts LIGO-G Z Jason Lee, Tiffany Summerscales (Andrews.
High Mass Stellar Evolution Astrophysics Lesson 13.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
18/04/2004New Windows on the Universe Jan Kuijpers Part 1: Gravitation & relativityPart 1: Gravitation & relativity J.A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics,
S.Klimenko, July 14, 2007, Amaldi7,Sydney, G Z Detection and reconstruction of burst signals with networks of gravitational wave detectors S.Klimenko,
LIGO- G Z Beyond the PSD: Discovering hidden nonlinearity Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
LIGO- G Z Analyzing Event Data Lee Samuel Finn Penn State University Reference: T030017, T
1. Background A generic ‘chirp’ can be closely approximated by a connected set of multiscale chirplets with quadratically-evolving phase. The problem of.
G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
This material is based upon work supported in part by National Science Foundation Award PHY May 30-31, 2003, LIGO G Z APS NW Section Meeting.
Baseband Receiver Receiver Design: Demodulation Matched Filter Correlator Receiver Detection Max. Likelihood Detector Probability of Error.
LIGO- G Z August 17, 2005August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Coherent network analysis technique for discriminating GW bursts from instrumental noise Patrick Sutton (CIT) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji,
LIGO- G Z August 15, 2006 August 2006 LSC meeting1 LSC Proposal Andrews University Gravitational Wave Group Tiffany Summerscales.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
A Comparison of Burst Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms for LIGO Amber L. Stuver Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
The Science of Map Making.  Separates the Earth into 2 halves a) Northern Hemisphere b) Southern Hemisphere.
Electricity, Sound and Light Chapter Nine: Waves and Sound 9.1 Harmonic Motion 9.2 Waves 9.3 Sound.
Isola d’Elba 28/05/2006 Non linear effects in pulsations of compact stars Andrea Passamonti Andrea Passamonti Aristotle University of Thessaloniki VESF.
October 17, 2003Globular Clusters and Gravitational Waves1 Gravitational Wave Observations of Globular Clusters M. Benacquista Montana State University-Billings.
Formation of BH-Disk system via PopIII core collapse in full GR National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Yuichiro Sekiguchi.
Chapter 13 Post Main Sequence Stellar Evolution. The Sun.
January 12, 2006Sources & Simulations 1 LIGO Supernova Astronomy with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.
A Model for GW Emission from CCSN Explosions by Jeremiah W. Murphy NSF AAP Fellow (University of Washington) Collaborators: Christian Ott (Caltech), Adam.
APS Meeting April 2003 LIGO-G Z 1 Sources and Science with LIGO Data Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee On Behalf of the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Ch 12--Life Death of Stars
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
The Fate of High-Mass Stars
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
Lecture 1.30 Structure of the optimal receiver deterministic signals.
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
Stochastic Background
Non-Standard Interactions and Neutrino Oscillations in Core-Collapse Supernovae Brandon Shapiro.
L(h) = || X – A*h ||2 + hT *Ω*h
Gravitational SIGNATURE of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Travis Hansen, Marek Szczepanczyk, Michele Zanolin
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy
Presentation transcript:

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Extracting Supernova Information from a LIGO Detection Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 2 Goal: Supernova Astronomy with Gravitational Waves The physics involved in core-collapse supernovae remains largely uncertain »Progenitor structure and rotation, equation of state Simulations generally do not incorporate all known physics »General relativity, neutrinos, convective motion, non-axisymmetric motion Gravitational waves carry information about the dynamics of the core which is mostly hidden Question: What supernova physics could be learned from a gravitational wave detection?

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 3 Maximum Entropy Problem: the detection process modifies the signal from its initial form h i Detector response R includes projection onto the beam pattern as well as unequal response to various frequencies (strain  AS_Q) Solution: maximum entropy – Bayesian approach to deconvolution used in radio astronomy Minimize the function where is the usual misfit statistic with N the noise covariance

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 4 Maximum Entropy Cont. Minimize S(h,m) is the Shannon information entropy that ensures the reconstructed signal h is close to the model m. We set m equal to the rms of the signal.  is a Lagrange parameter that balances being faithful to the signal (minimizing  2 ) and avoiding overfitting (maximizing entropy) Example:

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 5 Waveforms: Ott et.al.(2004) 2D core-collapse simulations restricted to the iron core Realistic equation of state (EOS) and stellar progenitors with 11, 15, 20 and 25 M  General relativity and Neutrinos neglected Some models with progenitors evolved incorporating magnetic effects and rotational transport. Progenitor rotation controlled with two parameters: fractional rotational energy  and differential rotation scale A (the distance from the rotational axis where rotation rate drops to half that at the center) Low  (zero to a few tenths of a percent): Progenitor rotates slowly. Bounce at supranuclear densities. Rapid core bounce and ringdown. Higher  : Progenitor rotates more rapidly. Collapse halted by centrifugal forces at subnuclear densities. Core bounces multiple times Small A: Greater amount of differential rotation so the central core rotates more rapidly. Transition from supranuclear to subnuclear bounce occurs for smaller value of 

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 6 Simulated Detection Start with Ott et.al. waveform from model having 15M  progenitor with  = 0.1% and A = 1000km Project onto H1 and L1 beam patterns as if signal coming from intersection of prime meridian and equator Convolve with H1 and L1 impulse responses calculated from calibration info at GPS time (during S3) Add white noise of varying amplitude to simulate observations with different SNRs Recover initial signal via maximum entropy

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 7 Extracting Bounce Type Calculated maximum cross correlation between recovered signal and all waveforms in catalogue Maximum cross correlation between recovered signal and original waveform (blue line) Plot at right shows highest cross correlations between recovered signal and a waveform of each type. Recovered signal has most in common with waveform of same bounce type (supranuclear bounce)

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 8 Extracting Mass Plot at right shows cross correlation between reconstructed signal and waveforms from models with progenitors that differ only by mass The reconstructed signal is most similar to the waveform with the same mass

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 9 Extracting Rotational Information Plots above show cross correlations between reconstructed signal and waveforms from models that differ only by fractional rotational energy  (left) and differential rotation scale A (right) Reconstructed signal most closely resembles waveforms from models with the same rotational parameters

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 10 Conclusions Maximum entropy successfully reconstructs signals from data. Reconstructed core-collapse supernova signals carry information about the physics of the supernova that produced them including bounce type, mass, and rotational parameters. Gravitational wave supernova astronomy can be realized!