Atlas Copco Group Q2 2013 results July 18, 2013. Q2 in brief  Service business continues to develop well  Industrial and construction demand improved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 27, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2009.
Advertisements

April 28, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 28, 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, Contents  Q2 business highlights  Market development  Business areas  Financials  Outlook 2 July 16,
July 17, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
July 18, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, 2008.
February 4, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 4, 2008.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Q4 - highlights  Order growth continued  Record operating profit –All business areas above 20% operating.
February 1, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 1, 2007.
Committed to sustainable productivity
February 2, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, 2009.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2006.
P R E L I M I N A R Y R E S U L T S 7 March 2007.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 20, Q1 - highlights  Very strong order intake –Record orders received in all business areas  Record operating.
I N T E R I M R E S U L T S 3 September Financial Highlights 6 months to June 2003 £ million Half Half% inc. Sales – continuing operations %
February 2, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, 2010.
Third Quarter 2012 Earnings Conference Call October 25, 2012.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, Q3 - highlights  Strong order growth –Sequentially higher volumes in all regions and in most customer.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2005.
October 24, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 24, 2006.
July 17, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2006.
October 22, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2009.
April 24, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 24, 2008.
October 23, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, 2008.
April 26, 2007, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 26, 2007.
October 21, 2005www.atlascopco.com1 Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 21, 2005.
22 October 2008 Slide 1 Results 3Q08 Results 3Q08 Martin De Prycker, CEO 22 October 2008.
FUCHS PETROLUB / Q Conference Call Dr. Alexander Selent, Vice Chairman and CFO Reiner Schmidt, Member of the Group Management Committee Mannheim,
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 30, 2014.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 31, 2013.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Q2 - highlights  Very strong organic order growth –Record orders received –Favorable demand in mining, manufacturing.
October 22, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 29, Page 2 April 29, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q1 Highlights and Strategic Moves  Market Development.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, Q2 - highlights  Healthy demand –Organic order intake declined slightly –Stable order intake for small.
Atlas Copco Group Q results October 25, 2013.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, Page 2 October 23, 2001www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials.
Group, First Quarter 8,156 MSEK -3% Change in value 1st Half-year, 1999 / 1998 Orders.
July 16, 2007, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2007.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 21, Q3 - highlights  Overall demand remained at a high level –Solid development in manufacturing and mining.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, Contents  Q2 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results Stockholm, April 26, 2001.
COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY Q results April 29, 2014.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 14, Page 2 February 14, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q4 Highlights and strategic moves  Market.
Group Handout Atlas Copco Group – September 30 th 2000 The face of interaction.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Page 2 July 18, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q2 Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas.
Giulio Mazzalupi Atlas Copco Group - Q4 Results Stockholm, February 12, 2001.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 28, Contents  Q1 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Index Group Handout Atlas Copco Group – June 30 th 2000 The face of interaction.
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 29, 2013.
The SKF Group Half-year result 2003 Tom Johnstone President and CEO.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 3, Page 2 February 3, 2003www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Contents  2003 Summary  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials 
COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY Q results October 20, 2014.
Group “Handout” Quarterly presentation Atlas Copco Group.
July 16, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, Contents  Q3 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 31, 2013
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 4, 2008.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2004 April 27, 2004.
The face of interaction
Q2 Results Stockholm, July 19, 2001
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
Atlas Copco Group Q results October 24, 2012.
The SKF Group Nine-month result 2003 Tom Johnstone President and CEO.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, 2012 July 17, 2012.
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 29, 2013
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 27, 2012 April 27, 2012.
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Presentation transcript:

Atlas Copco Group Q results July 18, 2013

Q2 in brief  Service business continues to develop well  Industrial and construction demand improved somewhat  Weaker demand for mining equipment  New innovative products  Solid profitability – negative currency effects  Strong cash flow July 18,

Q2 figures in summary  Orders received were MSEK , organic decline of 5%  Revenues down 7% to MSEK , organic decline of 2%  Operating profit decreased to MSEK (5 028) –Currency effect MSEK -535  Operating margin at 20.8% (21.5)  Profit before tax at MSEK (4 843)  Basic earnings per share SEK 2.58 (2.98)  Operating cash flow at MSEK (1 891) July 18,

Orders received - local currency July 18, ABC June 2013 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Q2 - the Americas  North America –Good order intake for industrial compressors and tools –Lower order intake for mining equipment –Service and parts business remained healthy  South America –Orders received improved sequentially for all business areas –Weak demand for mining equipment July 18, ABC June 2013 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Q2 - Europe and Africa/Middle East  Europe –Good order intake achieved for industrial compressors and tools –Orders increased for construction equipment, but decreased for mining equipment –Strong growth in the U.K., Germany and Turkey  Africa / Middle East –Increased order intake for all business areas July 18, ABC June 2013 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

Q2 - Asia and Australia  Asia –Orders received increased sequentially –Sequential growth in China for all business areas –Soft demand in India  Australia –Significant decline in order intake due to weak demand from the mining industry July 18, ABC June 2013 A =Share of orders received, year-to-date, % B =Year-to-date vs. previous year, % C =Last 3 months vs. previous year, %

 Change in orders received in % vs. same quarter previous year Organic* growth per quarter Atlas Copco Group, continuing operations *Volume and price July 18,

Atlas Copco Group – sales bridge July 18,

Atlas Copco Group July 18, months until June 2013 Compressor Technique 39% Industrial Technique 10% Construction Technique 37% Revenues per business area Mining and Rock Excavation Technique 14%

Compressor Technique  Industrial compressor business remained stable  Service and parts continued to grow  Operating margin improved to 23.0% (22.0) –Supported by efficiency improvements  Several new large compressors introduced, all with significant efficiency improvments July 18,

 4% organic order growth –Strong order intake from the motor vehicle industry –Sequential improvement for general industry –Growth in Europe and Asia  Operating margin at 21.5% (22.8) –Affected by currency and lower invoicing  Versatile tool wins design award Industrial Technique July 18,

Mining and Rock Excavation Technique  Weak demand for mining equipment  Civil engineering business more stable  Stable service, parts and consumables business  Operating margin at 22.1% (24.8) –Negatively affected by currency effects and lower volumes  Bob Fassl resigns as Business Area President July 18,

Construction Technique  Organic order growth of 2%  Equipment orders largely flat –Sequential growth in China, India, Brazil and in western Europe  Service and parts business remained healthy  Operating margin at 11.2% (13.2) –Negatively affected by currency and lower volumes  Several innovative products introduced July 18,

Group total July 18, April – June 2013 vs. 2012

Profit bridge July 18, April – June 2013 vs. 2012

Profit bridge – by business area July 18, April – June 2013 vs. 2012

Balance sheet July 18,

Cash flow July 18,

Near-term outlook The overall demand for the Group’s products and services is expected to remain at the current level. July 18,

Committed to sustainable productivity. July 18,

Cautionary Statement “Some statements herein are forward-looking and the actual outcome could be materially different. In addition to the factors explicitly commented upon, the actual outcome could be materially and adversely affected by other factors such as the effect of economic conditions, exchange-rate and interest-rate movements, political risks, the impact of competing products and their pricing, product development, commercialization and technological difficulties, supply disturbances, and major customer credit losses.” July 18,