A.Z. Gazizov LNGS, Italy Based on works with V. Berezinsky and R. Aloisio UHECR-08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
Advertisements

Neutrinos from cosmological cosmic rays: A parameter space analysis Diego González-Díaz, Ricardo Vázquez, Enrique Zas Department of Particle Physics, Santiago.
Bare Surface Tension and Surface Fluctuations of Clusters with Long–Range Interaction D.I. Zhukhovitskii Joint Institute for High Temperatures, RAS.
GZK cutoff and constraints on the Lorentz invariance violation Bi Xiao-Jun (IHEP) 2011/5/9.
THE ORIGIN OF COSMIC RAYS Implications from and for X and γ-Ray Astronomy Pasquale Blasi INAF/Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze.
GZK Horizons and the Recent Pierre Auger Result on the Anisotropy of Highest-energy Cosmic Ray Sources Chia-Chun Lu Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung.
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Ray Nuclei and Neutrinos
Nuclei As Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Oleg Kalashev* UCLA, INR RAS GZK 40: The 3rd International Workshop on THE HIGHEST ENERGY COSMIC RAYS AND THEIR.
XXI st European Cosmic Ray Symposium Kosice 2008 ^ Tadeusz Wibig University of Łódź A. Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies Heavy Cosmic Ray Nuclei from.
“Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic-Ray Spectrum” Aspen, CO 4/28/05 Diffusive Shock Acceleration of High-Energy Cosmic Rays The origin of the very-highest-energy.
An update on the High Energy End of the Cosmic Ray spectra M. Ave.
Magnetic Field Workshop November 2007 Constraints on Astrophysical Magnetic Fields from UHE Cosmic Rays Roger Clay, University of Adelaide based on work.
Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei Philipp Mertsch Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University.
Universe in a box: simulating formation of cosmic structures Andrey Kravtsov Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Center for Cosmological Physics (CfCP)
Joe Giacalone and Randy Jokipii University of Arizona
07/05/2003 Valencia1 The Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays Introduction Data Acceleration and propagation Numerical Simulations (Results) Conclusions Isola.
Primordial BHs. 2 Main reviews and articles astro-ph/ Primordial Black Holes - Recent Developments astro-ph/ Gamma Rays from Primordial.
Cosmological MHD Hui Li Collaborators: S. Li, M. Nakamura, S. Diehl, B. Oshea, P. Kronberg, S. Colgate (LANL) H. Xu, M. Norman (UCSD), R. Cen (Princeton)
A Model for Emission from Microquasar Jets: Consequences of a Single Acceleration Episode We present a new model of emission from jets in Microquasars,
Deflections of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays by Intergalactic Magnetic Fields Based on astro-ph/ with Klaus Dolag (Dipartimento di Astronomia -
High-energy emission from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators: K. S. Cheng(HKU),
Accelerators in the KEK, Tsukuba Mar. 14, Towards unravelling the structural distribution of ultra-high-energy cosmic ray sources Hajime.
Cosmological magnetic fields
銀河団における超高エネルギー物理過程 w. Felix Aharonian (MPIK), 杉山直 ( 国立天文台 ) 井上 進 ( 国立天文台 ) w. Günter Sigl, Eric Armengaud (IAP) Francesco Miniati (ETH) ZeV GeV TeV 100.
Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)
Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic  -Ray Sources Alexander Kappes, Christian Stegmann University Erlangen-Nuremberg Felix Aharonian, Jim Hinton.
TeV Particle Astrophysics II 1 Are there EHE signals? Shigeru Yoshida.
Yutaka Fujita (Osaka U.) Fuijta, Takahara, Ohira, & Iwasaki, 2011, MNRAS, in press (arXiv: )
ACCELERATION AND TRANSPORT OF HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS: A REVIEW PASQUALE BLASI INAF/Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri.
Diffusion of UHECRs in the Expanding Universe A.Z. Gazizov LNGS, INFN, Italy R. Aloisio V. Berezinsky Based on works with R. Aloisio and V. Berezinsky.
LBL November 3, 2003 selection & comments 14 June 2004 Thomas K. Gaisser Anatomy of the Cosmic-ray Energy Spectrum from the knee to the ankle.
Günter Sigl, Astroparticules et Cosmologie, ParisCosmology in Copenhagen, December 15  General facts and the experimental situation  Acceleration (“bottom-up”
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: Strangers Shrouded In Mystery Scott Fleming High Energy Series 24 Feb
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
Hajime Takami Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, the University of Tokyo High Energy Astrophysics KEK, Tsukuba, Nov. 11,
Propagation and acceleration of High Energy CRs
LOFAR & Particle Acceleration: Radio Galaxies & Galaxy Clusters
Propagation of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays in Local Magnetic Fields Hajime Takami (Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: Katsuhiko Sato (Univ. of Tokyo, RESCEU)
Open Problems with Very High Energy Cosmic Rays Pasquale Blasi National Institute for Astrophysics Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory Firenze, Italy TeV.
A.Z. Gazizov LNGS, Italy Based on works with V. Berezinsky and R. Aloisio Quarks-08.
Fitting the HiRes Data Douglas Bergman Rutgers University 28 April 2005.
April 23, 2009PS638 Tom Gaisser 1 Neutrinos from AGN & GRB Expectations for a km 3 detector.
1 Additional observable evidences of possible new physics Lecture from the course “Introduction to Cosmoparticle Physics”
1 NATURE OF KNEES AND ANKLE V.S. Berezinsky INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso.
260404Astroparticle Physics1 Astroparticle Physics Key Issues Jan Kuijpers Dep. of Astrophysics/ HEFIN University of Nijmegen.
Newly Born Pulsars as Sources of High and Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays Ke Fang University of Chicago ISCRA - Jul 9, KF, Kotera, Olinto 2012, ApJ,
Magnetowave Induced Plasma Wakefield Acceleration for UHECR Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung University and Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle astrophysics,
School of Cosmic-ray Astrophysics, Erice, July 4, 2004 Thomas K. Gaisser Role of particle interactions in high-energy astrophysics Uncorrelated fluxes.
November 1 - 3, nd East Asia Numerical Astrophysics Meeting KASI, Korea Shock Waves and Cosmic Rays in the Large Scale Structure of the Universe.
Propagation and Composition of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
Ускорение частиц вблизи массивных черных дыр Я.Н. Истомин ФИАН HEA 07.
V.M. Sliusar, V.I. Zhdanov Astronomical Observatory, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Observatorna str., 3, Kiev Ukraine
Current Physics Results Gordon Thomson Rutgers University.
The impact of magnetic turbulence spectrum on particle acceleration in SNR IC443 I.Telezhinsky 1,2, A.Wilhelm 1,2, R.Brose 1,3, M.Pohl 1,2, B.Humensky.
March 22, 2005Icecube Collaboration Meeting, LBL How guaranteed are GZK ’s ? How guaranteed are GZK ’s ? Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: The disappointing model Askhat Gazizov LNGS, INFN, Italy in collaboration with Roberto Aloisio and Veniamin Berezinsky April.
Can Primordial Antideuterons be Detected in the Cosmic Radiation? Gregory Tarlé University of Michigan Antideuteron 2014 June 6, 2014 UCLA.
UHE Cosmic Rays from Local GRBs Armen Atoyan (U.Montreal) collaboration: Charles Dermer (NRL) Stuart Wick (NRL, SMU) Physics at the End of Galactic Cosmic.
Shih-Hao Wang 王士豪 Graduate Institute of Astrophysics & Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics (LeCosPA), National Taiwan University 1 This.
AGASA results Anisotropy of EHE CR arrival direction distribution M. Teshima ICRR, U of Tokyo.
Signatures of Protons in UHECR Transition from Galactic to
Cosmogenic Neutrinos challenge the Proton Dip Model
Haoning He(RIKEN/UCLA/PMO)
Primordial BHs.
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
ultra high energy cosmic rays: theoretical aspects
Predictions of Ultra - High Energy Neutrino fluxes
Shigeru Yoshida and Aya Ishihara
宇宙磁场的起源 郭宗宽 中山大学宇宙学研讨班
A. Uryson Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow
Presentation transcript:

A.Z. Gazizov LNGS, Italy Based on works with V. Berezinsky and R. Aloisio UHECR-08

HECR are observed, but the nature of particles is unknown: protons, nuclei (chemical composition (E)=? ); sources of UHECR are unknown: are they galactic or extragalactic ( AGN, GRB, Hypernovae…? ); mechanism of acceleration up to E>10 20 eV is unknown; the way the charged particles propagate in intergalactic space, either 1. rectilinearly or 2. via diffusion in ExtraGalactic Magnetic Fields is unknown; strength, time evolution and space distribution of these magnetic fields, B(E,t,r), are unknown. UHECR-08

In accordance with HiRes data, CR at E>10 18 eV are mostly (extragalactic) protons. UHECR-08

Protons p +  CMB → p + e + + e - p +  CMB → N + pions Nuclei Z +  CMB → Z + e + + e - A +  CMB → (A-1) + N A +  CMB → A’ + N + pions Photons  +  CMB → e + + e - e +  CMB → e +  Proton mean energy loss length in CMBR z=0 UHECR-08 Red-shift, dE/dt=H(t)E

In case of homogeneously distributed sources with luminosity L 0 and power-law generation spectrum index  g the diffuse universal spectrum arises. V. Berezinsky, A.G., S. I. Grigorieva, Phys. Rev. D 74, (2006); hep-ph/ The diffuse flux where L 0 = L 0 n s (0) is the emissivity, L 0 and E are in GeV, m=  +  and n s (z) = n s (0) (1+z)  describes hypothetical evolution of sources., UHECR-08

Propagation of protons in the intergalactic space leaves imprints on the spectrum  GZK cutoff  Bump (washed out in the diffuse spectrum)  Dip ( E ~1×10 18 ÷ 4×10 19 eV ) UHECR-08

In a more realistic model sources are situated in the vertices of imaginary cubic lattice with edge length d ~ 30 ÷ 60 Mpc (AGN?) Here again L 0 = L 0 n s (0), E 0 =1 GeV, E g (E,z) is energy on characteristic. Comoving distance to a source is defined by coordinates {i, j, k}=0,  1,  2… It is assumed that all sources have the same luminosity, power-law generation index and maximum acceleration energy. Evolution may be included using (1+z) m factor for z  z c ~ 1.2. UHECR-08 Maximum distance between the detector and a source is defined either by z max or by E max.

Configuration (distributed as charged baryonic plasma?) and strength (10 -3  B  100 nG) of magnetic fields is basically unknown. 1.K. Dolag, D. Grasso, V. Springel & I. Tkachev, JKAS 37,427 (2004); 2.G. Sigl, F. Miniati & T. A. Enßlin, Phys. Rev. D 70, (2004); 3.K. Dolag, D. Grasso, V. Springel & I. Tkachev, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 1, 9 (2005) 4.H. Kang, S. Das, D. Ryu & J. Sho, Proc. of 30 th ICRC, Merida, Mexico The only information comes from observations of Faraday rotation in the core of cluster of galaxies.  Dolag et al. : < 1  — weak magnetic fields  Sigl et al. : ~ 10  ÷20  — strong magnetic fields give different results: for protons with E>10 20 eV the deflection angle is Hydrodynamical MC simulations of large scale structure formation with B amplitude in the end rescaled to those observed in cores of galaxies, UHECR-08

Assume protons propagate through a turbulent magnetized plasma. On the basic scale of turbulence (assume, l c = 1 Mpc ) the r.m.s. of coherent magnetic field B c lies in the range 3×10 -3 ÷ 10 nG. Critical energy E c =0.926×10 18 (B c /1 nG) eV is determined by r L (E c ) = l c. Characteristic diffusion length for protons with energy E, l d (E), determines the diffusion coefficient D(E) = c l d (E)/3. If E » E c, i.e. r L (E c ) » l c, At E « E c, the diffusion length depends on the spectrum of turbulence: l d (E) = l c (E/E c ) 1/3 for the Kolmogorov diffusion; l d (E) = l c (E/E c ) for the Bohm regime. UHECR-08

In 1959 S.I. Syrovatsky solved this equation for the case of D(E) and b(E) being independent of t and (e.g. Galaxy). S. I. Syrovatsky, Sov. Astron. J. 3, 22 (1959) [Astron. Zh. 36, 17 (1959) ] source generation function Propagation of UHECR in turbulent magnetic fields may be described by the following differential equation: space densitydiffusion coefficientenergy loss UHECR-08

Hereis the squared distance a particle passes from a source in the direction of observer, while its energy diminishes from E g to E; (magnetic horizon) Density of particles with energy E at distance r from a source UHECR-08 b(E)=dE/dt is the total rate of energy loss due to interactions with CMB (red-shift + pair-production +  -photoproduction).

In R. Aloisio & V. Berezinsky, 2004, APJ 612, 900 the Syrovatsky solution was applied to calculation of UHECR spectrum in ‘static’ universe; it was assumed that the energy losses due to interactions with CMB are the same as at z=0, but the red-shift energy loss was included as well. The model assumed rectilinear particle propagation at very high energies and weak magnetic fields and diffusive one at low energies and strong magnetic fields. Interpolation was done at intermediate energies. The calculated spectrum is similar to the ‘universal’ one: GZK-cutoff, dip and fall down at low energies. There was also proved the ’propagation theorem’. …When the distance between sources, d, decreases, getting smaller than all scales involved (attenuation and diffusion lengths), the Syrovatsky solutions converge to the ‘universal’ spectrum. UHECR-08

In M. Lemoine, Phys. Rev. D 71, (2005) ; R. Aloisio & V. Berezinsky, Astrophys. J. 625, 249 (2005) the transition from Galactic to extragalactic UHECR spectrum at the second knee ( E~(3-7)×10 17 eV ) was proposed. UHECR-08

R. Aloisio & V. Berezinsky, Astrophys. J. 625, 249 (2005)

In V. Berezinsky & A.G. Astrophys. J. 643, 8 (2006) a solution to the diffusion equation in the expanding universe with time-dependent diffusion in turbulent magnetic fields coefficient D(E,t) and energy losses due to interactions with CMB, b(E,t), Here x c is the comoving distance between a detector and a source, E g (E,z) is the solution to an ordinary differential equation has been obtained: which defines the characteristic line E(E,t). UHECR-08

is the analog of the Syrovatsky’s solution variable. It is the squared distance the particle emitted at epoch z travels from a source to a detector (z=0); the integral is to be taken along the characteristic line. The variable UHECR-08

In the expanding universe evolution of magnetic fields should be taken into account. At epoch z parameters characterizing the magnetic filed (l c, B c ) become where (1+z) 2 describes the diminishing of B c with time due to magnetic flux conservation, and (1+z) -m is due to MHD amplification. The critical energy derived from r L (E c ) = l c (z) is UHECR-08

For power-law source generation function and sources being in the vertices of 3D cubic lattice, the diffuse flux is In the case of rectilinear proton propagation the flux is At intermediate energies a ( smooth ?) interpolation between these two solutions is to be used. An example is given in UHECR-08 R. Aloisio, V. Berezinsky & A.G, arXiv:

UHECR-08

 GZK cutoff at E  5×10 19 eV and dip at < E < 4×10 19 eV are (the observed) signatures of rectilinear UHE protons propagation in CMB from extragalactic sources.  The account for diffusion in reasonable EGMF does not influence the high-energy (E>E c ) part of the spectrum and suppresses its low-energy part ( E<10 18 eV ), thus allowing for the smooth transition from galactic to extragalactic spectrum at the second knee.  The successful in case of Galaxy Syrovatsky solution may be generalized to the description of diffusive UHE extragalactic particles propagation in the expanding universe with time and energy dependent energy losses b(E,t) and diffusion coefficient D(E,t). UHECR-08

 To describe the full extragalactic CR spectrum one should interpolate between the rectilinear and diffusive propagation regimes.  The calculated spectra in case of reasonable EGMF and reasonable assumptions about granularity of sources ( d < 50 Mpc ) retains the GZK-cutoff and dip features,  and converges to the universal spectrum with d  0.  The generalized Syrovatsky solution may be applied as well to the description of diffusive propagation of nuclei. The photodisintegration term may be taken easily into account. UHECR-08