CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 9: Putting it All Together.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
Advertisements

Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
INTRODUCTION TO NON-PARAMETRIC ANALYSES CHI SQUARE ANALYSIS.
Structural Equation Modeling
OUTLIER, HETEROSKEDASTICITY,AND NORMALITY
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 14 Using Multivariate Design and Analysis.
Common Factor Analysis “World View” of PC vs. CF Choosing between PC and CF PAF -- most common kind of CF Communality & Communality Estimation Common Factor.
Statistics II: An Overview of Statistics. Outline for Statistics II Lecture: SPSS Syntax – Some examples. Normal Distribution Curve. Sampling Distribution.
Multiple Regression Models Advantages of multiple regression Important preliminary analyses Parts of a multiple regression model & interpretation Differences.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 4 – Multiple Regression.
GRA 6020 Multivariate Statistics The Structural Equation Model Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
Final Review Session.
Chapter 14 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 14 Inferential Data Analysis.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Different chi-squares Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
Chapter 11 Multiple Regression.
GRA 6020 Multivariate Statistics Regression examples Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
AN ALGORITHM FOR TESTING UNIDIMENSIONALITY AND CLUSTERING ITEMS IN RASCH MEASUREMENT Rudolf Debelak & Martin Arendasy.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 Using Inferential Statistics.
LECTURE 16 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING.
The General LISREL MODEL and Non-normality Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
The General (LISREL) SEM model Ulf H. Olsson Professor of statistics.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Leedy and Ormrod Ch. 11 Gray Ch. 14
Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data.
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Confirmatory factor analysis
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Moderation in Structural Equation Modeling: Specification, Estimation, and Interpretation Using Quadratic Structural Equations Jeffrey R. Edwards University.
Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
12.1 Heteroskedasticity: Remedies Normality Assumption.
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 10: Non-recursive Models.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Highlights for Quiz 2.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
Adjusted from slides attributed to Andrew Ainsworth
Advanced Statistics Factor Analysis, II. Last lecture 1. What causes what, ξ → Xs, Xs→ ξ ? 2. Do we explore the relation of Xs to ξs, or do we test (try.
Multivariate Statistics Confirmatory Factor Analysis I W. M. van der Veld University of Amsterdam.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 10 Inferential Statistics.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Model Building and Model Diagnostics Chapter 15.
Residual Analysis for ANOVA Models KNNL – Chapter 18.
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Item Factor Analysis Item Response Theory Beaujean Chapter 6.
Latent regression models. Where does the probability come from? Why isn’t the model deterministic. Each item tests something unique – We are interested.
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
The general structural equation model with latent variates Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Evaluation of structural equation models Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
The Invariance of the easyCBM® Mathematics Measures Across Educational Setting, Language, and Ethnic Groups Joseph F. Nese, Daniel Anderson, and Gerald.
Chapter 14 EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. Exploratory Factor Analysis  Statistical technique for dealing with multiple variables  Many variables are reduced.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
CFA with Categorical Outcomes Psych DeShon.
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Correlation, Regression & Nested Models
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Simple Linear Regression
Statistics II: An Overview of Statistics
3 basic analytical tasks in bivariate (or multivariate) analyses:
Factor Analysis.
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 9: Putting it All Together

Outline of Class Finishing up Confirmatory Factor Analysis Structural + Factor Analyses Recent Readings

Nonnormal distributions Normalize with transformations Use corrected normal theory method, e.g. use robust standard errors and corrected test statistics, ( Satorra-Bentler statistics) Use Asymptotic distribution free or arbitrary distribution function (ADF) - no distribution assumption - Need large sample Use elliptical distribution theory – need only symmetric distribution Mean-adjusted weighted least squares (MLSW) and variance-adjusted weighted least square (VLSW) - MPLUS with categorical indicators Use normal theory with nonparametric bootstrapping

Remedies to nonnormality Use a parcel which is a linear composite of the discrete scores, as continuous indicators Use parceling,when underlying factor is unidimensional.

Testing Models with Structural and Measurement Components Identification Issues For the structural portion of SR model to be identified, its measurement portion must be identified. Use the two-step rule: Respecify the SR model as CFA with all possible unanalyzed associations among factors. Assess identificaiton. View structural portion of the SR model and determine if it is recursive. If so, it is identified. If not, use order and rank conditions.

The 2-Step Approach Anderson & Gerbing’s approach Saturated model, theoretical model of interest Next most likely constrained and unconstrained structural models Kline and others’ 2-step approach: Respecify SR as CFA. Then test various SR models.

The 4-Step Approach Factor Model Confirmatory Factor Model Anticipated Structural Equation Model More Constrained Structural Equation Model

Constraint Interaction When chi-square and parameter estimates differ depending on whether loading or variance is constrained. Test: If loadings have been constrained, change to a new constant. If variance constrained, fix to a constant other than 1.0. If chi-square value for modified model is not identical, constraint interaction is present. Scale based on substantive grounds.

Single Indicators in Partially Latent SR Models Estimate proportion of variance of variable due to error (unique variance). Multiply by variance of measured variable.

Hayduk et al. Pearl’s D-Separation Better ways of controlling for extraneous variables

Noar Use of CFA in scale development Test of multiple factor models

Lance Multi-Trait, Multi-Method Comparison of Correlated Trait- Correlated Method versus Correlated Uniqueness Models