Validation of realistically simulated non-stationary data. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville. GWDAW9,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.

Advertisements

AGC DSP AGC DSP Professor A G Constantinides©1 Modern Spectral Estimation Modern Spectral Estimation is based on a priori assumptions on the manner, the.

Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.

R. Stone for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville. GWDAW, Boston, MA,

Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.

Noise Floor Non-stationarity Monitor Roberto Grosso*, Soma Mukherjee + + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernburg, Germany Detector.

Evolutionary Computational Intelligence Lecture 9: Noisy Fitness Ferrante Neri University of Jyväskylä.

LIGO-G Z External Triggers Circulation only within LIGO I authorship list Status of the Triggered Burst Search (highlights from LIGO DCC# T Z,

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group

Simulation Output Analysis

LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z1 Robust Detection of Noise Floor Drifts in Interferometric Data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck.

The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.

LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.

June 27, 2002 EK 1 Data Analysis Overview Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT PAC12 – June 27, 2002 LIGO-G Z.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group

Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec '03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA University of Texas.

New data analysis for AURIGA Lucio Baggio Italy, INFN and University of Trento AURIGA.

Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.

Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.

S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.

Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.

The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,

LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.

LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.

Applications of change point detection in Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Soumya D. Mohanty AEI.

Analysis of nonstationarity in LIGO S5 data using the NoiseFloorMon output A proposal for a seismic Data Quality flag. R. Stone for the LSC The Center.

Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from the fifth science run of LIGO Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB GWDAW11, Potsdam, 12/18/06 LIGO-G

Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS

18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.

LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.

Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.

Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas.

S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,

Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.

1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.

LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.

S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.

APPLICATION OF A WAVELET-BASED RECEIVER FOR THE COHERENT DETECTION OF FSK SIGNALS Dr. Robert Barsanti, Charles Lehman SSST March 2008, University of New.

S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.

ECE-7000: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems 2. Linear tools and general considerations 2.1 Stationarity and sampling - In principle, the more a scientific measurement.

Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.

Multidimensional classification analysis of kleine Welle triggers in LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC University of Texas at Brownsville GWDAW12,

S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.

LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.

Search for bursts with the Frequency Domain Adaptive Filter (FDAF ) Sabrina D’Antonio Roma II Tor Vergata Sergio Frasca, Pia Astone Roma 1 Outlines: FDAF.

Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.

GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.

Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, December'03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA Dept. of Physics.

Soma Mukherjee LSC, Hanford, Aug.19 '04 Generation of realistic data segments: production and application. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave.

Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)

WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler.

LIGO- G Z 11/13/2003LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 BlockNormal Performance Studies John McNabb & Keith Thorne, for the Penn State University.

LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.

2 June 2003Soumya D. Mohanty et al, LIGO-G D1 LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE OBSERVATORY - LIGO – CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.

SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.

MNFT : Robust detection of slow nonstationarity in LIGO Science data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Germany. LSC Meeting, Livingston,

LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.

LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.

A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches

P.Astone, S.D’Antonio, S.Frasca, C.Palomba

The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO

Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy

LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting

Soma Mukherjee for LIGO Science Collaboration

Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO

SLOPE: A MATLAB Revival

Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates

Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis

Presentation transcript:

Validation of realistically simulated non-stationary data. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville. GWDAW9, Annecy, France, 17/12/04 1

Why model the data ? An effort to simulate segments of detector noise such that it has the same statistical characteristics as the data itself, e.g., it shows same kind of nonstationarity as present in the data. Non–stationarity can be of different types at different times. We can characterize it near any instant and construct a long stretch of simulated data. Different times will lead to different noise models. Astrophysical searches estimate efficiency and tune parameters of search algorithms from playground data. Data is non-stationary. E.g. a 60 s stretch of data may not have same value of variance as another 60 s at a later time. Thus any comparison or any estimation work carried out with discretely sampled real data will have bias introduced in it. What we obtain in that case is an ‘average’ value, not instantaneous value. Certain search algorithms require comparison of different data segments. These are different quantities when data is non-stationary. 2

Model outline Each data segment is divided into three independent components viz. lines, transients and noise floor. Each component is characterized by low order ARMA model in time domain. Modeled noise generated from the three independent components are added back together to construct the final product. 3

Algorithm : Data Band pass FIR filter Whiten Clean Line estimates Noise floor Lines Second moment Estimation by Running median ARMA Model fit Data generation Demodulate Amplitude And phase

Validation : Using KSCD algorithm KSCD (Kolmogorov-Smirnov Change Point Detector) is a Nonparametric Burst Search algorithm. Both real data and modeled data is passed through the KSCD pipeline to make comparison. Rate (triggers per second) vs. Threshold is compared. 7

Future : Application in the triggered and untriggered burst searches. Library of models for an entire science run. Incoporate non-linearities: current modeling only valid for second moments