BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
A system of laws, policies, and practices that pushes students out of schools and into the juvenile and criminal systems An over-reliance on school.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Supporting Children Exposed to Domestic Violence Creating a Coordinated Response in Elementary Schools.
 Clarence H. Carter, Director, Department of Economic Security Edward B. Truman, Special Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office 1.
Spectrum of Prevention: A Model for Planning Public Health Interventions Traumatic Brain Injury Prevention Helmet Use and Bicycle Safety.
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND BULLYING POLICY AND PR0CEDURES Irvington Public Schools Staff Training School Year.
Partnering to Reduce School Crime Collaborative Efforts to Reduce School Crime Referrals in Hennepin County.
Student Code of Conduct Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Committee Assistant principals, parents, interventionists, AEA representatives.
Duty to Report Child Abuse, Neglect, and Dependency in North Carolina Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act By: Frank P. Cavallo, Jr., Esquire Parker McCay P.A.
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND BULLYING POLICY AND PR0CEDURES Franklin Township Public Schools Staff Training School Year.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Disciplining Students with Disabilities Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Office of Safety and Youth Development Elayna Konstan, Chief Executive Officer Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor.
Corporate Ethics Compliance *
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
PUBLIC ACT (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011) AN ACT CONCERNING THE STRENGTHENING OF SCHOOL BULLYING LAWS 1.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
Intervention and Referral Services Linda Remolino, LPC, NCC Director of School Counseling North Plainfield School District.
Threat Assessment Team Presented By: John Dailey, Jack Moorman, Jon Barnwell, Frank Brinkley Paul Cousins & Tina Nelson.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1 Worcester Public Schools A Collaborative-Proactive Approach to provide a Safe Teaching and Learning Environment.
Model Underage Drinking Enforcement Policy Summit Becca Matusovich, OSA Seth Blodgett, AG’s office November 16, 2004.
Sutton Public Schools Anti-Bullying Law Overview.
To (FORMERLY GUIDE TO POSITIVE STUDENT BEHAVIOR).
1 Coherent Governance Policies Operational Expectation: OE-13 Discipline February 4, 2009.
Coding Compliance Plan July 12, Benefits of a compliance program  To demonstrate our commitment to honest and responsible conduct, decrease the.
Threat Management, Assessment and Counseling Reducing the Risk of Violence in the Saint Paul Schools.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Presented at the 2004 CLEAR Annual Conference September 30 – October 2 Kansas City, Missouri The North Carolina Story Mary P. “Polly” Johnson, RN, MSN.
KSIS EoY Training April 29-30, 2015 Safe Schools Data Collection and Reporting WINDY NEWTON, ONGSD DATA MANAGER VICTORIA FIELDS, PROGRAM CONSULTANT OFFICE.
Policy Safe and Supportive Schools The Board of Education is committed to providing a safe, engaging, and supportive school climate: Behaviors that.
Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
Student Conduct and Discipline Meeting 10/06/09. New PPS Discipline Policy.
School Safety Update Guilford County Schools 712 North Eugene Street Greensboro, NC Presentation to the Board of Education July 28,
Alternatives to Arrest for School Based Law Enforcement Instructor.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
Cherry Hill School District Annual Violence, Vandalism, Weapons & Substance Abuse Report 2014–2015 School Year Presented to the BOE on October 20, 2015.
Practical Approaches for Engaging Youth Serving Organizations and Schools in Child Sexual Abuse Prevention.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Managing Allegations: The Role of the Local Authority Designated Officer.
1 Crisis Management and Communication Dr. Joy Smith and Ms. Robin Denny.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Employee Training: Requirements for Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse, Child Neglect, and Sexual Offenses on School Premises Involving Students
“Big Man on Campus”: The Campus Behavior Coordinator’s Role for School Discipline Cynthia S. Buechler Buechler & Associates, P.C Stoneridge Road,
Taylor County Schools FERPA (Confidentiality) Training August 17, 2010.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment pr/students/smspr021/
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Virginia’s Judicial System.
Professional Services for.  Desire to evaluate policies, procedures, and practices of LCPD  Hired Justice and Security Strategies (JSS) to: 1.Evaluate.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
August, September 2013 Promoting Positive Behavior: One Student at a Time!!!! Parents, We Need Your Help!!!
Sutton Public Schools Anti-Bullying Law Overview
Medina District Safety Plan.
Multidisciplinary Intervention Team
SCHOOL-JUSTICE PARTNERSHIPS AND THE SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE
Behavior, Weapons, HIB and Unexcused Absence Report
BULLYING AND MORE Presented by Dana Rahman Assistant District Attorney
CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE LEADERSHIP TRAINING
SCHOOL-JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP
Harassment, Intimidation & Bullying The New Legislation FAQs
Education Abroad Program Director Training
Presentation transcript:

BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening

AGREEMENT SIGNED!

BACKGROUND HISTORY OF THE PROBLEM NEW HANOVER COUNTY ACTS TIMELINE TEAM PROCESS

Inter-Agency Governance Agreement on the Handling of School Offenses

I. Introduction Schools and law enforcement share responsibility for school safety and must work together with complimentary policies and procedures with the goal of a safe learning environment for everyone. This document expresses the agreement of the parties for responding to non-emergency school disruptions. It strives to ensure a consistent response to incidents of student misbehavior, clarify the role of law enforcement in school disciplinary matters, efficiently utilize alternative support services and reduce involvement of law enforcement and court agencies for minor misconduct at school and school- related events. While this Agreement deals with the response to non-emergency school disruptions, the parties hereto also acknowledge the importance of cooperation between school officials and law enforcement in response to emergency and safety issues.

FOUNDATIONS OF THE AGREEMENT A.. The vast majority of student misconduct can be best addressed through classroom, in-school, family and community strategies and maintaining a positive climate within schools rather than by involvement of the justice community.

FOUNDATIONS OF THE AGREEMENT The response to school disruptions should be reasonable, consistent and fair with appropriate consideration of relevant factors such as the age of the student, the nature and severity of the incident and the impact of the conduct on the learning environment.

FOUNDATIONS OF THE AGREEMENT Students should be held accountable for their actions. When appropriate, a graduated response to minor misconduct that provides a continuum of services and increasingly more severe sanctions for continued misbehavior should be used. Disruptive students, who do not commit more serious offenses, should receive appropriate redirection and support from in-school and community resources prior to the consideration of the involvement of the law enforcement, or referral to court. This does not excuse compliance with mandatory reporting laws and policies.

KEY POINTS Convene a Progress Monitoring Team for the purpose of monitoring and oversight of the Inter-Agency Governance Agreement on the Handling of School Offenses when it is implemented. Share this agreement with a copy to all school and law enforcement personnel; Provide necessary and regular staff training on implementation of the agreement; Thoroughly investigate student misbehavior and, when appropriate, put into practice a graduated response prior to referral to court;

KEY POINTS Clarify the role of the School Resource Officer (SRO) and law enforcement in schools; Monitor implementation of the agreement; Collect data and assess the effectiveness of the agreement; Modify the agreement as appropriate and review at least annually; Assemble a threat assessment team in the event warning signs of serious behavior appear.

FACTORS IN DISCIPILNE Age, health, risks, needs and disability or special education status of the student. Intent, context, prior conduct and record of behavior of the student. Previous interventions with the student. Student’s willingness to repair the harm.

FACTORS IN DISCIPLINE Parents’ willingness to address any identified issues. Seriousness of the incident and degree of harm caused. The effect on the educational environment by the student’s continued presence in school.

GRADUATED RESPONSE CLASSROOM INTERVENTION SCHOOL ADMINSTRATION INTERVENTION SCHOOL BASED TEAM LAW ENFORCEMENT INTERVENTION SITE BASED MODEL REFINED MTSS

FOCUSED ACTS Affray (not involving serious physical injury or weapons and no heightened level of concern) Simple Assault (not involving school personnel and no heightened level of concern) Disorderly Conduct Misdemeanor Larceny Simple Possession of Marijuana (personal use) Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (personal use, related to use of marijuana, and no evidence of sale) Possession or smoking cigarettes or nicotine containing products including e-cigs, under age Damage to property (real property or personal property, damage less than $1,000, no heightened level of concern) Possession/Use of Alcohol

BEFORE CHARGING…….. 2 FOCUSED ACTS IN A SCHOOL YEAR INTERVENTION DISCRETION AFTER 2 WARNING NOTICE SAFETY FIRST SPECIAL EDUCATION

BEFORE CHARGING….. BULLYING FELONIES DIVERSION ELEMENTARY STUDENTS

COOPERATION Parents, Guardians and Private Service Providers Parties to this Inter-agency Agreement encourage parents, guardians and private service providers to involve schools in the treatment plan of students. Wrap-around services are more effective when all of the professionals and service providers that work with a student share relevant information.

COOPERATION CHAIR, BOARD OF EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT CHAIR, COUNTY COMMISSION CHIEF DISTRICT COURT JUDGE SHERIFF WILMINGTON POLICE CHIEF CAROLINA BEACH CHIEF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH CHIEF DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER CHIEF COURT COUNSELOR DSS DIRECTOR TRILLIUM CEO CITY OF WILMINGTON RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT

MOVING FORWARD TRAINING DATA COLLECTION DATA SHARING PROGRESS MONITORING

MOVING FORWARD WORD IS SPREADING NC COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE GOALS QUESTIONS CONTACT: