Mouse BIRN: Ontologies Maryann Martone and Bill Bug 2005 All Hands Meeting Mouse BIRN: Ontologies Maryann Martone and Bill Bug.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Human Body: An Orientation
Advertisements

Data Integration & Ontology Working Group(s) Report and Deliverables.
Who am I Gianluca Correndo PhD student (end of PhD) Work in the group of medical informatics (Paolo Terenziani) PhD thesis on contextualization techniques.
ECE Chapter One.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
New Approaches to GIS and Atlas Production Infrastructure for spatial data integration: across scales and projects Ilya Zaslavsky David Valentine San Diego.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Biomedical Informatics Research Network.
1 CIS607, Fall 2006 Semantic Information Integration Instructor: Dejing Dou Week 10 (Nov. 29)
Slides prepared for BIRN ONTOLOGY WORKSHOP (slimmed down version) Stanford Feb Barry Smith.
Anatomy and Physiology By: Gabriela Alvarez. The Human Body  Human body has a head, neck, trunk (thorax, abdomen), two arms and hands and two legs and.
Manolis Kellis Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Chapter 9: Nutrition $100 $200 $300 $400 $100$100$100 $200 $300 $400 NutrientsCarbohydratesFats/Proteins Vitamins, Minerals, Fiber FINAL ROUND.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
Chapter 20: Introduction to Animal Physiology
Integrating digital atlases of the brain: atlas services with WPS Ilya Zaslavsky San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD Lead of the INCF Digital Atlasing.
BIRN Ontologies Ontology Task Force. Topics Building the BIRNLex Structure of BIRNLex BIRN anatomy Next steps.
The BIRNLex: Principles and practices of community ontology development Maryann Martone.
Olivier Bodenreider Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications Bethesda, Maryland - USA Experiences in visualizing and navigating biomedical.
Software Quality Assurance in Neuroinformatics H Jeremy Bockholt NITRC Grantee Meeting.
Human Anatomy & Physiology, Sixth Edition Elaine N. Marieb 1 Introduction to Anatomy & Physiology.
All Hands Meeting 2003 BIRN ONTOLOGIES Session Jeffrey Grethe Amarnath Gupta Bertram Ludäscher Maryann E. Martone.
2005 All Hands Meeting Science of the Mouse models of human neurodegenerative disease.
Animal Science I EOC Terms Review. Standard 1.0 Animal Industry Binomial Nomenclature- A two word system of naming using the first word being genus and.
AMA Anatomy & Physiology/Medical Terminology/Pathology 1 Introduction.
Creating a community-based knowledge management framework for integrating neuroscience data via ontologies. A. Gupta 1, C. Bean 2, W. Bug 3, *C. Fennema-Notestine.
DONNA MAGLOTT, PH.D. PRO AND MEDICAL GENETICS RESOURCES AT NCBI.
Mark Ellisman, Ph.D. Professor of Neurosciences and Bioengineering Director, BIRN Coordinating Center Center for Research on Biological Systems University.
Lecture # 1: Fundamentals 1
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
What is an Ontology? An ontology is a specification of a conceptualization that is designed for reuse across multiple applications and implementations.
Alan Ruttenberg PONS R&D Task force Alan Ruttenberg Science Commons.
Neuroscience Information Framework Ontologies: Nerve cells in Neurolex and NIFSTD Maryann Martone University of California, San Diego.
BIRN Advantages in Morphometry  Standards for Data Management / Curation File Formats, Database Interfaces, User Interfaces  Uniform Acquisition and.
Standardization Challenges Neuroimaging datasets: FBIRN Human Imaging Database You say potato, I say potahto: Ontological engineering applied within the.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings What knowledge should I bring to A&P course?  To name some:  Basic math – mean,
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
INCF Digital Atlasing Infrastructure: An Overview.
Knowledge-Based Integration of Neuroscience Data Sources Amarnath Gupta Bertram Ludäscher Maryann Martone University of California San Diego.
Data Integration Progress. BIRN Data Integration Framework 2. Create conceptual links to a shared ontology 1. Create multimodal databases 3. Situate the.
Ontologies Working Group Agenda MGED3 1.Goals for working group. 2.Primer on ontologies 3.Working group progress 4.Example sample descriptions from different.
University of California, San Diego Ontology-based annotation of multiscale imaging data: Utilizing and building the Neuroscience Information Framework.
(Foundation Block) Organisation of the Human Body By Ahmad Ahmeda Assistant Professor of Physiology College of Medicine, KKUH, KSU
You say potato, I say potahto: Ontological engineering applied within the Biomedical Informatics Research Network J. A. Turner1, C. Fennema-Notestine2,
Jorge Jovicich, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School Biomedical Informatics Research Network Overview Testbeds Morphometry BIRN.
N IF S TD : A C OMPREHENSIVE O NTOLOGY FOR N EUROSCIENCE Fahim IMAM 1, Stephen LARSON 1, Sridevi POLAVARAM 2, Georgio ASCOLI 2, Gordon SHEPHERD 3, Jeffery.
Needs and Progress: Summary Flexible, powerful, modular atlas interface, and a query gateway to multiple types of data (GeneNetwork, Barlow, Smith, CCDB,
No Euphemisms Required: BIRN on the Leading Edge of Community Ontology Development.
All Hands Meeting 2003 mBIRN Scientific Session Maryann Martone October 8, 2003.
Phenotype And Trait Ontology (PATO) and plant phenotypes
Collaborative Mouse BIRN tools for sharing and visualizing multimodal, multi-scale data.
2007 Mouse All Hands Meeting BIRN Ontology Day Jeff Grethe & Bill Bug (BIRN OTF) - March 7th, 2007.
Organization of the Body. Overview of Anatomy and Physiology Anatomy – the study of the structure of body parts and their relationships to one another.
2005 AHM Mouse BIRN. Goals Review progress on mouse BIRN milestones Update priorities and milestones for SFN, next spring, and next fall 2006 Clarify.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
Biomedical Informatics Research Network The BIRN Architecture: An Overview Jeffrey S. Grethe, BIRN-CC 10/9/02 BIRN All Hands Meeting 2002.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
Contributions to mouse BIRN tools and resources Maryann Martone and Mark Ellisman University of California, San Diego 2008.
2005 All Hands Meeting Data & Data Integration Working Group Summary.
BIRNLex and Associated Tools Maryann Martone, Bill Bug, Jeff Grethe 2007.
National Partnership of Advanced Computational Infrastructure San Diego Supercomputer Center KNOW-ME (KNOWledge-Map-Explorer) Semantic Browsing of Integrated.
All Hands Meeting 2004 Clinician’s Requirements for HID Query and Statistics Interface Christine Fennema-Notestine, Ph.D. David Kennedy, Ph.D.
CNS-IV.
Chapter One Lecture One Introduction to the Human Body.
Nutrition and Nutrients
University of California, San Diego
IC Conceptual Data Model (CDM)
UCSD Neuron-Centered Database
Introduction to Anatomy & Physiology
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM INTRODUCTION LAB 1
Functional Annotation of the Horse Genome
Presentation transcript:

Mouse BIRN: Ontologies Maryann Martone and Bill Bug 2005 All Hands Meeting Mouse BIRN: Ontologies Maryann Martone and Bill Bug

Use of Ontologies in BIRN Databases Enforces semantic consistency within a database Data Sharing Establishes semantic relationship among concepts contained in distributed databases Data integration Bridging across multiscale and multimodal data Concept-based queries : Ontologies can be used to alter semantic context to present a view of the conceptual aspects of a data set or meta-analysis result most relevant to a particular neuroscientist

BIRN Ontolgy Working Group Agenda Overview (Maryann) Introduction to the UMLS (Carol) Introduction to Gene Ontology (Bill) Discussion Break Current Test Bed experiences with Ontologies –Mouse BIRN (Maryann) –Function BIRN (Jessica) –Morph BIRN (Christine) Panel discussion (Ontology Task Force): what areas of interest to BIRN are not adequately covered by existing ontologies, including discussion of mapping animal models onto human disease (Part 1) Wrap Up Day 2: Data Integration and Ontologies

Objectives of Working Group Educate BIRN participants on the use of ontologies and associated tools for data integration –Tuesday (PM) and Wednesday (AM) Develop a set of ontology resources for BIRN participants, based on existing ontologies where possible Identify areas that are not well covered by existing ontologies for possible development. ***Develop a clear set of policies and procedures for working with ontologies –Including curation, addition of core ontologies, extension of ontologies, mapping of databases to ontologies

The Ontology Task Force  Carol Bean (co-chair), NIH-NCRR  Maryann Martone (co-chair), Mouse BIRN, BIRN CC  Amarnath Gupta, BIRN CC  Bill Bug, Mouse BIRN  Christine Fennema-Notestine, Morph BIRN  Jessica Turner, FBIRN Jeff Grethe, BIRN CC

Goals of OTF Provide a dynamic knowledge infrastructure to support integration and analysis of BIRN federated data sets, one which is conducive to accepting novel data from researchers to include in this analysis. Identify and assess existing ontologies and terminologies for summarizing, comparing, merging, and mining datasets. Relevant subject domains include clinical assessments, demographics, cognitive task descriptions, imaging parameters/data provenance in general, and derived (fMRI) data. Identify the resources needed to achieve the ontological objectives of individual test-beds and of the BIRN overall. May include finding other funding sources, making connections with industry and other consortia facing similar issues, and planning a strategy to acquire the necessary resources.

BIRN Ontology Resources Mouse BIRN Ontology Resource Page Bonfire Ontology Browser and Extension Tool

Current Ontology Development by Mouse BIRN Participants Developmental Ontology Seth Ruffins, Cal Tech Subcellular Anatomy Maryann Martone and Lisa Fong, UCSD

Ontology for Subcellular Anatomy of Nervous System

CCDB Dictionary TermOntologyConceptIDSemantic TypeDefinition CerebellumUMLSC Body Part, Organ, or Organ Component Part of the metencephalon that lies in the posterior cranial fossa behind the brain stem. It is concerned with the coordination of movement. (MSH) Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein UMLSC Amino Acid, Peptide, or Protein, Biologically Active Substance An intermediate filament protein found only in glial cells or cells of glial origin. MW 51,000. (MSH) Medium Spiny Neuron BonfireBID000012CellSmall (10-15 µm in diameter) projection neurons found in neostriatum, possessing a rougly spherical dendritic tree composed of 3-5 primary dendrites. Dendrites are covered with dendritic spines. Purkinje cellUMLS C Cell large branching neurons of the middle layer of cerebellar cortex, characterized by vast arrays of dendrites; the output neurons of the cerebellar cortex.

Bonfire: Collaborative Building and Extension of Ontologies

Registered to Term Index Source of Mediator

Some Areas of Interest to BIRN Navigating through Multi-resolution information Linking animal and human imaging data brain cerebellum cerebellar cortex Purkinje cell dendritic spine Entopeduncular nucleus Globus pallidus, internal segment Animal Model Disease Process ***Map between Human and Animal models Functional assessment

Anatomical Knowledge Sources Foundational model of anatomy Neuronames (Brain Info)*** BAMS*** Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary (Edinburgh/GO) “Although BIRN is an open, diverse and fluid environment, the use of ontologies for enhanced interoperability will be pointless if we allow random use of ontologies. The OTF recommends that there be a set of ontologies that are approved for use and a set of policies and procedures for adding or creating additional knowledge sources. Current knowledge sources that are currently in use include UMLS, GO, LOINC, SNOMED, NEURONAMES.” -OTF report to BEC 8/05

Other Resources Likely of Use Mouse Phenome Project: a collection of phenotypic and genotypic data for the laboratory mouse anatomy behavior biological factors blood cancer diet effects drug effects, toxicity genotype heart, lung intake, metabolism musculoskeletal neurosensory reproduction acoustic startle response activity and motor function adrenal, thymus, kidney anxiety atherogenic diet avoidance blood calcium and pH blood coagulation factors body composition body weight bone mineral density and content brain measurements cardiovascular cholesterol craniofacial measurements disease susceptibility drinking preference electroconvulsive threshold ethanol effects exploratory behavior food and water intake gallbladder and gallstones glucose. hearing hematology hormones lipids lipoproteins liver lungs metabolism metastatic progression MHC H2 haplotype nociception organ weights pathology images peptides and proteins prepulse inhibition reproductive performance SNPs and other polymorphisms strength toxicity triglycerides wildness

Neuronames-UMLS-Smart Atlas Mapping of rodent nomenclature onto UMLS Neuronames has now included many of the terms Using concepts in Neuronames and Paxinos to create new hierarchy

What do we need to do in the next year Identify areas of mouse BIRN not covered –Do ontologies exist? –If not, do we develop them What known ontologies should be added to BIRN ontology resources –Who will handle semantic concordance –How do we represent these in BIRN? Mapping databases to ontologies –Time frame –What should be mapped? –Who will do this at each site

Mouse BIRN Global Conceptual Schema Project Experimental Data Molecular Distributions Subject Animal Type Experiments Anatomical Properties Microarray Results Images Atlas Region of Interest Worked with Data Integration group to define global schema