1 Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF) Information Meeting February 23, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3.4 Linear Programming.
Advertisements

Lecture 2 – Clearance Fits
C2 to C5 fit up review-R41 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4.
BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 1 The Design of the Booster Collimators Larry Bartoszek BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 3/10/03.
Mechanical Engineering Design Review BL ARPES Endstation Derek Yegian, Jonathan Denlinger, Keith Franck 4/18/2008.
Fast, Accurate and Reliable Robotic Storage System
Deviations from fiducial locations are unacceptable in areas despite high accuracy at alignment points.
CMS ZDC Crane Emergency Payload Removal Procedures This document proposes the viability of using a portable hydraulic actuator Hand crane (Davit crane)
MECHANICAL DRAWING Chapter 10: TOLERANCES AND FITS
Dan Cheng H. Felice, R. Hafalia QXF Structures Video Meeting July 10, 2014 Coil Handling for Magnet Assembly Status Update.
1 MC Assembly via Test Cell Crane FPA Stage 3 Peer Review August 12, 2005 T. Brown.
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
Magnet Measurement Device for MICE F. Garnier, P-A. Giudici, F.Bergsma CERN MICE Collaboration Meeting No July 2011 Oxford technical drawings by.
Review of the mechanical design of the final focusing region of the HIF Point Design T. Brown ARIES Project Meeting January 8, 2003.
Introduction to Computer Numerical control
How to support a shaft? The motor just turns the shaft. It doesn’t provide any support.
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. FDR Charge (answers were added below after the review) Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR - Charge to Reviewers –The.
ZDC/Dummy Absorber Exchange Crane Proposal Paul Debbins Ianos Schmidt Univ. of Iowa - Nov. 5, 2007.
MC Type-B fit up review1 Review of MC Type B assembly clearances reviewing A-to-B and B-to-C interfaces 3/1/07 Summary: Wing interfaces look okay between.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
Support and alignment of PXL box with MSC, operation steps
MARS 2 Design Review-Optomechanical Review 07 Nov 2002 GLW1 MARS 2 Mechanical Design Review.
Warp Knitting Warp knitting: In a warp knitted structure, each loop in the horizontal direction is made from a different thread and the number of.
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. Background Modular Coil winding forms are cast structures which provide the foundation on which the coils are constructed.
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
1 MCHP-1 clamp and MC port opening metrology review ProE model: stb-mchp-1_vvsa1_pppl_best_fit.asm stb-fpa_mech_left_side.asm, Rep: mchp-1_clamp_metrol_pts.
Defining the Vacuum Vessel Geometry NCSX Project Meeting November 27, 2002 Art Brooks.
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
Magnet Measurement Device for MICE F. Garnier, P-A. Giudici, F.Bergsma CERN MICE Collaboration Meeting No. 29 RAL technical drawings by O.Jamet.
January 25, 2005GRETINA 2004 Review1 GRETINA 2004 Annual Review Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Mechanical System.
Drawings Review. Drawings Drawings are used to communicate information –Sketch: A drawing done without instruments or measurements, but conveys the general.
ZDC Remote Handling Tool Structure and Force Analysis P. Debbins University of Iowa December 10, 2009.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD Industrial Engineering Department
White Table Tops Text Books & Work Books. Mechanical Engineering Linking in Technical Objects Guiding Controls.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
3.4 – Linear Programming. Ex. 1 Graph the system of inequalities. Name the coordinates of the vertices of the feasible region. Find the max & min values.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
SLHC Engineering Upgrade FCAL Remove-Install step by step procedure. Mircea Cadabeschi-University of Toronto March 01,
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Field Period Assembly Mike Viola NCSX Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Project Review April 8-10, 2008.
Modular Coil Metrology Data for Current Center Shift Calculation.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
Layout Drawings Presentation ME 4182 Team: 5 Guys Engineering + 1 Nathan Bessette, Rahul Bhatia, Andrew Cass, Zeeshan Saiyed, Glen Stewart YJ Chok.
SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY.
NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR A Systems Engineering Perspective Wayne Reiersen Bob Simmons NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR May 19-20, 2004 PPPL.
Forklift pick set-up interfacing with a MCHP
1 FPA Stage 2 MC Flange Assembly Issues and Design Proposals June 20, 2006 T. Brown.
1 MC B1 Inspection MTM data: FIDUCIALS.IGS DATA.IGS 9/26/06 Pro/E model: b1_mtm_data_check.asm.
1 Manufacturing process-1 ( ) Lathe Operations Guided By:Prepared By: Prof. Stany R. Ghadiyali
EdgeMax Less Space but Maximum Productivity Rugged unitized steel table/frame Full capture bearing assemblies Low mass aluminum beam driven by dual brushless.
1 VV Support Fixture FPA Stage 1 PDR Review August 10, 2005 T. Brown.
1 NCSX radial build NCSX Project Meeting December 18, Modular coil build assumptions 2.Vessel build assumptions 3.FW/internal build assumptions.
1 NCSX VV Assembly Joint Issue B. Nelson 17 Mar 2005.
Machine Elements in Mechanical Design Prepared by: Misrty Dipen
STEP 1: ASSEMBLE INSERT PLATES 1.Assemble insert plates by press fitting roller bearing and adapter plate into assembly 1.1 Prep all mating surfaces to.
STEP 1: ASSEMBLE ANGLE PLATES
STEP 1: ASSEMBLE ANGLE PLATES
Mounting Considerations …
3.4 – Linear Programming.
On the accuracy of port assembly at Wendelstein 7-X
Guide Roller Installation
McMaster linear bearing #6709K180 with guide rail suppressed
Fits & Tolerances.
Presentation transcript:

1 Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF) Information Meeting February 23, 2005

2 Agenda Define the basic design requirements of the Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF), Define VV / MC clearances during MC assembly Describe the Reference Design that was used to generate the MCAF design specifications, Review the MCAF performance requirements as they currently stand, and Answer questions

3 The design intent of the MCAF is pass two modular coil assemblies over the VV and accurately position mating flanges.

4 The Modular Coil Assembly Fixture Reference Design

5 MC Design and VV Clearance Module Coil Half Period 1.76” actual minimum for nominal sizes

6 A 1.76" (metal-to-metal) min clearance between MC’s and VV. MC to VV Clearance MC is at its final position

7 A 0.45” minimum clearance exists between wing region of Type A’s as the two half period MC shells comes together. MC to MC Clearance Wing region

8 How can assembly tolerances effect clearances? 0.96” 1.0” VV insulation ” VV tolerance 0.060” MC tolerance 1.25 ” Minimum Space MC is at its final position

9 MCAF Reference Design The Reference Design was develop to qualify technical feasibility and help in establishing a design specification. Gantry Crane Module Coil Half Period Turning Fixture Base Guide Rail Type “A” Type “B” Type “C” Turning Fixture / MC Interface Components VV Support

” 60 Deg The relation between the Reference Design and Machine Coordinate System X Z Y Machine Coordinate System Reference Design Coordinate System 6.125” Y

11 Rx Rz X Y Z X Ry X. Z For the Reference Design the X-axis was shifted up 6.125”

12 tdydxdzrxryrz The Reference Design MCAF motion is based on a 248 step servo table to drive six motors MC is at its final position

13 MCHP / Turning Fixture interface Module Coil Half Period Pivot and rotation gimbal component Cradle component Vertical guide component Linear turntable structure Linear motion structure (25000 lbs max) (3200 lbs) (6300 lbs) (3500 lbs) (2700 lbs) (3000 lbs) 18,700 lbs MCAF Component Details

14 Exploded isometric view MCHP / Turning Fixture interface Gimbal structure supports the MCHP and drives the pivot motion (“X rot”) A cradle structure support stabilizes and drives “Y rot” of a gimbal structure. The vertical guide component stabilizes four screw jacks (“Z” dir) which are driven by a single motor A linear turntable provides “X” motion with a pivot point (“Z rot”) and a bearing surface Base structure provides “Y” motion

15 Extent of motion of turning fixture components. DZ = 16” DX = 12” RZ = 15° Y X Z RX = 5° RY = 13° DY = 140”

16 MC Interface Structure A Local beam that interfaces with the gantry crane picks up existing MC holes The MC CG location stays within the attachment points Shaft attached to mid-section of Type “B” MC

17 Gantry crane designed with intermediate support system to provide final fit-up

18 In the final position two modular coil half periods will be separated by 0.50” (nominally) with three spherical seats engaged within an accuracy of 0.009”... If all goes well. Leica laser system used for assembly measurement.

19 What seismic design criteria do you apply during an assembly process? We have set a static seismic criteria of.108 as the design requirement following the NCSX Seismic Specification NCSX-CRIT-SEIS-00

20 Starting Position - CG Locations 18,300 MCHP 38,000 MCAF (Base End and Front Views)

” Final Position - CG Locations 18,300 MCHP 38,000 MCAF (Front and Top Views from Base Structure)

lbs (assumes a.108 seismic factor) 38,000 lbs 104” 34” A Side view show worst seismic position The existing base should work with captured rollers and a.108 static seismic factor but a broader base may be necessary if the CG moves up or a dynamic stop condition governs the design. Capture roller

23 Sideways clearances between MC shell and secondary support structure shall be greater that 60”

’ 21.25’ Test cell assembly space requirements.

25 System Requirements  Performance Requirements  Fit-up and Assembly Space Allocation  Motion Controllers Requirements