March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming.

Advertisements

Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Ensemble Climate-Chemistry simulations for the past 40 years Volker Grewe and the DLR/MPI Team Institut für Physik der.

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.

Proposed Aerosol Treatment for CAM4 Steve Ghan, Richard Easter, Xiaohong Liu, Rahul Zaveri Pacific Northwest National Laboratory precursor emissions coagulation.

Predicted change in global SOA in response to future climate, emissions, and land-use change Colette L. Heald NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral.

Modelling studies of metallic layers in the mesosphere using a GCM model Wuhu Feng 1,2, John Plane 1, Martyn Chipperfield 2, Dan Marsh 3, Diego Jaches.

Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.

Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.

Urban Air Pollution, Tropospheric Chemistry, and Climate Change: An Integrated Modeling Study Chien Wang MIT.

Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.

Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.

CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.

Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.

WRF-VIC: The Flux Coupling Approach L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory BioEarth Project Kickoff Meeting April 11-12, 2011 Pullman, WA.

Why Climate Modelers Think We Need a Really, Really Big Computer Phil Jones Climate, Ocean and Sea Ice Modeling (COSIM) Climate Change Prediction Program.

Update on paleochemistry simulations Jean-François Lamarque and J.T. Kiehl Earth and Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.

Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,

Welcome! Chemistry-Climate WG Peter Hess Jean-Francois Lamarque Michael Prather.

Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.

Progress on Application of Modal Aerosol Dynamics to CAM Xiaohong Liu, Steve Ghan, Richard Easter, Rahul Zaveri, Yun Qian (Pacific Northwest National.

Chemistry Climate Modeling of the UTLS An update on model inter-comparison and evaluation with observations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR & CCMVal Collaborators.

Seasonal variability of UTLS hydrocarbons observed from ACE and comparisons with WACCM Mijeong Park, William J. Randel, Louisa K. Emmons, and Douglas E.

GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.

The GEOS-CHEM Simulation of Trace Gases over China Li ZHANG and Hong LIAO Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences April 24, 2008.

Linking Anthropogenic Aerosols, Urban Air Pollution and Tropospheric Chemistry to Climate ( actually, to CAM/CCSM ) Chien Wang Massachusetts Institute.

MAP MODELING EFFORTS MAP: Building Integrated Earth System Analysis (Modeling): IESA CTM work funded by MAP will be seen as part of the overall Earth System.

Overview of the tracer code in RegCM Tracers Aerosols ( droplets, smoke particles, dust, pollens, flying cats …) Gazeous phase, chemical species Evolution.

Impact of lightning-NO and radiatively- interactive ozone on air quality over CONUS, and their relative importance in WRF-Chem M a t u s M a r t i n i.

AMWG Breakout, CCSM Workshop June 25, 2002 Overview of CAM status and simulations Bill Collins and Dave Randall National Center for Atmospheric Research.

GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting Harvard University Gabriele Curci6/2/2003 Stratospheric chemistry and SMVGEAR II in GEOS-CHEM model Gabriele Curci University.

Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting (March 22-24, 2006) Background –SSC expectations and the next IPCC (Bill Collins) Summarize where we are now Discuss.

Model Simulation of tropospheric BrO Xin Yang, J. Pyle and R. Cox Center for Atmospheric Science University of Cambridge 7-9 Oct Frascati, Italy.

An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.

Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.

10-11 October 2006HYMN kick-off TM3/4/5 Modeling at KNMI HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the.

Entrainment Ratio, A R -  R = c p  i / c p  s  sfc  ent c p  i c p  s PBL Schemes  = YSU  = MYJ  = MRF 12Z 00Z  adv Science issue: Assess.

THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,

Status of MOZART-2 Larry W. Horowitz GFDL/NOAA MOZART Workshop November 29, 2001.

An Interactive Aerosol-Climate Model based on CAM/CCSM: Progress and challenging issues Chien Wang and Dongchul Kim (MIT) Annica Ekman (U. Stockholm) Mary.

Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.

The G4-Specified Stratospheric Aerosol Experiment Alan Robock 1, Lili Xia 1 and Simone Tilmes.

Study on NO x lifetime in chemistry transport model Ran Yin.

Deliverables  Forcing for AR5 (1) -atmospheric composition (CH4, N2O….), including aerosols, O3 on a regional basis -nitrogen deposition -prescribed or.

Trends in lower stratosphere Jean-François Lamarque (NCAR and NOAA) and Susan Solomon (NOAA)

___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.

W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.

Chemistry-Climate Interaction Studies in Japan Hajime Akimoto Atmospheric Composition Research Program Frontier Research System for Global Change Chemistry.

Global Aerosol Forecasting System Applications to Houston/Costa Rica Aura Validation Experiments Arlindo da Silva Global Modeling and Assimilation Office,

METO 621 CHEM Lesson 4. Total Ozone Field March 11, 1990 Nimbus 7 TOMS (Hudson et al., 2003)

Case 5: Tracer Transport in Deep Convection STERAO-1996 From Dye et al. (2000)

SciDAC Fast Chemical Mechanism LLNL Philip Cameron-Smith Peter Connell Cathy Chuang (John Taylor) Keith Grant (Doug Rotman) NCARJean-Francois Lamarque.

What Were We Supposed to Have Done in CAM4 with Chemistry? Who will do what?

March BGC Working group The SANTA FE project Jean-François Lamarque.

Troposphere Strastosphere D. H. Gas phase chemistry Scavenging processes Fossil fuel Emissions Biomass burning emissions Biogenic emissions Boundary layer.

Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM A. Gettelman (NCAR), F. Vitt (NCAR), P. Hess (Cornell) H. Morrison (NCAR), P. R. Field (Met Office), S.J. Ghan (PNNL)

Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,

March 9, 2004CCSM AMWG Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison S. Walters and the WACCM group Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.

Jean-François Lamarque, Peter Hess, Louisa Emmons, and John Gille Figure 2 Days since June CO Mixing ratio (ppbv) See description above. AsiaNorth.

White paper: Atmospheric Chemistry impacts on the land biosphere Phillip Cameron-Smith and Natalie Mahowald Processes: 1.[AC-direct] Ozone Damage (a strong.

Status of CAM, March 2004 Phil Rasch. Differences between CAM2 and CAM3 (standard physics version) Separate liquid and ice phases Advection, sedimentation.

Chemistry-climate interactions in CCSM

Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell

A model of sea salt aerosol for Cape Grim Preliminary investigations

Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG.

Models of atmospheric chemistry

Chemistry Café and the Model Independent Chemistry Module (MICM)

Han-Li Liu, Raymond G. Roble, Arthur D. Richmond, Stanley C

Benchmarking of chemical mechanisms

Presentation transcript:

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Goal Provide a flexible framework for the study of chemistry-climate interactions in CCSM, including land/ocean interactions Include gas-phase and aerosols Focus on the troposphere and stratosphere

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Computational approach Chemical scheme is input in a preprocessor that creates a set of subroutines added to the standard CAM Reads a set of external files (for emissions, deposition velocities and photolysis rates) Uses the finite volume dynamical core for the advection of tracers Convective and diffusive transport of tracers is considered

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Main features Photolysis and chemical reactions solved with an implicit/explicit set of solvers Lookup table photolysis rates, including cloud correction (but not aerosols) Wet (first-order loss linked to precipitation in CAM) and dry removal Surface emissions (fixed, monthly averages) Lightning NO production linked to convection in CAM

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Current status Implementation in WACCM of combined tropospheric (regional and global scale) and stratospheric chemistry (including PSCs) : 105 species, over 300 chemical reactions Simulations performed with 52 levels, extending up to 85 km. Stratosphere-troposphere flux is explicitly calculated Horizontal resolution of 2x years of present-day simulations, using fixed SST

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Performance In the present configuration, inclusion of chemistry (including transport of tracers) approximately doubles the cost of the equivalent WACCM simulation; this ratio will be a little worse for CAM On bluesky, 96 CPUs, 1 year in 2 days

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Mid-tropospheric ozone

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Model evaluation Comparison with tropospheric and stratospheric observations Comparison with TOMS total ozone column

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Comparison with observations (1) Carbon monoxide (ppbv) Barrow, AlaskaBlack sea, Romania Mauna Loa, HawaiiHalley station, Antarctica Red : model results Blue : observations Month

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Comparison with observations (2) Ozone mixing ration (ppbv) Month

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Comparison with observations (3) NO x = NO + NO 2

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Comparison with observations (4)

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Summary Working version of interactive tropospheric/stratospheric chemistry Analysis of results indicate a good overall representation of the chemistry in the atmosphere Biases are similar to the ones found in MOZART results, on which the chemistry is based

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Next steps (1) Develop a CAM version (requires the addition of upper-boundary conditions); expected to happen within a month Inclusion of aerosols (ammonium, sulfate, sea-salt, dust,organic and black carbon; X.X. Tie, P. Hess N. Mahowald and P. Rasch) Better representation of wet removal (P. Hess and P. Rasch) Interactions with CLM (deposition; emissions of BVOCs (C. Wiedinmyer and S. Levis); soil NO)

March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Next steps (2) Interactive calculation of photolysis rates Development of a variety of chemical packages for ease of use Coupling with ocean biogeochemistry Coupling between the nitrogen and the carbon cycle through CLM (P. Thornton) Interactive emissions from wetlands